Recommended Posts

The problem isn't the people "capitalizing" on this. The problem is with the game publishers doing this in the first place...

 

The publishers are trying to artificially price their products higher in more affluent markets in an attempt to "price discriminate". If they want to eliminate this they should price their products the same in all markets... A person in the US shouldn't pay more "because they can".

 

 

This does seem like a "what the market will bear" issue. Charge higher rates in certain regions because of no other reason than you think that is what people will pay there.

 

Aussies know all about paying higher prices (the "Australia Tax") for software that is significantly cheaper internationally. Even when our dollar was almost at parity with the USD we were paying more.

 

This leads to two things: piracy, which is the worst outcome, and sourcing serials/keys outside of your region.

The problem isn't the people "capitalizing" on this. The problem is with the game publishers doing this in the first place...

The publishers are trying to artificially price their products higher in more affluent markets in an attempt to "price discriminate". If they want to eliminate this they should price their products the same in all markets... A person in the US shouldn't pay more "because they can".

:laugh: Price discrimination? They're pricing to what each market can bear. Its pretty much the picture perfect definition of capitalism and its also how you turn a bigger profit. If people stopped buying games at a particular price point in the US or UK, you can bet they'd drop it but people aren't stopping, so why would (or, quite frankly, should) they?

The problem isn't the people "capitalizing" on this. The problem is with the game publishers doing this in the first place...

 

The publishers are trying to artificially price their products higher in more affluent markets in an attempt to "price discriminate". If they want to eliminate this they should price their products the same in all markets... A person in the US shouldn't pay more "because they can".

LogicalApex - read my post above.  More often than not, the choice isn't up TO the publisher (or the manufacturer in the case of hardware region-locking).  Gray markets and black markets don't benefit the publishers OR the manufacturers - period; if anything, they are headaches for both. as much as publishers AND manufacturers would LOVE to be able to have a single price everywhere (or even a single manufacturing standard for HARDWARE everywhere), that isn't happening, and mostly WON'T happen either - because it's not in the "national interest" of the largest nations FOR it to happen.  (For example, why does Australia need a separate games-rating agency from the Germans or the EU?  Why does GERMANY need a separate games-rating agency from the EU for that matter?)

:laugh: Price discrimination? They're pricing to what each market can bear. Its pretty much the picture perfect definition of capitalism and its also how you turn a bigger profit. If people stopped buying games at a particular price point in the US or UK, you can bet they'd drop it but people aren't stopping, so why would (or, quite frankly, should) they?

 

Yes, this is Price Discrimination...

 

Game companies don't operate in a purely competitive market so they don't act in a competitive manner. In a competitive market, where the goods have perfect substitutes, the manufacturer has a harder time trying to extract higher amounts of money out of its customers as doing so would leave room for a competitor to capture the customer with lower prices.

 

 

LogicalApex - read my post above.  More often than not, the choice isn't up TO the publisher (or the manufacturer in the case of hardware region-locking).  Gray markets and black markets don't benefit the publishers OR the manufacturers - period; if anything, they are headaches for both. as much as publishers AND manufacturers would LOVE to be able to have a single price everywhere (or even a single manufacturing standard for HARDWARE everywhere), that isn't happening, and mostly WON'T happen either - because it's not in the "national interest" of the largest nations FOR it to happen.  (For example, why does Australia need a separate games-rating agency from the Germans or the EU?  Why does GERMANY need a separate games-rating agency from the EU for that matter?)

 

The cost of doing business in multiple regions is very minimal on these products. They don't amount to costs as high as 50% or more per unit in various markets. The cost of acquiring a rating logo is a fixed cost not a variable one...

 

Take a look at smart phones... A perfect example here because they need to be approved in almost every country they are sold in individually based on frequency bands. Take a look at a device like the iPhone where Apple has managed to slap all required logos on the device and sell a single SKU worldwide (the same is true for the majority of smartphone manufacturers by the way). The cost is a fixed one and can be uniformly spread in a one price for all markets model. This isn't done solely because if you can do price discrimination you'll extract more profit than if you don't...

 

Consumers shouldn't feel any sort of negativity if they work around companies attempts to price discriminate...

lol buying photoshop in Australia vs the usa comes to mind here :p

 

Yes this bull**** right here. That's its cheaper to FLY half way across the world to another 1st world country and pick up a copy and fly back is completely nuts. These companies get no sympathy off me because of the price guaging they do on Australians. Reap what you sow if your going to so blatantly price fix us.

 

There's a reason 90% of the content I consume is pirated. 

Yes, this is Price Discrimination...

Game companies don't operate in a purely competitive market so they don't act in a competitive manner. In a competitive market, where the goods have perfect substitutes, the manufacturer has a harder time trying to extract higher amounts of money out of its customers as doing so would leave room for a competitor to capture the customer with lower prices.

So what. If consumers are going to pay it, then let them. If I don't think a game will be worth $60, I wait until its on sale or don't buy it at all. If enough people do that, they drop the price on their games pretty quickly. Call it what you want, its just good business.

Discs are practically free to manufacture. Cutting them out won't result in massive savings in games. I don't see any discount on Destiny on the PS4 online store nor do I see any for The Last of Us. Actually, the few games I picked up for my gifted PS4 were all cheaper getting them new in store on an actual disk...

 

The Last of Us: Remastered was $20 cheaper in store at Best Buy. MLB The Show was also a fair bit cheaper, but I don't remember how much cheaper.

I was more thinking along the lines of stripping the game or software keys. if they were digitally delivered to say amazon where I buy, the key is safe. there is no CD/DVD key to steal off of a box software.

I was more thinking along the lines of stripping the game or software keys. if they were digitally delivered to say amazon where I buy, the key is safe. there is no CD/DVD key to steal off of a box software.

The article isn't saying the games are being stolen. The games are being purchased and paid for in Asia. After the purchase them they then strip the codes out and sell them...

 

So, this would be equal to buying a lot of codes from Amazon in HK and then reselling them in the US. You didn't steal the codes from Amazon, but the game industry is upset that you "stole" their extra money they wanted to charge the person in the West.

The article isn't saying the games are being stolen. The games are being purchased and paid for in Asia. After the purchase them they then strip the codes out and sell them...

 

So, this would be equal to buying a lot of codes from Amazon in HK and then reselling them in the US. You didn't steal the codes from Amazon, but the game industry is upset that you "stole" their extra money they wanted to charge the person in the West.

 

that's what I was saying. the amazon model prevents anyone from stripping a code away. I do see some advantages of digital download software.

  • Jim K locked this topic
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know The ONLY thing I need to know is the price, which I know will be way higher than I (and most people) are willing to pay for a phone... so basically nothing here I need to know. PS: Nice job getting that Apple reference to a non-existent and unrevealed product as "competition" in there. Cheque is in the mail.
    • Well I really think the repasting helped if your higher clocks have returned, maybe the next thing to look at is if there is a problem with your case airflow? I guess this because your 3080 has returned to optimal state, but is still staying too warm, which might suggest it was thermal throttling before you repasted, of which the only logical conclusion could be outside factors.
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know by Hamid Ganji Galaxy Z Fold 7 - Image via Samsung The next generation of Samsung foldables is set to be unveiled next month at the second Unpacked event of the year. Samsung’s 2026 foldables are not expected to offer significant upgrades over their predecessors, with the Korean firm instead focusing on design refinements and conventional upgrades such as faster processors and better cameras. However, Samsung is reportedly planning to unveil an all-new passport-style foldable this year to rival Apple’s first foldable iPhone, which is expected to debut this September. Here’s a roundup of everything we know about Samsung’s upcoming foldable devices ahead of their official debut. When can we expect Samsung’s new foldables? The Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7 series were unveiled in July, and Samsung is expected to maintain this timeframe in 2026. Based on previous reports from Korean sources, Samsung will hold its Unpacked event on July 22 in London, UK, to pull back the curtain on the Galaxy Z Fold 8 series. The devices are also expected to hit the shelves a few weeks after launch. However, Samsung has yet to announce an official date. A new naming scheme? One of the most interesting changes we might see this year is a new naming scheme for Samsung’s latest foldables. SamMobile reported that since Samsung is expected to unveil three foldables this year, it has adopted a new naming strategy to simplify product identification for customers. Accordingly, the standard Galaxy Z Fold 8 will reportedly be called the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and will serve as the direct successor to last year’s Galaxy Z Fold 7. The “Ultra” suffix suggests the phone could feature higher-end specifications, such as additional rear camera modules. Samsung’s new passport-style foldable is expected to carry the Galaxy Z Fold 8 name without any suffix. This model is reportedly equipped with two rear cameras. No major changes are expected for the Flip model. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 anticipated specs Rumors over the past few months suggest Samsung is preparing several upgrades for its upcoming foldables, although the devices may continue to rely on larger batteries and faster charging speeds rather than dramatic design changes. The primary focus this year is expected to be the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and its wide-screen design. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here are the anticipated specifications for the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra based on previous leaks: 6.5-inch outer display and 8-inch inner display, 120Hz refresh rate, and 2,600 nits peak brightness Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, paired with 12GB or 16GB of RAM and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB of storage 4.1mm thickness when unfolded and a weight of 210g 200MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, 10MP or 12MP telephoto camera, 10MP cover camera, and 10MP selfie camera 5,000mAh battery with 45W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 As for the Galaxy Z Flip 8, the device is not expected to be a major departure from its predecessor, although it could become slightly slimmer. Expected specifications include: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or Exynos 2600 processor 12GB of RAM with 256GB and 512GB storage options 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X inner dispaly and 4.1-inch Super AMOLED outer dispaly 50MP main camera, 12MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera 4,300mAh battery with 25W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 Samsung’s foldables are also expected to launch with Gemini Intelligence, Google’s AI suite for automating tasks in Android ecosystem. Moreover, given current memory and component costs, some Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 variants could see a price hike. Galaxy Z Fold 8 adopts a wide-screen design The centerpiece of the upcoming Unpacked event could be the Galaxy Z Fold 8, previously rumored as the Galaxy Z Fold Wide. This model adopts a passport-style form factor and is expected to compete directly with Apple’s iPhone Fold. Galaxy Z Fold 8 official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here’s what to expect: 7.6-inch primary OLED display and 5.4-inch cover display, 120Hz refresh rate, 2,600 nits peak brightness, and 4:3 aspect ratio Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, 12GB or 16GB of RAM, and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB storage options 4,800mAh battery with 45W wired charging 50MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera Android 17 and One UI 9 The three new foldable phones are unlikely to be the only devices unveiled at Samsung’s Unpacked event. The company is also expected to introduce the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 and the Galaxy Watch 9 series.
    • Thanks
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      140
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!