Recommended Posts

Honestly this may or may not happen, Ghostbusters 3 has had directors and screen writers in the past.  Lee Eisenberg & Gene Stupnitsky were set up back in 2008 and nothing happened, back in 2012 it was Etan Cohen & Ivan Reitman and obviously Dan has had several scripts himself.  We will see where this goes.

I'm a big fan and think this version should not happen. I've got nothing against movies with all female casts but not for this movie. I don't think it will work, it's not something I even feel I should go see and I'm a big fan like I said.

If you can't give us a real sequel that adds to the franchise then forget it, enough with the cheap reboots, it's just a money grab.

I'm a big fan and think this version should not happen. I've got nothing against movies with all female casts but not for this movie. I don't think it will work, it's not something I even feel I should go see and I'm a big fan like I said.

If you can't give us a real sequel that adds to the franchise then forget it, enough with the cheap reboots, it's just a money grab.

 

I am also fine with a female cast (as long as McCarthy isn't in it. I want her to stay away far as possible from this franchise.) I am not fine however when they totally decide to pretty much ignore the two movies ever happened. All the characters of the GB universe do no exist. Feig is wiping the slate clean. As Mr. Ernie Hudson says " Why bother calling it Ghostbusters then? " I wholeheartly agree with him. I also don't like the fact they are completely ignoring Dan's script and making their own script. It's also the script the late Harold Ramis also worked on. That's just disrespectful in my opinion. Not cool. Do they know anything about the Paranormal? I mean Dan is a massive fan of the unknown, he believes in Ghosts and stuff. Half if not all terms came from him or from his research on the project. I.e Class 5 FRV (Full Roam Vapor), EMF scrubbers, PKE.. etc etc etc whether it's real or if he made it up.. I don't know, but hey it sounded cool. I mean hell, he could name most if not all the stuff on the Roof Rack on the Ecto-1. Anyway, I"m ranting just a bit.. so yeah. 

  • Like 1

I am also fine with a female cast (as long as McCarthy isn't in it. I want her to stay away far as possible from this franchise.) I am not fine however when they totally decide to pretty much ignore the two movies ever happened. All the characters of the GB universe do no exist. Feig is wiping the slate clean. As Mr. Ernie Hudson says " Why bother calling it Ghostbusters then? " I wholeheartly agree with him. I also don't like the fact they are completely ignoring Dan's script and making their own script. It's also the script the late Harold Ramis also worked on. That's just disrespectful in my opinion. Not cool. Do they know anything about the Paranormal? I mean Dan is a massive fan of the unknown, he believes in Ghosts and stuff. Half if not all terms came from him or from his research on the project. I.e Class 5 FRV (Full Roam Vapor), EMF scrubbers, PKE.. etc etc etc whether it's real or if he made it up.. I don't know, but hey it sounded cool. I mean hell, he could name most if not all the stuff on the Roof Rack on the Ecto-1. Anyway, I"m ranting just a bit.. so yeah. 

 

I'm with you, I hope this never makes it past the script stage and they can find someone else who can respect the past 2 movies and do a good sequel not a silly reboot that takes advantage of the well known name to make it some silly all female comedy, we don't need bridesmaids with proton packs guys, just stop.

I'm with you, I hope this never makes it past the script stage and they can find someone else who can respect the past 2 movies and do a good sequel not a silly reboot that takes advantage of the well known name to make it some silly all female comedy, we don't need bridesmaids with proton packs guys, just stop.

 

yep, it's sounds crap, it's a guy movie, sorry is that sounds sexist. If this gets made it'll be stupid, i imagine revealing costumes and bad jokes....

I'm with you, I hope this never makes it past the script stage and they can find someone else who can respect the past 2 movies and do a good sequel not a silly reboot that takes advantage of the well known name to make it some silly all female comedy, we don't need bridesmaids with proton packs guys, just stop.

 

Speaking of new equipment and stuff I'd rather they have the old Proton Packs but upgraded a bit. Think the game's version put more compact to fit the pack's original design. It's pretty much perfected. I think that would be cool. Flight suits should stay the same IMO. Either Tan/Khaki or the Blue/Grey versions. Or maybe the new one is black. Although this probably won't happen. We will probably see them in formal dress wear as their uniform probably. Just because Feig is wiping the slate clean. 

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

Ghostbusters Reboot To Be Set In New York
 

Director Paul Feig tells Empire Magazine, emphatically, that the new Ghostbusters reboot will be set in New York City, as the original films were. In fact, he says he

 

I don't care where it's going to be filmed.. as long as McCarthy is gone. If she's on board.. she better be a animated free roaming vapor. 

I don't care where it's going to be filmed.. as long as McCarthy is gone. If she's on board.. she better be a animated free roaming vapor. 

 

Doubt that's going to happen shes a big actress now

Doubt that's going to happen shes a big actress now

 

She's big alright...but super annoying to even listen to.

 

I agree with the others.. if McCarthy is in it I will NOT go to theaters to see it and highly sure I won't even catch it till its on HBO or something so I can fast forward thru anything she is involved in.

 

We need a #NOMcCarthyGhost hash tag or something to get going to show that people do NOT want her in the movie!

 

I agree with the others.. if McCarthy is in it I will NOT go to theaters to see it and highly sure I won't even catch it till its on HBO or something so I can fast forward thru anything she is involved in.

 

 

 

i agree!    this is NOT the movie for her. its ######ing ghostbusters.  my childhood memories.

not a lame comedy about a fat chick who is comfortable enough with her body to shove it in out faces!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      189
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!