$10k Ethernet Cables for true AUDIO!


Recommended Posts

Well wouldn't you know I was holding it wrong, much better now.  Thanks!   

 

 

You know, this got me thinking. How many $100 bills have been used as toilet paper by the rich and later went on to circulate throughout the general population? It's definitely possible to use them and wash them off, but there would still be some fecal residue left over.

 

Perhaps this is what they really meant by trickle down economics.

Audioboxer, on 14 Feb 2015 - 15:23, said:

Now we know where the Neowin donation money goes  :shiftyninja: #cables4staff

 

Yeah but what do you think keeps Neowin up! The 1s and the 0s come in before they are even picked up by the ISP! Those magic rocks that come with it ensure only good news vibes get published too

Do you need the $100,000 data-centre grade networking switches and routers for these cables to truly shine?

No. You don't need any equipment. They work simply by being there. They don't have to be plugged in usually just be in the room with the equipment or for better throughput simply laying the cable on the device will get the best bandwidth. Your choice to leave it in the packaging or take it out

did you hear the news,

they are currently working on a new model that works from the moment the customer orders it, so the new "synchronous high-speed in transport" module is able to deliver high def audio that today's savy consumer demands from their audio equipment.

I bought a 80$ high grade 10pack floppy disk, once.

 

haha1.gif

 

 

 

i did pay $150 or something like that for component video cables from monster + audio,  so when i finally went digital (5 years ago),

i payed the same for digital cables from monster.   what an idiot.   my current HDMI cables are $5 from dollarama, same picture :)

 
 

 

I've never understood how this stuff doesn't fall under 'false advertising'.

With audio equipment, it's a bit different. There's many factors that play a part into high quality audio reproduction:

 

- source audio

The better the recording the better it will sound. A 128kb bitrate mp3 vs 320kb bitrate mp3 will sound vastly different.

- dac

How well it converts a digital signal to analog. It difficult to accurately convert between one signal and another without losing parts of the signal.

- amp

The signal from the dac often needs to be amplied so that we can hear it better. Now that we are working with an analog signal, we need to amplify it to better hear it. Electronic components have cutoffs for signal amplitudes and not all amplification will be the same or perfect. Some amplify parts of the signal differently and some parts of the signal might get too high and get cutoff.

- cables

Believe it or not, but the cable does make a difference. Since we have an analog signal, the cable can pick up microphonic distortions if it's not properly shielded. It can also distort if the cable doesn't have enough bandwidth for the full signal.

- audio drivers

The part that actually creates the sound in headphones or speakers.

 

Now the problem is different equipment produces a different "color" to the sound. Some focus on pounding bass. Some focus on clean mids, or treble, or bass. Due to people's ears, preferences for how their music sounds, and infinite combos of audio equipment, what's good to me might not be good to you. We can do a signal analysis between the source audio and outputed audio to see how the combination of equipment changes the signal, but beyond that, it's up to the person.

 

I know this is a joke thread, but I hope this somewhat dumb down explanation helps people understand the world of high end audio. Some of it is placebo (a lot of it is in fact in cables), but there's more to it than people think.

Sadly my dad is one of the people who falls for this sort of thing. He bought $200 worth of hdmi cables last year when he got a new tv. Of course he didn't bother to consult anyone when he got them, too. So he figured they're expensive so they must be better.

  • Like 2
Xilo, on 15 Feb 2015 - 20:08, said:

 

 
 

 

With audio equipment, it's a bit different. There's many factors that play a part into high quality audio reproduction:

 

- source audio

The better the recording the better it will sound. A 128kb bitrate mp3 vs 320kb bitrate mp3 will sound vastly different.

- dac

How well it converts a digital signal to analog. It difficult to accurately convert between one signal and another without losing parts of the signal.

- amp

The signal from the dac often needs to be amplied so that we can hear it better. Now that we are working with an analog signal, we need to amplify it to better hear it. Electronic components have cutoffs for signal amplitudes and not all amplification will be the same or perfect. Some amplify parts of the signal differently and some parts of the signal might get too high and get cutoff.

- cables

Believe it or not, but the cable does make a difference. Since we have an analog signal, the cable can pick up microphonic distortions if it's not properly shielded. It can also distort if the cable doesn't have enough bandwidth for the full signal.

- audio drivers

The part that actually creates the sound in headphones or speakers.

 

Now the problem is different equipment produces a different "color" to the sound. Some focus on pounding bass. Some focus on clean mids, or treble, or bass. Due to people's ears, preferences for how their music sounds, and infinite combos of audio equipment, what's good to me might not be good to you. We can do a signal analysis between the source audio and outputed audio to see how the combination of equipment changes the signal, but beyond that, it's up to the person.

 

I know this is a joke thread, but I hope this somewhat dumb down explanation helps people understand the world of high end audio. Some of it is placebo (a lot of it is in fact in cables), but there's more to it than people think.

 

 

It does not make a difference.

 

To the human ear it can not perceive it. People have did blind tests.

 

Also Ethernet is digital so no loss. That was the argument 30 years ago to switching to cds from tapes. People who are older fall for this crap because they think everything is still analog from the 1960s.

It does not make a difference.

 

To the human ear it can not perceive it. People have did blind tests.

 

Also Ethernet is digital so no loss. That was the argument 30 years ago to switching to cds from tapes. People who are older fall for this crap because they think everything is still analog from the 1960s.

The human ear can perceive differences in shielded vs non-shielded cables. Non-shielded cables can pick up distortions. This is a fact and is why cables are generally shielded and insulated in the first place. The problem with human testing is everyone is different. What I hear is different from what you hear. Our hearing is not equal.

 

Also, you completely failed to read my post. The "it's digital so it doesn't matter" is completely false. Unless you are using very specific equipment (fiber optic, usb connection, etc), all audio signals are converted to analog before hitting the cable.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!