Mom calls Santa Claus, gets hit with $145 fine


Recommended Posts

No, she didn't get a fine for talking to santa claus :rolleyes: , She got a fine for messing on her phone while driving. Against the law. And arguably even more dangerous since she has to use more of her brain to be creative, and pretend instead of using it to focus on driving.
 

She should've been ignoring her spoiled kids and paid attention to the road.

 

Try to control your kids without making fairy threats.

 

This "we're all victims" crap is getting old fast.

you did.

Not just once, but twice. First failing to get the inspection and secondly talking on the phone while driving.

 

She was keenly aware of this since she immediately threw the phone to the floor when she saw the cop.

 

I love how people seem to have cognitive dissonance when it comes to owning up to their law breaking and dangerous behavior.

santa does not exist neither does easter bunny, tooth fairy, g... ,. etc.

Hush you, makes for awesome leverage with your kids till they figure it out on their own.

On topic -- duh. Easily deserved that fine. Personally lost a few people over the years to driver stupidity.

when will parents quit lying to kids

 

santa does not exist neither does easter bunny, tooth fairy, g... ,. etc.

 

finish your post! WHAT DOES THE G STAND FOR? So much suspense.

 

I don't want all my heroes to be fake.

  • Like 3

I used to live in a third-wor...... developing country (now I live in another TW country :/).

 

For some moronic reasons, like lack of budget (not exactly true), etc. some of the "highways" pass through parts of small villages, meaning you have to slow down to ridiculous speeds, 20-30 Km/h.

 

Once I was travelling form one city to another and along the road there were at least 15 of such villages; it was really exhausting, constantly adjusting my speed from 110 to 30, being extra careful not to run over anyone, since people crossed the road to get from one side of the village to another, and so on.

 

Eventually I got tired and angry and passed one of the said villages at a higher speed, 60-70. A policeman stopped me. He asked "Do you know that you were supposed to go slow here?". I said "Yes, I were indeed. It is completely stupid for a supposed "highway" to be built like this, but the law is the law. I broke it and I'll pay for it. I know what I did."

 

He issued a ticket, obviously, but at the third of what it was supposed to be. :D

 

 

TL;DR

 

If you want to break the law, then be prepared to pay for it if you got caught. Arguing and false justification will only make it worse.

Is talking on your phone illegal every where? Sure can't be, at least in Michigan, as I can stand here in my picture window and count people on their phone that drive by. I'm in a raised ranch house so window is well above ground level. Can usually see the one's with phones in lap and tell if they're texting too!

 

If cops were actually busting people for talking, let alone the one's that are obviosuly texting, there shouldn't be hardly any traffic at all here!

santa does not exist neither does easter bunny, tooth fairy, g... ,. etc.

Oh yeah, then where do all my christmas presents from him come from then, huh? And how do you explain this:

father-christmas.jpg

Back to the story, she obviously knew that she shouldn't be on the phone while driving since she threw the phone down when she saw the officer. In that case, why didn't she pull over the car to make the call? If anything, pulling over the car may have silenced the children.

Is talking on your phone illegal every where? Sure can't be, at least in Michigan, as I can stand here in my picture window and count people on their phone that drive by. I'm in a raised ranch house so window is well above ground level. Can usually see the one's with phones in lap and tell if they're texting too!

 

If cops were actually busting people for talking, let alone the one's that are obviosuly texting, there shouldn't be hardly any traffic at all here!

It's quickly becoming illegal everywhere (in the US at least), like it should be.

Oh yeah, then where do all my christmas presents from him come from then, huh? And how do you explain this:

father-christmas.jpg

Back to the story, she obviously knew that she shouldn't be on the phone while driving since she threw the phone down when she saw the officer. In that case, why didn't she pull over the car to make the call? If anything, pulling over the car may have silenced the children.

yes, she should have pulled over, its her own stupid fault for breaking the law, what if she had caused an accident. the cost of her mistake is justified.  i have no time for people who use cellphones while driving / people who speed / think its cool to drift across the public roads/ etc... your driving a motor vehicle and that's all you should be doing with your attention on what's going on around you! you only have your self to blame if you are caught.

Michigan allows driving while talking on a phone, but some cities like Detroit have local bans. This patchwork of laws can get you in trouble fast.

OTOH, driving while texting is illegal as it is in most states. Fines run from $20 in California to $10,000 in Alaska.

194jo10wbl5u6jpg.jpg

when will parents quit lying to kids

 

santa does not exist neither does easter bunny, tooth fairy, g... ,. etc.

 

Let kids have some magic, it's where imagination comes from. 

Michigan allows driving while talking on a phone, but some cities like Detroit have local bans. This patchwork of laws can get you in trouble fast.

OTOH, driving while texting is illegal as it is in most states. Fines run from $20 in California to $10,000 in Alaska.

194jo10wbl5u6jpg.jpg

 

While not all places have specific laws against driving while using a cell phone. the law itself it's redundant. EVERYWHERE allover the world has laws against distracted driving, this covers driving while using or fiddling with the cell phone or any other hand held device. Cell phone laws are silly unnecessary paperwork that's already covered. 

I used to live in a third-wor...... developing country (now I live in another TW country :/).

 

For some moronic reasons, like lack of budget (not exactly true), etc. some of the "highways" pass through parts of small villages, meaning you have to slow down to ridiculous speeds, 20-30 Km/h.

 

Once I was travelling form one city to another and along the road there were at least 15 of such villages; it was really exhausting, constantly adjusting my speed from 110 to 30, being extra careful not to run over anyone, since people crossed the road to get from one side of the village to another, and so on.

 

Eventually I got tired and angry and passed one of the said villages at a higher speed, 60-70. A policeman stopped me. He asked "Do you know that you were supposed to go slow here?". I said "Yes, I were indeed. It is completely stupid for a supposed "highway" to be built like this, but the law is the law. I broke it and I'll pay for it. I know what I did."

 

He issued a ticket, obviously, but at the third of what it was supposed to be. :D

 

 

TL;DR

 

If you want to break the law, then be prepared to pay for it if you got caught. Arguing and false justification will only make it worse.

We have sections like that here in some parts of PA and NJ... Except the speed limit is 55Mph going right next to people's homes and driveways.

 

That always feels far too fast for me being right next to where someone is walking along the road or a kid could run out.

when will parents quit lying to kids

 

santa does not exist neither does easter bunny, tooth fairy, g... ,. etc.

 

..or God. You forgot about God. Another old man with a white beard who will give you what you wish for as long as you're on his "Nice List".

  • Like 2

Is talking on your phone illegal every where? Sure can't be, at least in Michigan, as I can stand here in my picture window and count people on their phone that drive by. I'm in a raised ranch house so window is well above ground level. Can usually see the one's with phones in lap and tell if they're texting too!

 

If cops were actually busting people for talking, let alone the one's that are obviously texting, there shouldn't be hardly any traffic at all here!

 

I know at least in Oregon, they passed a law making phones illegal to use while driving unless you have a hands free device such as a bluetooth headset or in car system.  If they see you with a phone in our hand, you as likely to get a ticket as the person who is breaking another traffic law.  They will excuse you though if you are pulled over on the shoulder of the road or parked in a parking lot (Basically not driving it and at a stop sign or light).  In spite of this, there are still plenty of folks with the phone glued to their ear and hand on the road here.  I guess the threat of the maximum fine of $500 is not enough of a deal to them. 

 

Anyway, using the power of Santa can really be a great tool for any parent of a young child.  We found though that it just does not work too well from January through until the stores put the decorations out in September.

That's what Siri and Google Now are for. My LG's voice recognition works like a charm.

 

Or Cortana, or course. Or TellMe, really. I never had any trouble using the voice dialing on WP7 even before Cortana.

 

 

Do these places that allow talking on a phone while driving require it to be handsfree? Dialing a number or pushing and buttons is exactly the same as texting.

 

Some places. It's a patchwork. You definitely shouldn't be searching through your contacts list.

In California, you have to be hands-free and you can't text at all. If you're under 18 or you drive a bus, you can't use a cell phone under any circumstances. Even so, there's plenty of people do it and I see a lot of young folks driving while holding a cell phone. Anecdotally, I'd say that enforcement is fairly minimal, probably about the same rate at which they enforce seatbelt laws.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I am not a US citizen nor a Trump fan. Respect to both left and right. But I will, for the sake of fun, predict something for my own. There will come a day when the US and China will collide like titans ( over Taiwan or anything else ). Then, on that day, some people in this comment section will realize how good an idea it was to become independent in areas like that. ( Or atleast try )
    • Microsoft Edge gets tons of security features, including AI model that can see your screen by Usama Jawad Microsoft Edge may not be the most popular browser out there, but it does receive quite frequent updates that sometimes bring surprising new features and axe others that are not as popular. Now, Microsoft has detailed some of the new security enhancements that it has introduced in Edge for Business, typically used by commercial customers. Microsoft has emphasized that security features are baked into Edge for Business and offer native integration with security and governance tools like Defender and Purview. Browser sessions are governed by default on managed devices but can also be governed through dedicated work profiles on unmanaged devices. An important aspect in this area is controlling the use of shadow AI. We have talked about this before, but it essentially restricts employees from using unsanctioned AI apps through data loss prevention (DLP) policies, with Edge redirecting them to trusted AI services like Microsoft 365 Copilot. This feature, available as a pay-as-you-go (PAYG) license, ensures that confidential data never exits AI boundaries set by your organization in Purview. Additionally, Microsoft also has strong DLP policies for contractors. Contractors leveraging a Entra ID-joined work profile provisioned by their contracting company on a device managed by their actual employer can be restricted from downloading files locally. In such scenarios, the file is saved on the contracting firm's OneDrive rather than being downloaded locally. Another useful Edge security feature disallows copying and pasting from unmanaged locations and apps. Similarly, DLP policies can be configured at a granular level to restrict screenshots or downloading of files from certain locations. In the same vein, IT admins can block the installation of extensions, hosted apps, themes and scripts, and control if users can install extensions from external locations. They can also enable the installation of specific extensions and allow users to request access to certain extensions, so that they can be managed on a case-by-case basis. Finally, Edge for Business now has an on-device AI model that uses computer vision to see what's on your screen and block potentially malicious content immediately. This does not rely on site reputation, as it simply monitors what is being displayed on your screen, which means that it is effective against malicious content that takes over your screen and employs scareware tactics. Since this is an on-device AI model, it does use your system's resources, so it's enabled by default only on devices with at least 2GB of RAM and four CPU cores. You can find more details in the Microsoft Mechanics video here.
    • Could you come up with a slightly less depressing background for Tux instead of that gray gradient? Doesn't have to be cheerful, just less of a downer...
    • Linux 7.2's first release candidate gets off to a good start by Paul Hill Credit: Larry Ewing It has been a few weeks since the release of Linux 7.1, and in that time, the Linux 7.2 merge window has been open, where developers can submit their features and patches ready for the upcoming release. That window is now shut, and the release candidate phase has begun so that new features can be tested and further fixes applied. According to the founder of Linux, Linus Torvalds, this week’s release candidate looks “reasonably normal”. Although we are super early in the release candidates, this is a good sign as it makes it more likely that an eighth release candidate will not be needed. Torvalds even mentioned that the update’s stats are only larger than they really are because there was another AMD header drop with a third of the patch just being AMD GPU register definitions, which aren’t big changes but make the code contributed look larger overall. In addition to this, he noted that just over half the patch is drivers, even when excluding the AMD register dump. The rest of the changes are spread out over architecture updates, tooling, documentation, and core kernel updates. In the next week, Torvalds says that he will be chilling out, taking the week “mostly off”. Despite this, he will be reading emails and keeping up with things, so if he is slow responding, now you know why. He said he is hoping for a calm week, but we will just have to see if the second release candidate is actually like that. We should expect seven or eight release candidates before Linux 7.2 is released, so expect it around the end of August. If you missed it a few weeks ago, be sure to check out our coverage of Linux 7.1's release.
    • Ridiculous claim that the labor cost difference of $6000 annually would increase cost per phone by $200. The employees produce 3 phones per month or what?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Zeynel earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      JKR earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Dedicated
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      248
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      86
    5. 5
      macoman
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!