32 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you think the Modern UI was crippled?

    • Yes
      14
    • No
      18
  2. 2. Do you feel a loss when upgrading from 8 to 10?

    • Yes
      7
    • No
      25


Recommended Posts

So after playing around with the new Technical Preview, I have come to a couple of conclusions. First and foremost, the main thing here is it is a PREVIEW so nothing is final.

 

However, I noticed a couple of things. 

 

  • The Taskbar now prominently shows on the Start Screen and is more pesky then on 8.1 Update
  • Charms is no longer accessible through mouse (don't know if this is just me)
  • Right click on the Start screen, and you get a new settings option in the right-click menu that opens the start settings
  • Bing Apps (now MSN) have smaller buttons within the apps and the text is smaller in the weather app
  • The updated MSN apps feel more crowded than before
  • Google Chrome (which runs on desktop mode) has an extra bar along the side due to the Modernization of the window borders, thinner borders
  • Apps cannot be switched to full screen mode. 
  • Without the App Switcher, switching between Modern UI apps is clunky with the new Task View
  • I AM liking the multi-desktop feature though
  • I cannot resize a Modern UI app vertically to less than 2/3 of the screen vertically
  • Especially on the SP3, the new experience is less than satisfiable
  • The icons are some Modern, mostly Vista, some XP and some 95/98 STILL
  • the repetitive apps are really shown as they are now side by side (calculator)
  • The gesture for closing an app quickly (swipe down) is gone 

I hated metro in windows 8 on my desktops so the changes in the tech preview have made that experience much better. However as you say, the touch friendlyness has definitely gone down. I'm afraid to load it on my SP3 as yet since it's obviously not finished. From what I've seen with my VM, on my tablet I will miss the quick swiping left thumb move and the swipe down to close.

 

Those may be reinstated as they finish work on the continuum feature where it switches between desktop-first and tablet-first depending on the attached peripherals. But this is the way it should have always been. Context-aware I mean; and not trying to forcefeed metro and the start screen on everyone. That has backfired badly for them obviously.

  • Charms is no longer accessible through mouse (don't know if this is just me)
You're right! Bits of Charms are gone even when the Start Screen is enabled. This means that certain personalization settings cannot be accessed to change logon/Start Screen colors.

What I kind of dislike is the "PC settings" throws you into a fullscreen "modern" mode..

 

Do you run it in a VM by any chance or did you install it on a PC without touch?   I have it in a VM on vbox and the input settings is for "tablet" or something along those lines.   I think if the system sees that you have touch as a option it will default modern apps to full screen when you first open them.   At least now we can change that and move them around like other desktop apps.

 

Anyways, on topic, I voted no to both because they were clear cut about the nature of this preview build, it's for core keyboard and desktop users and not for touch users.  JoeB was clear about who this targeted, and besides we know the touch first parts are coming, they're not in this build though, heck Continuum isn't even in this build.

'The icons are some Modern, mostly Vista, some XP and some 95/98 STILL'

Yes, they STILL are! :laugh: In the early days of using XP, I used to change all icons to Windows 98's variants, and even go to the extent of replacing XP sounds with 98's! Now that's CLASSIC.

 

Apps cannot be switched to full screen mode. 

 

 

Yes that can actually be done by using the charms menu in modern apps. In a modern app's window titlebar, there should be a "..." button, click that and then choose Full Screen.

Lots of "modern" apps don't like to be used inside a window, mostly games, they don't redraw correctly to account for the window size.  Devs will have to upgrade all their modern apps for Win10.

 

And yes, lots of swipe gesture are gone in this preview, hope they come back soon.  Won't be installing this on my SP3 because of that.

I'm sure developers will just have to run their app through VS and make some minor changes so that they can better support windowed modes in 10, I don't think lots of work will be needed.

This is unfinished and focused on the desktop UI side of things. I'm not going to draw any conclusions about Win 10's incarnation of Modern based on this preview.

 

Stop worrying about the Charms bar, that's almost certainly going away once they finish the UI (which is nowhere near complete at this stage).

 

And that's what worries me. I'd prefer the Charms bar be made useful on the desktop side, not removed. How can a central control panel for settings, printing etc. not be a good thing?

 

So after playing around with the new Technical Preview, I have come to a couple of conclusions. First and foremost, the main thing here is it is a PREVIEW so nothing is final.

 

However, I noticed a couple of things. 

 

  • The Taskbar now prominently shows on the Start Screen and is more pesky then on 8.1 Update
  • Charms is no longer accessible through mouse (don't know if this is just me)
  • Right click on the Start screen, and you get a new settings option in the right-click menu that opens the start settings
  • Bing Apps (now MSN) have smaller buttons within the apps and the text is smaller in the weather app
  • The updated MSN apps feel more crowded than before
  • Google Chrome (which runs on desktop mode) has an extra bar along the side due to the Modernization of the window borders, thinner borders
  • Apps cannot be switched to full screen mode. 
  • Without the App Switcher, switching between Modern UI apps is clunky with the new Task View
  • I AM liking the multi-desktop feature though
  • I cannot resize a Modern UI app vertically to less than 2/3 of the screen vertically
  • Especially on the SP3, the new experience is less than satisfiable
  • The icons are some Modern, mostly Vista, some XP and some 95/98 STILL
  • the repetitive apps are really shown as they are now side by side (calculator)
  • The gesture for closing an app quickly (swipe down) is gone 

 

Soo heres my 2 cents on some of your points:

 

Charms is no longer accessible through mouse (don't know if this is just me) > Although its enabled by default charms mouse acessibility isnt working (Feedback it if you havent done so) and Windows Key + C will have to do for now.

 

Apps cannont be switched to full-screen, Unless your talking about normal apps which is normal behaviour for them not to go full-screen, metro apps can be set to full-screen by pressing the Wonderfull new Button ... right after the apps icon on the oposite side of minimize,maximize and close.

 

As a unfinished software its supposed to have its "new experiences" as you call them less than satisfiable especially considering it still has a full year at least in development.

Really hope they don't throw out the baby with the bathwater of Metro.  I want 8.1 on touch and WinOne on k+m.  I want Charms on touch, but not on the desktop.  Its ok to be split-brained if you handle the transition effectively which is where they failed before.

 

Do we really need a poll for what should be self-evident?

Stop worrying about the Charms bar, that's almost certainly going away once they finish the UI (which is nowhere near complete at this stage).

It's evolving, but it won't be going away, according to Joe Bielfiore.

Returning? It's still there. Press Win+C. ;)

 

Accessible only via a hot key means it's gone for the average user. I would say most average users didn't use it anyway because it was hidden. Most users who have windows 8 and I walk then through something over the phone and walk them through activating the charms bar have no idea what i'm talking about. I usually have them Do Windows key + C because they always screw up when trying to activate it with their mouse.

So the hidden black charms bar along the right side of the screen will be returning in Windows 10?

Would make sense for the mobile devices, easier to access, maybe after Continuum makes it in or the CP? *shrug*

As far as the poll goes.. Eh I wouldn't say crippled (in 8.x), but definitely needed refinement yet. So far, on the desktop side, it's a huge improvement, a bit more work needed yet personally.. as long as they keep it friendly for touch for the mobile devices, it'll be pretty slick.

Accessible only via a hot key means it's gone for the average user.

For right now. But consumer features are coming later, at which point, I'm sure you'll see it again. Right now, Windows 10 only has about 10% of its over all planned feature set.

For right now. But consumer features are coming later, at which point, I'm sure you'll see it again. Right now, Windows 10 only has about 10% of its over all planned feature set.

 

I think only a few consumers even knew the charms bar was ever in windows 8.

I think only a few consumers even knew the charms bar was ever in windows 8.

Shoot saw tons of complaints about accidentally triggering the thing when 8.0 was released.. wasn't hard to find, even when you didn't mean to. (Never mind it flat out shows you how to do it the first time using your system, reeeealy hard to miss.)
  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
    • If you don’t get lucky with Valve’s Steam Machine reservation system, you can make your own Steam Machine instead. Valve says that “starting with the SteamOS 3.8 release, you can put together your own Steam Machine using whatever PC parts you want.” SteamOS 3.8.10 launched last week with a slew of updates, including “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” Alongside that improved compatibility, Valve is giving gamers the green light to install SteamOS on their own desktops. In an interview with The Verge, Valve’s Pierre-Loup Griffais said Valve has been “rolling out improvements to [SteamOS] so it’s more compatible with desktop hardware,” including eventual support for Nvidia graphics. Griffais says Valve has “a growing team” working on Nvidia driver support for SteamOS, adding, “We’re collaborating with Nvidia very closely.” While he mentioned that Nvidia support might not come this year, Griffais emphasized that “it’s certainly something that we’re working on in the background.”     Subscription not needed: https://archive.fo/Tssfc Subscription needed: https://www.theverge.com/games/953411/valve-steamos-desktop-nvidia
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!