AirAsia Plane With 162 Aboard Missing in Indonesia


Recommended Posts

I honestly thought at the very least, pilots would get themselves that Breitling Emergency watch

In this day and age, as commercial jetliners are going missing, pull the pin, it's not misuse, and it gives armed forces a bearing at the very least to go and take a look at...

It's a tad bit expensive though. And it's a fat watch.

Could just buy some life insurance and take care of any family members?! Hmmm?!

  • Like 1

It's a tad bit expensive though. And it's a fat watch.

Could just buy some life insurance and take care of any family members?! Hmmm?!

Yes, but commercial pilots aren't exactly 'living at the poverty line' and it's an added measure, if you will, for someone who knows how to decipher and locate the distress signal's origin

And to be honest,

Yes, but commercial pilots aren't exactly 'living at the poverty line' and it's an added measure, if you will, for someone who knows how to decipher and locate the distress signal's origin

And to be honest,

for something that most pilots would never experience in their lifetime? 

I get your point, but I was only offering something that could be used in addition to the measures already in place, I  mentioned this in the Malaysian Airlines thread also, I just feel something isn't working (clearly it isn't) in this modern day and age, planes go 'missing' we're not talking about a  random Cessna in Antarctica here, these are large jets and it's not like commercial pilots would feel the pinch, hell they could pay for it over time out of their pay if it's all about the cost of the watch...

The search for missing AirAsia Flight 8501 may have received a boost Monday after an Indonesian officials said that Australian planes had spotted objects in the Java Sea search area.

 

Jakarta's Air Force base commander Rear Marshal Dwi Putranto told the Associated Press that he was informed Monday that an Orion aircraft had detected "suspicious" objects near Nangka island, about 100 miles southwest of Pangkalan Bun, near central Kalimantan, or 700 miles from the location where the plane lost contact with air traffic controllers early Sunday.

 

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2014/12/29/objects-reportedly-spotted-in-search-for-missing-airasia-flight-as-hope-fades/

I get your point, but I was only offering something that could be used in addition to the measures already in place, I  mentioned this in the Malaysian Airlines thread also, I just feel something isn't working (clearly it isn't) in this modern day and age, planes go 'missing' we're not talking about a  random Cessna in Antarctica here, these are large jets and it's not like commercial pilots would feel the pinch, hell they could pay for it over time out of their pay if it's all about the cost of the watch...

 

Agree, the current solutions aren't providing enough measures to find the wreckage, but it shouldn't be the pilots to provide more measures but the airplane itself and the airliner should buy them (for cutting costs they don't implement all the solutions the airplanes constructors make). Regarding the Malasyan Airlines: the problem is that this is a big ocean, so it really feels like a Cessna went missing in there, not a big airliner.

 

i hope this time they find a quick resolution for this, those poor families need answers. :/

  • Like 1

Well if it's that cheap maybe you can buy me one. And how do you know that pilots aren't on the poverty line? I had to go bankrupt just a year into my job. This isn't the 1960s anymore. When I started, after loan repayments I was making less than someone who works at McDonalds.

If commercial pilots are living at the poverty line then they need to rethink their career path, I work as a truck driver and could afford to buy you one, but as you are in fact, a total stranger and my life isn't in your hands, no! Bankrupt a year into your job? I'll refrain from posting an opinion here.

And that reference to the 1960's waaaay before I was born, my comments were simply in reference to another form of tracking, but without any field data there's no way to know if it would help, but feel free to continue trying to put me down for suggesting something else be done in order to try and at least track the location of the plane.

For the record, I was looking forward to your reply as you have experience in being a pilot (or at least that's what I thought from the malaysia airlines thread)

If commercial pilots are living at the poverty line then they need to rethink their career path, I work as a truck driver and could afford to buy you one, but as you are in fact, a total stranger and my life isn't in your hands, no! Bankrupt a year into your job? I'll refrain from posting an opinion here.

And that reference to the 1960's waaaay before I was born, my comments were simply in reference to another form of tracking, but without any field data there's no way to know if it would help, but feel free to continue trying to put me down for suggesting something else be done in order to try and at least track the location of the plane.

For the record, I was looking forward to your reply as you have experience in being a pilot (or at least that's what I thought from the malaysia airlines thread)

When you owe

It just broke that they've found victims.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2014/12/30/air-asia-search-day-three/

BREAKING: 'Victims' have been spotted near the area where the missing AirAsia plane vanished, Indonesia officials say.

Indonesia officials confirmed reports of spotting an emergency door and a life jacket in the Java Sea

An Indonesian military aircraft spotted white, red and black objects including what appears to be a life jacket about 105 miles off the coast of Pangkalan Bun Tuesday. One helicopter has been dispatched to pick up the items for investigation.

"This is the most significant finding, but we cannot confirm anything until the investigation is completed," Murjatmodjo said.

The announcement comes after the U.S. sent a destroyer to help with the search-and-rescue operation Tuesday.

The 7th Fleet said the USS Sampson, which was already on an independent deployment in the Western Pacific, would be at the scene later Tuesday, Fox News confirmed.

>

BBC is also reporting.

 

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-30630330

 

At least 40 bodies have been recovered from the sea in the search for missing AirAsia Flight QZ8501, the Indonesian navy says.

The bodies were spotted along with debris floating in the Java Sea off the Indonesian part of Borneo, in one of the search zones for the plane.

There has been no official confirmation that the remains come from the plane.

The Airbus A320-200, carrying 162 people from Surabaya in Indonesia to Singapore, disappeared on Sunday.

 

Given the technology available today, why can't we have real time video transmitted from the cockpit and outside the plane. It wouldn't be that hard to do, and means we would at least know what's happened to these planes before millions are spend on search operations.

Bandwidth. Not enough internet satellites capable vs the number of in-flight aircraft. That may change if the 700 satellite SpaceX & WorldVu/F5 internet satellite joint venture gets launched. We'll know in a few weeks.

Given the technology available today, why can't we have real time video transmitted from the cockpit and outside the plane. It wouldn't be that hard to do, and means we would at least know what's happened to these planes before millions are spend on search operations.

Do you know how many flights are in the air at one time? That's a ridiculous amount of data to be transmitted and stored. Contrary to what you read/watch in media, planes are still the safest mode to travel. In 2013, there were the least amount of fatalities for modern aviation history. In 2014, there were the lowest number of crashes, for modern aviation history. 

Given the technology available today, why can't we have real time video transmitted from the cockpit and outside the plane. It wouldn't be that hard to do, and means we would at least know what's happened to these planes before millions are spend on search operations.

There is a company, I believe out of Canada working on a Cloud based black box. The way they describe it, is it checks in every hour, any deviation from flight path it automatically changes to live broacasts

Do you know how many flights are in the air at one time? That's a ridiculous amount of data to be transmitted and stored. Contrary to what you read/watch in media, planes are still the safest mode to travel. In 2013, there were the least amount of fatalities for modern aviation history. In 2014, there were the lowest number of crashes, for modern aviation history. 

 

I get that and I'm not questioning the safety of air travel, but given the technology available to us, when things do rarely go wrong, we shouldn't be in a position where we have no idea what happened to an aircraft.

 

You don't need to transmit every video from every flight, nor does it all have to be stored. Just allow ATC to request it, or automatically send it in the case of anything unusual (route diversion, power cut, harsh manoeuvre, etc). 

There is a company, I believe out of Canada working on a Cloud based black box. The way they describe it, is it checks in every hour, any deviation from flight path it automatically changes to live broacasts

British Airways was testing something similar (a while back) constant reports back to a datacentre, in theory little to no need for in flight recorders, don't know if they scrapped it or not..

Do you know how many flights are in the air at one time? That's a ridiculous amount of data to be transmitted and stored. Contrary to what you read/watch in media, planes are still the safest mode to travel. In 2013, there were the least amount of fatalities for modern aviation history. In 2014, there were the lowest number of crashes, for modern aviation history. 

That conception always bugged me. Safest, compared to what? Isn't that just a matter of proportion? I mean, there are clearly fewer planes than automobiles, right? So the chance of an accident is obviously smaller than a car crash.

Mindboggling that they do not know where this plane is.  Same thing with MH370.  

 

These planes should have their location known from takeoff to landing (or impact).  ADS-B (or better yet ALAS) devices need to put on the fast track and implemented into these aircraft.

We have these:

https://www.apple.com/icloud/find-my-iphone.html

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.fsp.android.phonetracker&hl=en

https://preyproject.com/

Why do planes not have this?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!