32 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you think the Modern UI was crippled?

    • Yes
      14
    • No
      18
  2. 2. Do you feel a loss when upgrading from 8 to 10?

    • Yes
      7
    • No
      25


Recommended Posts

So after playing around with the new Technical Preview, I have come to a couple of conclusions. First and foremost, the main thing here is it is a PREVIEW so nothing is final.

 

However, I noticed a couple of things. 

 

  • The Taskbar now prominently shows on the Start Screen and is more pesky then on 8.1 Update
  • Charms is no longer accessible through mouse (don't know if this is just me)
  • Right click on the Start screen, and you get a new settings option in the right-click menu that opens the start settings
  • Bing Apps (now MSN) have smaller buttons within the apps and the text is smaller in the weather app
  • The updated MSN apps feel more crowded than before
  • Google Chrome (which runs on desktop mode) has an extra bar along the side due to the Modernization of the window borders, thinner borders
  • Apps cannot be switched to full screen mode. 
  • Without the App Switcher, switching between Modern UI apps is clunky with the new Task View
  • I AM liking the multi-desktop feature though
  • I cannot resize a Modern UI app vertically to less than 2/3 of the screen vertically
  • Especially on the SP3, the new experience is less than satisfiable
  • The icons are some Modern, mostly Vista, some XP and some 95/98 STILL
  • the repetitive apps are really shown as they are now side by side (calculator)
  • The gesture for closing an app quickly (swipe down) is gone 

I hated metro in windows 8 on my desktops so the changes in the tech preview have made that experience much better. However as you say, the touch friendlyness has definitely gone down. I'm afraid to load it on my SP3 as yet since it's obviously not finished. From what I've seen with my VM, on my tablet I will miss the quick swiping left thumb move and the swipe down to close.

 

Those may be reinstated as they finish work on the continuum feature where it switches between desktop-first and tablet-first depending on the attached peripherals. But this is the way it should have always been. Context-aware I mean; and not trying to forcefeed metro and the start screen on everyone. That has backfired badly for them obviously.

  • Charms is no longer accessible through mouse (don't know if this is just me)
You're right! Bits of Charms are gone even when the Start Screen is enabled. This means that certain personalization settings cannot be accessed to change logon/Start Screen colors.

What I kind of dislike is the "PC settings" throws you into a fullscreen "modern" mode..

 

Do you run it in a VM by any chance or did you install it on a PC without touch?   I have it in a VM on vbox and the input settings is for "tablet" or something along those lines.   I think if the system sees that you have touch as a option it will default modern apps to full screen when you first open them.   At least now we can change that and move them around like other desktop apps.

 

Anyways, on topic, I voted no to both because they were clear cut about the nature of this preview build, it's for core keyboard and desktop users and not for touch users.  JoeB was clear about who this targeted, and besides we know the touch first parts are coming, they're not in this build though, heck Continuum isn't even in this build.

'The icons are some Modern, mostly Vista, some XP and some 95/98 STILL'

Yes, they STILL are! :laugh: In the early days of using XP, I used to change all icons to Windows 98's variants, and even go to the extent of replacing XP sounds with 98's! Now that's CLASSIC.

 

Apps cannot be switched to full screen mode. 

 

 

Yes that can actually be done by using the charms menu in modern apps. In a modern app's window titlebar, there should be a "..." button, click that and then choose Full Screen.

Lots of "modern" apps don't like to be used inside a window, mostly games, they don't redraw correctly to account for the window size.  Devs will have to upgrade all their modern apps for Win10.

 

And yes, lots of swipe gesture are gone in this preview, hope they come back soon.  Won't be installing this on my SP3 because of that.

I'm sure developers will just have to run their app through VS and make some minor changes so that they can better support windowed modes in 10, I don't think lots of work will be needed.

This is unfinished and focused on the desktop UI side of things. I'm not going to draw any conclusions about Win 10's incarnation of Modern based on this preview.

 

Stop worrying about the Charms bar, that's almost certainly going away once they finish the UI (which is nowhere near complete at this stage).

 

And that's what worries me. I'd prefer the Charms bar be made useful on the desktop side, not removed. How can a central control panel for settings, printing etc. not be a good thing?

 

So after playing around with the new Technical Preview, I have come to a couple of conclusions. First and foremost, the main thing here is it is a PREVIEW so nothing is final.

 

However, I noticed a couple of things. 

 

  • The Taskbar now prominently shows on the Start Screen and is more pesky then on 8.1 Update
  • Charms is no longer accessible through mouse (don't know if this is just me)
  • Right click on the Start screen, and you get a new settings option in the right-click menu that opens the start settings
  • Bing Apps (now MSN) have smaller buttons within the apps and the text is smaller in the weather app
  • The updated MSN apps feel more crowded than before
  • Google Chrome (which runs on desktop mode) has an extra bar along the side due to the Modernization of the window borders, thinner borders
  • Apps cannot be switched to full screen mode. 
  • Without the App Switcher, switching between Modern UI apps is clunky with the new Task View
  • I AM liking the multi-desktop feature though
  • I cannot resize a Modern UI app vertically to less than 2/3 of the screen vertically
  • Especially on the SP3, the new experience is less than satisfiable
  • The icons are some Modern, mostly Vista, some XP and some 95/98 STILL
  • the repetitive apps are really shown as they are now side by side (calculator)
  • The gesture for closing an app quickly (swipe down) is gone 

 

Soo heres my 2 cents on some of your points:

 

Charms is no longer accessible through mouse (don't know if this is just me) > Although its enabled by default charms mouse acessibility isnt working (Feedback it if you havent done so) and Windows Key + C will have to do for now.

 

Apps cannont be switched to full-screen, Unless your talking about normal apps which is normal behaviour for them not to go full-screen, metro apps can be set to full-screen by pressing the Wonderfull new Button ... right after the apps icon on the oposite side of minimize,maximize and close.

 

As a unfinished software its supposed to have its "new experiences" as you call them less than satisfiable especially considering it still has a full year at least in development.

Really hope they don't throw out the baby with the bathwater of Metro.  I want 8.1 on touch and WinOne on k+m.  I want Charms on touch, but not on the desktop.  Its ok to be split-brained if you handle the transition effectively which is where they failed before.

 

Do we really need a poll for what should be self-evident?

Stop worrying about the Charms bar, that's almost certainly going away once they finish the UI (which is nowhere near complete at this stage).

It's evolving, but it won't be going away, according to Joe Bielfiore.

Returning? It's still there. Press Win+C. ;)

 

Accessible only via a hot key means it's gone for the average user. I would say most average users didn't use it anyway because it was hidden. Most users who have windows 8 and I walk then through something over the phone and walk them through activating the charms bar have no idea what i'm talking about. I usually have them Do Windows key + C because they always screw up when trying to activate it with their mouse.

So the hidden black charms bar along the right side of the screen will be returning in Windows 10?

Would make sense for the mobile devices, easier to access, maybe after Continuum makes it in or the CP? *shrug*

As far as the poll goes.. Eh I wouldn't say crippled (in 8.x), but definitely needed refinement yet. So far, on the desktop side, it's a huge improvement, a bit more work needed yet personally.. as long as they keep it friendly for touch for the mobile devices, it'll be pretty slick.

Accessible only via a hot key means it's gone for the average user.

For right now. But consumer features are coming later, at which point, I'm sure you'll see it again. Right now, Windows 10 only has about 10% of its over all planned feature set.

For right now. But consumer features are coming later, at which point, I'm sure you'll see it again. Right now, Windows 10 only has about 10% of its over all planned feature set.

 

I think only a few consumers even knew the charms bar was ever in windows 8.

I think only a few consumers even knew the charms bar was ever in windows 8.

Shoot saw tons of complaints about accidentally triggering the thing when 8.0 was released.. wasn't hard to find, even when you didn't mean to. (Never mind it flat out shows you how to do it the first time using your system, reeeealy hard to miss.)
  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!