Windows 8 hater finally upgrading (me)


Recommended Posts

I love aero glass, gorgeous gradients, shadows, and organization. Windows 7 was everything I wanted from Vista and I became a big fan and evangelist.

I Spewed Comments and friended order66 and others to bash Windows 8.1 and 10 for being too flat with pastel nursery colors.

I am learning flat design for a website I plan to work on and also need a lite OS to handle GS3 viritual routers and setup domains in vmware for my certifications. It is time to stop resisting change and clinging my fists in anxiety over colors.

I need an app to put 3d flip desktops back?

So far I installed

1. Glass8 nag where which does not put all chrome back as 7.

2. Stardocks start8 with a black color that is translucent

3. Just need a flip app to emulate Windows key tab

Glass8 alternatives would be nice too. Any suggestions?

Just tossing it out there, if you really like Aero/gradients/etc that much and it's running everything you need, why switch at all? You got 6 years left on it, not exactly a big rush, especially if your workflow isn't going to change, never mind 10's just around the corner, may be worth waiting for what may be better. Be easier to use the built-in stuff that works 100% versus mods and get a better looking result in the process. Not a fan of transparency myself (especially with programs that misuse/abuse it), also dislike the blue pastel gradients, ick, but *shrug* personal tastes and all that, you can change it, I personally do away with a lot of that on my 7 desktops. That goes for 8 too.. there are different themes for it that can really change how it looks.

As far as the flip 3D thing goes, never used it myself (felt it gimmicky, ranks up there with wobbly windows), but I recall a program that did similar.. WinFlip or something like that, no idea if it's any good or even still developed, so don't quote me on it, but it might do what you need, theres a few other alternate task switchers out there with effects that do that as well, seen a couple that even go as far as that silly cube thing if you're into that.

There are some sites that may still have a program called winflip, I used to use it in my xp days, made xp take on the scrollable screenshots you see on vista

I daren't offer a link as linking to some sites that could be considered rivals as breaking the rules (or at the very least will be picked up by neowin's spam filter, kinda like how the 6+1 forums do)

Just tossing it out there, if you really like Aero/gradients/etc that much and it's running everything you need, why switch at all? You got 6 years left on it, not exactly a big rush, especially if your workflow isn't going to change, never mind 10's just around the corner, may be worth waiting for what may be better. Be easier to use the built-in stuff that works 100% versus mods and get a better looking result in the process. Not a fan of transparency myself (especially with programs that misuse/abuse it), also dislike the blue pastel gradients, ick, but *shrug* personal tastes and all that, you can change it, I personally do away with a lot of that on my 7 desktops. That goes for 8 too.. there are different themes for it that can really change how it looks.

As far as the flip 3D thing goes, never used it myself (felt it gimmicky, ranks up there with wobbly windows), but I recall a program that did similar.. WinFlip or something like that, no idea if it's any good or even still developed, so don't quote me on it, but it might do what you need, theres a few other alternate task switchers out there with effects that do that as well, seen a couple that even go as far as that silly cube thing if you're into that.

 

Because I used to laugh at XP die hards getting mad at Microsoft for dumping XP after a mere 13 years. I would be no different.

 

Besides I need to emulate whole freakign Cisco switches and need something that doesn't slow down under a very heavy load. Dot Matrix and others are correct in that the world changes and things advance. If I stay on Windows 7 how will I adapt to change like Windows 10 or late. I want an xboxONE too. Guess which OS is better integrated. Windows 10 may even run xboxone games if www.maximumpc.com is correct.

 

With these utilities it is bareable.

 

Also my monitor has VERY HIGH GAMMA which is why I hated the initial bright Windows task bars in 8 and Office 2013. I turned it down now so it is barable. I think the flat look is here like Yosemite has it in MacOSX but it seems to be showing off a demo which is now outdated looking in comparison. A small light aero is what I hope in Windows 10 in the consumer preview. But there is a hostile move for white flat no colors inside Microsoft. Look at the job in Office 2013. At the last second color was removed knowing folks would be forced to use it in order to get used to it. Metro in 8 was there too.

Because I used to laugh at XP die hards getting mad at Microsoft for dumping XP after a mere 13 years. I would be no different.

 

Besides I need to emulate whole freakign Cisco switches and need something that doesn't slow down under a very heavy load. Dot Matrix and others are correct in that the world changes and things advance. If I stay on Windows 7 how will I adapt to change like Windows 10 or late. I want an xboxONE too. Guess which OS is better integrated. Windows 10 may even run xboxone games if www.maximumpc.com is correct.

 

With these utilities it is bareable.

 

Also my monitor has VERY HIGH GAMMA which is why I hated the initial bright Windows task bars in 8 and Office 2013. I turned it down now so it is barable. I think the flat look is here like Yosemite has it in MacOSX but it seems to be showing off a demo which is now outdated looking in comparison. A small light aero is what I hope in Windows 10 in the consumer preview. But there is a hostile move for white flat no colors inside Microsoft. Look at the job in Office 2013. At the last second color was removed knowing folks would be forced to use it in order to get used to it. Metro in 8 was there too.

I'm curious as to why Windows 8 is otherwise "unbearable" without these additions? Personally, I find that a GUI should be clean, simple, easy to use and understand, and not distracting to the user. These are the marks of a very effective UI.

 

Windows XP's default layout hit none of those marks. XP was an constant eyesore, and fought you every inch of the way. Windows 7 hits all of those marks, except from distracting the user with unnecessary effects. Windows 8/8.1 hits all these marks. If you're obsessing over glass, shadows, and gradients, then what kind of work are you doing? Yes, glass was cool at first, but when you're working or playing at your PC, glass is the last thing on anyone's mind. Also, more times than not, it's disabled in the workplace either by hardware restrictions, or by a group policy.

During the XP years the first thing I did was put classic on. I love to see blue and gray as it showed me which was active with ease.

Vista was bad with all black or clear which would be black behind something ekse. I tried Vista glaze which kept breaking. Win 7 was exactly what I wanted!

My gamma is too high which on 8 made white title bar suck. When you a put a dark color you can't see the text so WTF . Start screen 8 Don't Care About As much.

Over the years, I have learnt to not customize OS UI too much. Trying out third party mods and figuring out their side effects is so much pain than just realizing why a UI is designed like the way it is. I just then use available built-in options+features to somewhat customize it (such as checkbox selection in FileExplorer).

This IMO is the best way to use any OS without affecting its base performance.

Over the years, I have learnt to not customize OS UI too much. Trying out third party mods and figuring out their side effects is so much pain than just realizing why a UI is designed like the way it is. I just then use available built-in options+features to somewhat customize it (such as checkbox selection in FileExplorer).

This IMO is the best way to use any OS without affecting its base performance.

I am hoping Windows 10 will fix this come January

Windows 7 hits all of those marks, except from distracting the user with unnecessary effects. Windows 8/8.1 hits all these marks. If you're obsessing over glass, shadows, and gradients, then what kind of work are you doing? Yes, glass was cool at first, but when you're working or playing at your PC, glass is the last thing on anyone's mind. Also, more times than not, it's disabled in the workplace either by hardware restrictions, or by a group policy.

 

What?  Aero glass is distracting...or you kidding me?  You are the one who doesn't think having to switch to a full screen menu just to launch an application is distracting?  Aero glass is more distracting than that?  You know what is distracting...the start screen and not being able to read text with black borders.  That is distracting (to me anyway).  Glass was never distracting...just gave the OS a nice look.  Glass can be disabled...so your distraction is gone.  I do not understand your issue with giving users options.

 

You do realize that some actually like effects (and it doesn't hinder their work)...and your hypercritical way of thinking others should feel about their system is borderline obsessive.  Your point of view is always right and everyone else  (those with opposing views) is either wrong or you are "just curious" to why x,y and z.

Because I used to laugh at XP die hards getting mad at Microsoft for dumping XP after a mere 13 years. I would be no different.

Sure, but 7 isn't due to be retired for six more years. Can't stick to one version of an OS forever, but hardly not in a big rush either. If you wanted to you could easily wait till 10 or even further before you really have to switch. If it works, *shrug* stick with it, it's still getting updated, that's what matters.

Not that I'm a die-hard anything, I have a mix of 7 and 8, pick what works and just go with it, but really excited about 10.. looks like they're going to nail that one in a big way. End of the day though, after a short tweaking session, my 7 and 8 desktops are very similar in look and feel, about the only time it's blatantly obvious which one I'm on is when I see the boot splash or copying a file.

 

If I stay on Windows 7 how will I adapt to change like Windows 10 or late.

Judging by how it's going so far, probably much easier than the 7 to 8 transition, assuming a straight out-of-the-box setup with no tweakery of course, a few tweaks and they're very similar regardless.

 

My gamma is too high which on 8 made white title bar suck. When you a put a dark color you can't see the text so WTF .

Yea I don't get why they took out the option to adjust the text colors in the titlebars, that was an odd choice. Get a third party theme with white text and go from there, there's a couple that are identical to the stock theme but with white text, or go with something else entirely. My 8 desktops use a window border that's near black, totally usable.

What?  Aero glass is distracting...or you kidding me?

Personally wouldn't say distracting, but it can be hard to read sometimes, and it's just awful to look at when a program misuses it, a few programs were spectacularly bad with it. The only time I sorta (sometimes) like it is moving windows, but can do without it. Much prefer a flatter solid window frame myself, but *shrug* opinion and all that.

Personally wouldn't say distracting, but it can be hard to read sometimes, and it's just awful to look at when a program misuses it, a few programs were spectacularly bad with it. The only time I sorta (sometimes) like it is moving windows, but can do without it. Much prefer a flatter solid window frame myself, but *shrug* opinion and all that.

 

hmmm, never ran into a program that "misuses" it.  Not saying there isn't of course.  The flat solid color window frame is fine in Windows 8...however...my big beef is that I'm unable to read text on solid black frames  (I prefer black...including Aero glass).  I'm hoping Windows 10 makes changes to this (seen white text on black border with Metro so I'm hopeful).  I've ran 8 enough of my backup notebook to realize that (even with Classic Shell) there is no way I'll upgrade any of my other computers to it.

 

I agree with opinions but mostly options ...  

hmmm, never ran into a program that "misuses" it.  Not saying there isn't of course.  The flat solid color window frame is fine in Windows 8...however...my big beef is that I'm unable to read text on solid black frames.

A good example of glass gone bad is Thunderbird. Good lord, it's awful, and there's some others.. not an epidemic or anything but when it happens you see it in a big way. And like I said, it's just an opinion, I'm sure Aero has its fans, I'm just not one of them. Was spiffy going from XP to Vista but the novelty wore off years ago for me. As far as the black frames go, I touched on that in my previous post, you can edit the theme or get a pre-built with white text.. not sure why they removed that ability, kinda stupid.

I can agree that what's there isn't horribly over-used though. Some other desktops use it too much, for example taskbar popups or dialogs that have transparency.. reeeealy hard to read and borderline useless. Aero at least hits a nice balance between purty and usability.

A good example of glass gone bad is Thunderbird. Good lord, it's awful, and there's some others.. not an epidemic or anything but when it happens you see it in a big way. And like I said, it's just an opinion, I'm sure Aero has its fans, I'm just not one of them. Was spiffy going from XP to Vista but the novelty wore off years ago for me. As far as the black frames go, I touched on that in my previous post, you can edit the theme or get a pre-built with white text.. not sure why they removed that ability, kinda stupid.

Yea. Just googled an image of thunderbird with glass...It is pretty awful. Though I think a black aero would be ok (the image I saw was almost a goldish color theme)

I personally like Windows 7 including Aero and every thing else. If MS has to do flat UI then they should learn thing or two from OS X Yosemite. There is huge difference between flat ugly design (MS) and flat sober design. OS X flat design is aesthetic and less obtrusive than MS ugly looking UI with white space everywhere. Thing looks damn unbearable on my 30 inch UHD monitor with white empty space everywhere. I will be sticking to windows 7 and my Hackintosh for the long time. I am not interested in Win 10 as well. 

Completely off topic from the OPs original post.

 

Each to their own, but I find the glass effect in Vista and 7 very obtrusive.  The flat, colour matched look for Windows 8 is something which is much easier on the eyes.  I think Vista certainly was better than XP, but to me the glass, bevelled look is something that is just superfluous and quite tacky to be honest.  I personally took to the flat gradient free look of Windows 8 immediately.

 

I have 2 Windows 7 machines (i5 laptop and Xeon desktop), 2 Windows 8 machines (Atom laptop and Core 2 Duo desktop), an i3 laptop running the Windows 10 TP, an Arm based ChromeBook and I have an i5 MacBook on the way.

I'm curious as to why Windows 8 is otherwise "unbearable" without these additions? Personally, I find that a GUI should be clean, simple, easy to use and understand, and not distracting to the user. These are the marks of a very effective UI.

 

Windows XP's default layout hit none of those marks. XP was an constant eyesore, and fought you every inch of the way. Windows 7 hits all of those marks, except from distracting the user with unnecessary effects. Windows 8/8.1 hits all these marks. If you're obsessing over glass, shadows, and gradients, then what kind of work are you doing? Yes, glass was cool at first, but when you're working or playing at your PC, glass is the last thing on anyone's mind. Also, more times than not, it's disabled in the workplace either by hardware restrictions, or by a group policy.

Like I've said 10000 times directed at YOU, everyone is different.. Different strokes for different folks. 

 

On the other hand, I actually really like Windows 8.1, just the way it is.. I hated it at first.. But, you have to give it a real honest try.. 

I'm curious as to why Windows 8 is otherwise "unbearable" without these additions? Personally, I find that a GUI should be clean, simple, easy to use and understand, and not distracting to the user. These are the marks of a very effective UI.

 

Windows XP's default layout hit none of those marks. XP was an constant eyesore, and fought you every inch of the way. Windows 7 hits all of those marks, except from distracting the user with unnecessary effects. Windows 8/8.1 hits all these marks. If you're obsessing over glass, shadows, and gradients, then what kind of work are you doing? Yes, glass was cool at first, but when you're working or playing at your PC, glass is the last thing on anyone's mind. Also, more times than not, it's disabled in the workplace either by hardware restrictions, or by a group policy.

 

I can't even take you seriously any more. The amount of changes Microsoft has already implemented with Windows 10, a number of them that have moved away from your flawed, minimalistic view of how a desktop computing experience should be. You can have eye candy and still productive. My users number one complaint with both 8 and Office 2013 are the lack of glass, too much white, bright space. Users don't want to stare of a screen blank colors or bland desks. They appreciate a little eye candy when working on their computers 8 hours a day.

  • Like 2

I can't even take you seriously any more. The amount of changes Microsoft has already implemented with Windows 10, a number of them that have moved away from your flawed, minimalistic view of how a desktop computing experience should be. You can have eye candy and still productive. My users number one complaint with both 8 and Office 2013 are the lack of glass, too much white, bright space. Users don't want to stare of a screen blank colors or bland desks. They appreciate a little eye candy when working on their computers 8 hours a day.

I have yet to hear any complaints from the lack of glass. Many computers I support don't even have the feature turned on. Take me as little serious as you want, again, I still believe a good GUI is one that doesn't distract you from your work. If your users are complaining about glass, then it seems like they're less focused on the tasks they should be accomplishing, and more on wasting time.

I have yet to hear any complaints from the lack of glass. Many computers I support don't even have the feature turned on. Take me as little serious as you want, again, I still believe a good GUI is one that doesn't distract you from your work. If your users are complaining about glass, then it seems like they're less focused on the tasks they should be accomplishing, and more on wasting time.

Wasting time because they want glass enabled? Nonsense.

 

I suppose users complaining that Office 2013 is too bright, white and they don't like using it and tend to use it less makes them more productive too? I mean that certainly doesn't waste time at all, right? It's also why Office 2015 is getting changed up with a dark theme too, right?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Exactly, this is just the beginning. I hope that by that time, our inept politicians devise something like a Universal Basic Income, because unemployment and poverty rates will skyrocket otherwise. And believe me, robots that perform physical work aren't a matter of IF, but WHEN. No career is truly safe from AI/robots, it's just a matter of time.
    • Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Subtitle Edit is a powerful, free, and user-friendly subtitle editing tool designed for creating, editing, and converting subtitles for videos. It supports a wide range of subtitle formats, including SRT, ****, and SUB, allowing users to easily modify and adjust subtitles for accurate timing and formatting. With its intuitive interface, Subtitle Edit provides a variety of features such as waveform audio display, spell-check, subtitle synchronization, and real-time video preview, making it an ideal choice for both beginners and professionals. The software also includes powerful tools for batch processing, translating subtitles, and converting between different subtitle formats. Subtitle Edit features: Create/adjust/sync/translate subtitle lines Convert between SubRib, MicroDVD, Advanced Sub Station Alpha, Sub Station Alpha, D-Cinema, SAMI, youtube sbv, and many more (300+ different formats!) Cool audio visualizer control - can display wave form and/or spectrogram Video player uses mpv, DirectShow, or VLC media player Visually sync/adjust a subtitle (start/end position and speed) Audio to text (speech recognition) via Whisper or Vosk/Kaldi Auto Translation via Google translate Rip subtitles from a (decrypted) dvd Import and OCR VobSub sub/idx binary subtitles Import and OCR Blu-ray .sup files - bd sup reading is based on Java code from BDSup2Sub Can open subtitles embedded inside Matroska files Can open subtitles (text, closed captions, VobSub) embedded inside mp4/mv4 files Can open/OCR XSub subtitles embedded inside divx/avi files Can open/OCR DVB and teletext subtitles embedded inside .ts/.m2ts (Transport Stream) files Can open/OCR Blu-ray subtitles embedded inside .m2ts (Transport Stream) files Merge/split subtitles Adjust display time Fix common errors wizard....and more. Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 changelog: Subtitle Edit 5 is a major new release and a big step for the project. For the first time, Subtitle Edit runs natively on Windows, macOS, and Linux from a single, modern, cross-platform codebase. The builds are self-contained, so no separate .NET installation is required, and on macOS and Linux the needed media components (mpv/ffmpeg) are bundled in. Please read before upgrading: Subtitle Edit 5 is a new application, not just an update of Subtitle Edit 4. It has been rebuilt from the ground up to be cross-platform, so: It is not 100% the same app. The look, layout, and some workflows have changed. Some things are in different places, and a few behave differently than in SE4. Not every SE4 feature exists in SE5 yet. SE5 covers all the core editing, conversion, sync, video playback, OCR, and online services, but some of the more specialized SE4 tools are not available yet. Features will continue to be added. If you rely on a specific SE4 feature that is missing, please keep SE4 installed alongside SE5. The easiest way to run both side by side is to use the Portable versions of SE4 and SE5, which keep their settings separate and do not interfere with each other. Which version should I use? Subtitle Edit 5: recommended for most users on Windows 10 (22H2) or newer, macOS 12+, and Linux. Subtitle Edit 4: please continue to use SE4 if you are on an older Windows version (Windows 7/8), or on older / slower computers where SE5 may not run well. SE4 remains available and is the right choice in those cases. To run SE4 and SE5 at the same time, use the Portable versions - you can try SE5 while keeping SE4 as a fallback. Download: Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 | ARM64 | ~60.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Subtitle Edit Portable | 103.0 MB View: Subtitle Edit Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Google Pixel 11 series: Here's what to expect by Hamid Ganji Google Pixel 10 series In recent years, Google has successfully turned its Pixel devices into worthy contenders in the smartphone market. The search giant is now preparing to launch the Pixel 11 series in just a few months, and many Pixel fans are likely wondering what Google has in store for them this year. The next lineup of Google smartphones includes four devices: the Pixel 11, Pixel 11 Pro, Pixel 11 Pro XL, and Pixel 11 Pro Fold. This year, we don’t expect Google to bring revolutionary upgrades to its handsets, and the Pixel 11 series is likely to receive modest hardware improvements alongside a slew of AI-powered features. Here are the rumored specifications of the Google Pixel 11 series ahead of its official debut: When will the new Pixel phones be unveiled? The last two generations of Google Pixel phones (Pixel 9 series and Pixel 10 series) were launched in August, unlike the previous three generations that debuted in October. With that in mind, we expect Google to unveil the Pixel 11 series sometime in August 2026. The exact launch date has yet to be confirmed. Google Pixel 11 CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines How much will the Pixel 11 series cost? Predicting the final price of upcoming smartphones has become increasingly difficult. As you may know, RAM and memory prices are rising sharply, leading to significant increases in the cost of consumer electronics. Recently, Apple CEO Tim Cook said that price increases for some future Apple products are unavoidable, suggesting that the iPhone 18 series could become more expensive. Google has remained tight-lipped about any potential price increases for the Pixel 11 series. If the company manages to maintain last year’s pricing structure, here’s what the lineup could cost: Pixel 11: $799 Pixel 11 Pro: $999 Pixel 11 Pro XL: $1,199 Pixel 11 Pro Fold: $1,799 Given current market conditions, it may be difficult for Google to avoid raising prices unless it adopts cost-saving measures, such as equipping the base model with 8GB of RAM. Google Pixel 11 series anticipated specs: We expect the Google Pixel 11 series to debut with a new Tensor G6 processor as well as an upgraded camera system. The overall design, however, is expected to remain largely unchanged across the lineup. Specifications Pixel 11 Pixel 11 Pro Pixel 11 Pro XL Pixel 11 Pro Fold Display 6.3-inch LTPO AMOLED / 120Hz refresh rate / up to 3100 nits of brightness 6.3-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 6.8-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 8-inch inner screen and 6.4-inch outer display, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness RAM & Processor Tensor G6 / 8-12GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 16GB of RAM Storage options 128GB or 256GB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB Camera 50MP main sensor, 13MP ultra-wide, 10.8MP 5x telephoto, 10.5MP front camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 10.5MP ultra-wide camera, 10.8MP telephoto camera, 10MP front camera, 10MP inner camera Battery 4,840 mAh 4,707 mAh 5,000 mAh 4,658 mAh Software Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 The Pixel 11 series won’t be a major departure from its predecessor, with Google instead focusing on subtle improvements and AI additions such as Gemini Intelligence. However, a patent filed by Google suggests the company is working on a removable battery for its smartphones, and we could see this feature make its way to the Pixel 11 Pro Fold. Given that nearly all smartphones today lack removable batteries, such a feature would be a welcome addition to future Pixel devices. That said, it may not arrive with this year’s lineup after all, and the final decision is yet to be made by Google. The Pixel 11 series could also face an uphill battle in the market. In the Android segment, Samsung is performing well with the Galaxy S26 series, while the Galaxy Z Fold 8 lineup is also expected to launch next month. On the other hand, Apple is preparing to unveil the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max in September alongside its first foldable iPhone.
    • At least AMD is still taking Windows 10 seriously (after the oops) before it consumer extended support ends. @WaltC - Memories, 2x Voodoo in SLI with a Riva TNT with an Aureal A3D soundcard.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      475
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!