Recommended Posts

I tested this three seperate occasions on clean SP-1 installations.

It's the only error I am getting, so I thought it deserved it's own thread.

(copied from MD351's post)

"...but i found a bug regarding the .NET Patch well 2 seperate errors but refers to the same thing.

1)

Some wierd error that only says ???? looks like something todo with the switches because it has /? /h /u /I

in the msg.

2)

I get an error while installing the patch for .NET, didnt happen in the last release....

"The Upgrade patch cannot be installed by the Windows Installer service because the program to be upgraded maybe missing, or the upgrade patch may update a different version of the program. Verify that the program to be upgraded exists on your computer and that you have correct patch."

this error displays on the NDP1.1-KB824629-x86.exe"

BTW I don't get the second error message when the .NET Framework "update" is left unchecked.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/124274-bug-reports-for-autopatcher-42/
Share on other sites

Hmmm... we're looking into this, so far none of us have been able to duplicate it. How are you installing it? From CD? From Hard Drive? From Network? If possible, can I get a screenshot of the error?

EDIT - Here's something that looks like your issue, but it's for Server 2003... check it out... very odd: Q821156 - INFO: ASP.NET 1.1 June 2003 Hotfix Rollup Package

.NET Framework shoudln't be apart of the AutoPatcher Program.. its not like everyone needs it. Whether you have it or not does NOT change the stability or the patch level of your operating system. Any reputable developer will package the framework in their installation program for you and download and install it when deemed necessary.

Unless the following apply:

Are you a .NET Developer?

Are you a user who has .NET Enabled Applications?

Are you developing web services?

Having the .NET Framework install is of 0 use to you.

This goes back to my focus that APXP should make the app smaller and focus on whats required to keep a user safe and secure by a method thats much more convienant than microsofts is. If you don't have the .NET Framework installed your not any bit less secure. If you already have installed it then you ONLY need SP2. (1.0) Framework 1.1 is NOT backwards compliant with Framework 1.0 so if any developer writes an app in an older version or even a newer version of the framework you're still going to have to end up installing that one when necessary. It does not work like the Sun JVM Where you can download 1 version and have it work.

Adding the .NET Framework to the APXP Causes 20+ MB of extra space that really isn't necessary at all.

Edited by xStainDx

Getting this error when installing Decemeber release of AP.

Looks as if that file isn't even in that folder.. i had just installed that file this week, maybe an update needs to grab files form the installer or something. I wonder if putting hte DVDpack.msi in that folder will take are of the problem.

Getting this error when installing Decemeber release of AP.

Looks as if that file isn't even in that folder.. i had just installed that file this week, maybe an update needs to grab files form the installer or something. I wonder if putting hte DVDpack.msi in that folder will take are of the problem.

Well actually the file is there, it's just named something different (WindowsXPMediaPlayer9DVDPack.msi)... you could try renaming it and see what happens...

@xStainDx - True for the most part, but I know a number of things that require it be installed, and not come with it (one is a fave screensaver of mine)... I only included it because it's an update on Windows Update, and I know some things require it. But it's not the .Net framework that's the problem, it's the update... which is odd, the update didn't change the way it worked from the last one. :/

Whether everybody else needs it or not, I couldn't say. It's very important to me because it's the only pre-requesite for Powerquest's Drive Image 7. That doesn't mean I can't install it seperately, I was just hoping that it would be included so that when the CD Maker tool is ready and I make my WinXP Unattended CD-ROM with AutoPatcher included, that .NET Framework wouldn't be left out.

BTW I know MS has "renewed" the release of .NET Framework. I think with the most recent release, the update shouldn't be necessary.

com_microsoft.Net_Framework_11_core_XP_5986

dotnetfx.exe

Microsoft .NET Framework version 1.1 - (Posted Date: August 05, 2003)

Download size: 23.1 MB

Edited by ITinerant
In the APC file it refers to "WindowsXPMediaPlayer9DVDPack.msi" but that file isn't in that directory. In fact there's nothing with DVD in that directory for me. Same with "WM9Codecs.exe" and "WMP9-MP3Encoding.reg" :blink:

Dazzla, are you saying that under AutoPatcher XP\ProgFiles you don't have WindowsXPMediaPlayer9DVDPack.msi, WM9Codecs.exe, or WMP9-MP3Encoding.reg?

EDIT - Like this below:

post-89-1071675296.jpg

Whether everybody else needs it or not, I couldn't say. It's very important to me because it's the only pre-requesite for Powerquest's Drive Image 7. That doesn't mean I can't install it seperately, I was just hoping that it would be included so that when the CD Maker tool is ready and I make my WinXP Unattended CD-ROM with AutoPatcher included, that .NET Framework wouldn't be left out.

BTW I know MS has "renewed" the release of .NET Framework. I think with the most recent release, the update shouldn't be necessary.

com_microsoft.Net_Framework_11_core_XP_5986

dotnetfx.exe

Microsoft .NET Framework version 1.1 - (Posted Date: August 05, 2003)

Download size: 23.1 MB

That is the version that is in AP.

That is the version that is in AP.

Hmmm... wait... may be onto something here... do you know for sure, if that release of the .Net framework doesn't need the patch? If so, that would totally explain the error.... hmmm....

checked december update files before applying updated and noticed it had

WindowsXPMediaPlayer9DVDPack.msi , WM9Codecs.exe , WMP9-MP3Encoding.reg , WMP9TweakMP.EXE

so i ran Updater.exe to pointed it to AutoPatcher_XP.exe

updated successfully but now i dont see WindowsXPMediaPlayer9DVDPack.msi , WM9Codecs.exe , WMP9-MP3Encoding.reg , WMP9TweakMP.EXE

could be other files missing..

odd.. any md5 on program files to see what else might be missing?

checked december update files before applying updated and noticed it had

WindowsXPMediaPlayer9DVDPack.msi , WM9Codecs.exe , WMP9-MP3Encoding.reg , WMP9TweakMP.EXE

so i ran Updater.exe to pointed it to AutoPatcher_XP.exe

updated successfully but now i dont see WindowsXPMediaPlayer9DVDPack.msi , WM9Codecs.exe , WMP9-MP3Encoding.reg , WMP9TweakMP.EXE

could be other files missing..

odd.. any md5 on program files to see what else might be missing?

Hmmm... the updater should transfer them over to "AutoPatcher XP\ProgFiles"... I've had no issues, but apparently it's possible for the Updater to miss it. Try running it again. As far as the MD5, I'll try to get you one here soon. :)

tried it for 3rd time. same thing..

checked to compared extracted december updated files to those that folder with successfully applied december updated and noticed

StartupCPL.lnk

StartupCPL.exe

StartupMonitor.msi

StopAVIPreview.reg

TARGET.DLL

TARGET.INF

TurnOnNumLock.reg

Tweakomatic Database.lnk

Tweakomatic Readme.lnk

tweakomatic.hta

tweakomatic.mdb

tweakomatic_readme.doc

WindowsXP-KB810217-x86-ENU.exe

WindowsXP-KB821588-x86-ENU.exe

WindowsXPMediaPlayer9DVDPack.msi

WM9Codecs.exe

WMP9-MP3Encoding.reg

WMP9TweakMP.EXE

ProgFiles\aspi

ProgFiles\VBLIBS

\UndoRegTweaks\

all missing

guess is stops at startupcpl.ink somehow

FlishFun, could you could make a addon/tool to remove the .NET stuff from the setup if there is away to do that?...

oh and thanx ITinerant, for posting that :)

Probably, you can do it yourself, too... just edit the database and remove it. :)

@blue baby boo - Let me check it... take me through the steps of you updating... is it from one place on your HDD to another? And it's not write protected, right?

EDIT - Also, I was looking... if those are the files that aren't copying, the line of code that's messed up would be this:

XCOPY "%APUpd%\December\AutoPatcher XP" "%AutoPatcherXP_Dir%" /S /E /Y

But yet the ones around it would be working... using similar commands... odd indeed... :/

Edited by FlishFun

extracted AutoPatcherXP_Nov.exe to D:\AutoPatcherXP\

extracted AP_Dec_Update.exe to D:\AutoPatcherXP\

run D:\AutoPatcherXP\Upgrade Release\Updater.exe

pointed it to D:\AutoPatcherXP\AutoPatcher_XP_4.0_Final\AutoPatcher_XP.exe

completed and pops up saying Successfully updated

also tried extracting full install and update in 2 diff folders.. and maybe renaming but results are the same

extracted AutoPatcherXP_Nov.exe to D:\AutoPatcherXP\

extracted AP_Dec_Update.exe to D:\AutoPatcherXP\

run D:\AutoPatcherXP\Upgrade Release\Updater.exe

pointed it to D:\AutoPatcherXP\AutoPatcher_XP_4.0_Final\AutoPatcher_XP.exe

completed and pops up saying Successfully updated

also tried extracting full install and update in 2 diff folders.. and maybe renaming but results are the same

Try this... after putting the Nov release in that folder, try running it (just get to the part where you'd normally install and hit Exit) then try to update... call me kooky, but it may work.

@heslo - I'll mention that to Raptor. :)

Hmmm... wait... may be onto something here... do you know for sure, if that release of the .Net framework doesn't need the patch? If so, that would totally explain the error.... hmmm....

Yes, this .NET Framework doesn't need the update patch. I've been installing it seperately since before (and after) I found AutoPatcher. Never shows up on Windows Update once installed.

BTW This thread is kinda confusing with different issues being discussed. :wacko:

Yes, this .NET Framework doesn't need the update patch. I've been installing it seperately since before (and after) I found AutoPatcher. Never shows up on Windows Update once installed.

BTW This thread is kinda confusing with different issues being discussed. :wacko:

Well actually it's only 3 issues... and if you're right, that would explain the error... I'll have to do some testing. :D So that may mean one down... and two to go. I may have figured out the other two as well, still looking into them. ;)

flish I got this error just after getting the ??????? error.

Thought you might want to take a look at it.

I'm thinking it may be the version of the .Net framework I included doesn't need that patch anymore... if so, then it will be removed from the Jan update, and just uncheck it and hit "Save as Default". :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Happens to the best of us, bro. 😛 
    • Thanks to some of the other recent Windows improvements, I'm optimistic about this one. My quick wishlist would be: perf like the older menu, merge both menus or at the very least, the older menu should be a flyout, not a simulated click to the old menu, and lastly, a customization window to let users move items from one menu to another, so I could bring Send To back to the main menu, and the OneDrive settings to the older.
    • This Gigabyte AMD RX 9070 XT is very good deal despite the launch of 9070 GRE by Sayan Sen Recently we reviewed AMD's latest 1440p gaming card, the Radeon RX 9070 GRE 12GB, for $549. The card is in stock too at that price, though if you want significantly better performance and don't mind spending a bit more, the Gigabyte Gaming model of RX 9070 XT is currently on sale for just $650 (purchase link under the specs table down below). The card employs Gigabyte's WINDFORCE cooling system which combines multiple design elements such as alternate-spinning Hawk fans, a vapor chamber, and composite heat pipes to manage heat dissipation. The Server-grade Thermal conductive gel further helps in this department. The inclusion of a semi-passive cooling mode allows the fans to remain inactive under low workloads, which allows for reduced noise operation during lighter usage. There is dual BIOS switch that allows toggling between performance and silent modes. The technical specifications of the Gigabyte Radeon RX 9070 XT GAMING OC 16G are given in the table below: Specification Value Core Clock Boost Clock: up to 3060 MHz Game Clock: up to 2520 MHz Stream Processors 4096 Memory Clock 20 Gbps Memory Size 16GB Memory Type GDDR6 Memory Bus 256-bit Card Bus Interface PCI Express 5.0 Maximum Resolution 7680 × 4320 Multi-View Support 4 displays Card Dimensions L=288 mm, W=132 mm, H=56 mm Recommended Power Supply 750W Power Connectors 3 × 8-pin Video Outputs 2 × DisplayPort 2.1a 2 × HDMI 2.1b Get it at the link below: GIGABYTE Radeon RX 9070 XT Gaming OC 16GB Graphics Card, GV-R9070XTGAMING OC: $649.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) (Was: $740) This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. This is a first-party seller link (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you also purchase from a first-party seller link only. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the previous deals that we have covered, OR you can also visit Amazon US deals page. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Why does this kind of tactic not surprise me?
    • They used AI based TOOLS to convert the JavaScript engine (the main rendering engine is still C++) and it was not fully automated but was human reviewed. Other subsystems will be looked into to also be converted to Rust in the future. I have no problem with any of that.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      80
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      63
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!