Recommended Posts

The problem isn't the people "capitalizing" on this. The problem is with the game publishers doing this in the first place...

 

The publishers are trying to artificially price their products higher in more affluent markets in an attempt to "price discriminate". If they want to eliminate this they should price their products the same in all markets... A person in the US shouldn't pay more "because they can".

 

 

This does seem like a "what the market will bear" issue. Charge higher rates in certain regions because of no other reason than you think that is what people will pay there.

 

Aussies know all about paying higher prices (the "Australia Tax") for software that is significantly cheaper internationally. Even when our dollar was almost at parity with the USD we were paying more.

 

This leads to two things: piracy, which is the worst outcome, and sourcing serials/keys outside of your region.

The problem isn't the people "capitalizing" on this. The problem is with the game publishers doing this in the first place...

The publishers are trying to artificially price their products higher in more affluent markets in an attempt to "price discriminate". If they want to eliminate this they should price their products the same in all markets... A person in the US shouldn't pay more "because they can".

:laugh: Price discrimination? They're pricing to what each market can bear. Its pretty much the picture perfect definition of capitalism and its also how you turn a bigger profit. If people stopped buying games at a particular price point in the US or UK, you can bet they'd drop it but people aren't stopping, so why would (or, quite frankly, should) they?

The problem isn't the people "capitalizing" on this. The problem is with the game publishers doing this in the first place...

 

The publishers are trying to artificially price their products higher in more affluent markets in an attempt to "price discriminate". If they want to eliminate this they should price their products the same in all markets... A person in the US shouldn't pay more "because they can".

LogicalApex - read my post above.  More often than not, the choice isn't up TO the publisher (or the manufacturer in the case of hardware region-locking).  Gray markets and black markets don't benefit the publishers OR the manufacturers - period; if anything, they are headaches for both. as much as publishers AND manufacturers would LOVE to be able to have a single price everywhere (or even a single manufacturing standard for HARDWARE everywhere), that isn't happening, and mostly WON'T happen either - because it's not in the "national interest" of the largest nations FOR it to happen.  (For example, why does Australia need a separate games-rating agency from the Germans or the EU?  Why does GERMANY need a separate games-rating agency from the EU for that matter?)

:laugh: Price discrimination? They're pricing to what each market can bear. Its pretty much the picture perfect definition of capitalism and its also how you turn a bigger profit. If people stopped buying games at a particular price point in the US or UK, you can bet they'd drop it but people aren't stopping, so why would (or, quite frankly, should) they?

 

Yes, this is Price Discrimination...

 

Game companies don't operate in a purely competitive market so they don't act in a competitive manner. In a competitive market, where the goods have perfect substitutes, the manufacturer has a harder time trying to extract higher amounts of money out of its customers as doing so would leave room for a competitor to capture the customer with lower prices.

 

 

LogicalApex - read my post above.  More often than not, the choice isn't up TO the publisher (or the manufacturer in the case of hardware region-locking).  Gray markets and black markets don't benefit the publishers OR the manufacturers - period; if anything, they are headaches for both. as much as publishers AND manufacturers would LOVE to be able to have a single price everywhere (or even a single manufacturing standard for HARDWARE everywhere), that isn't happening, and mostly WON'T happen either - because it's not in the "national interest" of the largest nations FOR it to happen.  (For example, why does Australia need a separate games-rating agency from the Germans or the EU?  Why does GERMANY need a separate games-rating agency from the EU for that matter?)

 

The cost of doing business in multiple regions is very minimal on these products. They don't amount to costs as high as 50% or more per unit in various markets. The cost of acquiring a rating logo is a fixed cost not a variable one...

 

Take a look at smart phones... A perfect example here because they need to be approved in almost every country they are sold in individually based on frequency bands. Take a look at a device like the iPhone where Apple has managed to slap all required logos on the device and sell a single SKU worldwide (the same is true for the majority of smartphone manufacturers by the way). The cost is a fixed one and can be uniformly spread in a one price for all markets model. This isn't done solely because if you can do price discrimination you'll extract more profit than if you don't...

 

Consumers shouldn't feel any sort of negativity if they work around companies attempts to price discriminate...

lol buying photoshop in Australia vs the usa comes to mind here :p

 

Yes this bull**** right here. That's its cheaper to FLY half way across the world to another 1st world country and pick up a copy and fly back is completely nuts. These companies get no sympathy off me because of the price guaging they do on Australians. Reap what you sow if your going to so blatantly price fix us.

 

There's a reason 90% of the content I consume is pirated. 

Yes, this is Price Discrimination...

Game companies don't operate in a purely competitive market so they don't act in a competitive manner. In a competitive market, where the goods have perfect substitutes, the manufacturer has a harder time trying to extract higher amounts of money out of its customers as doing so would leave room for a competitor to capture the customer with lower prices.

So what. If consumers are going to pay it, then let them. If I don't think a game will be worth $60, I wait until its on sale or don't buy it at all. If enough people do that, they drop the price on their games pretty quickly. Call it what you want, its just good business.

Discs are practically free to manufacture. Cutting them out won't result in massive savings in games. I don't see any discount on Destiny on the PS4 online store nor do I see any for The Last of Us. Actually, the few games I picked up for my gifted PS4 were all cheaper getting them new in store on an actual disk...

 

The Last of Us: Remastered was $20 cheaper in store at Best Buy. MLB The Show was also a fair bit cheaper, but I don't remember how much cheaper.

I was more thinking along the lines of stripping the game or software keys. if they were digitally delivered to say amazon where I buy, the key is safe. there is no CD/DVD key to steal off of a box software.

I was more thinking along the lines of stripping the game or software keys. if they were digitally delivered to say amazon where I buy, the key is safe. there is no CD/DVD key to steal off of a box software.

The article isn't saying the games are being stolen. The games are being purchased and paid for in Asia. After the purchase them they then strip the codes out and sell them...

 

So, this would be equal to buying a lot of codes from Amazon in HK and then reselling them in the US. You didn't steal the codes from Amazon, but the game industry is upset that you "stole" their extra money they wanted to charge the person in the West.

The article isn't saying the games are being stolen. The games are being purchased and paid for in Asia. After the purchase them they then strip the codes out and sell them...

 

So, this would be equal to buying a lot of codes from Amazon in HK and then reselling them in the US. You didn't steal the codes from Amazon, but the game industry is upset that you "stole" their extra money they wanted to charge the person in the West.

 

that's what I was saying. the amazon model prevents anyone from stripping a code away. I do see some advantages of digital download software.

  • Jim K locked this topic
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Anyway to download these versions without being on the Experimental builds?
    • Nothing is stopping you from continuing with your testing cadence. If updates are released every 2 weeks instead of 4, and you test once every 4 weeks, the exact same amount of patches will still be available for you in those 4 weeks. For example: Before 4th week - patch 1, 2, 3, 4 After 2nd week - patch 1 and 2 4th week - patch 3 and 4 Still the same amount after 4.
    • Everyone else has said it. I'm gonna say it - you don't know what you're talking about. I do. I have two laptops. One work, one personal. I have access to two more laptops - both personal. At home I manually update my personal laptop when I see on Neowin that there is an update - I carry on and only apply the updates when I am ready. My work one only updates when my workplace decides to send it - I carry on and only apply the updates (when they actually arrive, which is usually days after the release) when I switch off the laptop at the end of the day as usual. The two other personal laptops only get updated when I get to it which is rarely - the people who own them carry on using them until I get to it and update them. All of the browsers on all laptops are configured to restore the tabs when launched. Google and Microsoft have changed from 6 weeks to 4, and it looks like it's going to move to 2. None of these changes affect how any of these browsers on the laptops are used. Not one jot. My advice to you is stop panicking whenever you see an update. Just carry on with what you're doing. This even benefits you in a way - from your comment you sound like you don't like the changes or the frivolous new features - great - then carry on as before!
    • AMAZON needs to take total accountability for this.
    • Server Summit had a heap of announcements, ADCS changes are baller.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      197
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!