Recommended Posts

I tested this three seperate occasions on clean SP-1 installations.

It's the only error I am getting, so I thought it deserved it's own thread.

(copied from MD351's post)

"...but i found a bug regarding the .NET Patch well 2 seperate errors but refers to the same thing.

1)

Some wierd error that only says ???? looks like something todo with the switches because it has /? /h /u /I

in the msg.

2)

I get an error while installing the patch for .NET, didnt happen in the last release....

"The Upgrade patch cannot be installed by the Windows Installer service because the program to be upgraded maybe missing, or the upgrade patch may update a different version of the program. Verify that the program to be upgraded exists on your computer and that you have correct patch."

this error displays on the NDP1.1-KB824629-x86.exe"

BTW I don't get the second error message when the .NET Framework "update" is left unchecked.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/124274-bug-reports-for-autopatcher-42/
Share on other sites

Hmmm... we're looking into this, so far none of us have been able to duplicate it. How are you installing it? From CD? From Hard Drive? From Network? If possible, can I get a screenshot of the error?

EDIT - Here's something that looks like your issue, but it's for Server 2003... check it out... very odd: Q821156 - INFO: ASP.NET 1.1 June 2003 Hotfix Rollup Package

.NET Framework shoudln't be apart of the AutoPatcher Program.. its not like everyone needs it. Whether you have it or not does NOT change the stability or the patch level of your operating system. Any reputable developer will package the framework in their installation program for you and download and install it when deemed necessary.

Unless the following apply:

Are you a .NET Developer?

Are you a user who has .NET Enabled Applications?

Are you developing web services?

Having the .NET Framework install is of 0 use to you.

This goes back to my focus that APXP should make the app smaller and focus on whats required to keep a user safe and secure by a method thats much more convienant than microsofts is. If you don't have the .NET Framework installed your not any bit less secure. If you already have installed it then you ONLY need SP2. (1.0) Framework 1.1 is NOT backwards compliant with Framework 1.0 so if any developer writes an app in an older version or even a newer version of the framework you're still going to have to end up installing that one when necessary. It does not work like the Sun JVM Where you can download 1 version and have it work.

Adding the .NET Framework to the APXP Causes 20+ MB of extra space that really isn't necessary at all.

Edited by xStainDx

Getting this error when installing Decemeber release of AP.

Looks as if that file isn't even in that folder.. i had just installed that file this week, maybe an update needs to grab files form the installer or something. I wonder if putting hte DVDpack.msi in that folder will take are of the problem.

Getting this error when installing Decemeber release of AP.

Looks as if that file isn't even in that folder.. i had just installed that file this week, maybe an update needs to grab files form the installer or something. I wonder if putting hte DVDpack.msi in that folder will take are of the problem.

Well actually the file is there, it's just named something different (WindowsXPMediaPlayer9DVDPack.msi)... you could try renaming it and see what happens...

@xStainDx - True for the most part, but I know a number of things that require it be installed, and not come with it (one is a fave screensaver of mine)... I only included it because it's an update on Windows Update, and I know some things require it. But it's not the .Net framework that's the problem, it's the update... which is odd, the update didn't change the way it worked from the last one. :/

Whether everybody else needs it or not, I couldn't say. It's very important to me because it's the only pre-requesite for Powerquest's Drive Image 7. That doesn't mean I can't install it seperately, I was just hoping that it would be included so that when the CD Maker tool is ready and I make my WinXP Unattended CD-ROM with AutoPatcher included, that .NET Framework wouldn't be left out.

BTW I know MS has "renewed" the release of .NET Framework. I think with the most recent release, the update shouldn't be necessary.

com_microsoft.Net_Framework_11_core_XP_5986

dotnetfx.exe

Microsoft .NET Framework version 1.1 - (Posted Date: August 05, 2003)

Download size: 23.1 MB

Edited by ITinerant
In the APC file it refers to "WindowsXPMediaPlayer9DVDPack.msi" but that file isn't in that directory. In fact there's nothing with DVD in that directory for me. Same with "WM9Codecs.exe" and "WMP9-MP3Encoding.reg" :blink:

Dazzla, are you saying that under AutoPatcher XP\ProgFiles you don't have WindowsXPMediaPlayer9DVDPack.msi, WM9Codecs.exe, or WMP9-MP3Encoding.reg?

EDIT - Like this below:

post-89-1071675296.jpg

Whether everybody else needs it or not, I couldn't say. It's very important to me because it's the only pre-requesite for Powerquest's Drive Image 7. That doesn't mean I can't install it seperately, I was just hoping that it would be included so that when the CD Maker tool is ready and I make my WinXP Unattended CD-ROM with AutoPatcher included, that .NET Framework wouldn't be left out.

BTW I know MS has "renewed" the release of .NET Framework. I think with the most recent release, the update shouldn't be necessary.

com_microsoft.Net_Framework_11_core_XP_5986

dotnetfx.exe

Microsoft .NET Framework version 1.1 - (Posted Date: August 05, 2003)

Download size: 23.1 MB

That is the version that is in AP.

That is the version that is in AP.

Hmmm... wait... may be onto something here... do you know for sure, if that release of the .Net framework doesn't need the patch? If so, that would totally explain the error.... hmmm....

checked december update files before applying updated and noticed it had

WindowsXPMediaPlayer9DVDPack.msi , WM9Codecs.exe , WMP9-MP3Encoding.reg , WMP9TweakMP.EXE

so i ran Updater.exe to pointed it to AutoPatcher_XP.exe

updated successfully but now i dont see WindowsXPMediaPlayer9DVDPack.msi , WM9Codecs.exe , WMP9-MP3Encoding.reg , WMP9TweakMP.EXE

could be other files missing..

odd.. any md5 on program files to see what else might be missing?

checked december update files before applying updated and noticed it had

WindowsXPMediaPlayer9DVDPack.msi , WM9Codecs.exe , WMP9-MP3Encoding.reg , WMP9TweakMP.EXE

so i ran Updater.exe to pointed it to AutoPatcher_XP.exe

updated successfully but now i dont see WindowsXPMediaPlayer9DVDPack.msi , WM9Codecs.exe , WMP9-MP3Encoding.reg , WMP9TweakMP.EXE

could be other files missing..

odd.. any md5 on program files to see what else might be missing?

Hmmm... the updater should transfer them over to "AutoPatcher XP\ProgFiles"... I've had no issues, but apparently it's possible for the Updater to miss it. Try running it again. As far as the MD5, I'll try to get you one here soon. :)

tried it for 3rd time. same thing..

checked to compared extracted december updated files to those that folder with successfully applied december updated and noticed

StartupCPL.lnk

StartupCPL.exe

StartupMonitor.msi

StopAVIPreview.reg

TARGET.DLL

TARGET.INF

TurnOnNumLock.reg

Tweakomatic Database.lnk

Tweakomatic Readme.lnk

tweakomatic.hta

tweakomatic.mdb

tweakomatic_readme.doc

WindowsXP-KB810217-x86-ENU.exe

WindowsXP-KB821588-x86-ENU.exe

WindowsXPMediaPlayer9DVDPack.msi

WM9Codecs.exe

WMP9-MP3Encoding.reg

WMP9TweakMP.EXE

ProgFiles\aspi

ProgFiles\VBLIBS

\UndoRegTweaks\

all missing

guess is stops at startupcpl.ink somehow

FlishFun, could you could make a addon/tool to remove the .NET stuff from the setup if there is away to do that?...

oh and thanx ITinerant, for posting that :)

Probably, you can do it yourself, too... just edit the database and remove it. :)

@blue baby boo - Let me check it... take me through the steps of you updating... is it from one place on your HDD to another? And it's not write protected, right?

EDIT - Also, I was looking... if those are the files that aren't copying, the line of code that's messed up would be this:

XCOPY "%APUpd%\December\AutoPatcher XP" "%AutoPatcherXP_Dir%" /S /E /Y

But yet the ones around it would be working... using similar commands... odd indeed... :/

Edited by FlishFun

extracted AutoPatcherXP_Nov.exe to D:\AutoPatcherXP\

extracted AP_Dec_Update.exe to D:\AutoPatcherXP\

run D:\AutoPatcherXP\Upgrade Release\Updater.exe

pointed it to D:\AutoPatcherXP\AutoPatcher_XP_4.0_Final\AutoPatcher_XP.exe

completed and pops up saying Successfully updated

also tried extracting full install and update in 2 diff folders.. and maybe renaming but results are the same

extracted AutoPatcherXP_Nov.exe to D:\AutoPatcherXP\

extracted AP_Dec_Update.exe to D:\AutoPatcherXP\

run D:\AutoPatcherXP\Upgrade Release\Updater.exe

pointed it to D:\AutoPatcherXP\AutoPatcher_XP_4.0_Final\AutoPatcher_XP.exe

completed and pops up saying Successfully updated

also tried extracting full install and update in 2 diff folders.. and maybe renaming but results are the same

Try this... after putting the Nov release in that folder, try running it (just get to the part where you'd normally install and hit Exit) then try to update... call me kooky, but it may work.

@heslo - I'll mention that to Raptor. :)

Hmmm... wait... may be onto something here... do you know for sure, if that release of the .Net framework doesn't need the patch? If so, that would totally explain the error.... hmmm....

Yes, this .NET Framework doesn't need the update patch. I've been installing it seperately since before (and after) I found AutoPatcher. Never shows up on Windows Update once installed.

BTW This thread is kinda confusing with different issues being discussed. :wacko:

Yes, this .NET Framework doesn't need the update patch. I've been installing it seperately since before (and after) I found AutoPatcher. Never shows up on Windows Update once installed.

BTW This thread is kinda confusing with different issues being discussed. :wacko:

Well actually it's only 3 issues... and if you're right, that would explain the error... I'll have to do some testing. :D So that may mean one down... and two to go. I may have figured out the other two as well, still looking into them. ;)

flish I got this error just after getting the ??????? error.

Thought you might want to take a look at it.

I'm thinking it may be the version of the .Net framework I included doesn't need that patch anymore... if so, then it will be removed from the Jan update, and just uncheck it and hit "Save as Default". :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft launches Godot Sample to streamline Xbox PC game development on the engine by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft today announced a new endeavor that aims to make it simpler for Godot developers to get their products into the Xbox PC ecosystem. Dubbed the "XBOX Godot Sample," this is a new public reference for developers using the open-source engine. This is set to serve as an example of how Microsoft GDK, Xbox Services, and PlayFab can be integrated into their projects. The sample is available now on GitHub as a working example. This covers key features in gaming projects that developers may need to release their projects on Xbox PC, with everything from matchmaking and game sign-in to gamepad compatibility with Godot being covered. This release is being called the first step in giving Godot developers the tools to bring their games over to Xbox PC, with more changes to come based on feedback and issue reports. However, the company was clear that this is not related to bringing Godot projects to Xbox consoles. The engine's open development model stops it from accessing console SDKs due to the requirement of NDAs and legal contracts. Here's how it explained this Godot sample project's focus: This is a source-only sample, not a product. It's MIT-licensed at the wrapper layer; the GDK and PlayFab dependencies still require their own installs and license acceptance, consistent with our other XBOX samples. There is no set update cadence for support or maintenance. We’ll watch the repo, monitor issues, and iterate where it makes sense, but this isn't a commercial release. That said, we’re excited to hear your feedback and see any community PRs, as we evolve this together. This is the first step in bringing Godot for XBOX on PC. We plan to evolve it over time based on what the community tells us is most valuable. This sample is built specifically for XBOX on PC. It doesn’t include support for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One. If you’re already building for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One, please talk with your XBOX representative. If not, you can get started by signing up here. Game developers can find the XBOX Godot Sample by heading to GitHub over here. Documentation on how to get started with Godot for building an Xbox PC project can be seen here.
    • I don't understand the vision. Do people really want to buy a new computer from Dell with 6 browsers installed? We all keep asking for Microsoft to stop having so much junk on their OS, and adding a bunch of browsers seems to go against that. Ideally, we would just be asked what browser we want during OOBE but Google is just going to pay Dell a bunch of money to include Chrome. Additionally, would you want your phones to start including all the browsers too when you get them? The only thing I ever wanted was to be able to uninstall IE or edge and I believe you are now able to. I do agree that microsoft needs to chill with their "are you sure you don't want to try edge before you install chrome" ads when going to download chrome.
    • It is notable that around 70% of web browser users choose Google Chrome. However, it is puzzling why anyone on Windows would opt for Chrome when Microsoft Edge is often superior in many aspects and comes pre-installed. Edge collects less data, uses less RAM, and is more optimized for Windows as a native Microsoft product. While some may point to bloat in Edge, much of it can be removed with simple tools, requiring no more effort than installing Chrome. Meanwhile, Chrome reportedly downloads large amounts of AI data (4 GB) without explicit consent. I'm sure you Chrome users love that, or? Here is one example of a tool that doesn't even need to be installed to be able to use: https://github.com/TheBobPony/MSEdgeTweaker Although Microsoft’s aggressive promotion of Edge may be questionable, the browser’s current advantages make it a preferable choice over Chrome today, even if Chrome may have been better in the past.
    • JetBrains rolls out IntelliJ IDEA update with Markdown preview fixes and more by David Uzondu Image via JetBrains IntelliJ 2026.1.3 from JetBrains has landed, bringing several highly requested bug fixes that target common UI glitches and terminal rendering issues. If you run tmux inside the integrated terminal, the IDE no longer renders the cursor above the active line. The Markdown preview bug, which was fixed in this release, had annoyed developers for quite some time, as the preview pane failed to render images saved outside the project directory. Instead of displaying the actual image, the IDE simply showed a broken image icon, a problem that stuck around for two years before this update. Over on Windows, developers running WSL can now use wsl.exe to spin up their environments without losing terminal functionality. In previous builds, launching a terminal shell with something like wsl.exe -d ubuntu inside a Windows-based project broke both shell integration and active process detection. Other bug fixes in this release include: An issue where Gradle sync incorrectly reported success as a failure on WSL when using Gradle 9.5.0. A syntax highlighting bug that flagged valid Java for-loop initialization blocks with multiple statements as incorrect. A warning bug that triggered a false non-null local variable alert when using JSpecify annotations. A database generation bug that hid the option to use a DELETE statement instead of a TRUNCATE checkbox. A Kotlin highlighting failure where an assertion error in the Gradle redundant library inspection broke error highlighting. A UI bug where the ComboBox popup lacked a maximum height restriction. A Snowflake syntax error where DataGrip failed to support the "create temp" command. A Svelte syntax parsing failure that incorrectly flagged quotes inside inline expressions. A VCS repository manager deadlock that triggered thread pool exhaustion. A memory leak where the LazyTree component kept all previous versions of a tree in memory. IntelliJ 2026.1.3 is the third bug fix release for the IntelliJ 2026.1 series. The first one landed back in April with a fix for the WSL Python interpreter freeze, another fix for guest participants using Emmet abbreviations, and corrected WildFly server deployment errors.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!