Windows 8 hater finally upgrading (me)


Recommended Posts

I love aero glass, gorgeous gradients, shadows, and organization. Windows 7 was everything I wanted from Vista and I became a big fan and evangelist.

I Spewed Comments and friended order66 and others to bash Windows 8.1 and 10 for being too flat with pastel nursery colors.

I am learning flat design for a website I plan to work on and also need a lite OS to handle GS3 viritual routers and setup domains in vmware for my certifications. It is time to stop resisting change and clinging my fists in anxiety over colors.

I need an app to put 3d flip desktops back?

So far I installed

1. Glass8 nag where which does not put all chrome back as 7.

2. Stardocks start8 with a black color that is translucent

3. Just need a flip app to emulate Windows key tab

Glass8 alternatives would be nice too. Any suggestions?

Just tossing it out there, if you really like Aero/gradients/etc that much and it's running everything you need, why switch at all? You got 6 years left on it, not exactly a big rush, especially if your workflow isn't going to change, never mind 10's just around the corner, may be worth waiting for what may be better. Be easier to use the built-in stuff that works 100% versus mods and get a better looking result in the process. Not a fan of transparency myself (especially with programs that misuse/abuse it), also dislike the blue pastel gradients, ick, but *shrug* personal tastes and all that, you can change it, I personally do away with a lot of that on my 7 desktops. That goes for 8 too.. there are different themes for it that can really change how it looks.

As far as the flip 3D thing goes, never used it myself (felt it gimmicky, ranks up there with wobbly windows), but I recall a program that did similar.. WinFlip or something like that, no idea if it's any good or even still developed, so don't quote me on it, but it might do what you need, theres a few other alternate task switchers out there with effects that do that as well, seen a couple that even go as far as that silly cube thing if you're into that.

There are some sites that may still have a program called winflip, I used to use it in my xp days, made xp take on the scrollable screenshots you see on vista

I daren't offer a link as linking to some sites that could be considered rivals as breaking the rules (or at the very least will be picked up by neowin's spam filter, kinda like how the 6+1 forums do)

Just tossing it out there, if you really like Aero/gradients/etc that much and it's running everything you need, why switch at all? You got 6 years left on it, not exactly a big rush, especially if your workflow isn't going to change, never mind 10's just around the corner, may be worth waiting for what may be better. Be easier to use the built-in stuff that works 100% versus mods and get a better looking result in the process. Not a fan of transparency myself (especially with programs that misuse/abuse it), also dislike the blue pastel gradients, ick, but *shrug* personal tastes and all that, you can change it, I personally do away with a lot of that on my 7 desktops. That goes for 8 too.. there are different themes for it that can really change how it looks.

As far as the flip 3D thing goes, never used it myself (felt it gimmicky, ranks up there with wobbly windows), but I recall a program that did similar.. WinFlip or something like that, no idea if it's any good or even still developed, so don't quote me on it, but it might do what you need, theres a few other alternate task switchers out there with effects that do that as well, seen a couple that even go as far as that silly cube thing if you're into that.

 

Because I used to laugh at XP die hards getting mad at Microsoft for dumping XP after a mere 13 years. I would be no different.

 

Besides I need to emulate whole freakign Cisco switches and need something that doesn't slow down under a very heavy load. Dot Matrix and others are correct in that the world changes and things advance. If I stay on Windows 7 how will I adapt to change like Windows 10 or late. I want an xboxONE too. Guess which OS is better integrated. Windows 10 may even run xboxone games if www.maximumpc.com is correct.

 

With these utilities it is bareable.

 

Also my monitor has VERY HIGH GAMMA which is why I hated the initial bright Windows task bars in 8 and Office 2013. I turned it down now so it is barable. I think the flat look is here like Yosemite has it in MacOSX but it seems to be showing off a demo which is now outdated looking in comparison. A small light aero is what I hope in Windows 10 in the consumer preview. But there is a hostile move for white flat no colors inside Microsoft. Look at the job in Office 2013. At the last second color was removed knowing folks would be forced to use it in order to get used to it. Metro in 8 was there too.

Because I used to laugh at XP die hards getting mad at Microsoft for dumping XP after a mere 13 years. I would be no different.

 

Besides I need to emulate whole freakign Cisco switches and need something that doesn't slow down under a very heavy load. Dot Matrix and others are correct in that the world changes and things advance. If I stay on Windows 7 how will I adapt to change like Windows 10 or late. I want an xboxONE too. Guess which OS is better integrated. Windows 10 may even run xboxone games if www.maximumpc.com is correct.

 

With these utilities it is bareable.

 

Also my monitor has VERY HIGH GAMMA which is why I hated the initial bright Windows task bars in 8 and Office 2013. I turned it down now so it is barable. I think the flat look is here like Yosemite has it in MacOSX but it seems to be showing off a demo which is now outdated looking in comparison. A small light aero is what I hope in Windows 10 in the consumer preview. But there is a hostile move for white flat no colors inside Microsoft. Look at the job in Office 2013. At the last second color was removed knowing folks would be forced to use it in order to get used to it. Metro in 8 was there too.

I'm curious as to why Windows 8 is otherwise "unbearable" without these additions? Personally, I find that a GUI should be clean, simple, easy to use and understand, and not distracting to the user. These are the marks of a very effective UI.

 

Windows XP's default layout hit none of those marks. XP was an constant eyesore, and fought you every inch of the way. Windows 7 hits all of those marks, except from distracting the user with unnecessary effects. Windows 8/8.1 hits all these marks. If you're obsessing over glass, shadows, and gradients, then what kind of work are you doing? Yes, glass was cool at first, but when you're working or playing at your PC, glass is the last thing on anyone's mind. Also, more times than not, it's disabled in the workplace either by hardware restrictions, or by a group policy.

During the XP years the first thing I did was put classic on. I love to see blue and gray as it showed me which was active with ease.

Vista was bad with all black or clear which would be black behind something ekse. I tried Vista glaze which kept breaking. Win 7 was exactly what I wanted!

My gamma is too high which on 8 made white title bar suck. When you a put a dark color you can't see the text so WTF . Start screen 8 Don't Care About As much.

Over the years, I have learnt to not customize OS UI too much. Trying out third party mods and figuring out their side effects is so much pain than just realizing why a UI is designed like the way it is. I just then use available built-in options+features to somewhat customize it (such as checkbox selection in FileExplorer).

This IMO is the best way to use any OS without affecting its base performance.

Over the years, I have learnt to not customize OS UI too much. Trying out third party mods and figuring out their side effects is so much pain than just realizing why a UI is designed like the way it is. I just then use available built-in options+features to somewhat customize it (such as checkbox selection in FileExplorer).

This IMO is the best way to use any OS without affecting its base performance.

I am hoping Windows 10 will fix this come January

Windows 7 hits all of those marks, except from distracting the user with unnecessary effects. Windows 8/8.1 hits all these marks. If you're obsessing over glass, shadows, and gradients, then what kind of work are you doing? Yes, glass was cool at first, but when you're working or playing at your PC, glass is the last thing on anyone's mind. Also, more times than not, it's disabled in the workplace either by hardware restrictions, or by a group policy.

 

What?  Aero glass is distracting...or you kidding me?  You are the one who doesn't think having to switch to a full screen menu just to launch an application is distracting?  Aero glass is more distracting than that?  You know what is distracting...the start screen and not being able to read text with black borders.  That is distracting (to me anyway).  Glass was never distracting...just gave the OS a nice look.  Glass can be disabled...so your distraction is gone.  I do not understand your issue with giving users options.

 

You do realize that some actually like effects (and it doesn't hinder their work)...and your hypercritical way of thinking others should feel about their system is borderline obsessive.  Your point of view is always right and everyone else  (those with opposing views) is either wrong or you are "just curious" to why x,y and z.

Because I used to laugh at XP die hards getting mad at Microsoft for dumping XP after a mere 13 years. I would be no different.

Sure, but 7 isn't due to be retired for six more years. Can't stick to one version of an OS forever, but hardly not in a big rush either. If you wanted to you could easily wait till 10 or even further before you really have to switch. If it works, *shrug* stick with it, it's still getting updated, that's what matters.

Not that I'm a die-hard anything, I have a mix of 7 and 8, pick what works and just go with it, but really excited about 10.. looks like they're going to nail that one in a big way. End of the day though, after a short tweaking session, my 7 and 8 desktops are very similar in look and feel, about the only time it's blatantly obvious which one I'm on is when I see the boot splash or copying a file.

 

If I stay on Windows 7 how will I adapt to change like Windows 10 or late.

Judging by how it's going so far, probably much easier than the 7 to 8 transition, assuming a straight out-of-the-box setup with no tweakery of course, a few tweaks and they're very similar regardless.

 

My gamma is too high which on 8 made white title bar suck. When you a put a dark color you can't see the text so WTF .

Yea I don't get why they took out the option to adjust the text colors in the titlebars, that was an odd choice. Get a third party theme with white text and go from there, there's a couple that are identical to the stock theme but with white text, or go with something else entirely. My 8 desktops use a window border that's near black, totally usable.

What?  Aero glass is distracting...or you kidding me?

Personally wouldn't say distracting, but it can be hard to read sometimes, and it's just awful to look at when a program misuses it, a few programs were spectacularly bad with it. The only time I sorta (sometimes) like it is moving windows, but can do without it. Much prefer a flatter solid window frame myself, but *shrug* opinion and all that.

Personally wouldn't say distracting, but it can be hard to read sometimes, and it's just awful to look at when a program misuses it, a few programs were spectacularly bad with it. The only time I sorta (sometimes) like it is moving windows, but can do without it. Much prefer a flatter solid window frame myself, but *shrug* opinion and all that.

 

hmmm, never ran into a program that "misuses" it.  Not saying there isn't of course.  The flat solid color window frame is fine in Windows 8...however...my big beef is that I'm unable to read text on solid black frames  (I prefer black...including Aero glass).  I'm hoping Windows 10 makes changes to this (seen white text on black border with Metro so I'm hopeful).  I've ran 8 enough of my backup notebook to realize that (even with Classic Shell) there is no way I'll upgrade any of my other computers to it.

 

I agree with opinions but mostly options ...  

hmmm, never ran into a program that "misuses" it.  Not saying there isn't of course.  The flat solid color window frame is fine in Windows 8...however...my big beef is that I'm unable to read text on solid black frames.

A good example of glass gone bad is Thunderbird. Good lord, it's awful, and there's some others.. not an epidemic or anything but when it happens you see it in a big way. And like I said, it's just an opinion, I'm sure Aero has its fans, I'm just not one of them. Was spiffy going from XP to Vista but the novelty wore off years ago for me. As far as the black frames go, I touched on that in my previous post, you can edit the theme or get a pre-built with white text.. not sure why they removed that ability, kinda stupid.

I can agree that what's there isn't horribly over-used though. Some other desktops use it too much, for example taskbar popups or dialogs that have transparency.. reeeealy hard to read and borderline useless. Aero at least hits a nice balance between purty and usability.

A good example of glass gone bad is Thunderbird. Good lord, it's awful, and there's some others.. not an epidemic or anything but when it happens you see it in a big way. And like I said, it's just an opinion, I'm sure Aero has its fans, I'm just not one of them. Was spiffy going from XP to Vista but the novelty wore off years ago for me. As far as the black frames go, I touched on that in my previous post, you can edit the theme or get a pre-built with white text.. not sure why they removed that ability, kinda stupid.

Yea. Just googled an image of thunderbird with glass...It is pretty awful. Though I think a black aero would be ok (the image I saw was almost a goldish color theme)

I personally like Windows 7 including Aero and every thing else. If MS has to do flat UI then they should learn thing or two from OS X Yosemite. There is huge difference between flat ugly design (MS) and flat sober design. OS X flat design is aesthetic and less obtrusive than MS ugly looking UI with white space everywhere. Thing looks damn unbearable on my 30 inch UHD monitor with white empty space everywhere. I will be sticking to windows 7 and my Hackintosh for the long time. I am not interested in Win 10 as well. 

Completely off topic from the OPs original post.

 

Each to their own, but I find the glass effect in Vista and 7 very obtrusive.  The flat, colour matched look for Windows 8 is something which is much easier on the eyes.  I think Vista certainly was better than XP, but to me the glass, bevelled look is something that is just superfluous and quite tacky to be honest.  I personally took to the flat gradient free look of Windows 8 immediately.

 

I have 2 Windows 7 machines (i5 laptop and Xeon desktop), 2 Windows 8 machines (Atom laptop and Core 2 Duo desktop), an i3 laptop running the Windows 10 TP, an Arm based ChromeBook and I have an i5 MacBook on the way.

I'm curious as to why Windows 8 is otherwise "unbearable" without these additions? Personally, I find that a GUI should be clean, simple, easy to use and understand, and not distracting to the user. These are the marks of a very effective UI.

 

Windows XP's default layout hit none of those marks. XP was an constant eyesore, and fought you every inch of the way. Windows 7 hits all of those marks, except from distracting the user with unnecessary effects. Windows 8/8.1 hits all these marks. If you're obsessing over glass, shadows, and gradients, then what kind of work are you doing? Yes, glass was cool at first, but when you're working or playing at your PC, glass is the last thing on anyone's mind. Also, more times than not, it's disabled in the workplace either by hardware restrictions, or by a group policy.

Like I've said 10000 times directed at YOU, everyone is different.. Different strokes for different folks. 

 

On the other hand, I actually really like Windows 8.1, just the way it is.. I hated it at first.. But, you have to give it a real honest try.. 

I'm curious as to why Windows 8 is otherwise "unbearable" without these additions? Personally, I find that a GUI should be clean, simple, easy to use and understand, and not distracting to the user. These are the marks of a very effective UI.

 

Windows XP's default layout hit none of those marks. XP was an constant eyesore, and fought you every inch of the way. Windows 7 hits all of those marks, except from distracting the user with unnecessary effects. Windows 8/8.1 hits all these marks. If you're obsessing over glass, shadows, and gradients, then what kind of work are you doing? Yes, glass was cool at first, but when you're working or playing at your PC, glass is the last thing on anyone's mind. Also, more times than not, it's disabled in the workplace either by hardware restrictions, or by a group policy.

 

I can't even take you seriously any more. The amount of changes Microsoft has already implemented with Windows 10, a number of them that have moved away from your flawed, minimalistic view of how a desktop computing experience should be. You can have eye candy and still productive. My users number one complaint with both 8 and Office 2013 are the lack of glass, too much white, bright space. Users don't want to stare of a screen blank colors or bland desks. They appreciate a little eye candy when working on their computers 8 hours a day.

  • Like 2

I can't even take you seriously any more. The amount of changes Microsoft has already implemented with Windows 10, a number of them that have moved away from your flawed, minimalistic view of how a desktop computing experience should be. You can have eye candy and still productive. My users number one complaint with both 8 and Office 2013 are the lack of glass, too much white, bright space. Users don't want to stare of a screen blank colors or bland desks. They appreciate a little eye candy when working on their computers 8 hours a day.

I have yet to hear any complaints from the lack of glass. Many computers I support don't even have the feature turned on. Take me as little serious as you want, again, I still believe a good GUI is one that doesn't distract you from your work. If your users are complaining about glass, then it seems like they're less focused on the tasks they should be accomplishing, and more on wasting time.

I have yet to hear any complaints from the lack of glass. Many computers I support don't even have the feature turned on. Take me as little serious as you want, again, I still believe a good GUI is one that doesn't distract you from your work. If your users are complaining about glass, then it seems like they're less focused on the tasks they should be accomplishing, and more on wasting time.

Wasting time because they want glass enabled? Nonsense.

 

I suppose users complaining that Office 2013 is too bright, white and they don't like using it and tend to use it less makes them more productive too? I mean that certainly doesn't waste time at all, right? It's also why Office 2015 is getting changed up with a dark theme too, right?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Anthropic introduces Claude Tag, a new AI teammate for Slack by Fiza Ali Anthropic has announced Claude Tag, a new feature that lets teams work with Claude directly inside Slack. The idea is simple: once Claude is added to a Slack workspace and given access to selected channels, users can tag @Claude in conversations and assign tasks. Claude can then work through those requests using connected tools and data sources before posting its results back into a Slack thread. What makes Claude Tag different from a typical chatbot is that it's designed to operate as a shared assistant for an entire team rather than a single user. Everyone in a channel interacts with the same Claude instance. This allows the team members to see ongoing work and continue tasks started by others. Furthermore, Anthropic says the AI can build context over time by following conversations in channels where it has permission to operate. This means users don't have to repeatedly provide the same background information for every request. The system is also designed for asynchronous work. Instead of waiting for responses in a chat window, users can assign a task to Claude and return later once the work is complete. Anthropic says Claude can break larger requests into multiple steps and use connected tools to complete them. Moreover, the system can also schedule follow-up tasks and continue working on projects over extended periods. Another feature allows Claude to keep the users updated and follow up on unresolved tasks when its optional "ambient" mode is enabled. The company says the tool is already being used internally for software development, data analysis, support workflows, and debugging. According to Anthropic, around 65% of its product team's code is now generated through its internal version of Claude Tag. For organisations concerned about security, administrators can control which channels, tools, and data sources Claude can access. Separate Claude instances can also be configured for different departments, helping keep information isolated between teams. Administrators can also monitor activity logs, review completed tasks, and set spending limits at both the organisation and channel level. Claude Tag is now available in beta for Claude Enterprise and Claude Team customers and runs on Claude Opus 4.8 that was announced this May. The feature will also replace Anthropic's existing Claude in Slack application, with current users able to migrate within a 30-day migration window. Lastly, eligible customers will receive introductory credits to help teams evaluate the new experience.
    • Beats Studio Pro wireless over-ear ANC headphones drop to their lowest price yet by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Beats Studio Pro headphones at their all-time low price. The Studio Pro use 40mm active drivers which are designed to improve clarity and reduce distortion compared to previous models, with up to an 80% improvement over the Beats Studio3 Wireless. A built-in digital processor adjusts frequency response to keep the sound balanced rather than overly boosted in any one area. They also include Active Noise Cancelling that adapts to your surroundings to reduce background noise along with a Transparency mode that lets outside sound in when you need awareness of what’s going on around you. Furthermore, the headphones support personalised Spatial Audio with dynamic head tracking as well as Dolby Atmos playback on supported content. Moreover, built-in voice-targeting microphones improve call quality. You can also switch between three sound profiles including Beats Signature for balanced music playback, Entertainment for films and gaming, and Conversation for clearer voice in calls and podcasts. Physically, they are designed to be worn for long periods without feeling heavy or awkward. The ear cushions use UltraPlush engineered leather while metal sliders allow you to adjust the fit. On the connectivity side, the Studio Pro use Class 1 Bluetooth for a stable, long-range wireless connection. There is also a 3.5mm input if you want to plug in directly, including use with in-flight entertainment systems. Controls are located on the headphones and include a "b" button for music and call control, a volume rocker, and a multifunction button used for switching listening modes, EQ settings, power, and pairing. In addition, the headphones offer integration with both Apple and Android devices. On Apple devices, they support one-touch pairing with iCloud-linked devices, hands-free Siri access, Find My tracking based on last connected location, and automatic software updates. On Android devices, they support Google Fast Pair, Audio Switch between compatible devices, and Google Find My Device tracking, with additional features available through the Beats app. When it comes to the battery performance, it is rated at up to 40 hours of listening time with ANC turned off, and up to 24 hours with ANC or Transparency mode enabled. A 10-minute Fast Fuel charge should provide up to 4 hours of playback. Finally, the headphones use a rechargeable lithium-ion battery and charge via USB-C. Beats Studio Pro Wireless Over-Ear ANC Headphones: $149.95 (Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • "lets you pause updates by choosing an end date, for up to 35 days" Wasn't it "indefinitely"?
    • Those extra reboots are related to the UEFI Secure Boot certificate update thing.
    • Hands on with the ProtoArc EM25: Affordable ergonomic mouse that focuses on the right things by Taras Buria ProtoArc is known for making all sorts of office products with a big focus on ergonomics and comfort. Its latest product, the EM25, promises a comfortable-to-use, affordable, and customizable mouse. We took one for a spin; here are our impressions. The ProtoArc EM25 is a $49.99 mouse, but right now, during Prime Day 2026, you can get it for just $37.99. Right off the bat, you can see that the EM25 is inspired by Logitech's MX Master lineup and the legendary MX Master 3/3S. Its shape and proportions are very similar, so for a person with large hands (right-handed person, mind you), the EM25 is very comfortable to use. The mouse fills the palm, and the thumb rests on a small extension, giving your wrist a small tilt to reduce strain. The mouse is made of black plastic without any coating, eliminating long-term wear concerns. However, I can see the main buttons and other areas you touch the most getting polished over time. Despite its size and bulk, the mouse is not too heavy. It weighs about 100 grams, which is significantly less than the MX Master 3S and its successor. It is no lightweight gaming mouse by any means, but it is not excessively heavy like the MX Master 4. The EM25 has a built-in storage for its USB dongle. It is a cleverly made magnetic flap that you open by simply pressing on it. Next to the flap, you will find the on/off switch, the 1,000 Hz sensor, and a DPI button (up to 8,000 DPI). I find the DPI button location a bit odd, and I would prefer it somewhere below the main scroll wheel. Still, given that I never change DPI on my mice, I will let it pass. What is more important is that, unlike MX Master 3/3S/4, the device switch button is located below the left-click button, which allows you to switch devices without lifting and flipping the mouse. For a multi-device setup, this is a perfect solution: the button does not require too much effort to use, it does not get in your way, but it is also easily reachable with your thumb. The main scroll wheel has two modes: ratcheted and free-flow. You can only change between them with a bright orange button (I like this little touch of color), which is sprung and requires some effort to press. The wheel is dead-silent in free-flow mode, but ratched is quite loud and stiff, perhaps even too much to my liking. I can hardly call it deal-breaking, but it will certainly take some time to get used to. The side scroll wheel, it is notched, silent, and pleasant to use. Next to it, you can find a piece of glossed plastic with connection indicators: Dongle, Bluetooth 1, Bluetooth 2, and the low battery indicator. By the way, the built-in battery is rechargeable via a USB Type-C cable, which is included. It is sleeved and has an orange velcro strap to keep it tidy. After using the EM25 for a few weeks, I can say that its main buttons are my absolute favorite. They have very pronounced clicks, which feel great with just the right amount of force required to register a press. I would say they feel like something in between regular mouse clicks and silent ones. You can hear and feel the springy switch, but it is not sharp or loud to the point of annoying you. As for back/forward and device switch buttons, they are very clicky and quite noisy. Unfortunately, there are no extra buttons that you can map to specific things like in the MX Master lineup. Besides great primary clicks, another thing I like about the EM25 is its 1,000 Hz sensor. In the world, where Logitech still uses 125 Hz sensors in $100+ mice, seeing a much faster sensor in a mouse that costs three times less is very refreshing. Also, all the settings and customization you make are stored on-device, and you do not need to install any software. Just open the web-based app and change all that you need. Speaking of customization, you can remap what buttons do, adjust the DPI, and the sensor speed. Sadly, gestures are not supported, but you can still map pretty much anything to each button, including shortcuts, media buttons, and more. I also recommend using software like XMouseControl, as it will let you remap the side scroll wheel. At the end of the day, the ProtoArc EM25 is a great mouse. Clearly inspired by the MX Master lineup, it takes the best of it and complements it with a much more wallet-friendly price tag, significantly better sensor, on-device memory, a built-in storage for the dongle, and more (it fixes everything that I complained about the MX Master 4 recently). And for only $37.99 during Prime Day, the EM25 is an easy recommendation. Buy ProtoArc EM25 mouse - $37.99 | 24% off with Prime As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      460
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      110
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!