Recommended Posts

I worked 40 / week while putting myself through college with zero student loans. No one can tell me that higher education is unattainable for them in the United States... NO ONE. It might be that way in other parts of the world... but not here.

Working full time while going through school isn't exactly sensible though.

And it will be worse if hte min wage gets raised to 15 and hour like lots of min wage workers do.  Yea, they may get an increase in pay but food, clothes, and other items they by themselves will increase thus not changing a damn thing money wise for them.  If people want to make more money, work for it.  If not, you get what you get.

Statistically proven that the rate of increase would be pennies on the dollar compared to the extra they would earn.

 

if that is the case they better get a couple of them because you are not going to make it.  How is that anyone else's fault?  Raising the wage is going to cause many of these types of jobs to go away because employers will not be able to employ as many people.

He drew the line where the government told him he had to...

The biggest growing job fields in america are the service industry. They are becoming more and more common as the de facto job.

 

I agree that someone has to do these jobs, but they were not meant as career jobs to provide a living wage.  I am not classifying jobs as living wage, it was the politicians that did this when they passed the bill.  They said everyone deserves a living wage.  Well $9.50 is not a living wage and not everyone deserves it.

 

I know lots of people that worked 2 or 3 different jobs to make ends meet.  You do what you have to do.  I worked 2 jobs while going to school and even after I had a better paying job for extra money.  It is the mentality of people that needs to change.

Wrong, all full time jobs are considered to be able to make a living wage, in the mid 70s these jobs kept getting more and more unbearable for employees due to gaps in increasing the minimum wage over time. 

 

And then people would go work somewhere else and that shop would be forced to increase his wages to entice people to work for him.  That is the way it works in anyone job.  You have to pay to get and keep good workers.  There is no government involvement in the hiring.

>.> You have no idea how a business is run, people NEED jobs, jobs don't need SPECIFIC people because EVERYONE is fighting over the SCRAPS.

 

All I was trying to point out is that the more government gets involved the more expensive things are going to get, hence the higher taxes.  It is not all caused by the small minimum wage increase, but it is a small part of it.  I would rather keep my money and decide what to do with it than to give the majority of it away, but that is just me.

That was my point.  Higher taxes are the cause and will be the result of more regulation and mandates.

The more government gets involved the better the minimum standards are, unless you prefer to have "natural milk" instead of actually natural milk that we have to call organic, and it may not even be truly organic because we have two different descriptions of organic. I rather have the benefits that come with giving up a little money.

 

There has to be a good balance of regulations, some industries are over burdended, others are too free and 

35c makes sense. Don't bash on someone's business before you understand their financing system and how they value inventory.

Increase the prices sure, don't blame the minimum wage "that doesn't affect his employees which are paid more than minimum anyway"

 

This is why the customers should be a bit more adult and not boycott him... a boycott harms his employees too. If his business goes down he'll have to fire them.

 

The owner could still have been more polite about making his point if he wasn't trying to be political.

Yes, but saying "I don't agree with you, but take my money" doesn't make for a good point.

Good. That's one less scummy employer paying the bare minimum. We're talking about a city with a population of nearly 20,000 people - I'm sure they'll be able to find better jobs.

 

If that's true, then they could have had other jobs to begin with and what he pays them doesn't make a difference -- if they didn't like the wages, they could have left. However, if they couldn't have left -- that means its not the business owners fault and he's just being competitive with the other businesses in the area. [That's why minimum wage laws exist in the first place, because competition conspires to keep wages down]

 

 

Yes, but saying "I don't agree with you, but take my money" doesn't make for a good point.

 

No need to be outraged, the business owner is just being stupid. People are stupid sometimes, you need to get over it. Punishing the owner for being stupid is being just as petty as him.

 

This was how I would have made a point,

 

The owner is being pretty silly expecting people to get upset over a 35 cent increase. Then again, the customers are t*it-for-tat in being petty if they're really outraged and claiming they'll never go back there. The owner is just being stupid... people act stupid sometimes, get over it. And really, not going to that restaurant anymore will just harm the employees that they want to support. If business drops because their outrage causes them to leave, the employees will get fired. If there was a space for tip on the receipt, I'd just add 0.35 extra to the tip and write "I'm happy to pay 0.35 more so your employees get better wages."

 

Maybe that would change his opinion more than threatening to shut down his business would?

The point is they are making more than min wage already.

Where does it say that? :huh: I've read the article multiple times and NOWHERE does it say that.

 

If he was already paying them more than the new minimum wage then it would have ZERO effect on his business. He obviously wasn't, hence why he added the fee as a political statement.

 

If that's true, then they could have had other jobs to begin with and what he pays them doesn't make a difference

Just because they have a bad job doesn't mean there aren't better jobs out there. A lot of time people stick with a job simply due to inertia, because they have formed friendships with co-workers and don't want to risk the income they have - that doesn't mean it isn't a bad job and that they couldn't find better elsewhere.

 

Bad businesses don't deserve to be supported, even if it is the employees that lose out.

 
Just because they have a bad job doesn't mean there aren't better jobs out there. A lot of time people stick with a job simply due to inertia, because they have formed friendships with co-workers and don't want to risk the income they have - that doesn't mean it isn't a bad job and that they couldn't find better elsewhere.

 

Bad businesses don't deserve to be supported, even if it is the employees that lose out.

 

Then isn't it their fault and not the business owners? You're not making a good case that its the owner's fault; employees have some responsibility. If a lot of them quit (or threatened to quit), he would be forced to raise wages.

 

I mean, if jobs were plentiful, they wouldn't be worried about losing their source of income by quitting... if jobs aren't plentiful... then you are punishing them by boycotting the business.

Not in the US? In fact, in the US it's actually easier if you are struggling because of all the grants / extra care given to minorities... it's almost criminal.

 

 

What would that be? If you have the mental capacity for an education it is available to you.

 

Not everyone does have the mental capacity for higher education. Not everyone lives in suitable circumstances where they can access higher education, not everyone has a suitable home life where they can access higher education.

 

Don't presume that everyone's life is as privileged as your own.  There are many many factors that could prevent someone from furthering themselves in life.

  • Like 2

Not everyone does have the mental capacity for higher education. Not everyone lives in suitable circumstances where they can access higher education, not everyone has a suitable home life where they can access higher education.

 

Don't presume that everyone's life is as privileged as your own.  There are many many factors that could prevent someone from furthering themselves in life.

 

Agricultural and industrial jobs typically pay a lot better than low-end service jobs. Its one of the reasons its so bad that we're driving these sectors out of Western economies.

Agricultural and industrial jobs typically pay a lot better than low-end service jobs. Its one of the reasons its so bad that we're driving these sectors out of Western economies.

 

Sure, if you live in the countryside or near an industrial area.

Then isn't it their fault and not the business owners? You're not making a good case that its the owner's fault; employees have some responsibility. If a lot of them quit (or threatened to quit), he would be forced to raise wages.

And in an ideal world that would happen. Just because exploitation is tolerated doesn't mean it's acceptable.

 

As I said, he's a scummy employer and I hope he goes out of business. At the same time I hope all his employees are able to find other, better jobs.

Sure, if you live in the countryside or near an industrial area.

 

Most people are close enough or can move to where the jobs are. There used to be a lot more agriculture and industry in the US than there is now, but was driven out by trade deals... and what still exists attracts illegal labor. Its really not a good situation.

The biggest growing job fields in america are the service industry. They are becoming more and more common as the de facto job.

 

Wrong, all full time jobs are considered to be able to make a living wage, in the mid 70s these jobs kept getting more and more unbearable for employees due to gaps in increasing the minimum wage over time. 

 

>.> You have no idea how a business is run, people NEED jobs, jobs don't need SPECIFIC people because EVERYONE is fighting over the SCRAPS.

Can you live on $9.50 an hour?  This has nothing to do with full-time jobs.  This applies to all jobs with the exception of some teen-agers.

Not everyone does have the mental capacity for higher education. Not everyone lives in suitable circumstances where they can access higher education, not everyone has a suitable home life where they can access higher education.

 

Don't presume that everyone's life is as privileged as your own.  There are many many factors that could prevent someone from furthering themselves in life.

So you think someone with a lower mental capacity should make the same wage as someone with a higher mental capacity doing a more skilled job?  The higher your skill level and the need for those skills will determine your wage.

 

What circumstance would prevent someone from getting an education in the US?

 

Why are you presuming that I have a privileged life then?

If his staff were making more than the minimum wage he wouldn't have needed to add a minimum wage fee now, would he? He is a scummy employer because he's paying staff the bare minimum and adding this fee to make a political statement protesting the rise. If he cared about his employees he would pay them a living wage.

He was already paying minimum wage or more to his employees.  The state raised the minimum wage by $.75 so now he has to pay them more.  What is a living a wage anyway?  $15, $20, $30?

So you think someone with a lower mental capacity should make the same wage as someone with a higher mental capacity doing a more skilled job?  The higher your skill level and the need for those skills will determine your wage.

I didn't say that at all, stop inventing things.

What circumstance would prevent someone from getting an education in the US?

They could be a single parent with no one to care for the kid, as one example.

 

Why are you presuming that I have a privileged life then?

Compared to some folks, you do.

I worked 40 / week while putting myself through college with zero student loans. No one can tell me that higher education is unattainable for them in the United States... NO ONE. It might be that way in other parts of the world... but not here.

 

You're over 40, right?

35 cents enrages people?

 

Inappropriate politics enrages people. That's all this is, an example of a person who wont shut up about politics to the point where they have to make a statement to everyone who eats at their diner.

 

Besides, he's going to pull in over $50,000/yr from this fee, is 100% going to the workers?

His staff was making more than minimum wage

The point is they are making more than min wage already. The 10,000 extra May be his current profit margin.

He was already paying minimum wage or more to his employees.  The state raised the minimum wage by $.75 so now he has to pay them more.

That's completely different to what you said before. Earlier you said he was paying them MORE than the minimum wage, for which you have yet to produce any evidence.

 

What is a living a wage anyway?  $15, $20, $30?

The living wage for Washington County in Minnesota?where this cafe is located?is $9.69.

Inappropriate politics enrages people. That's all this is, an example of a person who wont shut up about politics to the point where they have to make a statement to everyone who eats at their diner.

 

Besides, he's going to pull in over $50,000/yr from this fee, is 100% going to the workers?

 

Yea, he's being stupid. What I'm trying to convince people here of that its not worth being outraged over people being stupid -- it doesn't help anyone. Be a bigger adult than he's being.

That's completely different to what you said before. Earlier you said he was paying them MORE than the minimum wage, for which you have yet to produce any evidence.

The living wage for Washington County in Minnesota?where this cafe is located?is $9.69.

I provided a link to the article it spells it all out what more do you want?

The living wage is meaningless. It is an arbitrary number that some politician pulled out of their rear end. There is no way you can live on that wage.

I provided a link to the article it spells it all out what more do you want?

I missed the link, apologies. :)

 

I just don't understand how customers are tipping to the point where he claims that waiters are taking home $20-35 an hour yet those same customers won't accept a small increase in the price of items on the menu to cover the increase in the minimum wage. Regardless, he used the fee to make a political statement and people have, understandably, reacted negatively. Tips should be on top of the minimum wage and the restaurant should price its items appropriately to cover that - adding fees like this is not the appropriate way to do business, as the owner has found out.

 

The living wage is meaningless. It is an arbitrary number that some politician pulled out of their rear end. There is no way you can live on that wage.

It's a good starting place. Sure it's not the answer to the world's socioeconomic problems but people shouldn't be paid less than it.

Then isn't it their fault and not the business owners? You're not making a good case that its the owner's fault; employees have some responsibility. If a lot of them quit (or threatened to quit), he would be forced to raise wages.

 

I mean, if jobs were plentiful, they wouldn't be worried about losing their source of income by quitting... if jobs aren't plentiful... then you are punishing them by boycotting the business.

If a lot of them quit, a lot of people who currently earn $0 will take their ###### positions at ###### pay, people do not quit to work elsewhere unless it is a step up, people do not give up life providing income, no matter how ###### the terms.

 

Most people are close enough or can move to where the jobs are. There used to be a lot more agriculture and industry in the US than there is now, but was driven out by trade deals... and what still exists attracts illegal labor. Its really not a good situation.

Thats true, but that is a situation also created by competing with labor rates where the minimums are much lower, which is more incentive than paltry tax credits.

 

Can you live on $9.50 an hour?  This has nothing to do with full-time jobs.  This applies to all jobs with the exception of some teen-agers.

No, it would currently take about $15 an hour for me to be able to live on my own. I mean, i could live off it, just in the street or a car which I may lose. My situation though will differ than those in other states, or even a different part of this state. A living wage is living above the poverty level and being able to support ones family just barely enough. It was the original intent of the minimum wage, and it kept in sync with that rate up until the mid 70s where some certain "economics" turned for the worse, notice in periods of where the minimum wage was high, the economy was strong, it falls, and the economy falls with it.

 

So you think someone with a lower mental capacity should make the same wage as someone with a higher mental capacity doing a more skilled job?  The higher your skill level and the need for those skills will determine your wage.

 

What circumstance would prevent someone from getting an education in the US?

 

Why are you presuming that I have a privileged life then?

Yes, minimum wage should be the minimum for everyone no matter what their abilities are, the people that do more than minimum should get paid more, but more often than not, do not.

 

He was already paying minimum wage or more to his employees.  The state raised the minimum wage by $.75 so now he has to pay them more.  What is a living a wage anyway?  $15, $20, $30?

Okay pick one, he either pays more than minimum and wouldn't get affected, or pays minimum + upto 35c, and does, but should have had more tact dealing with the situation.

You're over 40, right?

 

And if I am? What does my age have to do with it?

 

Not everyone does have the mental capacity for higher education. Not everyone lives in suitable circumstances where they can access higher education, not everyone has a suitable home life where they can access higher education.

 

Don't presume that everyone's life is as privileged as your own.  There are many many factors that could prevent someone from furthering themselves in life.

 

This line of thinking is tremendously backwards. It's true that not everyone has the same mental capacity to excel, but excellence isn't the same across all fields. Second, in the US It's not a matter of mental capacity but ambition. Home life doesn't factor into the equation with a higher education. There are plenty of grants and programs out there willing to shelter students that want to learn and strive for excellence if they can't do so at home.

 

I wouldn't call my life privileged when I put myself through college. Sure, I wasn't homeless and at war with drugs or abuse, but I certainly didn't have the opportunities some of my friends had and I came out ahead of them... all because of my own ambition.

 

Ones failure of ambition can not be blamed on a society...

 

If someone enjoys the service industry and finds comfort in it, I am not saying they're wrong, but what I am saying is that they and their families could be better served if they tried to strive for more. Why settle when there are grants and federal programs that want to help? Again... it likely comes back to ambition.

 

Working full time while going through school isn't exactly sensible though.

 

Not true, and this is why the US is a nation of debt; instead of putting in the effort first by working hard to attain that diploma, students now expect it to be handed over first and paid for later...

And if I am? What does my age have to do with it?

 

 

This line of thinking is tremendously backwards. It's true that not everyone has the same mental capacity to excel, but excellence isn't the same across all fields. Second, in the US It's not a matter of mental capacity but ambition. Home life doesn't factor into the equation with a higher education. There are plenty of grants and programs out there willing to shelter students that want to learn and strive for excellence if they can't do so at home.

 

I wouldn't call my life privileged when I put myself through college. Sure, I wasn't homeless and at war with drugs or abuse, but I certainly didn't have the opportunities some of my friends had and I came out ahead of them... all because of my own ambition.

 

Ones failure of ambition can not be blamed on a society...

 

If someone enjoys the service industry and finds comfort in it, I am not saying they're wrong, but what I am saying is that they and their families could be better served if they tried to strive for more. Why settle when there are grants and federal programs that want to help? Again... it likely comes back to ambition.

 

 

Not true, and this is why the US is a nation of debt; instead of putting in the effort first by working hard to attain that diploma, students now expect it to be handed over first and paid for later...

Timing has a lot to do with it, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/15/cost-of-college-degree-increase-12-fold-1120-percent-bloomberg_n_1783700.html Just a thought as to why your age may matter.

 

First, home life truly matters, as those around you influence your goals and ambitions. They can either encourage you, or hold you back, they can support you, or make it more difficult for you to do well.

 

Second, ambition can only get one so far, and you have to be accepted to receive those grants, not everyone will receive them even if they qualify. From the sound of it, you had nothing that held you back, even though you also had nothing to help you either, if only many others were so lucky.

 

Third, a job is a job, for any full time work people should be at minimum be able to support themselves. If the work is more than just very simple labor, then you should be earning more than minimum.

 

Fourth, People take loans to get their diplomas, and they cant pay back those loans because... they can't find jobs, and the jobs that are available, and ever growing, aren't paying enough to be livable. So now you have college grads working two jobs at the same poverty level as those without degrees.

 

Saving up for my 100k+ loan would have taken me til I'm 35 (I'm 27 now) at most of the jobs available to me, thanks in part to a weak minimum wage and ever increasing college prices. And I would have burned my self out trying to work a full time job and going to full time classes, which is the most affordable way to take classes. Otherwise I could have gone to college and worked both part time, and taken 6+ years to do a 2 year course.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!