AirAsia Plane With 162 Aboard Missing in Indonesia


Recommended Posts

I honestly thought at the very least, pilots would get themselves that Breitling Emergency watch

In this day and age, as commercial jetliners are going missing, pull the pin, it's not misuse, and it gives armed forces a bearing at the very least to go and take a look at...

It's a tad bit expensive though. And it's a fat watch.

Could just buy some life insurance and take care of any family members?! Hmmm?!

  • Like 1

It's a tad bit expensive though. And it's a fat watch.

Could just buy some life insurance and take care of any family members?! Hmmm?!

Yes, but commercial pilots aren't exactly 'living at the poverty line' and it's an added measure, if you will, for someone who knows how to decipher and locate the distress signal's origin

And to be honest,

Yes, but commercial pilots aren't exactly 'living at the poverty line' and it's an added measure, if you will, for someone who knows how to decipher and locate the distress signal's origin

And to be honest,

for something that most pilots would never experience in their lifetime? 

I get your point, but I was only offering something that could be used in addition to the measures already in place, I  mentioned this in the Malaysian Airlines thread also, I just feel something isn't working (clearly it isn't) in this modern day and age, planes go 'missing' we're not talking about a  random Cessna in Antarctica here, these are large jets and it's not like commercial pilots would feel the pinch, hell they could pay for it over time out of their pay if it's all about the cost of the watch...

The search for missing AirAsia Flight 8501 may have received a boost Monday after an Indonesian officials said that Australian planes had spotted objects in the Java Sea search area.

 

Jakarta's Air Force base commander Rear Marshal Dwi Putranto told the Associated Press that he was informed Monday that an Orion aircraft had detected "suspicious" objects near Nangka island, about 100 miles southwest of Pangkalan Bun, near central Kalimantan, or 700 miles from the location where the plane lost contact with air traffic controllers early Sunday.

 

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2014/12/29/objects-reportedly-spotted-in-search-for-missing-airasia-flight-as-hope-fades/

I get your point, but I was only offering something that could be used in addition to the measures already in place, I  mentioned this in the Malaysian Airlines thread also, I just feel something isn't working (clearly it isn't) in this modern day and age, planes go 'missing' we're not talking about a  random Cessna in Antarctica here, these are large jets and it's not like commercial pilots would feel the pinch, hell they could pay for it over time out of their pay if it's all about the cost of the watch...

 

Agree, the current solutions aren't providing enough measures to find the wreckage, but it shouldn't be the pilots to provide more measures but the airplane itself and the airliner should buy them (for cutting costs they don't implement all the solutions the airplanes constructors make). Regarding the Malasyan Airlines: the problem is that this is a big ocean, so it really feels like a Cessna went missing in there, not a big airliner.

 

i hope this time they find a quick resolution for this, those poor families need answers. :/

  • Like 1

Well if it's that cheap maybe you can buy me one. And how do you know that pilots aren't on the poverty line? I had to go bankrupt just a year into my job. This isn't the 1960s anymore. When I started, after loan repayments I was making less than someone who works at McDonalds.

If commercial pilots are living at the poverty line then they need to rethink their career path, I work as a truck driver and could afford to buy you one, but as you are in fact, a total stranger and my life isn't in your hands, no! Bankrupt a year into your job? I'll refrain from posting an opinion here.

And that reference to the 1960's waaaay before I was born, my comments were simply in reference to another form of tracking, but without any field data there's no way to know if it would help, but feel free to continue trying to put me down for suggesting something else be done in order to try and at least track the location of the plane.

For the record, I was looking forward to your reply as you have experience in being a pilot (or at least that's what I thought from the malaysia airlines thread)

If commercial pilots are living at the poverty line then they need to rethink their career path, I work as a truck driver and could afford to buy you one, but as you are in fact, a total stranger and my life isn't in your hands, no! Bankrupt a year into your job? I'll refrain from posting an opinion here.

And that reference to the 1960's waaaay before I was born, my comments were simply in reference to another form of tracking, but without any field data there's no way to know if it would help, but feel free to continue trying to put me down for suggesting something else be done in order to try and at least track the location of the plane.

For the record, I was looking forward to your reply as you have experience in being a pilot (or at least that's what I thought from the malaysia airlines thread)

When you owe

It just broke that they've found victims.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2014/12/30/air-asia-search-day-three/

BREAKING: 'Victims' have been spotted near the area where the missing AirAsia plane vanished, Indonesia officials say.

Indonesia officials confirmed reports of spotting an emergency door and a life jacket in the Java Sea

An Indonesian military aircraft spotted white, red and black objects including what appears to be a life jacket about 105 miles off the coast of Pangkalan Bun Tuesday. One helicopter has been dispatched to pick up the items for investigation.

"This is the most significant finding, but we cannot confirm anything until the investigation is completed," Murjatmodjo said.

The announcement comes after the U.S. sent a destroyer to help with the search-and-rescue operation Tuesday.

The 7th Fleet said the USS Sampson, which was already on an independent deployment in the Western Pacific, would be at the scene later Tuesday, Fox News confirmed.

>

BBC is also reporting.

 

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-30630330

 

At least 40 bodies have been recovered from the sea in the search for missing AirAsia Flight QZ8501, the Indonesian navy says.

The bodies were spotted along with debris floating in the Java Sea off the Indonesian part of Borneo, in one of the search zones for the plane.

There has been no official confirmation that the remains come from the plane.

The Airbus A320-200, carrying 162 people from Surabaya in Indonesia to Singapore, disappeared on Sunday.

 

Given the technology available today, why can't we have real time video transmitted from the cockpit and outside the plane. It wouldn't be that hard to do, and means we would at least know what's happened to these planes before millions are spend on search operations.

Bandwidth. Not enough internet satellites capable vs the number of in-flight aircraft. That may change if the 700 satellite SpaceX & WorldVu/F5 internet satellite joint venture gets launched. We'll know in a few weeks.

Given the technology available today, why can't we have real time video transmitted from the cockpit and outside the plane. It wouldn't be that hard to do, and means we would at least know what's happened to these planes before millions are spend on search operations.

Do you know how many flights are in the air at one time? That's a ridiculous amount of data to be transmitted and stored. Contrary to what you read/watch in media, planes are still the safest mode to travel. In 2013, there were the least amount of fatalities for modern aviation history. In 2014, there were the lowest number of crashes, for modern aviation history. 

Given the technology available today, why can't we have real time video transmitted from the cockpit and outside the plane. It wouldn't be that hard to do, and means we would at least know what's happened to these planes before millions are spend on search operations.

There is a company, I believe out of Canada working on a Cloud based black box. The way they describe it, is it checks in every hour, any deviation from flight path it automatically changes to live broacasts

Do you know how many flights are in the air at one time? That's a ridiculous amount of data to be transmitted and stored. Contrary to what you read/watch in media, planes are still the safest mode to travel. In 2013, there were the least amount of fatalities for modern aviation history. In 2014, there were the lowest number of crashes, for modern aviation history. 

 

I get that and I'm not questioning the safety of air travel, but given the technology available to us, when things do rarely go wrong, we shouldn't be in a position where we have no idea what happened to an aircraft.

 

You don't need to transmit every video from every flight, nor does it all have to be stored. Just allow ATC to request it, or automatically send it in the case of anything unusual (route diversion, power cut, harsh manoeuvre, etc). 

There is a company, I believe out of Canada working on a Cloud based black box. The way they describe it, is it checks in every hour, any deviation from flight path it automatically changes to live broacasts

British Airways was testing something similar (a while back) constant reports back to a datacentre, in theory little to no need for in flight recorders, don't know if they scrapped it or not..

Do you know how many flights are in the air at one time? That's a ridiculous amount of data to be transmitted and stored. Contrary to what you read/watch in media, planes are still the safest mode to travel. In 2013, there were the least amount of fatalities for modern aviation history. In 2014, there were the lowest number of crashes, for modern aviation history. 

That conception always bugged me. Safest, compared to what? Isn't that just a matter of proportion? I mean, there are clearly fewer planes than automobiles, right? So the chance of an accident is obviously smaller than a car crash.

Mindboggling that they do not know where this plane is.  Same thing with MH370.  

 

These planes should have their location known from takeoff to landing (or impact).  ADS-B (or better yet ALAS) devices need to put on the fast track and implemented into these aircraft.

We have these:

https://www.apple.com/icloud/find-my-iphone.html

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.fsp.android.phonetracker&hl=en

https://preyproject.com/

Why do planes not have this?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
    • AMD releases hotfix for driver install issues on Windows 10 PCs by Taras Buria Earlier this week, AMD released an important graphics driver update. Version 26.6.2 brought AMD FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen Radeon lineup, the RX 7000 series, giving users better upscaling tech that was previously locked to the newest GPUs. However, the driver turned out to be a little buggy, with users reporting installation issues on systems still running Windows 10. AMD quickly acknowledged the bug and today released a hotfix to resolve the problem. The AMD 26.6.3 Hotfix update is now available for download from the official website. Given that it is a hotfix release, it has only one change in its release notes: AMD announced the update on its official X account and added that a WHQL driver update with the necessary fixes would be released next week. Meanwhile, users can apply the hotfix or roll back to the previous driver using the official AMD Cleanup Utility. You can download AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.3 Hotfix Preview Driver from the official website here. It is compatible with all currently supported graphics cards and 64-bit Windows 10 and 11. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • With Microsoft now listening to its core audience and acting upon received feedback, fans can finally expect a much better version of Windows 11 than what was available five years ago. Here is to five more years, Windows 11! I guess we all need a good laugh now and again...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      466
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!