Gunman killed after shooting 2 officers at Minnesota city hall


Recommended Posts

Training is required for a permit to carry in MN.

I am talking more generally then this specific person.

No... It would be more correct to say he probaby has had some training in the past and we don't know the last time he pulled it out of the holster.

Training, licensing and periodic recertification are the rule in the vast majority of states. Not to mention that civilians as a rule practice MUCH more than most cops do.

Training, licensing and periodic recertification are the rule in the vast majority of states. Not to mention that civilians as a rule practice MUCH more than most cops do.

So you aggreed with my statment then...

That is your right to do that.  Just curious why you are so afraid of guns and prejudiced against people that own them?

Huh? I am not afraid of guns at all. You could say the issue is I don't trust most people... I grew up with guns in the house and hunted with my dad. I merely have no use for owning any today... In why most of my family and friends don't own them? I guess you would have to ask them.

What states require recertification outside of license expiration? got a link to that?

Look em up. Most are 2, 3, 4, 5 or 10 years. 10 is often an enhancement that requires a very clean record and extra fees.

http://www.usacarry.com/concealed_carry_permit_information.html

Huh? I am not afraid of guns at all. You could say the issue is I don't trust most people... I grew up with guns in the house and hunted with my dad. I merely have no use for owning any today... In why most of my family and friends don't own them? I guess you would have to ask them.

Sorry.  Misread your post.  I read it as you don't associate with people that have guns.  That is what I get for responding while trying to work.

Look em up. Most are 2, 3, 4, 5 or 10 years. 10 is often an enhancement that requires a very clean record and extra fees.

http://www.usacarry.com/concealed_carry_permit_information.html

 

 

I will look through that list when I get a chance, I am kind of surprised their is no list with that already in easy to find form. By re-certification, I do not mean paying a renewal fee, I mean must attend training. In my state, I just pay 52 dollars every 5 years. No training to get it and none to keep it.

Exactly. Race is immaterial in this instance - the man had a gun and shot at officers. However, it's different when you're talking about institutionalised racism, where ethnic minorities are targeted disproportionately by the police because of their race. As long as people are discriminated against because of their race it will always be a factor.

 

The question is why did he shoot at the officers?

The question is why did he shoot at the officers?

In this kind of incident vs city officials it's usually a dispute over ordinance violations, permitting, taxes or the seizure of property. Those or he's simply nuts.

>

In my state, I just pay 52 dollars every 5 years. No training to get it and none to keep it.

In Michigan CPL renewal is pretty much the same procedure as getting your first permit. You do new paperwork, take a refresher course and show proficiency at the range within 6 months of renewal. Cost: $105 not counting the class & range time which is usually $50-85. The only thing we don't need to do is get new fingerprints. Our licenses are honored in 36 other states, and counting.

The question is why did he shoot at the officers?

He was nuts.  Had lots of run-ins with the cops and government over various issues.  Family warned that this might happen.  They don't know if he was targeting the cops or just the city government in general.  The cops were there being sworn in as new officers, so they might have just been the first people he saw.

He was nuts.  Had lots of run-ins with the cops and government over various issues.  Family warned that this might happen.  They don't know if he was targeting the cops or just the city government in general.  The cops were there being sworn in as new officers, so they might have just been the first people he saw.

And that's the end of the discussion, But if he was black the usual suspects would be up in arms telling us how rap music, his parent's, his culture are to blame, How this is yet another example of these race baiters killing innocent people. But no hes white so that's where the discussion ends.

And that's the end of the discussion, But if he was black the usual suspects would be up in arms telling us how rap music, his parent's, his culture are to blame, How this is yet another example of these race baiters killing innocent people. But no hes white so that's where the discussion ends.

I am glad he was white so we don't have to listen to all the complaining from the race baiters...

Not sure why this is on Neowin. The man was an older Caucasian man with a persecution complex. He had multiple issues with the New Hope government and police. Apparently, they did not want to buy a house he owned for more than double what it was worth, thought the police were targeting him and his son(s). They were trying to get him committed for his threatening behaviors. He fired on 2 officers as they were leaving the city council chamber and wounded both. Other officers returned fire and killed him. The man with the gun in the council chambers was a ex-cop councilman. This is another case of a person losing their mental faculties who owned guns. Apparently, his family didn't think he was crazy enough to have him committed and his guns confiscated (by them or the police). It is similar to old people who lose their faculties and insist on driving. There should be a way to make sure people with gun permits and drivers licenses are "still with us" and take them away when they are not. Unfortunately, at what point would someone be able to judge this for someone else? People kill other people for many reasons and use many methods. Are they all crazy and when did they cross the line?

 

He was nuts.  Had lots of run-ins with the cops and government over various issues.  Family warned that this might happen.  They don't know if he was targeting the cops or just the city government in general.  The cops were there being sworn in as new officers, so they might have just been the first people he saw.

 

Then he should have been executed long ago. No need to have these ticking time bombs roaming the streets.

One more failure of our mental health committal laws, which make it ridiculously difficult for the family or authorities to do an intervention that lasts more than 72 hours. A misbegotten effort by civil libertarians for 'rights of the mentally ill' made 40 years ago that keeps on giving.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
    • Depends on what you need. Might be a bit clearer on what you plan to do with it. Sort of a waste if you get the newest and greatest, but don't know how to use it.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      258
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!