Mom calls Santa Claus, gets hit with $145 fine


Recommended Posts

No, she didn't get a fine for talking to santa claus :rolleyes: , She got a fine for messing on her phone while driving. Against the law. And arguably even more dangerous since she has to use more of her brain to be creative, and pretend instead of using it to focus on driving.
 

She should've been ignoring her spoiled kids and paid attention to the road.

 

Try to control your kids without making fairy threats.

 

This "we're all victims" crap is getting old fast.

you did.

Not just once, but twice. First failing to get the inspection and secondly talking on the phone while driving.

 

She was keenly aware of this since she immediately threw the phone to the floor when she saw the cop.

 

I love how people seem to have cognitive dissonance when it comes to owning up to their law breaking and dangerous behavior.

santa does not exist neither does easter bunny, tooth fairy, g... ,. etc.

Hush you, makes for awesome leverage with your kids till they figure it out on their own.

On topic -- duh. Easily deserved that fine. Personally lost a few people over the years to driver stupidity.

when will parents quit lying to kids

 

santa does not exist neither does easter bunny, tooth fairy, g... ,. etc.

 

finish your post! WHAT DOES THE G STAND FOR? So much suspense.

 

I don't want all my heroes to be fake.

  • Like 3

I used to live in a third-wor...... developing country (now I live in another TW country :/).

 

For some moronic reasons, like lack of budget (not exactly true), etc. some of the "highways" pass through parts of small villages, meaning you have to slow down to ridiculous speeds, 20-30 Km/h.

 

Once I was travelling form one city to another and along the road there were at least 15 of such villages; it was really exhausting, constantly adjusting my speed from 110 to 30, being extra careful not to run over anyone, since people crossed the road to get from one side of the village to another, and so on.

 

Eventually I got tired and angry and passed one of the said villages at a higher speed, 60-70. A policeman stopped me. He asked "Do you know that you were supposed to go slow here?". I said "Yes, I were indeed. It is completely stupid for a supposed "highway" to be built like this, but the law is the law. I broke it and I'll pay for it. I know what I did."

 

He issued a ticket, obviously, but at the third of what it was supposed to be. :D

 

 

TL;DR

 

If you want to break the law, then be prepared to pay for it if you got caught. Arguing and false justification will only make it worse.

Is talking on your phone illegal every where? Sure can't be, at least in Michigan, as I can stand here in my picture window and count people on their phone that drive by. I'm in a raised ranch house so window is well above ground level. Can usually see the one's with phones in lap and tell if they're texting too!

 

If cops were actually busting people for talking, let alone the one's that are obviosuly texting, there shouldn't be hardly any traffic at all here!

santa does not exist neither does easter bunny, tooth fairy, g... ,. etc.

Oh yeah, then where do all my christmas presents from him come from then, huh? And how do you explain this:

father-christmas.jpg

Back to the story, she obviously knew that she shouldn't be on the phone while driving since she threw the phone down when she saw the officer. In that case, why didn't she pull over the car to make the call? If anything, pulling over the car may have silenced the children.

Is talking on your phone illegal every where? Sure can't be, at least in Michigan, as I can stand here in my picture window and count people on their phone that drive by. I'm in a raised ranch house so window is well above ground level. Can usually see the one's with phones in lap and tell if they're texting too!

 

If cops were actually busting people for talking, let alone the one's that are obviosuly texting, there shouldn't be hardly any traffic at all here!

It's quickly becoming illegal everywhere (in the US at least), like it should be.

Oh yeah, then where do all my christmas presents from him come from then, huh? And how do you explain this:

father-christmas.jpg

Back to the story, she obviously knew that she shouldn't be on the phone while driving since she threw the phone down when she saw the officer. In that case, why didn't she pull over the car to make the call? If anything, pulling over the car may have silenced the children.

yes, she should have pulled over, its her own stupid fault for breaking the law, what if she had caused an accident. the cost of her mistake is justified.  i have no time for people who use cellphones while driving / people who speed / think its cool to drift across the public roads/ etc... your driving a motor vehicle and that's all you should be doing with your attention on what's going on around you! you only have your self to blame if you are caught.

Michigan allows driving while talking on a phone, but some cities like Detroit have local bans. This patchwork of laws can get you in trouble fast.

OTOH, driving while texting is illegal as it is in most states. Fines run from $20 in California to $10,000 in Alaska.

194jo10wbl5u6jpg.jpg

when will parents quit lying to kids

 

santa does not exist neither does easter bunny, tooth fairy, g... ,. etc.

 

Let kids have some magic, it's where imagination comes from. 

Michigan allows driving while talking on a phone, but some cities like Detroit have local bans. This patchwork of laws can get you in trouble fast.

OTOH, driving while texting is illegal as it is in most states. Fines run from $20 in California to $10,000 in Alaska.

194jo10wbl5u6jpg.jpg

 

While not all places have specific laws against driving while using a cell phone. the law itself it's redundant. EVERYWHERE allover the world has laws against distracted driving, this covers driving while using or fiddling with the cell phone or any other hand held device. Cell phone laws are silly unnecessary paperwork that's already covered. 

I used to live in a third-wor...... developing country (now I live in another TW country :/).

 

For some moronic reasons, like lack of budget (not exactly true), etc. some of the "highways" pass through parts of small villages, meaning you have to slow down to ridiculous speeds, 20-30 Km/h.

 

Once I was travelling form one city to another and along the road there were at least 15 of such villages; it was really exhausting, constantly adjusting my speed from 110 to 30, being extra careful not to run over anyone, since people crossed the road to get from one side of the village to another, and so on.

 

Eventually I got tired and angry and passed one of the said villages at a higher speed, 60-70. A policeman stopped me. He asked "Do you know that you were supposed to go slow here?". I said "Yes, I were indeed. It is completely stupid for a supposed "highway" to be built like this, but the law is the law. I broke it and I'll pay for it. I know what I did."

 

He issued a ticket, obviously, but at the third of what it was supposed to be. :D

 

 

TL;DR

 

If you want to break the law, then be prepared to pay for it if you got caught. Arguing and false justification will only make it worse.

We have sections like that here in some parts of PA and NJ... Except the speed limit is 55Mph going right next to people's homes and driveways.

 

That always feels far too fast for me being right next to where someone is walking along the road or a kid could run out.

when will parents quit lying to kids

 

santa does not exist neither does easter bunny, tooth fairy, g... ,. etc.

 

..or God. You forgot about God. Another old man with a white beard who will give you what you wish for as long as you're on his "Nice List".

  • Like 2

Is talking on your phone illegal every where? Sure can't be, at least in Michigan, as I can stand here in my picture window and count people on their phone that drive by. I'm in a raised ranch house so window is well above ground level. Can usually see the one's with phones in lap and tell if they're texting too!

 

If cops were actually busting people for talking, let alone the one's that are obviously texting, there shouldn't be hardly any traffic at all here!

 

I know at least in Oregon, they passed a law making phones illegal to use while driving unless you have a hands free device such as a bluetooth headset or in car system.  If they see you with a phone in our hand, you as likely to get a ticket as the person who is breaking another traffic law.  They will excuse you though if you are pulled over on the shoulder of the road or parked in a parking lot (Basically not driving it and at a stop sign or light).  In spite of this, there are still plenty of folks with the phone glued to their ear and hand on the road here.  I guess the threat of the maximum fine of $500 is not enough of a deal to them. 

 

Anyway, using the power of Santa can really be a great tool for any parent of a young child.  We found though that it just does not work too well from January through until the stores put the decorations out in September.

That's what Siri and Google Now are for. My LG's voice recognition works like a charm.

 

Or Cortana, or course. Or TellMe, really. I never had any trouble using the voice dialing on WP7 even before Cortana.

 

 

Do these places that allow talking on a phone while driving require it to be handsfree? Dialing a number or pushing and buttons is exactly the same as texting.

 

Some places. It's a patchwork. You definitely shouldn't be searching through your contacts list.

In California, you have to be hands-free and you can't text at all. If you're under 18 or you drive a bus, you can't use a cell phone under any circumstances. Even so, there's plenty of people do it and I see a lot of young folks driving while holding a cell phone. Anecdotally, I'd say that enforcement is fairly minimal, probably about the same rate at which they enforce seatbelt laws.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • google, meta, microsoft, true cancers of modern society
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 changelog: Fixed a bug where Overwrite behaved as Overwrite All during same-drive move operations. AdvancedInstaller fixed the installer’s security vulnerability: EXE Bootstrapper resolved the %appdata% location incorrectly for the System account. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 | 14.6 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • First exciting thing to come to Windows in a long time ! This is the kind of things they should focus on, instead of cramming as much AI as they can in everything.
    • New AMD graphics driver fixes install issues and FSR 4.1 crashes on RX 7000 GPUs by Taras Buria AMD is rolling out yet another graphics driver. Version 26.6.4 is now available for download, bringing two important fixes. One is for those still using Windows 10 and having trouble installing driver 26.6.2. In fact, this patch is coming from the recently released hotfix, so it is not new if you are already running version 26.6.3. The second fix is for RX 7000 owners. AMD recently brought FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen graphics cards, but there was a bug with certain games crashing when using FSR 4.1. I experienced this issue with Forza Horizon 6, so today's driver should take care of that. Here is the official changelog: Intermittent install issue seen when installing AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.2 on Windows® 10 systems for Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Intermittent application crash may be observed in some games with AMD FSR Upscaling 4.1 enabled on Radeon™ RX 7000 series graphics products. Known issues include the following: Intermittent application crash or driver timeout may be observed while playing Battlefield™ 6 on AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. AMD is actively working on a resolution with the developer to be released as soon as possible. Texture flickering or corruption may appear while playing Battlefield™ 6 with AMD Record and Stream on some AMD graphics products. AMD FSR Upscaling and AMD FSR Frame Generation may show as inactive in AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition while playing Battlefield™ 6 when enabled on Radeon™ RX 9000 series graphics products. Failure to install may be observed while installing AI Bundle components in some regions with limited access to HuggingFace and GitHub. Model flickering or rendering failure may be observed in Maxon Cinema 4D and Blender on Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Users experiencing this issue are recommended to install AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.3.1. Intermittent application crash may be observed on some models while running Blender on Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Users experiencing this issue are recommended to install AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.3.1. You can download the AMD Radeon driver 26.6.4 from the official website here. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • Amazon may use OpenAI and Nova models after Anthropic reportedly raises costs by Karthik Mudaliar Amazon is reportedly considering to use OpenAI models and even its own Nova family of AI models after Anthropic raised the cost of using Claude inside Amazon services. According to a report from The Information, Amazon is weighing its options to reduce costs under a new arrangement with Anthropic. But back in April, Amazon said it would invest $5 billion more in Anthropic, with the possibility of adding up to another $20 billion if certain commercial milestones are met. That investment actually came on top of another $8 billion Amazon had already put into the Claude maker. Anthropic, meanwhile, committed to spend more than $100 billion over 10 years on AWS technologies, including Amazon’s Trainium chips. Amazon isn't just a customer of Anthropic but also one of the most important backers and cloud partners. This is why it makes it interesting that Amazon is considering other alternatives to handle its internal workloads. Although Amazon has been building its own options for a while now. Its Nova family of AI models was announced in late 2024 for Amazon Bedrock, with models aimed at text, image, and video tasks. Amazon pitched the model around cost and latency at that time. With that said, OpenAI has also become a more realistic option recently for AWS customers as well as for Amazon itself. Earlier this year, OpenAI brought its latest models and Codex coding agent to Amazon Bedrock, after changes to its previously more restrictive Microsoft cloud arrangement. This allowed AWS to serve even those customers who wanted other alternatives from Claude, without having to move workloads out of Amazon's cloud. Evaluating alternatives could also be due to commercial pressure and not necessarily a sign of a damaged partnership between Amazon and Anthropic. Whether or not Amazon is actually considering switching entirely to OpenAI's models or its own Nova models remains unknown at this moment.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      61
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!