Recommended Posts

As long as MS phone operators are prepared to give you the benefit of the doubt when you claim that "I just changed my harddisk and increased my RAM, then authentication failed", ALL keys are transferable.

 

I just changed my motherboard, processor, RAM, video card, hard drive, optical drive and then authentication failed. Please help!  :woot:

  • Like 3

why would it be any different than say windows 8.1? 

 

Free is free. I think we might be reading too much into this. I'm sure if anything changes, we'll ferret it out

Free is "free for the life of the device" if it can't be transfered, meaning activated automatically or manually, on another device afterwards, even though the license you "traded in"  could do that virtually indefinitely.

 

If the Windows 10 license is a bonus license that people who use 7 or 8 get for free upon upgrade, but are still able to use the new Windows 10 license and the old Windows (7) license on separate machines, even though the Win10 one is tied to a machine, but the old can be used on another machine , then, yes,  your point still stands.

I really hope Microsoft don't require the "free" upgrade to be done from a previous Windows install (i.e. Windows 8.1 upgrades to 10 through the Windows Store) but offer a proper Windows 10 ISO download. Imagine how much of a nightmare it would be having to reinstall 8.1 then do the 10 upgrade.

 

The sad thing is I see Microsoft doing exactly this :no:

I really hope Microsoft don't require the "free" upgrade to be done from a previous Windows install (i.e. Windows 8.1 upgrades to 10 through the Windows Store) but offer a proper Windows 10 ISO download. Imagine how much of a nightmare it would be having to reinstall 8.1 then do the 10 upgrade.

 

The sad thing is I see Microsoft doing exactly this :no:

 

We don't know for sure, but I don't think they'll do it via Store. Look at what happened with 8.1. They'll most likely offer it via Windows Update.

 

If I remember correctly, you could do a clean install with the $30 windows 8 upgrade, so it might be possible with this one as well. 

Why is it so hard to understand this? It's the same licencing system as it always has been, you just aren't handing over any cash if you upgrade in the first year of release.

 

You really have no clue...

 

I really hope Microsoft don't require the "free" upgrade to be done from a previous Windows install (i.e. Windows 8.1 upgrades to 10 through the Windows Store) but offer a proper Windows 10 ISO download. Imagine how much of a nightmare it would be having to reinstall 8.1 then do the 10 upgrade.

 

The sad thing is I see Microsoft doing exactly this :no:

 

Yes, this, plus the fact that i'd probably be replacing a retail license of Windows (7)  for an OEM equivalent of Windows 10.

 

 

We don't know for sure, but I don't think they'll do it via Store. Look at what happened with 8.1. They'll most likely offer it via Windows Update.

 

If I remember correctly, you could do a clean install with the $30 windows 8 upgrade, so it might be possible with this one as well. 

 

Yes but that 30$ Windows could be moved to another machine, right? One can hope it's the same for 10, but "supported for the life of the device" doesn't give me much hope.

 

Yes, this, plus the fact that i'd probably be replacing a retail license of Windows (7)  for an OEM equivalent of Windows 10.

 

 

Yes but that 30$ Windows could be moved to another machine right? One can hope it's the same for 10, but "supported for the life of the device" doesn't give me much hope.

 

Not as far I know. 

 

In the comments section of this article http://winsupersite.com/article/windows8/clean-install-windows-8-upgrade-media-144648

 

 

 

Hello, this would be my first time buying an upgrade so I have a question. If for whatever reason I have the need to format my pc later on, is the key I purchased still usable for a re-install or would I have to buy another? Thanks =)

 

To which Paul responded:

 

 

 

You can use the same key (on the same computer).

 

It appears as thought the behaviour will indeed be the same with Windows 10. One can hope that if for example you've gotten the upgrade in the first year, but let's say you add more ram after the offer is over, you could upgrade to a non-OEM licence by paying a smaller fee than buying W10 outright. 

It appears as thought the behaviour will indeed be the same with Windows 10. One can hope that if for example you've gotten the upgrade in the first year, but let's say you add more ram after the offer is over, you could upgrade to a non-OEM licence by paying a smaller fee than buying W10 outright. 

But if one had a Windows 7 RETAIL license to begin with, it seems like a downgrade to move to an upgrade that's basically tied to that machine like an OEM one, isn't it? Am i the only one that sees the wrongness in this?

 

Also if you add more ram, you're genuine license won't get invalidated. Didn't happen 15 years ago, not gonna happen now. If adding more RAM forces you to move from 32 bit to 64bit that may be another issue alltoghether. However i have yet to come across a license that worked on one and didn't work on the other (i.e. 8 pro 32 bit to 8 pro 64 bit and viceversa, 8 non-pro 32 bit to 8 non-pro 34 bit, 7 home premium 32 bit to 7 home premium 64 bit and so on).

But if one had a Windows 7 RETAIL license to begin with, it seems like a downgrade to move to an upgrade that's basically tied to that machine like an OEM one, isn't it? Am i the only one that sees the wrongness in this?

 

Also if you add more ram, you're genuine license won't get invalidated. Didn't happen 15 years ago, not gonna happen now. If adding more RAM forces you to move from 32 bit to 64bit that may be another issue alltoghether. However i have yet to come across a license that worked on one and didn't work on the other (i.e. 8 pro 32 bit to 8 pro 64 bit and viceversa, 8 non-pro 32 bit to 8 non-pro 34 bit, 7 home premium 32 bit to 7 home premium 64 bit and so on).

 

 

If you have a retail license to begin with, yes, this like a downgrade. That said, I don't think the target audience for this thing is the tech enthusiast, but rather John or Jane Doe, in the sense that normal people usually buy a PC and use it until it breaks. When it does break they most often buy a new PC, rather than upgrading it. Since the PC comes with Windows pre-installed, this upgrade makes sense  'for the lifetime of the device'. Tech enthusiasts will most likely buy a system builder license or something, depending on their needs.

 

I think they'll focus on the upgrade, but will have the other options also available at launch. One can hope.

But if one had a Windows 7 RETAIL license to begin with, it seems like a downgrade to move to an upgrade that's basically tied to that machine like an OEM one, isn't it? Am i the only one that sees the wrongness in this?

 

Also if you add more ram, you're genuine license won't get invalidated. Didn't happen 15 years ago, not gonna happen now. If adding more RAM forces you to move from 32 bit to 64bit that may be another issue alltoghether. However i have yet to come across a license that worked on one and didn't work on the other (i.e. 8 pro 32 bit to 8 pro 64 bit and viceversa, 8 non-pro 32 bit to 8 non-pro 34 bit, 7 home premium 32 bit to 7 home premium 64 bit and so on).

At this time, it does not convert the license.  So if you have a retail license, it continues to be a retail license.

There is not one word of this that has been different than any other Windows License Agreement, including the wording of, "Life of the Device".

 

This was first used in context of Windows XP.  Life of the device in Microspeak is:

 

1. Life of the License Purchased (Lifecycle of the Product)

2. Type of License Purchased. (Retail, OEM, MAK, VAK, Enterprise)

 

If you purchase an OEM license (One that comes with the machine) It is tied to the machine it was purchased for.  That license cannot be moved to another machine.

If you purchase a Retail license, that can be moved to another machine. So it then becomes the Life of the product only.

 

This is how all of the licensing has worked up to this point, and I do not see it changing. 

If you have a retail license to begin with, yes, this like a downgrade. That said, I don't think the target audience for this thing is the tech enthusiast, but rather John or Jane Doe, in the sense that normal people usually buy a PC and use it until it breaks. When it does break they most often buy a new PC, rather than upgrading it. Since the PC comes with Windows pre-installed, this upgrade makes sense  'for the lifetime of the device'. Tech enthusiasts will most likely buy a system builder license or something, depending on their needs.

 

I think they'll focus on the upgrade, but will have the other options also available at launch. One can hope

I do not see anywhere in this that it is a Downgrade of the license.  Can you please point that out to me?

I do think LauRoman is bringing up a good point that many in this thread either ignore or don't understand.

 

There are clear differences between RETAIL and OEM licensing. With the free Windows 8 program done in the past, that was meant for mom and pop machines who bought Windows 7 near 8's release (which 99% of the time is equipped with an OEM license) and get a free OEM upgrade.

 

...thats fine and all and that is "equivalent exchange" (OEM for OEM)...except LauRoman threw up the cash for a RETAIL Windows 7 which has privledges and the biggest perk is its ability to be moved to another machine (so long as you purge it from the previous machine it was on). If Microsoft's licensing allows Lau to generate a 10 key for their 7 key, will that 10 key be RETAIL or OEM? If its OEM then yes, Lau definitely got the short end of the stick.

 

At the same point, one could say its "fair" solely for the fact that man hours have went into a product upgrade that you haven't paid for and, luckily, Microsoft is giving some sort of licensing of 10 away for free for sometime. I honestly expect that it will ONLY be OEM freebies as the priveldge described above comes as a premium.

 

Until Microsoft clarifies, I recommend holding on to your keys Lau.

I do not see anywhere in this that it is a Downgrade of the license.  Can you please point that out to me?

 

I guess it's a problem of interpretation. I thought of "life of the device' as how long the hardware itself lasts, be it 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, whatever. The way you said it, it seems as though 'life of the device' means life cycle of the product, rather than the hardware. That's where the trouble is. 

 

One could argue that if it is the way you said it, they could just replace 'device' with 'product' and it would clear a lot of misunderstandings. I think it has to do with the proportion of Windows licences sold. If most of them are OEM licences (i.e. tied to the device) , then 'lifetime of the device' makes sense. If not, I don't know.

Please, people stop friggin saying it's a free license, like people didn't get this when Microsoft first said it and you think it's some insightful thing.

 

So, if you see it as a downgrade - here's a solution...

 

DON'T TAKE UP THIS OFFER

 

(gasp)

 

You misunderstand me. I will take the offer, on one machine, at least, regardless of the type of license. As i paid for 7 Windows 7 licenses (1 is OEM Home Prem. and 6 are Retail Pro) i just wish Microsoft would make it clear before the launch of the product what type of license (stop saying free) you get after the upgrade, hopefully.

 

If that clarification will not be forthcoming i would like to know from people that used the $30 (or whatever the price was) Windows 8 upgrade to go from XP/Vista/7 if they could, or have moved their Windows 8 installs to another machine if the original XP/Vista/7 was RETAIL.

Please, people stop friggin saying it's a free license, like people didn't get this when Microsoft first said it and you think it's some insightful thing.

 

 

You misunderstand me. I will take the offer, on one machine, at least, regardless of the type of license. As i paid for 7 Windows 7 licenses (1 is OEM Home Prem. and 6 are Retail Pro) i just wish Microsoft would make it clear before the launch of the product what type of license (stop saying free) you get after the upgrade, hopefully.

 

If that clarification will not be forthcoming i would like to know from people that used the $30 (or whatever the price was) Windows 8 upgrade to go from XP/Vista/7 if they could, or have moved their Windows 8 installs to another machine if the original XP/Vista/7 was RETAIL.

Just checking to see if you saw my message or not.  It spells everything out, unless it is changed, and if it is changed, it will be rather big news. 

I am not certain how much more they can spell it out.

As long as MS phone operators are prepared to give you the benefit of the doubt when you claim that "I just changed my harddisk and increased my RAM, then authentication failed", ALL keys are transferable.

 

Its automated anyway.

 

I really hope Microsoft don't require the "free" upgrade to be done from a previous Windows install (i.e. Windows 8.1 upgrades to 10 through the Windows Store) but offer a proper Windows 10 ISO download. Imagine how much of a nightmare it would be having to reinstall 8.1 then do the 10 upgrade.

 

The sad thing is I see Microsoft doing exactly this :no:

 

I'm pretty sure this is how its going to work. Least work for them, plus then after the 'year', they can easily start charging since they would just shut down the upgrade system.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • A different thing with Russia. When you say is it better, depends on things. It is better that we don't have the E.U making rules and laws that have nothing to do with them. Is the trading part better? No, that is really mucked up, but then we knew that was going to happen and we would have make agreements, like we do with other parts of the world. Freedom of movement is certainly better, but could be improved, we still need more control over our borders. do you live in the U.K?
    • So what am I quoting from them? I never listened to what Farage or his cronies said. I wanted the U.K to leave the E.u years before the referendum and it had nothing to do with Farage and his cronies. So what country do you live in? Did we work much better together? We were always at logger heads with the E.U because we disagreed with them so much. Maggie was always on at them. I would have thought the E.U was glad to get rid of us as we stopped the integration or made it a two tier. Now without us they can integrate more. I would not have voted out if it was just a trading block and we can still work together on somethings.
    • MPC-BE 1.9.0 by Razvan Serea Media Player Classic - BE is a free and open source audio and video player for Windows. Media Player Classic - BE is based on the original "Media Player Classic" project (Gabest) and "Media Player Classic Home Cinema" project (Casimir666), contains additional features and bug fixes. The BE mod (Black Edition Mod) is a skinned version of Media Player Classic Home Cinema, much better looking than the plain old MPC. MPC-BE 1.9.0 changelog: Splitters Fixed crashes in some situations. AudioSplitter Added support for the RF64 format. Fixed reading of channel layout for some WavPack files. Added support for ID3 tags for Wave64 files. Unknown Wave64 chunks are now ignored. AviSplitter Added support for 'y408' video. Improved support for 'HEVC' video. FLVSplitter Added support for VVC video. MP4Splitter Improved handling of corrupted files. MatroskaSplitter Expanded support for V_UNCOMPRESSED video codecs. Fixed support for frame rotation (ProjectionPoseRoll). Improved support for "V_MS/VFW/FOURCC / HEVC". MpcDvdVideoDecoder Fixed conversion to YUY2. Fixed display of menus for some DVD-Videos. RoQVideoDecoder Output in NV12 and YV12 formats is allowed. Full range is used. MPC Video Decoder RGB32 format will be output as a top-down bitmap by default. Added support for the "IID_MediaSideDataDOVIMetadataV2" interface. Removed support for the deprecated "IID_MediaSideDataDOVIMetadata" interface. Fixed retrieving the name of the video adapter when using NVDEC. Fixed crashes in some situations. MPC Video Converter Added support for AYUV video format. MpcAudioRenderer Improved input format validation. Optimized retrieval of supported formats for exclusive mode. Added the "Keep audio device active when paused" setting. Fixed crashes and freezes in various situations. Subtitles Added the ability to open the properties of an external subtitle renderer in the "Subtitles" settings panel. Fixed external subtitle connections for VSFilter. Fixed a crash when rendering PGS/SUP subtitles when using AVX2. YouTube Improved support for yt-dlp. The built-in YouTube parser is no longer used. Player The HTTP read strategy has been changed. If the playlist contains one entry, more key combinations can be used to control the player (jump through chapters, adjust volume). Improved support for reading ASX playlists. The translation of the MediaInfo report for Chinese, Korean and Japanese has been removed. Added blocking of 32-bit filter "PICVideo Lossless JPEG Decompressor" (pvljpg20.dll), because it crashes. Added blocking of the system filter "AVI Decompressor", which will eliminate the crash of VFW codecs. Fixed a rare crash when using the "/slave" key. Fixed a crash when getting a list of fonts for OSD. Added the ability to load an external audio file using hotkeys. Fixed opening a network path starting with \?\UNC. The "Determine duration when adding" playlist setting now works for YouTube video URLs. The "Online media services" settings panel has been redesigned. Added a "Merge files using FFmpeg" option to the file saving dialog. This option is activated when playing multiple streams obtained using yt-dlp. Added loading of local .dpl playlists ("DAUMPLAYLIST"). Fixed a hang when the user closes the player during the URL opening process. Various interface fixes. Installer Updated MPC Video Renderer 0.10.5. Updated MPC Script Source 0.2.17. Added MPC Image Source 0.3.6. Translations Updated Japanese translation (by tsubasanouta). Updated Chinese (Traditional) and Dutch translation (by beter). Updated Romanian translation (by Andrei Miloiu). Updated Hungarian translation (by mickey). Updated Turkish translation (by cmhrky). Updated German translation (by Klaus1189). Updated Chinese (Simplified) translation (by wushantao). Updated Italian translation (by mapi68). Updated Korean translation (by Hackjjang). Updated Chinese (Traditional) (by udfbe). Updated libraries dav1d 1.5.3-6-g04b69f9; ffmpeg n8.2-dev-1857-g4653e68aab; libpng git-v1.6.55-9-g7d52a8087; Little-CMS git-lcms2.18-26-gf739cda; MediaInfo git-v26.05-38-g702c9b7fd; ZenLib git-v0.4.41-91-g073f297; zlib 1.3.2. Download: MPC-BE 64-bit | Portable MPC-BE 64-bit | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: MPC-BE 32-bit | Portable MPC-BE 32-bit Link: Media Player Classic - BE Home Page Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Apple reportedly looks to blacklisted Chinese memory chips as RAM prices climb by Karthik Mudaliar Image via Apple Apple is reportedly trying to get a clearance from the Trump administration to buy memory from ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT) to get some relief from soaring DRAM prices. As per a report by the Financial Times, Apple approached the Commerce Department more than a month ago and also spoke to other officials and allies in Washington. For starters, CXMT is a company that's already been placed on the Pentagon's list of Chinese military companies. The Chinese company is the country's top DRAM maker. For Apple, the timing is certainly awkward but not surprising. Tim Cook had recently warned that Apple would have to raise prices because AI companies are buying up large amounts of memory for data centers, and just like that, Apple raised MacBook and iPad prices. Micron also recently revealed that customers have committed billions of dollars to secure memory supply years in advance, which shows us how aggressive securing infrastructure has become. This gives suppliers such as Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron more leverage, while pushing hardware makers to look for alternatives. CXMT is one of those alternatives, but not the simplest one. Apple has spent many years trying to diversify parts of its supply chain away from China, especially for final assembly, while still depending heavily on Chinese manufacturing and suppliers. Even domestic brands from China are moving towards CXMT and YMTC instead of relying on Samsung, Micron, and SK Hynix. For Apple, though, it would invite more scrutiny than local Chinese companies. For now, this is more like a lobbying effort rather than a confirmed supply deal. There's no official statement from either of the parties. What is clearer, though, is the pressure behind such a request. AI demand has certainly made hardware a bottleneck, and companies are trying everything they can to bring things back to normal, even if that means making politically sensitive choices. Source: Financial Times
    • I did test it a month or so back, but ... the results I expect to be on the first page are not there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      486
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!