Mom calls Santa Claus, gets hit with $145 fine


Recommended Posts

No, she didn't get a fine for talking to santa claus :rolleyes: , She got a fine for messing on her phone while driving. Against the law. And arguably even more dangerous since she has to use more of her brain to be creative, and pretend instead of using it to focus on driving.
 

She should've been ignoring her spoiled kids and paid attention to the road.

 

Try to control your kids without making fairy threats.

 

This "we're all victims" crap is getting old fast.

you did.

Not just once, but twice. First failing to get the inspection and secondly talking on the phone while driving.

 

She was keenly aware of this since she immediately threw the phone to the floor when she saw the cop.

 

I love how people seem to have cognitive dissonance when it comes to owning up to their law breaking and dangerous behavior.

santa does not exist neither does easter bunny, tooth fairy, g... ,. etc.

Hush you, makes for awesome leverage with your kids till they figure it out on their own.

On topic -- duh. Easily deserved that fine. Personally lost a few people over the years to driver stupidity.

when will parents quit lying to kids

 

santa does not exist neither does easter bunny, tooth fairy, g... ,. etc.

 

finish your post! WHAT DOES THE G STAND FOR? So much suspense.

 

I don't want all my heroes to be fake.

  • Like 3

I used to live in a third-wor...... developing country (now I live in another TW country :/).

 

For some moronic reasons, like lack of budget (not exactly true), etc. some of the "highways" pass through parts of small villages, meaning you have to slow down to ridiculous speeds, 20-30 Km/h.

 

Once I was travelling form one city to another and along the road there were at least 15 of such villages; it was really exhausting, constantly adjusting my speed from 110 to 30, being extra careful not to run over anyone, since people crossed the road to get from one side of the village to another, and so on.

 

Eventually I got tired and angry and passed one of the said villages at a higher speed, 60-70. A policeman stopped me. He asked "Do you know that you were supposed to go slow here?". I said "Yes, I were indeed. It is completely stupid for a supposed "highway" to be built like this, but the law is the law. I broke it and I'll pay for it. I know what I did."

 

He issued a ticket, obviously, but at the third of what it was supposed to be. :D

 

 

TL;DR

 

If you want to break the law, then be prepared to pay for it if you got caught. Arguing and false justification will only make it worse.

Is talking on your phone illegal every where? Sure can't be, at least in Michigan, as I can stand here in my picture window and count people on their phone that drive by. I'm in a raised ranch house so window is well above ground level. Can usually see the one's with phones in lap and tell if they're texting too!

 

If cops were actually busting people for talking, let alone the one's that are obviosuly texting, there shouldn't be hardly any traffic at all here!

santa does not exist neither does easter bunny, tooth fairy, g... ,. etc.

Oh yeah, then where do all my christmas presents from him come from then, huh? And how do you explain this:

father-christmas.jpg

Back to the story, she obviously knew that she shouldn't be on the phone while driving since she threw the phone down when she saw the officer. In that case, why didn't she pull over the car to make the call? If anything, pulling over the car may have silenced the children.

Is talking on your phone illegal every where? Sure can't be, at least in Michigan, as I can stand here in my picture window and count people on their phone that drive by. I'm in a raised ranch house so window is well above ground level. Can usually see the one's with phones in lap and tell if they're texting too!

 

If cops were actually busting people for talking, let alone the one's that are obviosuly texting, there shouldn't be hardly any traffic at all here!

It's quickly becoming illegal everywhere (in the US at least), like it should be.

Oh yeah, then where do all my christmas presents from him come from then, huh? And how do you explain this:

father-christmas.jpg

Back to the story, she obviously knew that she shouldn't be on the phone while driving since she threw the phone down when she saw the officer. In that case, why didn't she pull over the car to make the call? If anything, pulling over the car may have silenced the children.

yes, she should have pulled over, its her own stupid fault for breaking the law, what if she had caused an accident. the cost of her mistake is justified.  i have no time for people who use cellphones while driving / people who speed / think its cool to drift across the public roads/ etc... your driving a motor vehicle and that's all you should be doing with your attention on what's going on around you! you only have your self to blame if you are caught.

Michigan allows driving while talking on a phone, but some cities like Detroit have local bans. This patchwork of laws can get you in trouble fast.

OTOH, driving while texting is illegal as it is in most states. Fines run from $20 in California to $10,000 in Alaska.

194jo10wbl5u6jpg.jpg

when will parents quit lying to kids

 

santa does not exist neither does easter bunny, tooth fairy, g... ,. etc.

 

Let kids have some magic, it's where imagination comes from. 

Michigan allows driving while talking on a phone, but some cities like Detroit have local bans. This patchwork of laws can get you in trouble fast.

OTOH, driving while texting is illegal as it is in most states. Fines run from $20 in California to $10,000 in Alaska.

194jo10wbl5u6jpg.jpg

 

While not all places have specific laws against driving while using a cell phone. the law itself it's redundant. EVERYWHERE allover the world has laws against distracted driving, this covers driving while using or fiddling with the cell phone or any other hand held device. Cell phone laws are silly unnecessary paperwork that's already covered. 

I used to live in a third-wor...... developing country (now I live in another TW country :/).

 

For some moronic reasons, like lack of budget (not exactly true), etc. some of the "highways" pass through parts of small villages, meaning you have to slow down to ridiculous speeds, 20-30 Km/h.

 

Once I was travelling form one city to another and along the road there were at least 15 of such villages; it was really exhausting, constantly adjusting my speed from 110 to 30, being extra careful not to run over anyone, since people crossed the road to get from one side of the village to another, and so on.

 

Eventually I got tired and angry and passed one of the said villages at a higher speed, 60-70. A policeman stopped me. He asked "Do you know that you were supposed to go slow here?". I said "Yes, I were indeed. It is completely stupid for a supposed "highway" to be built like this, but the law is the law. I broke it and I'll pay for it. I know what I did."

 

He issued a ticket, obviously, but at the third of what it was supposed to be. :D

 

 

TL;DR

 

If you want to break the law, then be prepared to pay for it if you got caught. Arguing and false justification will only make it worse.

We have sections like that here in some parts of PA and NJ... Except the speed limit is 55Mph going right next to people's homes and driveways.

 

That always feels far too fast for me being right next to where someone is walking along the road or a kid could run out.

when will parents quit lying to kids

 

santa does not exist neither does easter bunny, tooth fairy, g... ,. etc.

 

..or God. You forgot about God. Another old man with a white beard who will give you what you wish for as long as you're on his "Nice List".

  • Like 2

Is talking on your phone illegal every where? Sure can't be, at least in Michigan, as I can stand here in my picture window and count people on their phone that drive by. I'm in a raised ranch house so window is well above ground level. Can usually see the one's with phones in lap and tell if they're texting too!

 

If cops were actually busting people for talking, let alone the one's that are obviously texting, there shouldn't be hardly any traffic at all here!

 

I know at least in Oregon, they passed a law making phones illegal to use while driving unless you have a hands free device such as a bluetooth headset or in car system.  If they see you with a phone in our hand, you as likely to get a ticket as the person who is breaking another traffic law.  They will excuse you though if you are pulled over on the shoulder of the road or parked in a parking lot (Basically not driving it and at a stop sign or light).  In spite of this, there are still plenty of folks with the phone glued to their ear and hand on the road here.  I guess the threat of the maximum fine of $500 is not enough of a deal to them. 

 

Anyway, using the power of Santa can really be a great tool for any parent of a young child.  We found though that it just does not work too well from January through until the stores put the decorations out in September.

That's what Siri and Google Now are for. My LG's voice recognition works like a charm.

 

Or Cortana, or course. Or TellMe, really. I never had any trouble using the voice dialing on WP7 even before Cortana.

 

 

Do these places that allow talking on a phone while driving require it to be handsfree? Dialing a number or pushing and buttons is exactly the same as texting.

 

Some places. It's a patchwork. You definitely shouldn't be searching through your contacts list.

In California, you have to be hands-free and you can't text at all. If you're under 18 or you drive a bus, you can't use a cell phone under any circumstances. Even so, there's plenty of people do it and I see a lot of young folks driving while holding a cell phone. Anecdotally, I'd say that enforcement is fairly minimal, probably about the same rate at which they enforce seatbelt laws.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
    • Depends on what you need. Might be a bit clearer on what you plan to do with it. Sort of a waste if you get the newest and greatest, but don't know how to use it.
    • NTLite 2026.06.11200 by Razvan Serea NTLite is a Windows configuration tool that allows you to modify your existing Windows install or an image yet to be deployed, remove Windows components, configure and integrate, speed up the Windows deployment process. Reduce Windows footprint on your RAM and storage drive memory. Remove components of your choice, guarded by compatibility safety mechanisms, which speed up finding that sweet spot. Windows Unattended feature support, providing many commonly used options on a single page for easy setup. Easily integrate a single or multiple drivers, update or language packages. Package integration features smart sorting, enabling you to seamlessly add packages for integration and the tool will apply them in the appropriate order, keeping hotfix compatibility in check. One of the important new features of NTLite (compared to its predecessors) is the ability to modify an already installed the operating system, by removing unnecessary components. Supports Windows 11, 10, 8.1 and 7, x86 and x64, live and image. Server editions of the same versions, excluding support for component removals and feature configuration. ARM64 image support in the alpha stage. Does not support Checked/Debug, Embedded, IoT editions, nor Vista or XP. NTLite 2026.06.11200 changelog: New Secure Boot Migration support: Verification, certificate staging, and boot-manager/sector update across the Image, Updates, Apply, and Create-ISO pages (2023 CA migration, optional 2011 revocation, Anti-rollback, Boot sector choice etc) Secure Boot Host Readiness: Live host Secure Boot migration monitor and Servicing-task control Option under Image page - C:\Windows row, or load the host as the target - Updates - Secure Boot Image: 'Sort mounted images first' option for the image list in Menu-Settings UI: Hover description card for Components and Unattended pages, selectable text and quick access to Compatibility options Command line: Relay commands into the already-running instance Enables controlling already running NTLite via ntlite.exe Use /NewInstance to launch an additional instance using CLI operations (premium) UI: 'New instance' option via main menu instead of a secondary ntlite.exe prompt Apply: Hide individual Apply-page notes with a per-note dismiss (X), critical excluded Settings: 'Unsigned RDP file launch warnings' tweak (RDP client), bypassing the April 2026 security-update prompt on RDP connections Upgrade Image: Live OS and deployed image editing now unlocked on free/test licenses, same licensing as images Image: 'Recompress' option in manual dialog Remove Editions to shrink the WIM in one session Image: SWM part size set inline on the Apply page and image dialogs, split-size popup retired Image: Relative 'Last change' dates; editions grouped by build time to reduce noise Image: 'Forget - Missing' on the Edit-cache menu to mass drop entries whose folder is gone Components: Root groups reorganized - user-facing groups first, system/critical last Components: Show filter options to view components by Template or App-type, since Apps are now merged into groups Presets: Delete confirmation now lists the multi-selected preset names UI: Design update propagated to the rest of the tool UI: Filter and search match words in any order and partially, better results filtering Components Unattended: Input-locale language derives from the user locale, with an independent keyboard picker, enables combinations previously unavailable Unattended: Input-locale now allows for a user value override Unattended: Localization OOBE WinPE now can be copied with the new WinPE Copy OOBE localization toggle, enter locale settings once for both stages Updates: Downloader greys and locks updates the image already carries (hotfix and MSIX) Updates: Resume interrupted update downloads Command line: Many upgrades, see /?, now prints help to the console or redirected output UI-Translation: Finnish language added, also thanks for Chinese Traditional (Matt), French (tistou77), Italian (clarensio), Russian (RDS), Swedish (1FF), Vietnamese (Vu Anh Vu) Fix Components: Containers removal breaking Apps deployment Components: Microsoft Account had leftovers when Easy Migrate is kept Image: Export to an existing WIM improvements, Append renamed to Merge Image: Improved 26H1 live removal support Image: No more 'X:\ not accessible' popup for certain drives during image scan Presets: Manual image refresh picks up presets added/removed outside the app Tweaks: Disabled visual-effect animations no longer return after first logon on a new profile Tweaks: Live Visual Effects toggles (animations, drag full windows, font smoothing) now apply correctly Download: NTLite 2026.06.11200 | 20.5 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Link: NTLite Home Page | NTLite Features | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      258
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!