Recommended Posts

I found the problem. 

 

Core Parking.

 

In power schemes if I select High Performance I get 2 cores out of 6. In Balanced I get 4 out of 6. I struggled to disable core parking with all the utilities out there and reg keys and it all failed until I forcefully disabled it in BIOS. I have a Asus motherboard and under Core Activation I was able to set them to manual instead of Auto.

 

It did the trick. No more audio distortion in Youtube gawd daym html5 player because core one is handling the whole computer. To be noted I have a 24bit Audigy that is working A1 on this computer. 

 

In conclusion Microsoft really want to impose core parking so they did something different from previous Windows so we cant toy with that anymore. I'm not against it but now its broken for some of us. (Google "disable core parking"). 

 

Note: If any of you want to know if you have parked cores its in Resource Monitor under CPU that you can see in real time the cpu states.

  • Like 2
  On 21/02/2015 at 10:58, Err0r4o4 said:

I found the problem. 

 

Core Parking.

 

In power schemes if I select High Performance I get 2 cores out of 6. In Balanced I get 4 out of 6. I struggled to disable core parking with all the utilities out there and reg keys and it all failed until I forcefully disabled it in BIOS. I have a Asus motherboard and under Core Activation I was able to set them to manual instead of Auto.

 

It did the trick. No more audio distortion in Youtube gawd daym html5 player because core one is handling the whole computer. To be noted I have a 24bit Audigy that is working A1 on this computer. 

 

In conclusion Microsoft really want to impose core parking so they did something different from previous Windows so we cant toy with that anymore. I'm not against it but now its broken for some of us. (Google "disable core parking"). 

 

Note: If any of you want to know if you have parked cores its in Resource Monitor under CPU that you can see in real time the cpu states.

 

 

Please use the insider app to report so they can fix it.

 

My APU when idle still uses 40% - 50% CPU

 

reported it.

  On 21/02/2015 at 11:49, Dingleberry San the Super said:

Please use the insider app to report so they can fix it.

 

My APU when idle still uses 40% - 50% CPU

 

reported it.

 

Done

 

 

And as a follow up my computer is running very well since yesterday. Idle cpu usage is less than 1%. Power consumption (according to my UPS) is just like before I try Win 10. There are a whole lot of bugs everywhere in this Windows but at least my cpu is doing alright.

  On 21/02/2015 at 20:50, Err0r4o4 said:

Done

 

 

And as a follow up my computer is running very well since yesterday. Idle cpu usage is less than 1%. Power consumption (according to my UPS) is just like before I try Win 10. There are a whole lot of bugs everywhere in this Windows but at least my cpu is doing alright.

 

 

Was is always ok in W10TP or Fixed in recent build?

 

Tried the first two TPs where the issue occured.

  • Like 7
  On 21/02/2015 at 11:45, netty2014 said:

msconfig.exe boot advanced change the number of cpu's your os is using sorry but ive know that since windows started :p

That's not how that works ... And has nothing to do with core parking.

 

it is used for debugging for different core/cpu requirements. Default uses all core/cpu's.

  • 1 year later...
  • 1 month later...

i5 680 CPU - dual core, 4 logical. Now I'm seeing only half my cores in the Windows 10 task manager (2 logical). Device manager shows all 4. This was not the case the last time I checked and I didn't make any changes. . I think there is a nasty bug in the latest Windows 10 update. 

 

Anyone else seeing this?

  • 1 month later...

SOLVED - Windows 10 by default (which I think was set during some MS update a few months back) has the "Number of processors" for boot check box checked which, depending on the number of processors selected, will boot only that number of processors. The fix is to uncheck this check box. System Configuration --> Boot --> Advanced Options --> uncheck "Number of processors" and also uncheck "Maximum Memory" (not sure why anyone would want to limit the memory). Click OK and reboot. System should come up with correct number of logical processors (AMD cores or Intel Hyperthreads). 

  On 21/02/2015 at 11:45, netty2014 said:

msconfig.exe boot advanced change the number of cpu's your os is using sorry but ive know that since windows started :p

Expand  

Oh lord. Not this (false) chestnut again.

  On 12/09/2016 at 14:29, chaos0099 said:

SOLVED - Windows 10 by default (which I think was set during some MS update a few months back) has the "Number of processors" for boot check box checked which, depending on the number of processors selected, will boot only that number of processors. The fix is to uncheck this check box. System Configuration --> Boot --> Advanced Options --> uncheck "Number of processors" and also uncheck "Maximum Memory" (not sure why anyone would want to limit the memory). Click OK and reboot. System should come up with correct number of logical processors (AMD cores or Intel Hyperthreads). 

Expand  

Was that without me changing.

  On 12/09/2016 at 14:29, chaos0099 said:

SOLVED - Windows 10 by default (which I think was set during some MS update a few months back) has the "Number of processors" for boot check box checked which, depending on the number of processors selected, will boot only that number of processors. The fix is to uncheck this check box. System Configuration --> Boot --> Advanced Options --> uncheck "Number of processors" and also uncheck "Maximum Memory" (not sure why anyone would want to limit the memory). Click OK and reboot. System should come up with correct number of logical processors (AMD cores or Intel Hyperthreads). 

Expand  

Lol, you're making ###### up or running some bugged out version of your OS. This is not necessary at all.

I didn't have to tweak ###### for my system to run like a mother ######er.

 

Rolling my eyes at your post. :/

  • Jason S. locked this topic
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • just in time for it to be replaced with something that makes everyone unhappy! - The Microsoft way
    • Is this written by AI? The article contradicts itself and doesn't even line up with the title.
    • Pale Moon 33.7.2 by Razvan Serea Pale Moon is an Open Source, Goanna-based web browser available for Microsoft Windows, Linux and Android, focusing on efficiency and ease of use. Make sure to get the most out of your browser! Pale Moon offers you a browsing experience in a browser completely built from its own, independently developed source that has been forked off from Firefox/Mozilla code, with carefully selected features and optimizations to improve the browsers speed, resource use, stability and user experience, while offering full customization and a growing collection of extensions and themes to make the browser truly your own. Features: Optimized for modern processors Based on proprietary optimized layout engine (Goanna) Safe: forked from mature Mozilla code and regularly updated Secure: Additional security features and security-aware development Supported by our user community, and fully non-profit Familiar, efficient, fully customizable interface Support for full themes: total freedom over any elements design Support for easily-created lightweight themes (skins) Smooth and speedy page drawing and script processing Increased stability: experience fewer browser crashes Support for many Firefox extensions Support for a growing number of Pale Moon exclusive extensions Extensive and growing support for HTML5 and CSS3 Many customization and configuration options Pale Moon 33.7.2 release notes: Addressed PWN2OWN-2025-1 (out of bounds read or write in promise) DiD Addressed PWN2OWN-2025-2 (out of bounds read or write when using the ExtractLinearSum optimization) DiD Fixed potential unexpected behavior in embedded protobuf code. DiD Fixed an issue with potentially uninitialized contrast values when enhanced device contrast values can not be read from the O.S. DiD Fixed potential sanitization issues with devtools' "Copy as curl" feature. It should be noted that we do not currently offer cross-platform "curl" features, so this is another DiD for this release. Download: Pale Moon (64-bit) | Portable 64-bit | ~40.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Pale Moon (32-bit) | Portable 32-bit Links: Pale Moon Homepage | Add-ons | Themes | Extensions | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Another disappointing rumor: iPhone 17 won't get a ProMotion display by Hamid Ganji With the iPad Pro in 2017, Apple introduced a new type of display technology for its devices, dubbed ProMotion. The ProMotion feature enables a variable refresh rate, ranging from 24Hz to 120Hz, and it has a critical role in enhancing display sharpness and responsiveness. With the iPhone 13 Pro and iPhone 13 Pro Max in 2021, the ProMotion feature landed on iPhones, but it has stuck with the Pro variants since then, leaving the standard and Plus versions with a regular Super Retina display. While customers expected to get a ProMotion display on the vanilla iPhone 17, and even some rumors hinted at this possibility, the latest leaks suggest ProMotion remains with the Pro iPhone variants for another generation. According to Chinese leaker Fixed Focus Digital on Weibo, Apple has decided to keep the ProMotion feature exclusive to iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max, and the rest of the lineup would launch with a “normal 120hz screen”. This Chinese leaker has conflicting reports about Apple’s future products. For now, we should take this claim with a pinch of salt and wait for more confirmation from the Apple supply chain insiders. In September last year, analyst Ross Young said the entire 17 lineup would get the ProMotion feature and the Always-on display (via 9to5mac). Young is also a credible source for Apple-related news, but too many conflicting rumors around upcoming iPhones make us question every claim. The only thing that seems certain so far is that Apple will increase the screen refresh rate on the iPhone 17 and 17 Air to 120Hz, which is a significant increase from the current 60Hz on the iPhone 16 base and Plus variants. Also, by boosting the iPhone 17 and 17 Air refresh rate to 120Hz, Apple is more likely to retain the ProMotion feature for the Pro models in the lineup to differentiate devices better from a marketing standpoint.
    • The article clearly states multiple times that he will DONATE his wealth. There's no mention of any loan, but haters gonna hate. He doesn't need to do this, you know? He could just give all that money to his kids and call it a day.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jim Dugan earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Adam Todd earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Contributor
      Ed B went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      moporcho earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Parotel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      211
    2. 2
      snowy owl
      156
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      134
    4. 4
      Xenon
      119
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      113
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!