$10k Ethernet Cables for true AUDIO!


Recommended Posts

Well wouldn't you know I was holding it wrong, much better now.  Thanks!   

 

 

You know, this got me thinking. How many $100 bills have been used as toilet paper by the rich and later went on to circulate throughout the general population? It's definitely possible to use them and wash them off, but there would still be some fecal residue left over.

 

Perhaps this is what they really meant by trickle down economics.

Audioboxer, on 14 Feb 2015 - 15:23, said:

Now we know where the Neowin donation money goes  :shiftyninja: #cables4staff

 

Yeah but what do you think keeps Neowin up! The 1s and the 0s come in before they are even picked up by the ISP! Those magic rocks that come with it ensure only good news vibes get published too

Do you need the $100,000 data-centre grade networking switches and routers for these cables to truly shine?

No. You don't need any equipment. They work simply by being there. They don't have to be plugged in usually just be in the room with the equipment or for better throughput simply laying the cable on the device will get the best bandwidth. Your choice to leave it in the packaging or take it out

did you hear the news,

they are currently working on a new model that works from the moment the customer orders it, so the new "synchronous high-speed in transport" module is able to deliver high def audio that today's savy consumer demands from their audio equipment.

I bought a 80$ high grade 10pack floppy disk, once.

 

haha1.gif

 

 

 

i did pay $150 or something like that for component video cables from monster + audio,  so when i finally went digital (5 years ago),

i payed the same for digital cables from monster.   what an idiot.   my current HDMI cables are $5 from dollarama, same picture :)

 
 

 

I've never understood how this stuff doesn't fall under 'false advertising'.

With audio equipment, it's a bit different. There's many factors that play a part into high quality audio reproduction:

 

- source audio

The better the recording the better it will sound. A 128kb bitrate mp3 vs 320kb bitrate mp3 will sound vastly different.

- dac

How well it converts a digital signal to analog. It difficult to accurately convert between one signal and another without losing parts of the signal.

- amp

The signal from the dac often needs to be amplied so that we can hear it better. Now that we are working with an analog signal, we need to amplify it to better hear it. Electronic components have cutoffs for signal amplitudes and not all amplification will be the same or perfect. Some amplify parts of the signal differently and some parts of the signal might get too high and get cutoff.

- cables

Believe it or not, but the cable does make a difference. Since we have an analog signal, the cable can pick up microphonic distortions if it's not properly shielded. It can also distort if the cable doesn't have enough bandwidth for the full signal.

- audio drivers

The part that actually creates the sound in headphones or speakers.

 

Now the problem is different equipment produces a different "color" to the sound. Some focus on pounding bass. Some focus on clean mids, or treble, or bass. Due to people's ears, preferences for how their music sounds, and infinite combos of audio equipment, what's good to me might not be good to you. We can do a signal analysis between the source audio and outputed audio to see how the combination of equipment changes the signal, but beyond that, it's up to the person.

 

I know this is a joke thread, but I hope this somewhat dumb down explanation helps people understand the world of high end audio. Some of it is placebo (a lot of it is in fact in cables), but there's more to it than people think.

Sadly my dad is one of the people who falls for this sort of thing. He bought $200 worth of hdmi cables last year when he got a new tv. Of course he didn't bother to consult anyone when he got them, too. So he figured they're expensive so they must be better.

  • Like 2
Xilo, on 15 Feb 2015 - 20:08, said:

 

 
 

 

With audio equipment, it's a bit different. There's many factors that play a part into high quality audio reproduction:

 

- source audio

The better the recording the better it will sound. A 128kb bitrate mp3 vs 320kb bitrate mp3 will sound vastly different.

- dac

How well it converts a digital signal to analog. It difficult to accurately convert between one signal and another without losing parts of the signal.

- amp

The signal from the dac often needs to be amplied so that we can hear it better. Now that we are working with an analog signal, we need to amplify it to better hear it. Electronic components have cutoffs for signal amplitudes and not all amplification will be the same or perfect. Some amplify parts of the signal differently and some parts of the signal might get too high and get cutoff.

- cables

Believe it or not, but the cable does make a difference. Since we have an analog signal, the cable can pick up microphonic distortions if it's not properly shielded. It can also distort if the cable doesn't have enough bandwidth for the full signal.

- audio drivers

The part that actually creates the sound in headphones or speakers.

 

Now the problem is different equipment produces a different "color" to the sound. Some focus on pounding bass. Some focus on clean mids, or treble, or bass. Due to people's ears, preferences for how their music sounds, and infinite combos of audio equipment, what's good to me might not be good to you. We can do a signal analysis between the source audio and outputed audio to see how the combination of equipment changes the signal, but beyond that, it's up to the person.

 

I know this is a joke thread, but I hope this somewhat dumb down explanation helps people understand the world of high end audio. Some of it is placebo (a lot of it is in fact in cables), but there's more to it than people think.

 

 

It does not make a difference.

 

To the human ear it can not perceive it. People have did blind tests.

 

Also Ethernet is digital so no loss. That was the argument 30 years ago to switching to cds from tapes. People who are older fall for this crap because they think everything is still analog from the 1960s.

It does not make a difference.

 

To the human ear it can not perceive it. People have did blind tests.

 

Also Ethernet is digital so no loss. That was the argument 30 years ago to switching to cds from tapes. People who are older fall for this crap because they think everything is still analog from the 1960s.

The human ear can perceive differences in shielded vs non-shielded cables. Non-shielded cables can pick up distortions. This is a fact and is why cables are generally shielded and insulated in the first place. The problem with human testing is everyone is different. What I hear is different from what you hear. Our hearing is not equal.

 

Also, you completely failed to read my post. The "it's digital so it doesn't matter" is completely false. Unless you are using very specific equipment (fiber optic, usb connection, etc), all audio signals are converted to analog before hitting the cable.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!