Recommended Posts

The latest release estimate for PS4?s Gran Turismo 7 is some time over the next two years.
 
?For GT7, myself and my staff have a clear vision: to do everything we couldn?t do in GT6,? series creator Kazunori Yamauchi told GamesTM. ?We want to make it very Gran Turismo. By that I mean it?s going to be a game that matches the very era that we live in, in 2015 or 2016.
 
?Everything will be running naturally. PS3 was much, much more difficult. The high quality of data that we have being rendered on the PS4 I think is going to make an incredible difference.?
 
The series has a reputation for delays. PS2 title Gran Turismo 4 was delayed by a year and a half before arriving in early 2005 while Gran Turismo 5 was announced in 2006 but didn?t actually arrive until late 2010, and that was after a string of delays.
 
It looked as if Gran Turismo 6 would go the same way when in September last year Yamauchi said that the game was only ?80 per cent done? and later that the schedule was ?very tight?, although the PS3 racer did subsequently arrive as planned in December 2013.
 
Just prior to this, however, Yamauchi hinted that Gran Turismo 7 could arrive as early as this year, having suggested prior to this that the game could in fact be a re-jig of Gran Turismo 6 ? which was little surprise as sales of the game fell well short of the series standards, presumably due to the fact that it arrived after the launch of the PS3?s successor.
 
However, this summer Yamauchi admitted that a 2014 release was unlikely.

 

 

Source: http://www.mcvuk.com/news/read/yamauchi-says-gran-turismo-7-will-be-with-us-in-2015-or-2016/0139716

 

Gran Turismo 6 on PS3 was a NOT-needed product. I agree it was better experience compared to GT5, Polyphony got their priorities horribly wrong. 

 

Gran Truismo 6 should have been PS4 title with launch at Fall of 2014.

 

With Drive Club flopping, now we gotta wait for 2 more years to have a decent racer.

So GT7 will be around the time of FM6 or FH3....

And fans of GT won't care, so your point is Forza being pumped out yearly makes it the superior game?

Besides GT6 (which is still at 2.5-3m) no other PS platform exclusive sells like GT. Don't think Sony mind waiting a few years between releases.

bi yearly.

 

and actually, GT fans do care. how much complaining has there been about GT's late release and delays. 

 

I also think Sony does care, and that's why Drive Club exist, as a poker to poke PD and get them into gear. 

bi yearly.

 

and actually, GT fans do care. how much complaining has there been about GT's late release and delays. 

 

The Forza name is still going to a title each year. People would rather compare FH2 than F5 to Driveclub, so it just goes to show it doesn't matter if it's a spin off with the Forza name, people will compare it to anything racing related.

 

If you wanted to be fair in comparison as well, Horizon is actually made by Playground Games. GT would never be co-developed or given to another development studio, or even have a spin-off. If open world is going to come to GT it'll come within GT, just like kart racing or dirt-track racing or Nascar.

 

I agree the GT5 delays were a bit mental, but to a GT fan, with a PS, they're going to buy GT when it comes out regardless of what Forza is doing. The sales figures prove that, hence me saying if GT7 hits in 2015, or even 2016, it won't really matter what Forza has done, it'll sell just fine. You entered the GT7 release date topic just to say this is what Forza may have done by then, I answered that with a reply questioning what will it matter?

A lot of Racing/driving simulator fans(who care more about the sim aspect than the title of the game) has switched to Forza due to the release delays though.  their release schedule is ridiculous and inexcusable. there is no reason it should take this long. 

 

and it is unfortunate since We need GT release to create competition to make all games better. 

A lot of Racing/driving simulator fans(who care more about the sim aspect than the title of the game) has switched to Forza due to the release delays though.  their release schedule is ridiculous and inexcusable. there is no reason it should take this long. 

 

and it is unfortunate since We need GT release to create competition to make all games better. 

 

What is this based on, your friends? Sure some people will have, but GT5 has hit over 10m sales - http://www.polyphony.co.jp/english/list.html

 

I don't think Sony/PD have to worry that much. 

A lot of Racing/driving simulator fans(who care more about the sim aspect than the title of the game) has switched to Forza due to the release delays though.  their release schedule is ridiculous and inexcusable. there is no reason it should take this long. 

 

and it is unfortunate since We need GT release to create competition to make all games better. 

 

Care to back that up? 

Was reading GTPlanet just now and stumbled upon this post from a member there that hit the nail right on the spot (Y) -
 

PD has already produced software that can run 16 ridiculously detailed cars (and now runs them with adaptive tessellation) in one frame, with a dynamic lighting engine and a day/night cycle, and a super-detailed dynamic weather system, all at (roughly) 1080p @ 60fps, on hardware with difficult architecture from 2006.

I have very little doubt that they can achieve 1080x1920 @60fps on dev-friendly architecture with about 16x the power.

Honestly I don't see why people have an ounce of worry in this regard, unless they try to do another visual cram on this generation, like combining 100 cars on track with perfect anti-aliasing, ray-tracing reflections, volumetric smoke/mist, and dynamic/interactive terrain/track borders in one sitting.

I would imagine they'll try to push the hardware as they always seem to do, but it seems they've learned from their past mistakes. It seems they felt it would be bad taste to go backwards from GT5's visuals, so they found ways to make them more efficient in GT6, while simultaneously increasing their strength. If I'm not mistaken, GT5 ran at 1080x1280, and then GT6 was upgraded to 1440 vertical... So PD is insane when it comes to their capabilities of data compression and efficiency.

 
PD should not really have any issues adapting to the PS4 hardware, if anything; development might go faster ( :laugh: ) but they still need to keep the current (GT6) user base happy with features that should have been in the game from the start, B-Spec/Course Maker to name a few and the magical sound update but I guessing that in particular is destined for GT7. Just hope they deliver on their promises on next-gen hardware ....
 
IIRC Dan Greenawalt said in an interview last year that Forza 5 is steering away from the hardcore simulation racer as in previous games and merging more gaming to the franchise (with Drivatar as an example). It's a decent game but lacks things I find in the GT series - day/night cycles on most tracks, manual pit stops, realistic fuel consumption/tire degradation and dynamic weather.

  • Like 2

 

 

PD has already produced software that can run 16 ridiculously detailed cars (and now runs them with adaptive tessellation) in one frame, with a dynamic lighting engine and a day/night cycle, and a super-detailed dynamic weather system, all at (roughly) 1080p @ 60fps, on hardware with difficult architecture from 2006.

 

 

To bad that part isn't actually true though.  unless by "roughly" he means "a completely diffrent much lower resolution"

Yep, Spec II at the end of its first anniversary - hopefully :laugh:

 

I genuinely think the game could be out next year, in Nov/Dec. The PS4 is much easier to develop for, and the turnaround for GT6 was quick.

 

The only thing I think that could hold it back is Kaz's "visions". He kept saying he wanted some sort of real world/open world simulator added to GT5. I think for GT7 just do what makes sense, GT with tons of content and cars, and taking advantage of the PS4, instead of the grind on the PS3 to get the high resolution/60fps/weather and everything else you wonder how they managed.

If you wanted to be fair in comparison as well, Horizon is actually made by Playground Games. GT would never be co-developed or given to another development studio, or even have a spin-off. If open world is going to come to GT it'll come within GT, just like kart racing or dirt-track racing or Nascar.

If Horizon is a good game, its a good game, regardless of developer. I'm not sure what kind of 'critique' your trying to make other than you see no point is having separate games that cater to different styles. If GT wants to integrate more arcade styles, then great. I'm just not sure that is what most GT fans want.

The proper GT comparison is still the standard Forza games. So when GT 7 is out that might be Forza 6. Horizon may have sim elements, but its clearly more focused on the open world arcade style. GT is all about the sim focus along with Forza.

I agree the GT5 delays were a bit mental, but to a GT fan, with a PS, they're going to buy GT when it comes out regardless of what Forza is doing. The sales figures prove that, hence me saying if GT7 hits in 2015, or even 2016, it won't really matter what Forza has done, it'll sell just fine.

I feel the same way. These racing series have a strong fan base that is pretty loyal. Sure, people will complain and have legitimate issues, but if a game like GT is good, they will be there day one.

If Horizon is a good game, its a good game, regardless of developer. I'm not sure what kind of 'critique' your trying to make other than you see no point is having separate games that cater to different styles. If GT wants to integrate more arcade styles, then great. I'm just not sure that is what most GT fans want.

The proper GT comparison is still the standard Forza games. So when GT 7 is out that might be Forza 6. Horizon may have sim elements, but its clearly more focused on the open world arcade style. GT is all about the sim focus along with Forza.

I feel the same way. These racing series have a strong fan base that is pretty loyal. Sure, people will complain and have legitimate issues, but if a game like GT is good, they will be there day one.

 

That wasn't my point.

 

It was that PD aren't going to be working on two titles at once, Forza has two main branches now and a lot of staff across two studios. PD are one studio and make one game at a time.

With Drive Club flopping, now we gotta wait for 2 more years to have a decent racer.

Actually, you might only have to wait another month; Project CARS comes out in November and I'm pretty confident that'll satisfy most Gran Turismo fans while they're waiting for GT7.

That wasn't my point.

 

It was that PD aren't going to be working on two titles at once, Forza has two main branches now and a lot of staff across two studios. PD are one studio and make one game at a time.

Ah ok that is much clearer.

As you pointed out, Turn 10 will continue to focus just on main Forza while Playground works on Horizon.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
    • Rufus alternative Ventoy now supports Windows 11's mandatory update, fixes major boot bug by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has its own official Media Creation Tool used for making bootable USB media, there are some popular third-party utilities as well which offer additional options like bypassing system requirements, Microsoft Account creation, and more. One of these is Ventoy, and the software has received its latest update today. In fact, the app actually got a slew of updates over the last couple of days, three version releases in total, to be specific. The first release, version 1.1.13, was pulled as there was some unspecified error in the update, and as such, the corrected version 1.1.14 was pushed out. Following that on very short notice, 1.1.15 was published as well. For those unfamiliar, Ventoy is an open-source utility that lets users create a bootable USB drive once and then simply copy ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD, or EFI files onto it without repeatedly formatting the drive. It supports both legacy BIOS and UEFI boot modes, Secure Boot, and a wide range of operating systems, making it one of the most versatile tools in the category. The biggest change in version 1.1.14 is an updated Secure Boot shim file aimed at resolving the UEFI CA 2023 issue, which is basically a compatibility problem that has affected Secure Boot environments on some systems. If you recall, we reported about severe boot issues on HP devices following the release of updated Secure Boot 2023 keys. For anyone who may not be aware, back in early 2024, Microsoft announced that it was updating Secure Boot keys as they were going to become 15 years old in 2026, which is also when they are set to expire. As such, the new 2023 certificates have been rolling out with the newest Windows 11 updates. Updated boot manager and Secure Boot certificates are crucial for protection against malware like bootkits. These are mandatory updates. Alongside that, the VentoyPlugson graphical plugin configurator was updated in sync with the release. The update also introduces a new VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option within the Global Control plugin, giving users more flexibility in managing Secure Boot behavior. Ventoy has also received a fix for a startup issue when Secure Boot was disabled. Microsoft does officially allow users to boot systems without Secure Boot as long as the PC is Secure Boot capable. The full changelog is given below: Update secure boot shim file to solve the UEFI CA 2023 issue. The new release use a new CA, so you need to enroll the new key for the first boot time. VentoyPlugson update synchronously. Global control plugin add a VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option. Fix the boot issue when Secure Boot is disabled in the UEFI firmware. You can download the latest version of the app here on Ventoy's official GitHub repo or from Neowin software stories.
    • Windows 11 is fine, no issues on any of the machines I've run it on since release. The stricter security requirements are a good thing, sometimes the baseline needs to change and people will winge, but it is what it is. Happened with the move from 9x to NT - broke compatability Happened with XP SP2 when security started to become a serious consideration Certainly happend with Vista that brought in UAC, the concept of not running as admin (something that has been the norm in Linux/Unix from pretty much the start) and a completely new driver stack. Windows 11 will probably get looked back at as the point where even consumer and SMB IT was dragged kicking and screaming into a somewhat secure by default configuration.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!