Will Windows 9 reintroduce the classic theme?


Recommended Posts

The classic theme is still there underneath the skin, it's just that they removed access to it.

It seems to me it is a fundamental part of the win32 core user interface, and is just "draped" with the PNG-based imagery and graphics. With the right hack, it is revealed that classic theme has been there all along in Win 8.x, and can even run with all of the DWM-enabled animations.

post-289974-0-54472000-1411328591.jpg

Why? What benefit does it have on any computer in use today?

Why not? What drawbacks would it have on any computer in use today?

If it renders utilizing modern 3-d acceleration techniques, then it becomes simply a matter of subjective preference... you know, "taste".

Impossible to be logical about that sort of thing is it not?

Why not? What drawbacks would it have on any computer in use today?

If it renders utilizing modern 3-d acceleration techniques, then it becomes simply a matter of subjective preference... you know, "taste".

Impossible to be logical about that sort of thing is it not?

 

You don't add a bunch of useless stuff and a whole lot of development costs because of "why not" adding a single theme to windows DOUBLES all QnA testing as EVERYTHING even non GUI related stuff has to be tested on both. for what reason. why would you add a basic theme ? there's no reason to, it serves no purpose and costs a lot of development time and resources, in a time where MS is trying to speed up release schedules. 

Microsoft having to maintain code that almost NOBODY uses. Bloating the size of the Windows installation more than it already is by including UI options that almost NOBODY uses.

Everyone who uses Windows is using these functions and libraries. These are responsible for governing the logic, behavior and arrangement of UI abstractions like windows, controls and everything else on the desktop. The classic look, though buried, is an inextricable part of this, and will definitely be present (and still buried of course) in Windows vNext.

Bloat? We are talking about small things in modern times as far as file sizes, don't know why "bloat" would be the adjective used. USER32.DLL, COMCTL32.DLL and so on do not use much space considering their fundamental nature.

You don't add a bunch of useless stuff and a whole lot of development costs because of "why not" adding a single theme to windows DOUBLES all QnA testing as EVERYTHING even non GUI related stuff has to be tested on both. for what reason. why would you add a basic theme ? there's no reason to, it serves no purpose and costs a lot of development time and resources, in a time where MS is trying to speed up release schedules. 

To return the classic look, no one has to add anything because it is ALREADY there.

All MS has done is to completely bury all access to it through any officially-supported means,

C'mon now...

To return the classic look, no one has to add anything because it is ALREADY there.

All MS has done is to completely bury all access to it through any officially-supported means,

C'mon now...

 

That's not how it works.

 

when you have some education and experience in high level developement of OS software you can talk about what keeping and adding elements affects and costs.  As I said just the QnA for having it there doubles. of course since the classic isn't technically in windows and isn't used except for fallback it isn't required for full testing. a basic skin would require to be tested in EVERY POSSIBLE use case test scenario along with the normal skin. 

To return the classic look, no one has to add anything because it is ALREADY there.

All MS has done is to completely bury all access to it through any officially-supported means,

C'mon now...

How do you know? MS could have removed stuff that you may not see on the surface of things. It may cause huge errors and massive amounts of bugs.

Why not? What drawbacks would it have on any computer in use today?

First of all, it doesn't scale. That UI was built for a different age, with different needs than today.

To return the classic look, no one has to add anything because it is ALREADY there.

All MS has done is to completely bury all access to it through any officially-supported means,

C'mon now...

Wrong.. The new mini-start (w/ reported scale-ibility) would not be there. Neither would multi-desktop UI.

Will Windows 9 reintroduce the classic theme?

 

It's just so ultra clean and simple, allowing me to go about my work without getting distracted by the latest fad whether it's shiny 3D buttons, gradients and transparent this or that. Felt like Windows lost its soul after MS took it away.

To be fair, the Windows 8 desktop theme is remarkably devoid of shiny 3D buttons, gradients and transparency. It's quite flat; much more so, in fact, than the classic theme which emulated 3D borders everywhere.

  • Like 3

To return the classic look, no one has to add anything because it is ALREADY there.

All MS has done is to completely bury all access to it through any officially-supported means,

C'mon now...

If it's buried and inaccessible by default then they don't have to test and support it officially.

"C'mon now..."

One thing I like about classic Theme is consistency among any program that adhere to it,

but hell, it was Microsoft who break it with introduction of Office 2007 which jaggering inconsistency with existing programs' look & feel at that time.

And its obvious other program starting to disregard the windows' theme as well.

  • Like 2

To be fair, the Windows 8 desktop theme is remarkably devoid of shiny 3D buttons, gradients and transparency. It's quite flat; much more so, in fact, than the classic theme which emulated 3D borders everywhere.

This is why I like Aero Lite, it uses flat elements and opaque color, including on the taskbar. I dunno why Microsoft hid it by default, but it's easy enough to bring back. 

 

I do wonder if anyone ever made a Windows Classic theme with flat elements, no gradients or 3D, etc.

 

One thing I like about classic Theme is consistency among any program that adhere to it,

but hell, it was Microsoft who break it with introduction of Office 2007 which jaggering inconsistency with existing programs' look & feel at that time.

And its obvious other program starting to disregard the windows' theme as well.

There might have been consistency in terms of program chrome, but there was hardly consistency in how programs worked, looked or how things like toolbars were laid out. Not to mention how many vendors completely overwrote Windows Classic with their own chrome and UI.

  • 2 weeks later...

DWM recently crashed for me in Windows 10 revealing that the vanilla GDI theme does exist in some form - of course its only seen when DWM crashes.

 

So this appears to be an artificial limitation to not let us have the classic GDI [Windows 2000 and before] look.

DWM recently crashed for me in Windows 10 revealing that the vanilla GDI theme does exist in some form - of course its only seen when DWM crashes.

 

So this appears to be an artificial limitation to not let us have the classic GDI [Windows 2000 and before] look.

It's not artificial. It hasn't been developed for in years.

DWM recently crashed for me in Windows 10 revealing that the vanilla GDI theme does exist in some form - of course its only seen when DWM crashes.

 

So this appears to be an artificial limitation to not let us have the classic GDI [Windows 2000 and before] look.

 

The the base fallback "classic" is missing major and large parts of the GUI elements used in modern windows, resulting in those just being white areas.

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!