Recommended Posts

If it's gaming performance you're after, you'd get much more out of your money by getting a better graphics card and choosing another CPU/platform. The i7-4790K with a Z97 motherboard would make more sense; even the i5-4690K would still be a great choice for video games. Unless you really plan on doing a lot of long-running heavily multithreaded tasks, you're not going to benefit much from a 6-core CPU. Keep in minds all these X99 motherboards are brand new with consequently immature BIOSes.

 

Why would you want another SSD in RAID0? You'd gain more by using the other SSD for storage and making access to that data faster instead.

  • Like 2

What are the main, heavy tasks that you perform on your computer? Gaming? Video editing? Graphic design?

 

If you're looking to build it for gaming, then I second Andre S. (Hey, I'm andre too :D).

 

Haswell-E is an overkill for gaming. You can save a LOT by going with a cheaper i7 or even i5 and also on the MB and RAM, as a result, and use that money to get a faster video card.

 

As for storage; a single 120 GB isn't really enough. Either go with at least 240/256 GB or two 120/128 GB as you mentioned, but SSDs are quite fast already. Is it really necessary to do a RAID 0 setup? I don't know. Others will know better, I guess.

Do you really need the Asus X99-DELUXE? The Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4 thats out of stock at Scan might be a better choice unless you need wireless without using a PCI-e slot or USB. Ebuyer has it in stock.
http://www.ebuyer.com/660467-gigabyte-ga-x99-ud4-socket-lga-2011-2-4-5-1-7-1-channel-audio-atx-motherboard-ga-x99-ud4
also some G.Skill 16GB (4x4GB)Ripjaws 4 PC4-24000 / DDR4 3000 Mhz 15-15-15-35 1.35V
http://www.ebuyer.com/662234-g-skill-16gb-4x4gb-ripjaws-4-pc4-24000-ddr4-3000-mhz-15-15-15-35-1-35v-f4-3000c15q-16grr

Only going to use one GPU? A 650W PSU will be more then enough
http://www.scan.co.uk/products/650w-seasonic-m12ii-hybrid-modular-80plus-bronze-1x120mm-silent-fan-atx-psu-dc-dc

With them saving you can get a  4GB Gainward GTX 770
http://www.scan.co.uk/products/4gb-gainward-gtx-770-phantom-28nm-pcie-30-3505mhz-gddr5-gpu-1046mhz-boost-1085mhz-cores-1536-dport-d

Don't go for two SSDs in RAID0, you will only notice the difference in sequential benchmarks. Some things that are more important (random access and access speed) suffer in RAID.

 

A bigger, single SSD will most likely be faster in real-world usage. I'd recommend the Crucial MX100 256GB (or even the 512GB), they're excellent quality and one of the only consumer SSDs with power loss protection. Otherwise the Samsung 840 EVOs are fine too. In general, avoid 128GB SSDs. They are usually a good chunk slower than their 256GB counterparts.

 

Besides that, you'll have a beast for anything CPU-intensive. I built a rig with a 4790k and a 256GB MX100 a few weeks back, those things fly. Personally I decided not to wait since the things I use benefit more from a few high-Ghz cores and scale less good over at more than 4 cores, but if you're doing anything like video processing you'll have an incredibly powerful machine.

  • Like 2

Thanks for the input guys, I've been hearing the same stuff from other sources regarding gaming performance/value for money.

I suppose the real reason I went for Haswell-E, X99, DDR4 is because it's the latest architecture, and I think that means it will give me the greatest upgrade path in the future.

It is overkill for my needs, but then at the time, so was the system it's replacing, but the fact that I've gotten 7 years out of it seems to make it worth while.

Am I correct with that logic?

Thanks for the info about RAID0, I thought the performance gains would be significant. I guess times have changed, or has it always been a fallacy?

I don't need wireless, so I'll definitely take a closer look at that mobo, Peter. I'm thinking of going with dual gfx cards in the future (if its worth it) so I want a beefy enough PSU to expand the system at some point down the line.

Also considering a stronger gfx card off the bat.

I've had a bit of a windfall, hence the opportunity to upgrade.

I don't want to over spend, but at the same time, I want something that will last.

Peter. I'm thinking of going with dual gfx cards in the future (if its worth it) so I want a beefy enough PSU to expand the system at some point down the line.

If your thinking of going dual card a 800W+ PSU would be suggested to go with.

http://www.scan.co.uk/products/850w-seasonic-evo-full-modular-80-plus-bronze-1x120mm-fan-atx-psu

or

http://www.scan.co.uk/products/850w-thermaltake-toughpower-grand-80plus-gold-full-modular-psu

Good call on the PSU, decided to go with the Seasonic M1211-850 EVO Edition

 

The G.Skill memory seems like a much better deal too. Cheaper, faster clock speed and lower latency. Am I missing something there?

 

Still haven't really looked into the mobo and gfx card yet, getting ready to go out tonight, so not going to have much of a chance to really study the options as soon as I would have liked. :/

Please do the following steps:

 

1) Put the new build in the box.

2) Close it up and tape it down.

3) Insert 2 labels on it (addressee and return address)

4) Go to UPS and drop it off.

5) Send me the tracking number.

6) You will be notified when I get the package from you.

7) Wait for the mail for the reward.

 

 

:p

 

Joking aside, Nice biuld!  Good luck with it. :D

I suppose the real reason I went for Haswell-E, X99, DDR4 is because it's the latest architecture, and I think that means it will give me the greatest upgrade path in the future.

It is overkill for my needs, but then at the time, so was the system it's replacing, but the fact that I've gotten 7 years out of it seems to make it worth while.

Am I correct with that logic?

It's unlikely you will ever upgrade the CPU or RAM on your X99 motherboard. You're spending a lot of money up front on purely hypothetical savings several years from now with little benefit to no benefit to the applications you will actually be running. That doesn't ring like sound logic to me. You'd get more out of your money by optimizing your computer for the tasks you want to do now (i.e., downgrade the CPU, motherboard and RAM, and upgrade the GPU), and keeping any leftovers for a future upgrade that'll also really benefit you. 

It's unlikely you will ever upgrade the CPU or RAM on your X99 motherboard. You're spending a lot of money up front on purely hypothetical savings several years from now with little benefit to no benefit to the applications you will actually be running. That doesn't ring like sound logic to me. You'd get more out of your money by optimizing your computer for the tasks you want to do now (i.e., downgrade the CPU, motherboard and RAM, and upgrade the GPU), and keeping any leftovers for a future upgrade that'll also really benefit you. 

Why is it unlikely? I upgraded the ram on my last system, and always considered upgrading the CPU.

 

I'm not sure, but the upgrade options for my current system were not that great, the last time I checked.

 

It is also the current raw power that I am considering, as well as the longevity, due to potential upgrade paths. Am I wrong in thinking that this new platform will have more scope for upgrades in the future?

 

I do all sorts of stuff with my PC, Photo/Video editing, 3D rendering, so not just gaming. But I do not do any of that professionally or even that regularly. I am an enthusiast, and a tinkerer, and to have the power there would be nice.

 

As for leftover money going towards future upgrades, that won't really happen. If I have the money at the time, I'll buy something, if I don't (which is most of the time), then I don't.

 

I don't want to sound like I'm just flat out ignoring your advice, otherwise what was the point of me asking for it? I'm just trying to battle it out in my own mind.

 

You do make some valid points, but I like shiny new things, but it is large chunk of change. Urgh :wacko:

I'm not sure about the longevity of socket LGA-2011, I don't think anyone can say for how long Intel will keep using it. LGA-1150 will be used for Broadwell at least. Either way, several years down the line sockets will probably change so by that time if you want to upgrade the CPU you'll have to get a new motherboard anyway. I guess it boils down to being able to add more DDR4 eventually instead of being stuck with DDR3. So far DDR4 hasn't proved to provide substantial performance improvements in benchmarks AFAIK. 

Just remember that the power difference a 6-core Haswell E you may get might not be worth the huge price premium. In applications that really do well with threading you'll see good gains (although I don't know if 20% really matters if it's only occasional), but for most things you won't notice the difference at all.

 

A 4790k with DDR3 would probably not be noticeably slower (and faster in games and easier to cool), and with the money you'll save you can probably get a new CPU+Mainboard+RAM down the road for the same total amount, or get a better GPU right away. You'll probably benefit from that more if you game regularly.

 

But, by all means, if you have the money and you'll spend a significant amount of time waiting for CPU-bound applications, go for Haswell E.

 

On the SSD with RAID0 thing, well, nowadays it doesn't matter much. In the past it was sometimes interesting (my laptop has 2x64GB SSDs in RAID0, it's a thing from 2010), but nowadays you just shouldn't bother.

 

What you could do for a major performance gain is get a M2 SSD (and a mainboard with a fast M2 slot). The Samsung XP941 256GB is hard to find but well worth the price and trouble. It can easily be double as fast as a SATA3 SSD. Current SSDs really hit the SATA3 bottleneck. But again, if you're not running heavily IO-bound applications you really won't notice the difference.

Well that was one hell of a weekend :s :woot: :rofl:

 

I've been reading up on various components for the last couple of days, I've got 210 tabs open, and my head is just filled with so much info that I'm confusing the hell out of myself, and I have kinda come full circle :/

 

So, to give myself a kick in the pants and get things off the ground, I've ordered the case from Amazon for ?100.99. Corsair Obsidian 550D

 

post-18738-0-03135500-1410372136.png

 

And now I'm off out to the local Indian restaurant, with my better half.

 

To be continued...

  • Like 3

Do we still have BIOS in 2014?  Isn't x99 UEFI only?

 

I've been out of touch with the build community.

You are correct in thinking that it's UEFI only, but it seems that the term BIOS is so deeply ingrained, that people are still using it when referring to that part of the system. Or calling it a "uefi bios".

 

Even the motherboard manufactures themselves are still calling it BIOS when referring to updates, as can be seen here. http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/X99DELUXE/HelpDesk_Download/

 

I've probably explained that horribly, but I think that's the gist of it.

Slight spanner has been thrown into the works, that G.Skill memory from ebuyer won't be available for 3 months.

 

I had to phone them up to find that out, as hitting the pre-order button was doing nothing.

 

Haven't been able to find it at that price anywhere else, as yet.

Currently weighing up the pros and cons of pulling the trigger on an Asus X99-S / Core i7 5930K bundle for ?635.99 inc vat and delivery (I've got free shipping for life from scan :D )

 

That same bundle was ?609 at overclockers uk, but the price went up as I was looking at it :angry:

 

There is also a cashback offer if you buy an Asus X99 board and a Samsung 850 pro SSD, but the X99-S isn't included in that offer, I think that is due to the fact that apparently that board is only available in pre-built PCs. :/

After much, much soul crushing deliberation, I have decided to swerve X99 (sorry tim_s), as I think I'll get better gaming performance for my budget (as has been pointed out to me numerous times)

 

So... what to you think of these choices?

 

Obsidian 550D - ?100.99
Amazon

i7 4790K - ?251.25
ebuyer

ZOTAC GTX 780 Overclocked 3GB - ?287.74
scan

Corsair H100i CPU Watercooler - ?62.52
Scan

Asus Maximus VII Hero - ?156.84
Micom

16GB Corsair Vengeance Pro, DDR3, 2133MHz, CAS 11-11-11-27, 1.5V - ?133.92
Scan

or

16GB Corsair Vengeance Pro, DDR3, 2400Mhz, CL 11-13-13-31, 1.5v - ?135.21
ebuyer

or

16GB G.Skill TridentX, DDR3, 2400MHz, CL10 (10-12-12-31 2N), 1.65V - ?134.14
ebuyer

Seasonic M1211-850 EVO Edition 850W Full Modular Power Supply - ?89.59
Overclockers UK

Samsung 850 Pro 256GB SSD - ?149.99
expansys

~?1232.92

 

 

I'm not sure if it's better to get the faster RAM, or go for lower latency.

 

The 850 Pro SSDs are supposed to be really fast. How big of a deal is power loss protection? I have SSD's in 3 PCs and they are all fine after multiple power outages.

 

Really don't like the look of the gfx card, but it's going to be out of sight, and it seems like really good value.

 

The psu is over kill right?

 

Thinking of adding a second gfx card in 6 months to a years time.

 

I currently have a single 1680x1050 monitor (it's twin died  :cry: ), but I'm looking at 1440p screens right now.

RAM hardly matters if you don't use the integrated graphics. Crucial has an excellent 1600Mhz set that uses less power and has nice low latencies for less money. Crucial Ballistix I think. Save yourself some money. The DDR3L set is the one you want, the lower power allows faster latencies and reduces heat production a little. Compatible with all Haswells.

Latencies are a complex thing too. 2133 CL10 and 2400 CL11 are the same, for example (I think, the numbers might be off but it's the principle). The CL says how many clocks it takes and since you have more clocks a second with faster RAM the CL always goes up.

Latencies do more for performance than RAW speed too. Keeping that in mind I'd really just go with the Crucial Ballistix set.

SSD-wise the 850 is fine but too expensive for the minor speed increase. Just go for the MX100 (or the 840 EVO if you really prefer Samsung, but I wouldn't). Equally fast as they're all mostly limited by SATA and much cheaper per gigabyte. You could even get a bigger one. If you really want something faster, look for a M.2 SSD. The Samsung XP941 is really fast and pretty amazing but hard to find.

In general, beware paying too much. Really high end stuff like that 850 or very fast RAM can cost a lot more for a performance difference you'll never notice. The money you spend on those is much better spent on upgrading later on or investing more in actually useful nice things like a faster GPU, more SSD storage instead of slightly faster, a new sound system, ...

Don't be blinded by specs.

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Now comes with a money back guarantee instead of a replacement! Hah
    • Rufus 4.15.2391 Beta by Razvan Serea Rufus is a small utility that helps format and create bootable USB flash drives, such as USB keys/pendrives, memory sticks, etc. Despite its small size, Rufus provides everything you need! Oh, and Rufus is fast. For instance it's about twice as fast as UNetbootin, Universal USB Installer or Windows 7 USB download tool, on the creation of a Windows 7 USB installation drive from an ISO (with honorable mention to WiNToBootic for managing to keep up). It is also marginally faster on the creation of Linux bootable USBs from ISOs. A non-exhaustive list of Rufus supported ISOs is available here. It can be especially useful for cases where: you need to create USB installation media from bootable ISOs (Windows, Linux, UEFI, etc.) you need to work on a system that doesn't have an OS installed you need to flash a BIOS or other firmware from DOS you want to run a low-level utility Rufus 4.15.2391 Beta changelog: Improve the guards for using the "silent" option Improve the ability to cancel during write retries Fix unrestricted XML entity expansion and integer overflow in ezxml parser (courtesy of @esadowski4) [GHSA-55r2-34wg-8mv9] Fix "silent" Windows installation failing at 75% in most cases [#2960] Fix a crash during boot when using UEFI:NTFS on Snapdragon X based ARM64 platforms [#2934] Fix the first WUE option always being checked by default [#2965] Fix an infinite loop when using Windows ISOs that contain multiple WIMs Fix "Enable runtime UEFI media validation" checkbox not always being properly enabled Other WUE improvements/fixes for OneDrive removal and username validation (with thanks to @christian8641) [#2984, #2991] Download: Rufus 4.15 Beta | 1.9 MB (Open Source) Links: Rufus Home Page | Project Page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Media Player Classic - Home Cinema 2.7.3 by Razvan Serea Media Player Classic - Home Cinema (MPC-HC) is a free and open-source video and audio player for Windows. MPC-HC is based on the original Guliverkli project (which is no longer maintained) and contains many additional features and bug fixes. As the continuation of the original Media Player Classic, MPC-HC isn’t flashy but it works with nearly any media format. MPC-HC uses DXVA technology to pass decoding operations to your modern video card, enhancing your viewing experience. And MPC-HC supports both physical and software DVDs with menus, chapter navigation, and subtitles. Overview of features A lot of people seem to be unaware of some of the awesome features that have been added to MPC-HC in the past years. Here is a list of useful options and features that everyone should know about: Dark interface Menu > View > Dark Theme When using dark theme it is also possible to change the height of the seekbar and size of the toolbar buttons. Options > Advanced Video preview on the seekbar Options > Tweaks > Show preview on seek bar Adjust playback speed Menu > Play > Playback rate The buttons in the player that control playback rate take a 2x step by default. This can be customized to smaller values (like 10%): Options > Playback > Speed step Adjusting playback speed works best with the internal audio renderer. This also has automatic pitch correction. Options > Playback > Output > Audio Renderer MPC-HC can remember playback position, so you can resume from that point later Options > Player > History You can quickly seek through a video with Ctrl + Mouse Scrollwheel. You can jump to next/previous file in a folder by pressing PageUp/PageDown. You can perform automatic actions at end of file. For example to go to next file or close player. Options > Playback > After Playback (permanent setting) Menu > Play > After Playback (for current file only) A-B repeat - You can loop a segment of a video. Press [ and ] to set start and stop markers. You can rotate/flip/mirror/stretch/zoom the video Menu > View > Pan&Scan This is also easily done with hotkeys (see below). There are lots of keyboard hotkeys and mouse actions to control the player. They can be customized as well. Options > Player > Keys Tip: there is a search box above the table. You can stream videos directly from Youtube and many other video websites You can stream videos directly from Youtube and many other video websites Put yt-dlp.exe or youtube-dl.exe in the MPC-HC installation folder. Then you can open website URLs in the player: Menu > File > Open File/URL You can even download those videos: Menu > File > Save a copy Tip: to be able to download in best quality with yt-dlp/youtube-dl, it is recommended to also put ffmpeg.exe in the MPC-HC folder. Several YDL configuration options are found here: Options > Advanced This includes an option to specify the location of the .exe in case you don't want to put it in MPC-HC folder. Play HDR video This requires using madVR or MPC Video Renderer. After installation these renderers can be selected here: Options > Playback > Output Ability to search for and download subtitles, either automatically or manually (press D): Options > Subtitles > Misc Besides all these (new) features, there have also been many bugfixes and internal improvements in the player in the past years that give better performance and stability. It also has updated internal codecs. Support was added for CUE sheets, WebVTT subtitles, etc. Media Player Classic - Home Cinema 2.7.3 changelog: Updated LAV Filters to version 0.82 Updated MPC Video Renderer to version 0.10.4.2550 Updated MPC Audio Renderer A few crash fixes, bug fixes and small improvements. Download: MPC-HC 2.7.3 (x64) | Standalone | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: MPC-HC 2.7.3 (x86) | Standalone Links: MPC-HC Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft will finally let you sign in to Edge with a Google account by Usama Jawad As things currently stand, Microsoft Edge only allows you to sign in to the browser with a Microsoft Account (MSA). This allows you to sync your browser settings and other data across other devices, as long as you sign in with the same account. However, Microsoft is now modifying this mechanism in a way that will likely please many users. In an update to its Microsoft 365 Roadmap, Microsoft has indicated that it will soon let users sign into Edge using a Google account from the profile menu and the Edge sign-in screen. This will be in addition to the MSA login option, and it opens up new doors for people who prefer using Edge, but cannot be bothered to configure a Microsoft account. This brings several advantages such as the ability to sync your data across devices using just a Google account. It may even facilitate flexible single sign-on (SSO) experiences where you can quickly login to websites and services through a single Google account that is presented as the preferred sign-in option. Up until now, Microsoft allowed customers to indirectly use a Google account, by configuring a Google account as a Microsoft account, or by setting up a one-way sync option between Edge and Chrome. This is a rather interesting development, especially considering that Google Chrome still limits you to a Google account sign-in, but it will be interesting to see if the company reciprocates Microsoft's gesture in the future. This is not the only recent instance in which Microsoft has extended a handshake to Google via Edge. In April 2026, it began tracking the development of a work search banner for Google Search queries, just like the one present in Edge. However, if we go back almost seven years, to January 2020, Microsoft had emphasized that it had no plans to "integrate Google services into Microsoft Edge by default", in response to people requesting Google sign-in services on Edge. Fast-forward to today, and Microsoft is planning to release this feature in July 2026, with IT admins having the option to control its availability on Windows and macOS through the NonMicrosoftAccountSignInEnabled policy.
    • If they ever come out and say the AI is no longer accessible to the gen pop people aren't going to know how to tie their own shoelaces.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      89
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!