Recommended Posts

FCC Starlink approvals just keep coming. It's almost as if govt. agencies need it for something...

 

Space News...

 


SpaceX gets OK to re-space Starlink orbits

WASHINGTON  The U.S. Federal Communications Commission approved SpaceX's request to increase the number of lanes its Starlink satellites can orbit, a modification the company said would accelerate service rollout across the United States. 

The FCC said SpaceX can field satellites in 72 rings around the Earth at 550 kilometers -  three times as many as the commission approved in April. 
>
In August, SpaceX told the FCC that by tripling the number of lanes for those first Starlink satellites, it could build out enough coverage to offer internet access in southern states by the 2020 hurricane season. 
>
SpaceX is building out Starlink from the poles, with coverage expanding towards the equator as more satellites get launched. 
>
SpaceX said the Starlink orbit modifications could cut the number of Starlink launches necessary by up to 50%. Under the revised plans, each of the 72 orbital rings will have 22 satellites instead of 66, meaning a single Falcon 9 launch can now populate approximately three rings. The company has been launching 60 satellites at a time on its Falcon 9 rockets. The next Starlink mission, and SpaceXs last launch of the year, is planned for late December. 
>
>

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Do we know what their current bottleneck is? 

 

Is it satellite production, second stage production, launch options, money, system testing, etc.

 

Also will they be able to launch starlink from both Vandy and Kennedy?

21 minutes ago, IsItPluggedIn said:

Do we know what their current bottleneck is? 

 

Is it satellite production, second stage production, launch options, money, system testing, etc.

 

They have $billions banked, and can get more just by asking. About every major venture capital or sovereign fund on Earth would buy into SpaceX given the chance.  Their last 2 rounds they had more offers than funding  needs.

 

SpaceX is running a satellite mass production line fast enough to support launching 120+ birds/month, and can modify those sat busses for other tasks. Watch that in the future.

 

Because reuse has worked so well they've also been able to switch much first stage production capacity into upper stage production.

 

Bottleneck: user terminal mass production.

 

Basically; an enclosed 30cm ± multi-beam phased array antenna with a 2-axis self-aligning base which can be fastened to a structure, plugged in and turned on for $300-500.

 

They'll need about 1 million, for starts. The patent is public, production is the issue.

 

Quote

 

Also will they be able to launch starlink from both Vandy and Kennedy?

 

The vast majority of Starlink will go up from the Cape due to it now having a polar launch corridor for vehicles with Autonomous Flight Safety Systems; F9, FH, Starship, New Glenn.

 

ULA won't fly an AFSS until Vulcan-Centaur arrives. Rocket Lab's Electron will fly AFSS from Wallops. 

 

Vandenberg SLC-4E will mostly do military, SpaceX SmallSat Rideshare Program and a few other polar launches. 

  • 1 month later...

US Air Force and US Space Force could be major Starlink profit centers, and a bit of regulatory grease.

 

Gen. John Raymond is Chief of Space Operations,  US Space Force

 

(CNBC)

 

 

Edited by DocM
  • 3 months later...
  • 2 months later...

StarLink's laser interlinks are coming sooner than expected...

 

https://boards.greenhouse.io/spacex/jobs/4719869002?gh_jid=4719869002

 

Quote

STARLINK LASER COMMUNICATION MANUFACTURING ENGINEER

 

Redmond, WA, United States

SpaceX was founded under the belief that a future where humanity is out exploring the stars is fundamentally more exciting than one where we are not. Today SpaceX is actively developing the technologies to make this possible, with the ultimate goal of enabling human life on Mars.

STARLINK MANUFACTURING ENGINEER (STARLINK SPACE LASER COMMUNICATIONS)

RESPONSIBILITIES:

Perform hands-on engineering and liaison role between the design teams and production organization as SpaceX works to iterate on the design and ramp into the manufacturing phase

Responsible for the manufacturability and introduction into high-rate manufacturing environment

Contribute to design reviews acting as an expert in design for manufacturability, design for testability, yield improvements, supplier capabilities assessments, quality control, etc.

Primary point of contact for production, non-conforming product, troubleshooting, root cause, failure investigations and corrective actions

Lead the initial manufacturing development for electro-mechanical assembly components

Tooling design and validation

Prepare engineering documentation necessary for the transition from development to production including assembly procedures, test procedures, standard operating procedures, schematic diagrams, bills of materials, suitable alternate parts lists and mechanical drawings

Update designs when necessary in response to manufacturing issues, parts obsolescence, and system requirement changes

Lead continuous improvement efforts of established product

Perform structured root cause analysis of in-process failures

Perform training of production personnel and leadership

QUALIFICATIONS:
>

 

 

Laser interlink analysis

 

Edited by DocM
  • 5 weeks later...

This is the highly complex setup needed for Washington's state militia to connect to StarLink during the wildfire recovery. They connected in "5-10 minutes" vs. up to several hours for geostationary gear.

 

106721395-1601384443173-starlink_pic.jpg

 

More on the First Responders use from CNBC. This from a partially completed network (700+ satellites up, thousands more to go).

 

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/29/washington-emergency-responders-use-spacex-starlink-satellite-internet.html

 

Quote

Washington emergency responders first to use SpaceX’s Starlink internet in the field: ‘It’s amazing’

KEY POINTS

• Washington’s state military, which includes its emergency response division, began using Starlink user terminals in early August to bring internet service to areas devastated by wildfires.

• “I have spent the better part of four or five hours with some satellite equipment trying to get a good [connection]. So, to me, it’s amazing,” Washington state’s emergency telecommunications leader Richard Hall told CNBC.

• Washington has used Starlink to get regions “zero day communications,” Hall said.
>
Hall, whose division has used other satellite broadband services, said “there’s really no comparison” between Starlink and traditional networks, where the satellites are farther away from the Earth in Geosynchronous or medium earth orbits.

“Starlink easily doubles the bandwidth” in comparison, Hall said, noting that he’s seen more than 150% decreases in latency. “I’ve seen lower than 30 millisecond latency consistently,” he said.
>
The base of the terminal was originally a solid round weight but changed to a tripod, which Hall said allowed for a more flexible set up experience. While SpaceX told Hall that the terminal “required a clear North-facing shot,” some places he set them up were “slightly obscured but it still worked like a charm, with great speeds.”
>
Hall added that he’s aware of interest in Starlink from other organizations, such as from Washington’s Department of Natural Resources and the Department of Homeland Security’s Federal Emergency Management Agency.
>

7 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

That’s not what I consider impressive speed. 

Try any other satellite companies internet and you'll be in disbelief of how bad it is.

  • Like 2
6 hours ago, adrynalyne said:

That’s not what I consider impressive speed. 

It is for a constellation that isn't fully deployed (700 of 12,000) and is using ground stations before transitioning to laser satellite-2-satellite routing about years end. They're testing the satellite routing now.

 

Also; the goal is serving unserved or underserved areas (no broadband or few options), fast setup in disaster areas, first responders, the military, planes, ships at sea, etc. at much lower prices and at higher performance than geostationary services than ViaSat, Hughes Net or the existing military data satellites.

Edited by DocM
On 02/10/2020 at 22:57, adrynalyne said:

Well it helps when you give it context too.

Well, considering where I'm staying right now, this is the best internet that's available, I definitely wouldn't complain going to starlink.

Screenshot_20201009-123230.png

1 hour ago, adrynalyne said:

I sympathize.

 

Much of the US is rural, as is Canada. Where I grew up there was a farm every half mile plus. Lots of people, but very spread out so the cost per customer to run fiber is so high the companies won't make the investment. As a result, many rural and exurban folks are stuck with DSL. Many have nothing. Casper.

 

Enter: StarLink, which analysts estimate will bring SpaceX multiples of NASA's budget per year. Now add DoD, disaster management, farmers who need satellite data to manage crops, air & sea connectivity, transnational financial companies, etc. A license to print money.

  • Like 1

The FCC has announced qualified bidders for the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund Phase I auction (RDOF). The fund will spend up to $16 billion to get broadband service into underserved areas of the US. Satellite service selectees,

 

Hughes Network Systems (HughesNet)

 

Space Exploration Technologies (SpaceX Starlink)

 

ViaSat

49 minutes ago, DocM said:

The FCC has announced qualified bidders for the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund Phase I auction (RDOF). The fund will spend up to $16 billion to get broadband service into underserved areas of the US. Satellite service selectees,

 

Hughes Network Systems (HughesNet)

 

Space Exploration Technologies (SpaceX Starlink)

 

ViaSat

 

Looks like it's $20.4 billion

 

https://spacenews.com/fcc-rural-broadband-qualified-bidders-2020/

On 09/10/2020 at 15:28, DocM said:

Much of the US is rural, as is Canada. Where I grew up there was a farm every half mile plus. Lots of people, but very spread out so the cost per customer to run fiber is so high the companies won't make the investment. As a result, many rural and exurban folks are stuck with DSL. Many have nothing. Casper.

My ISP did run fiber out here in the ass end of nowhere and I love them for it.  I’d love to stay with them, but they refuse to enable ipv6 which irritates me.  I can’t guarantee anything about Starlink but I suspect they’ll support modern routing protocols better and have better latency over longer distances than land networks so depending on initial setup costs I’d love to move over.

 

I’m not saying I actually need it, just that tech companies that refuse to keep up with the times are another reason to switch.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!