Recommended Posts

I guess I was panicking a little bit because women don't have the same symptoms as men for heart attack," Sarrel said.

She dialed 911, and soon a team of North Shore emergency medical technicians were at her door. Her vitals were OK; so was the electrocardiogram. They told her she wasn't having a heart attack.

"'But we can take you to the hospital,' and I said, 'Why would I go to the hospital if I don't need to?'" Sarrel said.

A week later, a bill for her 911 call came in the mail.

"For a grand total of $315.38," Sarrel said. "I can't afford this. I'm a senior. I'm living on Social Security," Sarrel said.

North Shore Fire Chief Robert Whitaker told WISN 12 News that many residents don't know their taxes don't completely cover 911 costs, so the department posts fees on its website.

Whitaker said most private insurance covers the cost, but Medicare generally only covers the cost if patients go to a hospital because otherwise, it doesn't consider the call "medically necessary."

Whitaker said he believes that's a bad policy because patients either make unnecessary trips to an emergency room to avoid a bill -- or, worse yet, they have Sarrel's reaction.

"I said to myself, 'I'll never call 911 again,'" she said.

Friday afternoon, a Medicare spokeswoman told WISN 12 News the agency doesn't want to discourage anyone from calling 911. She said a case worker will contact Sarrel to review her claim.

North Shore Fire said it wants people to call 911 and works with those with financial hardships to resolve their bills.

source & video

Sucks it has to be this way but unless people want to pay more in taxes or fees to avoid this, this is a necessary cost of doing business.  Too many people call 911 trying to get free medical care because they can't afford to go to the hospital or just don't want to.  So they call 911 to ask for a few things thinking it will be free, not caring that ambulance could be used on a real call and the care they are providing you is not free.  $315 isn't that much though, senior or not.

That's ridiculous... If it was a prank, ok deserved, but on this situation... I prefer living in a broke country than on one that bill you for 911. What a joke...


Sucks it has to be this way but unless people want to pay more in taxes or fees to avoid this, this is a necessary cost of doing business.  Too many people call 911 trying to get free medical care because they can't afford to go to the hospital or just don't want to.  So they call 911 to ask for a few things thinking it will be free, not caring that ambulance could be used on a real call and the care they are providing you is not free.  $315 isn't that much though, senior or not.

 

I will never understand the Medical health policy on USA, you guys have the most rich people and company's on the planet and you charge for calling 911?

 

Ok I had to add also this: You spent billions on stupid wars like Iraq based on lies and no one get's a penalty, prison anyone? And yet charge 911 calls?

 

I'm not a USA hater, far from it, I have great American friends but I do tell them you are running a really crazy country!

Edited by Digitalfox

Sucks it has to be this way but unless people want to pay more in taxes or fees to avoid this, this is a necessary cost of doing business.  Too many people call 911 trying to get free medical care because they can't afford to go to the hospital or just don't want to.  So they call 911 to ask for a few things thinking it will be free, not caring that ambulance could be used on a real call and the care they are providing you is not free.  $315 isn't that much though, senior or not.

Why? If you have a real emergency the fee should be waived. If you don't and it's a prank call then charge the ###### out of those morons. Make it $10,000 for all I care.

Sucks it has to be this way but unless people want to pay more in taxes or fees to avoid this, this is a necessary cost of doing business.  Too many people call 911 trying to get free medical care because they can't afford to go to the hospital or just don't want to.  So they call 911 to ask for a few things thinking it will be free, not caring that ambulance could be used on a real call and the care they are providing you is not free.  $315 isn't that much though, senior or not.

It is when your SS income is $1100.00 a month. She has rent, food, utilities, etc. I am speaking for seniors I know and help personally, so I don't have an actual source that I can post. 

It is when your SS income is $1100.00 a month. She has rent, food, utilities, etc. I am speaking for seniors I know and help personally, so I don't have an actual source that I can post. 

I meant for the specific service that she got, it wasn't that much money.  Senior or not, if she went to the hospital she would have been paying probably two times as much for the exact same thing.

 

That's ridiculous... If it was a prank, ok deserved, but on this situation... I prefer living in a broke country than on one that bill you for 911. What a joke...

 

I will never understand the Medical health policy on USA, you guys have the most rich people and company's on the planet and you charge for calling 911?

 

Ok I had to add also this: You spent billions on stupid wars like Iraq based on lies and no one get's a penalty, prison anyone? And yet charge 911 calls?

 

I'm not a USA hater, far from it, I have great American friends but I do tell them you are running a really crazy country!

the main problem is what the Fire Chief said, taxes don't cover the full cost of services.  Unless people want to pay more in taxes, then this is the system that's in place for now.  What the article really needs to say is Senior's insurance company refuses to cover medical visit.  If she had went to the hospital, her insurance would have covered it, but since she just wanted to get checked out and probably take a pill or whatever to lower blood pressure, that costs money.

 

There is no way the paramedic services can absorb the cost of "free healthcare" and not attempt to get that money back somehow.  They'd go broke quickly and not be able to provide service.  Before people get worked up, you have to understand the fire departments in your area aren't doing this for profit they are doing this just to cover their costs that's it.

Typical America. Spending trillions on wars and bogus programs like 'war on drugs' is perfectly ok, not to mention the trillions in subsidies to corporations. But mention anything that actually helps people, esp those in lower/middle class, and we are asked to pay more taxes. Wonderful.

This is very much a local thing. Here real 911 calls aren't charged, and seniors are a priority.

OTOH - if you're a prankster they'll come down on you with a load of bricks, including criminal charges its serious enough or a repeat offense.

Just take a closer look at the breakup of expenses, and you'll see that the generous benefits, pensions, and wages for these union workers are becoming a huge problem for the municipalities in the U.S. It's only going to be a matter of time before we see more and more cities, and possibly even states collapsing because they are unable to pay, they can only raise the fees and taxes so high before people either move away or start revolting.  

 

Mark my words.

That's actually still pretty cheap.

If you call 911 for an ambulance and we get there and you say "you know, I don't think I'll goto the hospital". You'll still get a bill. I think it's $150? If you are a member, you'll only have to pay $50. If you're a member and your insurance only pays half of the bill, you only pay $100-$150 depending on the service.

Medics, which is what came out to this lady did a good bit. Chances are, if she went to her Primary Care Doctor and he did the EKG too, her insurance wouldn't have covered it.

Medicare is a pain in the ass. They look for reasons not to pay anything at all. Same thing if you goto the hospital for treatment. If you get admitted for days and decide "I'm going home". Your insurance will most likely not pay a cent.

My organization isn't union.

Say the ambulance sends the bill to Medicare for $1,000. You got some meds, hooked up to the EKG, oxygen and whatnot.

Send the bill to Medicare, they give a check for $300. (This has happened a few times) and you pretty much accept it or you don't get money.

Edit:

For a comment above, "if it's a real emergency the fee should be waived". That's not how that works. Depending on your emergency and illness or injury you could be getting a decent amount of drugs given. Nitro, Epi, atropine, D50, and a few others they add up. The ambulances don't get anything like that for free. They have to order it and pay sometimes a ridiculous amount. Hospitals with their own ambulances get a cheaper rate because they get it directly from the hospital who buy it in bulk. Smaller places have to pay for everything out of pocket.

We just used an epipen on someone. And bought two and it was over $400 total. It's ridiculous.

Just take a closer look at the breakup of expenses, and you'll see that the generous benefits, pensions, and wages for these union workers are becoming a huge problem for the municipalities in the U.S. It's only going to be a matter of time before we see more and more cities, and possibly even states collapsing because they are unable to pay, they can only raise the fees and taxes so high before people either move away or start revolting.

Mark my words.

Detroit largely collapsed because of high union benefit and retirement costs, and the state of Michigan was close to it with a $1.7 billion annual deficit. Then in 2010 Gov. Snyder and his legislative crew were elected, took the bull by the horns and we now have a $500 million annual surplus. Turnaround took just over a year.

Then his team forced Detroit to accept a managed bankruptcy instead of waiting for an uncontrolled collapse. So far it's going rather well, but the gangs and their wars are still a problem

It takes the people deciding to elect grownups, not Pied Pipers.

California is still riding the tax & over-spend wave, but the cracks are showing and before long it'll be in crisis too. LA and other cities already are.

I agree that other states will go through the same problems, but you can't fix then with politicians legislatures that say yes to every grpup who wants some benefit or service at no or low cost. They have to learn to say no.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
    • 38% off a super insane price is still an INSANE price.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!