Recommended Posts

Playing the campaigns of the first two Halo games just reminds me why I never liked them -- Bungie was absolutely terrible at designing levels.

 

What about them don't you like? Out of curiosity.

What about them don't you like? Out of curiosity.

Not really sure what kind of clarification you're looking for. I think the level design in the first two games is, for the most part, absolutely abysmal. There are a few bright spots, such as The Silent Cartographer, but the majority of the levels -- especially those after the Flood are introduced in the first game -- have exceptionally poor designs where the environments are merely repeat after repeat of the same kinds of rooms with wave after wave of enemies, something that should have ended after first-person shooters made the jump to truly 3D environments.

 

To top it off, on several levels there are multiple instances of the budget-bin FPS cliche: an enemy with a massively overpowered weapon popping out at the last second, a poor design choice that seemed to have ended years before the first Halo came out. Yet in Halo, Bungie apparently thought it'd be a good design choice to place a random Flood-infected marine with a rocket launcher at the end of a hallway following a major fight just for the sake of it. I'm not saying that because it makes the game more difficult -- I've been every Halo game multiple times, on legendary solo at least once for each title -- just because it's such a terrible gimmick.

 

A bigger issue I have is that there's no atmosphere to any of the Forerunner and Covenant areas in Bungie's original graphics for the first two games, making the sameness of the design even more grating. Bungie went on to rectify this in "Halo 3," but the first two Halo games lack almost any atmosphere for non-UNSC areas. It's a shame, because Bungie did a terrific job designing the Pillar of Autumn, and the level design in The Silent Cartographer is fantastic, but it seems like they ran out of steam after the first few levels of both "Halo" and "Halo 2."

 

I'm fully aware that you're a big fan of the first two games, and my response isn't to engage in some sort of argument, it's merely to clarify my position. I respect your opinion and can understand why you love the games, but for me their level designs are among the weakest of any major first-person shooter games released around their time frames.

So I'm still having a ridiculously hard time playing MCC with some friends. It takes some jujitsu to try and get me and a couple of friends into a game session in order to do some matchmaking. Even more difficult when there's any guest accounts involved. We often have to resort to doing a custom game, and even then there's frequent crashes/freezes and forced restarts that have to happen and then we have to jump through hoops to get back into the same game session again. It's abysmal.

 

I hope that now we're past the holiday break that 343 shapes up and fixes this sorry excuse for a release. It literally feels like they hardly tested this at all before releasing. Tsk tsk :(

 

To top it all off, even the recent UGC tournaments suffered from the numerous bugs in the game. You could notice this by the awkwardly long pauses between game sessions and the "exit the build" steps that kept happening on the big screen in the background. It's really embarrassing. 

I'm currently playing through the campaign on Halo:CE on the MCC.

 

Im going with Heroic for difficulty...  Was trying to give Legendary a shot, but just couldn't take dying a b'jillion times...

I'm still too awful for a heroic run, I tried back with Reach and only did the first level, with Halo 4 I got up to the point where the Prometheans got introduced, and I was so bad I had to get Timan to show me how to do the level :laugh:

  • Like 2

I'm still too awful for a heroic run, I tried back with Reach and only did the first level, with Halo 4 I got up to the point where the Prometheans got introduced, and I was so bad I had to get Timan to show me how to do the level :laugh:

 

 

I'm on Heroic for Halo:CE... And trust me, I take my share of deaths...

 

I definitely know when I'm doing ok, and I definitely know when I should just call it a day with Halo.

He's got a point though that even outside Neowin (he just said 'the press'), it doesn't seem to be a big deal, which actually does seem odd. Perhaps it's because there's a heck of a lot more to it than MP, but it does seem strange.

 

Lot of reviews criticized HTMCC for it's broken multiplayer.

I've played all the original releases on their respective consoles (Hey, Halo 1 on MCC is using the PC version, so I'm right at home) and I must say... they bumped the difficulty level up on all the games.

I'm still too awful for a heroic run, I tried back with Reach and only did the first level, with Halo 4 I got up to the point where the Prometheans got introduced, and I was so bad I had to get Timan to show me how to do the level :laugh:

You should get on with me than, you, myself and my buddie could get on Halo 1-4 legendary coop :p.

How are people finding this playing co-op?

 

I've found Halo 2 is extremely buggy, the game had crashed my console to the dashboard 6 times by the time myself and a mate got through the campaign doing split screen co-op...

 

One crash can be replicated every single time... on the regret level right at the end when your in the temple and you have to knock the prophet off his hovering thorn, the game freezes. You can hear the sound constantly repeating and after about 5-10 seconds the game crashes to the dashboard.

 

We tried 3 times on co-op and got the game to crash in the same place every time, I then did it on single player and was able to pass the level fine.

 

I posted the Halo 2 Game Crash Bug on the Waypoint Forums and it appears others have had the same issue too.

 

If you read the Master Chief Collection Forum on Halo Waypoint it appears many people are having issues with the campaign too.

Yeah, MP in the MCC is kinda a crapshoot, mainly due to how it's structured (Each game runs separately, as well as the UI. So a lobby in the UI needs to be created and joined separately in each game, transitioning between them, etc.)

...

You should get on with me than, you, myself and my buddie could get on Halo 1-4 legendary coop :p.

ha, thanks, but I'd be the straggler who kept dying all the time, never mind that I'm in Australia, so we're talking about a rather large amount of latency (My co-op run with Timan lasted a single map because of that)

No one said it'd be easy to take 4 different games and jam them together into one. Most if not all of the MP issues are probably because the code between the 4 games is different, I think they'll get it all fixed with a few more updates before the month is over though.

Yeap, unfortunately it still is very much broken. Practically unplayable with a party of 2 or more.

 

On the bright side, this has allowed me to spend more time with the Halo 5 Beta and it's really starting to grow on me! :)

 

They need to tone down the grenades in the Halo 5 Beta, so tired of them launching me into the air completely defenseless.

Actually it's not.

 

I'm afraid you might be on that island alone. Thousands of redditers, halowaypoint posts and tweets seem to suggest an alternate reality to yours.

 

Now, don't get me wrong. I'm probably the biggest Halo fan on this forum, but I can't even defend this at this point. It really is a mess, unfortunately. Facts are stubborn :(

  • Like 2

I haven't tried the H5 beta much because when I did it was pretty much entirely broken, my shots didn't hit, I'd get killed behind cover, etc.

Then I got stuck in a broken lobby before myself and had to exit to the dashboard and force quit the game.

I haven't tried the H5 beta much because when I did it was pretty much entirely broken, my shots didn't hit, I'd get killed behind cover, etc.

Then I got stuck in a broken lobby before myself and had to exit to the dashboard and force quit the game.

 

When was the last time you played? I think they've tweaked some settings and such and I haven't noticed the problem of getting hit behind cover, although some people say that's due to the amount of bullet magnetism in the game which I don't think has changed.

 

As for matchmaking, it seems to be much more consistent now, previously I had to quit the build often to get a working match but now it seems much smoother -- at least for Slayer. The other playlists take much longer to find a match, but they eventually do.

I'm afraid you might be on that island alone. Thousands of redditers, halowaypoint posts and tweets seem to suggest an alternate reality to yours.

 

Now, don't get me wrong. I'm probably the biggest Halo fan on this forum, but I can't even defend this at this point. It really is a mess, unfortunately. Facts are stubborn :(

 

Nope, not alone. In fact, I am on an planet with the majority. 10's of thousands of redditers, halowaypoint posts and tweet seem to suggest reality, as opposed to what you are suggesting. 

 

Though, I prefer dealing with facts. Nothing to defend since it is working great Loving it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • How can it beat a Steam machine without a serious GPU? The two CU iGPU only provides about 5fps in gaming. That's not going to make any gamer happy.
    • Anthropic introduces Claude Tag, a new AI teammate for Slack by Fiza Ali Anthropic has announced Claude Tag, a new feature that lets teams work with Claude directly inside Slack. The idea is simple: once Claude is added to a Slack workspace and given access to selected channels, users can tag @Claude in conversations and assign tasks. Claude can then work through those requests using connected tools and data sources before posting its results back into a Slack thread. What makes Claude Tag different from a typical chatbot is that it's designed to operate as a shared assistant for an entire team rather than a single user. Everyone in a channel interacts with the same Claude instance. This allows the team members to see ongoing work and continue tasks started by others. Furthermore, Anthropic says the AI can build context over time by following conversations in channels where it has permission to operate. This means users don't have to repeatedly provide the same background information for every request. The system is also designed for asynchronous work. Instead of waiting for responses in a chat window, users can assign a task to Claude and return later once the work is complete. Anthropic says Claude can break larger requests into multiple steps and use connected tools to complete them. Moreover, the system can also schedule follow-up tasks and continue working on projects over extended periods. Another feature allows Claude to keep the users updated and follow up on unresolved tasks when its optional "ambient" mode is enabled. The company says the tool is already being used internally for software development, data analysis, support workflows, and debugging. According to Anthropic, around 65% of its product team's code is now generated through its internal version of Claude Tag. For organisations concerned about security, administrators can control which channels, tools, and data sources Claude can access. Separate Claude instances can also be configured for different departments, helping keep information isolated between teams. Administrators can also monitor activity logs, review completed tasks, and set spending limits at both the organisation and channel level. Claude Tag is now available in beta for Claude Enterprise and Claude Team customers and runs on Claude Opus 4.8 that was announced this May. The feature will also replace Anthropic's existing Claude in Slack application, with current users able to migrate within a 30-day migration window. Lastly, eligible customers will receive introductory credits to help teams evaluate the new experience.
    • Beats Studio Pro wireless over-ear ANC headphones drop to their lowest price yet by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Beats Studio Pro headphones at their all-time low price. The Studio Pro use 40mm active drivers which are designed to improve clarity and reduce distortion compared to previous models, with up to an 80% improvement over the Beats Studio3 Wireless. A built-in digital processor adjusts frequency response to keep the sound balanced rather than overly boosted in any one area. They also include Active Noise Cancelling that adapts to your surroundings to reduce background noise along with a Transparency mode that lets outside sound in when you need awareness of what’s going on around you. Furthermore, the headphones support personalised Spatial Audio with dynamic head tracking as well as Dolby Atmos playback on supported content. Moreover, built-in voice-targeting microphones improve call quality. You can also switch between three sound profiles including Beats Signature for balanced music playback, Entertainment for films and gaming, and Conversation for clearer voice in calls and podcasts. Physically, they are designed to be worn for long periods without feeling heavy or awkward. The ear cushions use UltraPlush engineered leather while metal sliders allow you to adjust the fit. On the connectivity side, the Studio Pro use Class 1 Bluetooth for a stable, long-range wireless connection. There is also a 3.5mm input if you want to plug in directly, including use with in-flight entertainment systems. Controls are located on the headphones and include a "b" button for music and call control, a volume rocker, and a multifunction button used for switching listening modes, EQ settings, power, and pairing. In addition, the headphones offer integration with both Apple and Android devices. On Apple devices, they support one-touch pairing with iCloud-linked devices, hands-free Siri access, Find My tracking based on last connected location, and automatic software updates. On Android devices, they support Google Fast Pair, Audio Switch between compatible devices, and Google Find My Device tracking, with additional features available through the Beats app. When it comes to the battery performance, it is rated at up to 40 hours of listening time with ANC turned off, and up to 24 hours with ANC or Transparency mode enabled. A 10-minute Fast Fuel charge should provide up to 4 hours of playback. Finally, the headphones use a rechargeable lithium-ion battery and charge via USB-C. Beats Studio Pro Wireless Over-Ear ANC Headphones: $149.95 (Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • "lets you pause updates by choosing an end date, for up to 35 days" Wasn't it "indefinitely"?
    • Those extra reboots are related to the UEFI Secure Boot certificate update thing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      460
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      110
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!