Recommended Posts

Yes, that's right, the 19-year-old woman actually tried to drive in the carpool lane with a giant teddy bear in the front seat next to her. The state patrol wasn't having it.

According to The Seattle Times, the teddy bear wasn't the only issue. Authorities say that the woman was driving 14 miles per hour over the speed limit.

Trooper Mark Francis, who pulled her over, tweeted that the woman was also driving without insurance.

There's a reason the bear was sitting in the front seat. Francis told KOMO, "She said she didn't have any room in the back of her minivan for the bear." :huh:

He also said the woman knew she shouldn't have been driving in the carpool lane but never gave an explanation for doing so.

Anchors on the morning shows thought the woman should have played up the situation a bit more.

Dylan Dreyer for NBC said, "At least dress him up a little bit."

Matt Lauer chimed in: "That lady made a little boo boo."

FOX NEWS's Brian Kilmeade queried: "And no seat belt for the bear? Yeah, no seat belt. It's unbelievable! Just count on the air bag."

ABC's Michael Strahan says that "she should have talked to it like it was real."

Okay, that might have been taking things a bit too far. But what's even more bizarre is the exact same thing happened two years ago in Oregon.

Another woman got caught driving in the carpool lane with a teddy bear -- albeit not as large of one -- in her passenger seat.

She told KATU that she thought she might have been able to get away with it until an officer pulled her over and gave her a $260 ticket.

As for the woman in Washington, her fine was a little bigger. She was ticketed $818 for all three alleged offenses.

 

xWashington+State+Patrol.jpg.pagespeed.i

source

whats wrong with having a teddy bear in pass seat? Am I not reading something correct?

Most likely she had the teddy bear in the front seat to give the impression that she was traveling with another person; therefore, making it legal for her to be in the carpool lane.

 

Since she was driving a minivan, and the story doesn't explain much else, we can assume she had plenty of room in the van for the teddy bear other than the front seat. It's highly unlikely that her putting the bear in the front seat AND driving in the carpool lane (knowing it was just her in the car) is pure coincidence.

Sorry what is a carpool lane?

 

 

carpool-lane-sign.jpg

 

05_gx_carpool_lane_500.jpg

 

Basically this - a special lane on the road where only cars that have a driver and at least one passenger can be driven on; if you are the only person in your car (aka the driver) then you have to be on the right side of the special carpool lane on the lower image.

 

My country doesn't have this, but does have special lanes for buses and taxis

  • Like 1

Sorry what is a carpool lane?

Just to add to what Tigurinn has already said, I believe the initial idea was to cut down on the amount of cars that are on the road during work-commuting hours. If I remember, it was part of the whole "let's go green and cut down on our carbon emissions" plan. Why have 2 cars on the road with each driver going to the same destination when you could have 1 car with 2 people in it?

Just to add to what Tigurinn has already said, I believe the initial idea was to cut down on the amount of cars that are on the road during work-commuting hours. If I remember, it was part of the whole "let's go green and cut down on our carbon emissions" plan. Why have 2 cars on the road with each driver going to the same destination when you could have 1 car with 2 people in it?

This. Except it didn't work, because no one wants to carpool. It's a lot of work to coordinate your schedule with another person and it gets exponentially harder the more people you include. So it really is just an extra lane that is barely used most of the time.

 

The other side of the argument though is that even if this lane was opened up to regular traffic, it wouldn't do much quell traffic congestion, at least in my state. It's kind of a lose-lose situation.

Thats stupid? Whats the point? Just has a whole lane being wasted. They have this in Lithuania, and literally only 4 cars used it while other lanes were blocked up.

 

It wouldn't be "wasted" if people would actually share rides, thus reducing demand on fuel and reducing car exhaust...now wouldn't it?  Unfortunately, the problem is people are expected to do so many things throughout the day and expected to be at various locations throughout the day that such a lane these days is not very practicable.

 

Not every state has this.  Some states have (free) express lanes; a set of lanes designated for cars only to flow in a single direction for a period of time.  Then, flow the opposite direction at other times - reducing congestion.  While other states have an express lane which charges you to bypass congestion.

 

My state only has the two or more occupant lane for metered on ramps.  Once on the highway, all lanes are open.

This. Except it didn't work, because no one wants to carpool. It's a lot of work to coordinate your schedule with another person and it gets exponentially harder the more people you include. So it really is just an extra lane that is barely used most of the time.

 

The other side of the argument though is that even if this lane was opened up to regular traffic, it wouldn't do much quell traffic congestion, at least in my state. It's kind of a lose-lose situation.

There's not much difference with or without to be honest. Having the big bus out of traffic congestion does help. Having one less lane does the opposite. In the end i personally didn't see much of a difference when they added one here. It was not worse nor it was better.

Thats stupid? Whats the point? Just has a whole lane being wasted. They have this in Lithuania, and literally only 4 cars used it while other lanes were blocked up.

 

Lived in Phoenix and carpool lane was always busy during rush hour.  Non rush hour, the carpool lane is free for anyone. Some states, its a permanent lane regardless the time of day and single passenger cars are not allowed.  Like LA, always PITA traffic.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Google reportedly limited Meta's Gemini access over limited AI compute by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly limiting Meta's use of its Gemini AI models after Meta tried buying more computing capacity than even Google could supply. According to the Financial Times, Google told Meta in March that it could not provide the full Gemini capacity that Meta had requested. This shortfall even disrupted and delayed some of Meta's internal projects. Due to this, Meta even told its employees internally to use AI tokens more efficiently. Meta wasn't the only one to get hit by this sudden refusal by Google; even other customers were affected. But Meta was hit harder because of its unusually high demand for Google's models. The move from Google makes it evident that companies all over are in limited supply of both infrastructure and compute. Alphabet said in April that Google Cloud revenue grew 63% year-over-year to $20 billion in the first quarter, helped by enterprise AI infrastructure and AI solutions. In pursuit of more compute, Meta had earlier signed a multi-billion-dollar AWS agreement as well as a large AMD GPU deal for AI data centers. But the crunch would be short-lived as both Meta and Google have also ramped up infrastructure investments heavily. Meta said in November that it was committing more than $600 billion in the U.S. by 2028 for AI technology, infrastructure, and workforce expansion. In the first quarter of this year, Meta also raised its expected capital expenditure for 2026 to a range of $125 billion to $145 billion, citing higher component pricing and additional data center costs for future capacity. However, this doesn't make the company immune to the current dependence on outside suppliers. Meta has also spent many years promoting Llama as an open-weight alternative to closed models from Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic. But if the reported reliance on Google's Gemini models is severe enough for internal work to get impacted, then it looks like even frontier labs and Big Tech aren't fully self-sufficient. Source: Financial Times
    • I like to reminisce about the good old days, way back in autumn 2025 when building a gaming machine was fun and the drives were about $150 when you caught a deal. Yes duh, back in the day we had it gone. Then baby Skynet came along, hiding in AI datacenters demanding more processing power until it reached singularity. End of a not totally fictional story.
    • My experience in the past with older Windows 11 builds was not great on unsupported machines but I recently used Rufus to put the latest build on a older 5th Gen Core Thinkpad T that we upgraded with a SATA SSD and 8GB of RAM four years ago when hardware was reasonable and it seemed pretty fast and solid. Customer is very happy with the performance and will probably get four more years out of that venerable laptop that he loves so much. Another customer just retired his Dell Studio laptop from 2009 running Windows 10. It got an SSD over 10 years ago and did everything he needed it to for 17 years but he also retired last year and is happy doing everything on his iPad now.
    • Apple's newest AirTag 2 gets first big discount by Taras Buria In late January 2026, Apple introduced its second-generation AirTag trackers, bringing a refresh to the old model that has been on the market for half a decade. Now, you can get these new trackers at an all-time low price, thanks to the first big discount that brought the price down by 17% on Amazon. While the second-generation AirTag looks identical to its predecessor, it packs meaningful upgrades inside. The second-gen ultrawideband chip works 50% farther than the original AirTag, allowing you to detect lost items in a wider range. In addition, the second-generation AirTag features an upgraded Bluetooth chip for extended range and a significantly louder speaker (up to 50%) so that you can hear it better when locating a lost item. Note that the second-gen AirTag only works with iPhones and iPads that run iOS/iPadOS 26 and newer, so you need a compatible device to use the tracker. Like the original AirTag, the AirTag 2 is available in two packs: one and four pieces. Both are now available at a notable discount on Amazon, and you can purchase them using the links below. Apple AirTag 2 tracker - $24 | 17% off on Amazon Apple AirTag 2 tracker (four-pack) - $89 | 10% off on Amazon Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S.- specific and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!