• 0

Definitive Best *Paid* Antivirus 2015


Poll: Definitive Best *Paid* Antivirus 2015  

282 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • Avast! Pro/Internet Security
      11
    • AVG Antivirus PRO/Internet Security
      1
    • Avira Antivirus Premium/Pro/Endpoint
      7
    • BitDefender Anti Virus/Internet Security/Total Security
      16
    • Comodo Endpoint Security/Internet Security Pro
      1
    • Emsisoft Anti-Malware/Internet Security
      0
    • ESET NOD32/Smart Security/Endpoint Security
      64
    • Kaspersky Anti Virus
      20
    • MalwareBytes Anti Malware PRO
      4
    • McAfee Anti Virus
      0
    • Panda Anti Virus/Internet Security
      0
    • Sophos Endpoint
      0
    • Symantec/PC Tools/Norton
      19
    • Trend Micro Anti Virus/Internet Security
      1
    • Vipre Anti Virus
      0
    • Webroot
      6
    • Other (please specify below)
      5


Question

It's a new year, and a new poll for Definitive Best Antivirus. The 2014 thread can be found here.

This is a poll for best Paid antivirus, there is a separate thread for free antiviruses here.

 

If your choice of Paid Antivirus is not listed, please choose Other and specify in the comments.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1241710-definitive-best-paid-antivirus-2015/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Another one for a sandbox in conjunction with safe computing habits. Along with regular backups of course. No AV is 100% guaranteed to catch everything, never mind the performance drag and false positives, plus too many people use it as a crutch and assuming it's ok to be stupid with what they're doing. If you're frequently having issues, you're definitely doing it wrong.

  • 0

can we get 360 internet security added to the list?.

 

edit: nevermind, clicked into the wrong thread

 

a vote for ESET from me for paid :)

 

Actually I think 360 Total Security is better than a paid AV.

  • 0

ESET, I love that they take the threat of bloatware seriously saving me time cleaning useless toolbars and extensions. The remote administration is awesome too but takes some getting used to.

  • 0

I've used the free Avast for a while now but needed a change. So I've been using Norton Antivirus for the last 3 months and it's pretty good. Doesn't nag as much as Avast or have as many false positives. Also it makes it easy to whitelist files I trust.

  • 0

We've been deploying AVG CloudCare to clients for about a year. Only had one person with it installed successfully get reinfected, which is a much better ratio than we've seen with anything else we've tried.

 

I figure no AV protects against 100% of everything so why pay for it.

 

Don't you do tech support? What do you tell your customers?

  • 0

Don't you do tech support? What do you tell your customers?

 

Pretty much what I wrote above.  I usually give them Avast.

 

over the years i've seen people infected while running

 

webroot

Eset

Kaspersky

Avast

AVG

MSE

Norton

Mcafee

Trend

Secure it

Frontier Security (F-secure)

 

So why pay for an AV just go free.

 

I mean just upload an newly infected file to virus total. One file Avast will detect it and Norton won't and then the next file Norton Will detect it and Avast won't (example).

 

Sometimes only 5 of the 52 AV companies will detect an infected file. Sometimes less, sometimes more.

  • 0

Kaspersky Internet Security has been my choice for several years. I buy licenses for my family and also have a pool of friends who use it as well. The UI is great and most of all, there are very little false positives and the performance doesn't take a big hit.

 

I voted for Antivirus but Internet Security should be added to that item.

 

360 Total Secutiry is really awesome and my opinion is the best free alternative out there. The option to use Bitdefender and Avira engines is an added bonus. The only downside to it is that it has a module to disable services and startup entries that can cause more harm than good in the hands of less tech savvy people. It also shows many false positives.

  • 0

Eset Nod32 was once a top notch product, unfortunately it has been leaking for some time now and I have several customers that hadregularly updated their boxes and definitions caught some nasty stuff, and the replacement that I use "MalwareBytes Antimalware" proved to be  impenetrable for now.

  • 0

ESET is the one. I am a virus writter and they released a definition for my last creation within days of its release. And it was not a binary release so they had to compile it and test it etc, they were really fast. Oh, its a Linux virus to make it better. More info about it: www.virusradar.com/en/Linux_Zariche/detail

  • 0

Using Kaspersky, although I don't 'pay' for it. I get it free from my bank for doing online banking. They've given a new license every year since 2007 or something, although it wasn't always Kaspersky

  • 0

I'm using Avast Premiere and I'm happy with it, but Avast the company has disappointed me a fair number of times. I suppose it works really well and I still deploy the free version on PCs I repair, but I'm looking at other solutions.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Valve finally confirms Steam Machine prices, starts at $1049 for 512GB option by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The $1,428 option The Steam Hardware lineup that Valve announced last year is slowly starting to roll out. Following the recent Steam Controller launch, Valve has now confirmed the price of the Steam Machine, its all-in-one console-like solution for PC gaming in the living room. There are currently four variants being presented, with only the storage and the included controller being the biggest differences. All of the Steam Machines have the same internals consisting of a semi-custom AMD Zen 4 CPU with six cores and 12 threads, an RDNA 3 28CU GPU, 16GB of DDR5 memory, and 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM, all inside the familiar box Valve has been showing off for months now. The Steam Machine base model starts at $1,049. This has a 512GB NVMe SSD but does not come with a Steam Controller. Keep in mind that storage can be expanded with the microSD card slot too. Next, the $1,128 model has the exact same storage as the previous one but it does come with the new Steam Controller. If you need the Steam Machine to have more storage for games and apps than that, then the 2TB tiers are also available. The $1,349 Steam Machine has no controller once again, but it does ship with two extra faceplates (red fabric and solid walnut) to replace the standard black one. The final option costs $1,428, and it adds the controller back into the bundle. The Steam Machine ships with the Linux-based SteamOS. The box has a 1 Gigabit Ethernet port, DisplayPort 1.4, and HDMI 2.0, as well as one USB-C and four USB-A ports. Keep in mind that when purchasing standalone, the Steam Controller has a $100 price tag. With the above bundles, that drops to $80. It's a rather expensive machine for the internals it is touting, though the design and small form factor do help it somewhat. However, at the same time, the lack of upgradability hurts it. Valve says the ongoing parts shortages and massive price hikes for memory were the leading causes for this price. "The overall effect is that our original goal for the price of Steam Machine is no longer viable," added the company. "So the prices we're sharing today reflect the state of the world for manufacturing; or, more accurately, it reflects the price of the components as we've secured them over the past 6 months." Valve wants interested gamers to reserve it now to get the chance to pre-order a Steam Machine starting June 25, with shipping starting on June 29. Head here to sign up. The invites to buy it will be sent in a randomized order.
    • What the press release doesn’t mention, however, is how much water the natural gas plant itself will consume, Natural gas plants use about 2,803 gallons of water per megawatt-hour produced, which is significantly less than coal-fired plants that use around 19,185 gallons per megawatt-hour. Overall, natural gas plants are more water-efficient, using 584% less water than traditional power plants on average. AI generated
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      516
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      203
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!