32 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you think the Modern UI was crippled?

    • Yes
      14
    • No
      18
  2. 2. Do you feel a loss when upgrading from 8 to 10?

    • Yes
      7
    • No
      25


Recommended Posts

So after playing around with the new Technical Preview, I have come to a couple of conclusions. First and foremost, the main thing here is it is a PREVIEW so nothing is final.

 

However, I noticed a couple of things. 

 

  • The Taskbar now prominently shows on the Start Screen and is more pesky then on 8.1 Update
  • Charms is no longer accessible through mouse (don't know if this is just me)
  • Right click on the Start screen, and you get a new settings option in the right-click menu that opens the start settings
  • Bing Apps (now MSN) have smaller buttons within the apps and the text is smaller in the weather app
  • The updated MSN apps feel more crowded than before
  • Google Chrome (which runs on desktop mode) has an extra bar along the side due to the Modernization of the window borders, thinner borders
  • Apps cannot be switched to full screen mode. 
  • Without the App Switcher, switching between Modern UI apps is clunky with the new Task View
  • I AM liking the multi-desktop feature though
  • I cannot resize a Modern UI app vertically to less than 2/3 of the screen vertically
  • Especially on the SP3, the new experience is less than satisfiable
  • The icons are some Modern, mostly Vista, some XP and some 95/98 STILL
  • the repetitive apps are really shown as they are now side by side (calculator)
  • The gesture for closing an app quickly (swipe down) is gone 

I hated metro in windows 8 on my desktops so the changes in the tech preview have made that experience much better. However as you say, the touch friendlyness has definitely gone down. I'm afraid to load it on my SP3 as yet since it's obviously not finished. From what I've seen with my VM, on my tablet I will miss the quick swiping left thumb move and the swipe down to close.

 

Those may be reinstated as they finish work on the continuum feature where it switches between desktop-first and tablet-first depending on the attached peripherals. But this is the way it should have always been. Context-aware I mean; and not trying to forcefeed metro and the start screen on everyone. That has backfired badly for them obviously.

  • Charms is no longer accessible through mouse (don't know if this is just me)
You're right! Bits of Charms are gone even when the Start Screen is enabled. This means that certain personalization settings cannot be accessed to change logon/Start Screen colors.

What I kind of dislike is the "PC settings" throws you into a fullscreen "modern" mode..

 

Do you run it in a VM by any chance or did you install it on a PC without touch?   I have it in a VM on vbox and the input settings is for "tablet" or something along those lines.   I think if the system sees that you have touch as a option it will default modern apps to full screen when you first open them.   At least now we can change that and move them around like other desktop apps.

 

Anyways, on topic, I voted no to both because they were clear cut about the nature of this preview build, it's for core keyboard and desktop users and not for touch users.  JoeB was clear about who this targeted, and besides we know the touch first parts are coming, they're not in this build though, heck Continuum isn't even in this build.

'The icons are some Modern, mostly Vista, some XP and some 95/98 STILL'

Yes, they STILL are! :laugh: In the early days of using XP, I used to change all icons to Windows 98's variants, and even go to the extent of replacing XP sounds with 98's! Now that's CLASSIC.

 

Apps cannot be switched to full screen mode. 

 

 

Yes that can actually be done by using the charms menu in modern apps. In a modern app's window titlebar, there should be a "..." button, click that and then choose Full Screen.

Lots of "modern" apps don't like to be used inside a window, mostly games, they don't redraw correctly to account for the window size.  Devs will have to upgrade all their modern apps for Win10.

 

And yes, lots of swipe gesture are gone in this preview, hope they come back soon.  Won't be installing this on my SP3 because of that.

I'm sure developers will just have to run their app through VS and make some minor changes so that they can better support windowed modes in 10, I don't think lots of work will be needed.

This is unfinished and focused on the desktop UI side of things. I'm not going to draw any conclusions about Win 10's incarnation of Modern based on this preview.

 

Stop worrying about the Charms bar, that's almost certainly going away once they finish the UI (which is nowhere near complete at this stage).

 

And that's what worries me. I'd prefer the Charms bar be made useful on the desktop side, not removed. How can a central control panel for settings, printing etc. not be a good thing?

 

So after playing around with the new Technical Preview, I have come to a couple of conclusions. First and foremost, the main thing here is it is a PREVIEW so nothing is final.

 

However, I noticed a couple of things. 

 

  • The Taskbar now prominently shows on the Start Screen and is more pesky then on 8.1 Update
  • Charms is no longer accessible through mouse (don't know if this is just me)
  • Right click on the Start screen, and you get a new settings option in the right-click menu that opens the start settings
  • Bing Apps (now MSN) have smaller buttons within the apps and the text is smaller in the weather app
  • The updated MSN apps feel more crowded than before
  • Google Chrome (which runs on desktop mode) has an extra bar along the side due to the Modernization of the window borders, thinner borders
  • Apps cannot be switched to full screen mode. 
  • Without the App Switcher, switching between Modern UI apps is clunky with the new Task View
  • I AM liking the multi-desktop feature though
  • I cannot resize a Modern UI app vertically to less than 2/3 of the screen vertically
  • Especially on the SP3, the new experience is less than satisfiable
  • The icons are some Modern, mostly Vista, some XP and some 95/98 STILL
  • the repetitive apps are really shown as they are now side by side (calculator)
  • The gesture for closing an app quickly (swipe down) is gone 

 

Soo heres my 2 cents on some of your points:

 

Charms is no longer accessible through mouse (don't know if this is just me) > Although its enabled by default charms mouse acessibility isnt working (Feedback it if you havent done so) and Windows Key + C will have to do for now.

 

Apps cannont be switched to full-screen, Unless your talking about normal apps which is normal behaviour for them not to go full-screen, metro apps can be set to full-screen by pressing the Wonderfull new Button ... right after the apps icon on the oposite side of minimize,maximize and close.

 

As a unfinished software its supposed to have its "new experiences" as you call them less than satisfiable especially considering it still has a full year at least in development.

Really hope they don't throw out the baby with the bathwater of Metro.  I want 8.1 on touch and WinOne on k+m.  I want Charms on touch, but not on the desktop.  Its ok to be split-brained if you handle the transition effectively which is where they failed before.

 

Do we really need a poll for what should be self-evident?

Stop worrying about the Charms bar, that's almost certainly going away once they finish the UI (which is nowhere near complete at this stage).

It's evolving, but it won't be going away, according to Joe Bielfiore.

Returning? It's still there. Press Win+C. ;)

 

Accessible only via a hot key means it's gone for the average user. I would say most average users didn't use it anyway because it was hidden. Most users who have windows 8 and I walk then through something over the phone and walk them through activating the charms bar have no idea what i'm talking about. I usually have them Do Windows key + C because they always screw up when trying to activate it with their mouse.

So the hidden black charms bar along the right side of the screen will be returning in Windows 10?

Would make sense for the mobile devices, easier to access, maybe after Continuum makes it in or the CP? *shrug*

As far as the poll goes.. Eh I wouldn't say crippled (in 8.x), but definitely needed refinement yet. So far, on the desktop side, it's a huge improvement, a bit more work needed yet personally.. as long as they keep it friendly for touch for the mobile devices, it'll be pretty slick.

Accessible only via a hot key means it's gone for the average user.

For right now. But consumer features are coming later, at which point, I'm sure you'll see it again. Right now, Windows 10 only has about 10% of its over all planned feature set.

For right now. But consumer features are coming later, at which point, I'm sure you'll see it again. Right now, Windows 10 only has about 10% of its over all planned feature set.

 

I think only a few consumers even knew the charms bar was ever in windows 8.

I think only a few consumers even knew the charms bar was ever in windows 8.

Shoot saw tons of complaints about accidentally triggering the thing when 8.0 was released.. wasn't hard to find, even when you didn't mean to. (Never mind it flat out shows you how to do it the first time using your system, reeeealy hard to miss.)
  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!