• 0

Definitive Best *Paid* Antivirus 2015


Poll: Definitive Best *Paid* Antivirus 2015  

282 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • Avast! Pro/Internet Security
      11
    • AVG Antivirus PRO/Internet Security
      1
    • Avira Antivirus Premium/Pro/Endpoint
      7
    • BitDefender Anti Virus/Internet Security/Total Security
      16
    • Comodo Endpoint Security/Internet Security Pro
      1
    • Emsisoft Anti-Malware/Internet Security
      0
    • ESET NOD32/Smart Security/Endpoint Security
      64
    • Kaspersky Anti Virus
      20
    • MalwareBytes Anti Malware PRO
      4
    • McAfee Anti Virus
      0
    • Panda Anti Virus/Internet Security
      0
    • Sophos Endpoint
      0
    • Symantec/PC Tools/Norton
      19
    • Trend Micro Anti Virus/Internet Security
      1
    • Vipre Anti Virus
      0
    • Webroot
      6
    • Other (please specify below)
      5


Question

It's a new year, and a new poll for Definitive Best Antivirus. The 2014 thread can be found here.

This is a poll for best Paid antivirus, there is a separate thread for free antiviruses here.

 

If your choice of Paid Antivirus is not listed, please choose Other and specify in the comments.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1241710-definitive-best-paid-antivirus-2015/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I am using Norton, Norton 360 for me. It hasn't failed me yet these past few years and it has been light on resources and stable ever since I used it. Was using ESET before but there some things they were scanning that somehow wasn't picked up by them, hence the move back to Norton.

 

Scirwode

  • 0

Somehow DrWeb is missed in the list. It's main competitor to Kaspersky in its home market. And it's older. Back in 1990's-mid 2000's it was more popular than AVT. Kaspersky came to front mainly thank to marketing and rebranding.

I use mainly standalone scanners - AVZ (most of its technologies were acquired by Kaspersky many years ago), Kaspersky AVT, DrWeb CureIt.

  • Like 2
  • 0

ESET is the one. I am a virus writter and they released a definition for my last creation within days of its release. And it was not a binary release so they had to compile it and test it etc, they were really fast. Oh, its a Linux virus to make it better. More info about it: www.virusradar.com/en/Linux_Zariche/detail


Put your talents to better uses rather than pissing off people and needlessly causing problems with their systems.

  • 0

Secureaplus

the thread title said "paid"

looking at this it looks like a free mashup of other companies engines...  in cloud.    not even sure how can they do this as the engines are paid for.     i am confused now.   sounds like a hack.

  • 0

the thread title said "paid"

looking at this it looks like a free mashup of other companies engines...  in cloud.    not even sure how can they do this as the engines are paid for.     i am confused now.   sounds like a hack.

 

You can pay for it. I paid for it. I really like the whitelisting aspect of the AV.

  • 0

Trend Micro Anti Virus/Internet Security, seems I'm the only one. :(

 

Worked on  military contracts and the department of defense use it on their computers and gave me a license from their enterprise plan that they re-license every year.

So I use it basically cause its free for me, until they decide to change anti-virus companies.

 

It fairly lightweight and I haven't picked up anything nasty with it so it seems to do alright.

 

Haven't used Symantec/PC Tools/Norton in awhile but when I last used it, it was very resource heavy and not sure why it has so many users. It was like the Internet Explorer of the anti-virus world, bloated, slow and very behind in comparison to the competition and most systems came with it (like a free 3 month license or something). Will have to check it out again one day.

 

Before my free Trend license I used Kaspersky and I will likely go back to it if my trend license stops working.

  • 0
On 12/5/2015, 9:22:37, Luc2k said:

Have they fixed the huge amount of space it uses for monitored files?



I know about that bug, I actually heard about it here first, then researched it a little.  People would all of sudden have a 600GB AV folder and run out of disk space - pretty crazy.

I would like to say, yes, it was fixed - but I dont know as the 25 or so machines I admin for (family, friends, clients)  through my enterprise license have never experienced it and when you dont have problems, you tend not to research them much.
 

  • 0

Another nod for ESET. I truly do not even remember it is running on any of my machines until I get prompted for an update. I use it on all of my devices, even my phone, and it is so lightweight and actually does work.
The easiest recommendation I can make from a software standpoint.

  • 0

I like this thread - through 2 pages there have been a bunch of different solutions mentioned, but instead of someone just saying, "Oh that sucks - you dont know" - people are giving their reasons why they rely on a certain brand.  When you deal with people who only use the free crap - their expectations are lower, and they tend to be a little out of the loop on things.  Still of the mindset "well you have to use 2 different programs..."  - not if you're main AV program is good... I havent had MBAM installed in 2 years.

  • 0

ESET always wins these popularity contests by far. I'm confused why though, it rarely scores better than Kaspersky on AV-Comp. Why do people prefer ESET so overwhelmingly?

ESET always wins these popularity contests by far. I'm confused why though, it rarely scores better than Kaspersky on AV-Comp. Why do people prefer ESET so overwhelmingly?

  • 0
3 minutes ago, primexx said:

ESET always wins these popularity contests by far. I'm confused why though, it rarely scores better than Kaspersky on AV-Comp. Why do people prefer ESET so overwhelmingly?

ESET always wins these popularity contests by far. I'm confused why though, it rarely scores better than Kaspersky on AV-Comp. Why do people prefer ESET so overwhelmingly?

Uh-oh. The "double post bug" is back.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Web search has been one of those crap ware that I try to get rid of asap. It's annoying and slow. It was a cheap way for Microsoft to drive traffic to Bing.
    • All I can say is that think the USB G8 is better in many ways, and costs the same or slightly less. I wouldn't part with mine. It's even a big improvement over the G6 USB. (You can also use studio phones (up to 600 OHMs I think) with the G8, but I have to say that even relatively cheap 30-50 OHM phones sound absolutely great--far better than through most internal motherboard sound!) Considering the difference in these products I am surprised that Creative is still making the PCIe internal card versions. https://www.headphoneer.com/cr...ve-sound-blaster-g8-review/
    • I missed this when you first posted it, but those are awesome icons! I would normally prefer things to be uniform, but each of those icons seems to fit perfectly for the game! If I may ask though, what was your thought process on which icons are circular - MK makes sense - and which ones should be rectangular or square?
    • What I like about Paint is using it almost exclusively for cropping and resizing images I get elsewhere--it's quick, easy and cheap... I keep it glued to my taskbar, in fact. Also, the clipping tool comes in handy, as well (hit print scrn on the keyboard and it activates immediately.)
    • I still remember it fondly today. It was so cool to work in 64-color Half Bright mode and 4.096-color HAM mode (interlaced) when x86 was still in 4-color CGA or 16-color EGA low res. C= never realized what it had until it was far too late--the failure of C= was the failure of its top management. The C= Amiga was 20 years ahead of its time, I always thought. It didn't hurt that in only 512k of chip memory, the Amiga could preemptively multitask when Apple was still doing gray scale graphics on tiny screens and along with everyone else was doing cooperative multitasking (running more than one app at a time in resident memory, but you could only run one of them at a time--had to manually switch between them.) I had a ball with AREXX scripting running between programs that had AREXX ports so that when you sent other applications data and instructions, those running applications could process the same in real time to output! Memories...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      84
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!