AirAsia Plane With 162 Aboard Missing in Indonesia


Recommended Posts

I honestly thought at the very least, pilots would get themselves that Breitling Emergency watch

In this day and age, as commercial jetliners are going missing, pull the pin, it's not misuse, and it gives armed forces a bearing at the very least to go and take a look at...

It's a tad bit expensive though. And it's a fat watch.

Could just buy some life insurance and take care of any family members?! Hmmm?!

  • Like 1

It's a tad bit expensive though. And it's a fat watch.

Could just buy some life insurance and take care of any family members?! Hmmm?!

Yes, but commercial pilots aren't exactly 'living at the poverty line' and it's an added measure, if you will, for someone who knows how to decipher and locate the distress signal's origin

And to be honest,

Yes, but commercial pilots aren't exactly 'living at the poverty line' and it's an added measure, if you will, for someone who knows how to decipher and locate the distress signal's origin

And to be honest,

for something that most pilots would never experience in their lifetime? 

I get your point, but I was only offering something that could be used in addition to the measures already in place, I  mentioned this in the Malaysian Airlines thread also, I just feel something isn't working (clearly it isn't) in this modern day and age, planes go 'missing' we're not talking about a  random Cessna in Antarctica here, these are large jets and it's not like commercial pilots would feel the pinch, hell they could pay for it over time out of their pay if it's all about the cost of the watch...

The search for missing AirAsia Flight 8501 may have received a boost Monday after an Indonesian officials said that Australian planes had spotted objects in the Java Sea search area.

 

Jakarta's Air Force base commander Rear Marshal Dwi Putranto told the Associated Press that he was informed Monday that an Orion aircraft had detected "suspicious" objects near Nangka island, about 100 miles southwest of Pangkalan Bun, near central Kalimantan, or 700 miles from the location where the plane lost contact with air traffic controllers early Sunday.

 

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2014/12/29/objects-reportedly-spotted-in-search-for-missing-airasia-flight-as-hope-fades/

I get your point, but I was only offering something that could be used in addition to the measures already in place, I  mentioned this in the Malaysian Airlines thread also, I just feel something isn't working (clearly it isn't) in this modern day and age, planes go 'missing' we're not talking about a  random Cessna in Antarctica here, these are large jets and it's not like commercial pilots would feel the pinch, hell they could pay for it over time out of their pay if it's all about the cost of the watch...

 

Agree, the current solutions aren't providing enough measures to find the wreckage, but it shouldn't be the pilots to provide more measures but the airplane itself and the airliner should buy them (for cutting costs they don't implement all the solutions the airplanes constructors make). Regarding the Malasyan Airlines: the problem is that this is a big ocean, so it really feels like a Cessna went missing in there, not a big airliner.

 

i hope this time they find a quick resolution for this, those poor families need answers. :/

  • Like 1

Well if it's that cheap maybe you can buy me one. And how do you know that pilots aren't on the poverty line? I had to go bankrupt just a year into my job. This isn't the 1960s anymore. When I started, after loan repayments I was making less than someone who works at McDonalds.

If commercial pilots are living at the poverty line then they need to rethink their career path, I work as a truck driver and could afford to buy you one, but as you are in fact, a total stranger and my life isn't in your hands, no! Bankrupt a year into your job? I'll refrain from posting an opinion here.

And that reference to the 1960's waaaay before I was born, my comments were simply in reference to another form of tracking, but without any field data there's no way to know if it would help, but feel free to continue trying to put me down for suggesting something else be done in order to try and at least track the location of the plane.

For the record, I was looking forward to your reply as you have experience in being a pilot (or at least that's what I thought from the malaysia airlines thread)

If commercial pilots are living at the poverty line then they need to rethink their career path, I work as a truck driver and could afford to buy you one, but as you are in fact, a total stranger and my life isn't in your hands, no! Bankrupt a year into your job? I'll refrain from posting an opinion here.

And that reference to the 1960's waaaay before I was born, my comments were simply in reference to another form of tracking, but without any field data there's no way to know if it would help, but feel free to continue trying to put me down for suggesting something else be done in order to try and at least track the location of the plane.

For the record, I was looking forward to your reply as you have experience in being a pilot (or at least that's what I thought from the malaysia airlines thread)

When you owe

It just broke that they've found victims.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2014/12/30/air-asia-search-day-three/

BREAKING: 'Victims' have been spotted near the area where the missing AirAsia plane vanished, Indonesia officials say.

Indonesia officials confirmed reports of spotting an emergency door and a life jacket in the Java Sea

An Indonesian military aircraft spotted white, red and black objects including what appears to be a life jacket about 105 miles off the coast of Pangkalan Bun Tuesday. One helicopter has been dispatched to pick up the items for investigation.

"This is the most significant finding, but we cannot confirm anything until the investigation is completed," Murjatmodjo said.

The announcement comes after the U.S. sent a destroyer to help with the search-and-rescue operation Tuesday.

The 7th Fleet said the USS Sampson, which was already on an independent deployment in the Western Pacific, would be at the scene later Tuesday, Fox News confirmed.

>

BBC is also reporting.

 

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-30630330

 

At least 40 bodies have been recovered from the sea in the search for missing AirAsia Flight QZ8501, the Indonesian navy says.

The bodies were spotted along with debris floating in the Java Sea off the Indonesian part of Borneo, in one of the search zones for the plane.

There has been no official confirmation that the remains come from the plane.

The Airbus A320-200, carrying 162 people from Surabaya in Indonesia to Singapore, disappeared on Sunday.

 

Given the technology available today, why can't we have real time video transmitted from the cockpit and outside the plane. It wouldn't be that hard to do, and means we would at least know what's happened to these planes before millions are spend on search operations.

Bandwidth. Not enough internet satellites capable vs the number of in-flight aircraft. That may change if the 700 satellite SpaceX & WorldVu/F5 internet satellite joint venture gets launched. We'll know in a few weeks.

Given the technology available today, why can't we have real time video transmitted from the cockpit and outside the plane. It wouldn't be that hard to do, and means we would at least know what's happened to these planes before millions are spend on search operations.

Do you know how many flights are in the air at one time? That's a ridiculous amount of data to be transmitted and stored. Contrary to what you read/watch in media, planes are still the safest mode to travel. In 2013, there were the least amount of fatalities for modern aviation history. In 2014, there were the lowest number of crashes, for modern aviation history. 

Given the technology available today, why can't we have real time video transmitted from the cockpit and outside the plane. It wouldn't be that hard to do, and means we would at least know what's happened to these planes before millions are spend on search operations.

There is a company, I believe out of Canada working on a Cloud based black box. The way they describe it, is it checks in every hour, any deviation from flight path it automatically changes to live broacasts

Do you know how many flights are in the air at one time? That's a ridiculous amount of data to be transmitted and stored. Contrary to what you read/watch in media, planes are still the safest mode to travel. In 2013, there were the least amount of fatalities for modern aviation history. In 2014, there were the lowest number of crashes, for modern aviation history. 

 

I get that and I'm not questioning the safety of air travel, but given the technology available to us, when things do rarely go wrong, we shouldn't be in a position where we have no idea what happened to an aircraft.

 

You don't need to transmit every video from every flight, nor does it all have to be stored. Just allow ATC to request it, or automatically send it in the case of anything unusual (route diversion, power cut, harsh manoeuvre, etc). 

There is a company, I believe out of Canada working on a Cloud based black box. The way they describe it, is it checks in every hour, any deviation from flight path it automatically changes to live broacasts

British Airways was testing something similar (a while back) constant reports back to a datacentre, in theory little to no need for in flight recorders, don't know if they scrapped it or not..

Do you know how many flights are in the air at one time? That's a ridiculous amount of data to be transmitted and stored. Contrary to what you read/watch in media, planes are still the safest mode to travel. In 2013, there were the least amount of fatalities for modern aviation history. In 2014, there were the lowest number of crashes, for modern aviation history. 

That conception always bugged me. Safest, compared to what? Isn't that just a matter of proportion? I mean, there are clearly fewer planes than automobiles, right? So the chance of an accident is obviously smaller than a car crash.

Mindboggling that they do not know where this plane is.  Same thing with MH370.  

 

These planes should have their location known from takeoff to landing (or impact).  ADS-B (or better yet ALAS) devices need to put on the fast track and implemented into these aircraft.

We have these:

https://www.apple.com/icloud/find-my-iphone.html

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.fsp.android.phonetracker&hl=en

https://preyproject.com/

Why do planes not have this?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And Microsoft got walloped on here for what they were charging for the new Surface book. Not looking as bad now. This was inevitable as they have to maintain those Apple margins.
    • Now 8GB of ram looks even worse in the Neo. I'm so happy I purchased 128GB of DDR 4 when I did.... paid $174. Upgraded my parents laptop to 32GB around the same time for $48. Luckily I have a TON of spare laptops. So i'm good on laptops for a while. I also have a lot of desktops too that I could use if i had to. Lets just hope nothing happens to my main 4 monitor couch workstation.
    • I will keep my current devices for several years... no planning in upgrading until these devices stop working. Too pricey.
    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has raised the U.S. prices of several MacBook and iPad models, including the MacBook Neo, which it launched for $599 less than four months ago. The company’s cheapest laptop now starts at $699, while some MacBook Pro configurations have increased by $300. The changes affect the MacBook Neo, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Apple has not changed the hardware or storage included with these models, so customers are simply paying more for the same configurations. Here is how the new US pricing compares with the previous starting prices: Product Previous price New price Increase MacBook Neo $599 $699 $100 13-inch MacBook Air, 512GB $1,099 $1,299 $200 14-inch MacBook Pro, 1TB $1,699 $1,999 $300 16-inch MacBook Pro $2,699 $2,999 $300 11-inch iPad Air, 128GB $599 $749 $150 13-inch iPad Air, 128GB $799 $949 $150 11-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $999 $1,199 $200 13-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $1,299 $1,499 $200 The updated prices are already appearing on Apple’s U.S. online store. The MacBook Neo increase will probably attract the most attention. Apple introduced the laptop in March for $599, pitching it as a more affordable Mac for students and buyers considering Windows laptops or Chromebooks. It uses an A18 Pro processor and originally undercut Dell’s new $699 XPS 13 by $100. Following the increase, the two laptops now have the same starting price. The M5 MacBook Air has also lost the price Apple promoted when it launched in March. The 13-inch model arrived with 512GB of storage for $1,099, while Apple’s store now lists the MacBook Air range as starting at $1,299. The 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 chip and 1TB of storage has gone from $1,699 to $1,999. Apple has made similar changes to its iPads. The recently released M4 iPad Air, which launched at the same $599 starting price as its predecessor, now starts at $749 for the 11-inch version. The 13-inch version has risen from $799 to $949. The iPad Pro increases are larger in dollar terms. Apple’s 11-inch M5 iPad Pro now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version has moved from $1,299 to $1,499. Both base models still include 256GB of storage. Apple blamed the increases on the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and NAND flash, which provide system memory and device storage. The company told Reuters that it had tried to shield customers from the increases but could no longer absorb them. “We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly,” Apple said. Tim Cook had already warned that price increases were coming. Cook said Apple’s existing component inventory had softened the immediate impact, but that higher memory costs would increasingly affect the company after the June quarter. Much of the pressure comes from the construction of AI data centers. Memory manufacturers are directing more production toward high-margin server products, leaving PC, tablet, and smartphone makers competing for the remaining supply. Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary or whether further increases are planned. For now, the changes show that even Apple’s purchasing power has not been enough to keep the AI-driven memory shortage away from consumer devices.
    • Ventoy 1.1.16 is out.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      453
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Xenon
      77
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!