• 0

Advice on the best Remote PC Software


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

"be default it's not setup for "unattended""

It is if you install that one..

http://www.teamviewer.com/hi/download/windows.aspx

post-14624-0-55554300-1419178732.png

Or you click a checkmark when doing the full install

post-14624-0-29086300-1419178902.png

It literally is click click and ready to go.. You don't even have to create an account if you don't want.. Just a password, it then gives you an ID to use

post-14624-0-38240400-1419179264.png

This is so drop dead stupid that anyone can do it, nothing to do on firewall, no accounts to even create if you don't want too.. Click Click unattended is up and running and you can access from anywhere.. Where you got the idea that this was hard not possible or a PITA to setup I have no idea - maybe you just have not played with it, or its been since like version 1 or something.. I would really suggest you give the current version a test, its idiot proof ;)

For meraki remote access I Need vnc, or java.. And the port is quite possible could be blocked from where your at (60000).. While TV only needs SSL..

post-14624-0-35320500-1419179908.png

Not saying this software is not slick - I plan on having some fun with it for sure, and adding to my toolbelt.. But sorry it is just over the top for normal user remote access.. But thanks for bringing it up!!

  • Like 2
  • 0

while MSM is free to corp and personal use, You're free to use ANY VNC client and you are more in control and not forced to use viewer you might not like. I can use ANY VNC client I want with MSM.

  • 0

I also use mine commercially so I legally can't use TV unless it's only for personal systems.

 

I tried MSM a bit today, and I can't stand it personally

 

1: No easy way to deploy with any type of remote management console over a LAN, only options are via GPO which I don't want to do, run client manually on 100 systems, or run psexec/msiexec through one of my existing utilities to deploy it

 

2: Remote access is via VNC, sucks. Default web client requires Java installed, 3rd party client's don't recognize vnc:// by default so you have to setup a registry hack to enable that link so you can click it or else you are copying and pasting address, username/password

 

So I am sticking with the following items for these things

 

1: TeamViewer - Remote access to PC's not on my corporate VPN or on a seperate non-linked LAN

2: Pulseway - Monitoring of specs/remote reboots, wakes, alerts etc of specific servers

3: Remote Desktop - to remote into corporate VPN connected systems for exclusive control

4: Netmonitor for Employees Professional - See all screens for corporate connected LAN/VPN clients at once, and be able to right click and remote control instantly over LAN/VPN.

  • 0

2: Remote access is via VNC, sucks. Default web client requires Java installed, 3rd party client's don't recognize vnc:// by default so you have to setup a registry hack to enable that link so you can click it or else you are copying and pasting address, username/password

 

That's always the problem with Cisco products, their symbiotic relationship with Java.

  • 0

Remixedcat, your view of teamviewer is highly inaccurate. Meraki doesn't work in every browser and sometimes requires additional configuration when remotting into systems. Cad.exe sometimes does not get loaded, this is what allows control alt del to be sent to the client. It is a very hokey system imo.

Even after many years dameware is still on of my favorites and their drs has the ability to offer remote support to off site users that aren't vpn'd in or are part of your network, similar to logmein rescue.

  • 0

Umm I can use any android or windows vnc client....

 

Nothing limiting and most clients can send cntl alt del.

 

Oh and i only had to install the endpoint and then plug a URL and password into tight vnc and I got control.

 

What's so hard about that??

  • 0

nothing, I have meraki installed it on a server, try to send ctrl alt del and it doesn't send.   try with a standalone vnc client and it also doesn't send.  when I look up the issue, it has to do with cad.exe possibly not being there or not installed in the right directory.

  • 0

Teamviewer is really good. Keeps improving with each new release. A couple of new free teamviewer clones are 'Supremo' and 'Anydesk'. Both use the ID number and password method. Anydesk still has a ways to go and was a little slow working on the remote screen.

Microsoft's own RDP is great. Best if the computer being connected to has a static IP, but you can get a domain name to follow the changing IP address if required.

  • 0

remixedcat.

 

Does the PC agent that runs on the workstations self-update? If not, do they ever issue updates to the client and if so how are they deployed.

 

I think they do. Meraki is all cloud based so I imagine so...

  • 0

We use Meraki switching and APs at work and have little if any downtime, so not sure why you're getting that error. I would say it's an isolated incident.

That being said, I use Teamviewer for remote support for the most part. ZENworks has a VNC client built-in, so we use that on local network.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • YouTube has finally brought back its DMs feature, but only in these countries by David Uzondu Late last year, YouTube started testing a "new" way to share videos directly with friends, without having to leave the app. Now, the video giant has announced that is now rolling out a revamped direct messaging inbox, which lets you share videos, Shorts, and live streams and have conversations about them, directly on YouTube. The platform limits this feature to 18+ users who are signed in to a verified channel and use the latest mobile app version. Direct messaging on YouTube first became a thing back in 2017 inside the mobile app (later renamed to "Messages"), where users could chat one-on-one and share clips directly, but all that came to an end on September 18, 2019, when Google decided to shut it down after giving users a month to download a .zip file archive of their past chats. No one really knows why YouTube killed the feature, but users were encouraged to migrate to the public Comments section, on Community tab posts, and via YouTube Stories. The previous incarnation suffered from moderation challenges, prompting Google to implement stricter safety guidelines and age verifications for this new iteration. Here's a list of the countries where the re-launched feature is currently available, though note that Brand Accounts do not have access to it, at least for now: Countries American Samoa Austria Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Guam Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Latvia Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Northern Mariana Islands Norway Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Romania Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland U.S. Virgin Islands United Kingdom United States Before you can use the feature, you first have to send an invite link to your contact. Invite links expire exactly seven days after you create them. If the person on the other end accepts the invite, you can exchange videos directly and text back and forth inside the app. To delete a message, just long-press on the message and tap unsend to remove it for both users. You can also delete entire conversations by long-pressing the thread and selecting delete, but the other person will continue to see the chat history on their end. To make sure everything remains safe, YouTube monitors these messages to ensure they follow Community Guidelines.
    • The problem of course is simply that government does not always know best. My point is that agency is taken away from the EU consumer in these cases. I'm sorry, but I do not believe that governments (politicians) are inherently good, and "looking out for me." Primarily they look to themselves and their own personal desires first, foremost, and always. When the EU or the DOJ fines these companies, claiming to "represent the welfare of the consumer," how much of these billion-dollar judgments are handed to the consumers they claim to represent? Not even a dollar, as I've seen. Yet the EUC lawyers who are paid to sit around and dream up these suits make huge commissions on the fines the EUC adjudicates, which is an ironclad fact I hope everyone is aware of. It's also rank corruption, of course, but that's another topic. Last, when the EU inflicts these judgments, or the DOJ, take your pick, the costs are bundled right along in the cost of the goods and services these companies provide the consumers they are "looking out for." If you are someone who believes his government is his savior then you have my condolences. I think Apple is right here, because the whole scheme of consumer choice is that consumers pick and choose among the products companies offer. Microsoft Windows is more compatible with third party software and hardware than any desktop OS on Earth, which is my sole reason for choosing it. Just because the EUC forces companies do certain things it knows the companies do not want to do, "or else", has no bearing on consumer benefit. This Siri thing is almost idiotic it's so infantile. But this is what the EUC does when the EU in Brussels becomes cash-strapped and needs a big infusion of cash. Some people get upset by "big companies" but it's the opposite when governments dwarf the size and scope of these companies, which is so obvious it hurts.... I mean you can't honestly believe that forcing Apple to do things with Siri it has its own reasons to decline is something that "opens up" Apple, do you? Say it aint' so...
    • Looks like many years since the request was made, a directory tree view finally may be added. https://github.com/files-community/Files/pull/18537
    • Is it still super slow or has it improved on that area?
    • There's this from last year https://gist.github.com/threat...364659a8887841aa43deca4efd9 but nothing about a buffer overflow that MS somehow can't code against. No matter what, it makes sense to take a "protected by default" approach.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      DragonOfMercy earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      bella52 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Techinmay earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      214
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!