Recommended Posts

The problem isn't the people "capitalizing" on this. The problem is with the game publishers doing this in the first place...

 

The publishers are trying to artificially price their products higher in more affluent markets in an attempt to "price discriminate". If they want to eliminate this they should price their products the same in all markets... A person in the US shouldn't pay more "because they can".

 

 

This does seem like a "what the market will bear" issue. Charge higher rates in certain regions because of no other reason than you think that is what people will pay there.

 

Aussies know all about paying higher prices (the "Australia Tax") for software that is significantly cheaper internationally. Even when our dollar was almost at parity with the USD we were paying more.

 

This leads to two things: piracy, which is the worst outcome, and sourcing serials/keys outside of your region.

The problem isn't the people "capitalizing" on this. The problem is with the game publishers doing this in the first place...

The publishers are trying to artificially price their products higher in more affluent markets in an attempt to "price discriminate". If they want to eliminate this they should price their products the same in all markets... A person in the US shouldn't pay more "because they can".

:laugh: Price discrimination? They're pricing to what each market can bear. Its pretty much the picture perfect definition of capitalism and its also how you turn a bigger profit. If people stopped buying games at a particular price point in the US or UK, you can bet they'd drop it but people aren't stopping, so why would (or, quite frankly, should) they?

The problem isn't the people "capitalizing" on this. The problem is with the game publishers doing this in the first place...

 

The publishers are trying to artificially price their products higher in more affluent markets in an attempt to "price discriminate". If they want to eliminate this they should price their products the same in all markets... A person in the US shouldn't pay more "because they can".

LogicalApex - read my post above.  More often than not, the choice isn't up TO the publisher (or the manufacturer in the case of hardware region-locking).  Gray markets and black markets don't benefit the publishers OR the manufacturers - period; if anything, they are headaches for both. as much as publishers AND manufacturers would LOVE to be able to have a single price everywhere (or even a single manufacturing standard for HARDWARE everywhere), that isn't happening, and mostly WON'T happen either - because it's not in the "national interest" of the largest nations FOR it to happen.  (For example, why does Australia need a separate games-rating agency from the Germans or the EU?  Why does GERMANY need a separate games-rating agency from the EU for that matter?)

:laugh: Price discrimination? They're pricing to what each market can bear. Its pretty much the picture perfect definition of capitalism and its also how you turn a bigger profit. If people stopped buying games at a particular price point in the US or UK, you can bet they'd drop it but people aren't stopping, so why would (or, quite frankly, should) they?

 

Yes, this is Price Discrimination...

 

Game companies don't operate in a purely competitive market so they don't act in a competitive manner. In a competitive market, where the goods have perfect substitutes, the manufacturer has a harder time trying to extract higher amounts of money out of its customers as doing so would leave room for a competitor to capture the customer with lower prices.

 

 

LogicalApex - read my post above.  More often than not, the choice isn't up TO the publisher (or the manufacturer in the case of hardware region-locking).  Gray markets and black markets don't benefit the publishers OR the manufacturers - period; if anything, they are headaches for both. as much as publishers AND manufacturers would LOVE to be able to have a single price everywhere (or even a single manufacturing standard for HARDWARE everywhere), that isn't happening, and mostly WON'T happen either - because it's not in the "national interest" of the largest nations FOR it to happen.  (For example, why does Australia need a separate games-rating agency from the Germans or the EU?  Why does GERMANY need a separate games-rating agency from the EU for that matter?)

 

The cost of doing business in multiple regions is very minimal on these products. They don't amount to costs as high as 50% or more per unit in various markets. The cost of acquiring a rating logo is a fixed cost not a variable one...

 

Take a look at smart phones... A perfect example here because they need to be approved in almost every country they are sold in individually based on frequency bands. Take a look at a device like the iPhone where Apple has managed to slap all required logos on the device and sell a single SKU worldwide (the same is true for the majority of smartphone manufacturers by the way). The cost is a fixed one and can be uniformly spread in a one price for all markets model. This isn't done solely because if you can do price discrimination you'll extract more profit than if you don't...

 

Consumers shouldn't feel any sort of negativity if they work around companies attempts to price discriminate...

lol buying photoshop in Australia vs the usa comes to mind here :p

 

Yes this bull**** right here. That's its cheaper to FLY half way across the world to another 1st world country and pick up a copy and fly back is completely nuts. These companies get no sympathy off me because of the price guaging they do on Australians. Reap what you sow if your going to so blatantly price fix us.

 

There's a reason 90% of the content I consume is pirated. 

Yes, this is Price Discrimination...

Game companies don't operate in a purely competitive market so they don't act in a competitive manner. In a competitive market, where the goods have perfect substitutes, the manufacturer has a harder time trying to extract higher amounts of money out of its customers as doing so would leave room for a competitor to capture the customer with lower prices.

So what. If consumers are going to pay it, then let them. If I don't think a game will be worth $60, I wait until its on sale or don't buy it at all. If enough people do that, they drop the price on their games pretty quickly. Call it what you want, its just good business.

Discs are practically free to manufacture. Cutting them out won't result in massive savings in games. I don't see any discount on Destiny on the PS4 online store nor do I see any for The Last of Us. Actually, the few games I picked up for my gifted PS4 were all cheaper getting them new in store on an actual disk...

 

The Last of Us: Remastered was $20 cheaper in store at Best Buy. MLB The Show was also a fair bit cheaper, but I don't remember how much cheaper.

I was more thinking along the lines of stripping the game or software keys. if they were digitally delivered to say amazon where I buy, the key is safe. there is no CD/DVD key to steal off of a box software.

I was more thinking along the lines of stripping the game or software keys. if they were digitally delivered to say amazon where I buy, the key is safe. there is no CD/DVD key to steal off of a box software.

The article isn't saying the games are being stolen. The games are being purchased and paid for in Asia. After the purchase them they then strip the codes out and sell them...

 

So, this would be equal to buying a lot of codes from Amazon in HK and then reselling them in the US. You didn't steal the codes from Amazon, but the game industry is upset that you "stole" their extra money they wanted to charge the person in the West.

The article isn't saying the games are being stolen. The games are being purchased and paid for in Asia. After the purchase them they then strip the codes out and sell them...

 

So, this would be equal to buying a lot of codes from Amazon in HK and then reselling them in the US. You didn't steal the codes from Amazon, but the game industry is upset that you "stole" their extra money they wanted to charge the person in the West.

 

that's what I was saying. the amazon model prevents anyone from stripping a code away. I do see some advantages of digital download software.

  • Jim K locked this topic
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • 1. Define "better". 2. It's still more expensive than equivalent PCs so...
    • Major Xbox layoffs may claim South of Midnight developer Compulsion entirely by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft has been making major changes in its gaming wing Xbox for a few months now, including the appointment of a new CEO, a large number of leadership changes, and strategy shifts. However, the company is seemingly also looking at initiating a major layoffs wave at Xbox and perhaps even a studio closure. The new report lands from Kotaku, Xbox first-party developer Compulsion Games is being shuttered soon by Microsoft. For those unfamiliar with the studio, it's the team behind Contrast (2013), We Happy Few (2018), and South of Midnight (2025). Its latest game was quite well received, even winning a Peabody Award for its writing. It even received a 9/10 in Neowin's own review, highlighting its engaging storyline, gorgeous world, and curious characters. The studio joined Xbox Game Studios in 2018, just as Microsoft announced it is acquiring Playground Games, Undead Labs, and Ninja Theory. Despite recent listings for new staff roles, according to the new report, Compulsion Games is being closed entirely, with over 90 staff being let go. Kotaku also added that the studio's leadership is in negotiations with Microsoft about this decision, but no official details have been revealed yet. The report lands just as two senior managers of Xbox leave their posts at Microsoft Gaming. Head of Xbox Game Studios Craig Duncan and chief of staff Louise O'Connor originally began their journey in Rare and have been a part of Xbox for over two decades. Dunkan has been responsible for games like Kinect Sports and Sea of Thieves, while O'Connor was primarily working on Rare's Everwild project before its cancelation. If this report about the studio shutdown is accurate, this may just be the start of a major new layoffs wave at Xbox Game Studios. There are also rumors of Arkane Studios being heavily affected. As always, take all these reports with a grain of salt until something official materializes from Microsoft or the studios.
    • The flaw with this analysis is that this laptop has a cellphone CPU in it. In the Intel world, that would be an N150 and those are everywhere, even in low end laptops. You can get an N150 based NUC with 16GB RAM and 256GB-512GB SSD... NOT soldered in... for < $500 Canadian (around US$360). The problem is two fold: tech bloggers/writers on most tech site (like this one, ironically) overvalue Apple and apparently aren't in the same earnings class as most regular people. As a result, we get breathless articles about how everyone needs a folding phone when most people just cannot afford one... or really need one. And we get Apple used as the baseline metric regardless of whether that comparison makes any sense. If Dell or HP released a retail laptop with a cellphone motherboard, you'd be all over them for doing that - but Apple does it and it's genius. I see articles suggesting what Samsung - a company that basically started the foldable phone market and has built them for eight years - needs to do to compete with Apple's unreleased, unspecced and unseen folding phone. Sorry, no - if the Neo (really creative name there BTW - still, better than the Go, the other "creative" product name everyone's using) encourages PC makers to make cellphone laptops using lower end ARM processors, we all lose. It's a step backwards and a capitulation to the fact that semiconductor makers and computer OEMs (and tech bloggers) have totally lost the plot.
    • Everyone should install this extension and ignore games that use AI. https://chromewebstore.google....nnigaaeelfkeomjcngmnh?pli=1 https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ai-warning-for-steam/
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      ThatGuyOnline earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      127
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      82
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!