Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

The UK is very interested in Starlink...

 

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/22/elon-musks-spacex-starlink-in-talks-with-uks-project-gigabit.html

 

Quote

 

SpaceX’s Starlink satellite internet in talks for a place in the UK’s $6.9 billion ‘Project Gigabit’

 

KEY POINTS

 

• Elon Musk’s SpaceX is in talks with the United Kingdom for the company’s Starlink satellite division to potentially earn funding as a part of the government’s new $6.9 billion internet infrastructure program.

 

• U.K. Minister for Digital Infrastructure Matt Warman recently met with Starlink leadership, a person familiar with the talks told CNBC, as a part of discussions for the ‘Project Gigabit’ plan rolled out on Friday.

 

• SpaceX in October began rolling out early Starlink service in a public beta that now extends to customers in the U.S., Canada, the U.K., Germany and New Zealand – with service priced at $99 a month in the U.S.

>

Sky News first reported the talks, noting that U.K. Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden believes Starlink is one of the best options for delivering internet service to hard-to-reach areas across the country.

>

 

 

  • 2 weeks later...

StarLink factory the street from Tesla's Giga Texas 

 

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/02/spacex-building-starlink-manufacturing-factory-in-austin-texas.html

 

Quote

SpaceX is building a factory in Austin, Texas for Starlink satellite internet equipment

 

KEY POINTS

 

• SpaceX plans to build a new Starlink equipment factory in Austin, Texas, a company job posting revealed.

 

• Elon Musk’s company noted that the factory is designed for “high volume manufacturing,” specifically to make “millions of consumer facing devices.”

 

• Starlink is the company’s capital-intensive project to build an interconnected internet network with thousands of satellites.

---

SpaceX plans to build a new factory in Austin, Texas – adding another expansion to the region from one of Elon Musk’s companies after the billionaire founder moved there last year.

>

SpaceX noted that the factory is designed for “high volume manufacturing,” specifically to make “millions of consumer facing devices.” For its satellite internet network, those devices are known as the Starlink Kit and include the antenna (or dish) that connects to the satellites, Wi-Fi routers and antenna mounting hardware

>

 

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

StarLink + Google Cloud

 

(Been expecting this since Google & Fidelity invested $1B in 2015)

 

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/13/google-cloud-wins-spacex-deal-for-starlink-internet-connectivity.html

 

Quote

 

Google wins cloud deal from Elon Musk’s SpaceX for Starlink internet connectivity

 

KEY POINTS

 

• Google announced that its cloud unit has won a deal to supply computing and networking resources to Elon Musk’s SpaceX to help deliver internet service through the latter’s Starlink satellites.

 

• The Starlink satellite internet will rely on Google’s private fiber-optic network to quickly make connections to cloud services as part of a deal that could last seven years.

>

>

SpaceX will install ground stations at Google data centers that connect to SpaceX’s Starlink satellites, with an eye toward providing fast internet service to enterprises in the second half of this year.

 

The deal represents a victory for Google as it works to take share from Amazon and Microsoft in the fast-growing cloud computing market.

>

 

 

  • 1 month later...

Starlink adoption among Canada's First Nations...

 

https://www.kenoraminerandnews.com/news/local-news/elon-musks-starlink-set-up-for-schooling-in-five-more-first-nation-communities

 

Quote

 

Elon Musk’s Starlink set up for schooling in five more First Nation communities

 

The Anishinaabeg of Kabapikotawangag Resource Council (AKRC) has teamed up with Kenora’s FSET Information Technology to deliver high-speed internet access for educational purposes via Starlink to five different First Nations across northwestern Ontario.
>

As a pilot program, the project was funded by Indigenous Services Canada and the door is open to additional phases, installations and partners in the future.

>

“It’s a feel-good moment to know that Starlink, FSET and AKRC can support our First Nations and their education,” Katic said. “It’s not just a gamechanger, but life-changing for First Nations people.”

 

 

  • 2 weeks later...

StarLink v1.5 w/laser links soon,  v2 next year

 

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/29/elon-musk-.html

 

Quote

 

Elon Musk says SpaceX’s Starlink internet service possibly on track for 500,000 users in one year

>

“The latency for the Starlink system is similar to latency for ground-based fiber and 5G, so we’re expecting to get latency down under 20 milliseconds,” Musk said.

>

We’re getting close to launching satellite 1.5, which has laser inter-satellite links, and that’ll be used especially for continuous connectivity over the Arctic and Antarctic regions,” Musk said. “Next year we’ll start launching version two of our satellite, which will be significantly more capable.”

>

 

 

53 minutes ago, spikey_richie said:

That's steep! Especially considering it's running at around 50-150Mbps

 

image.png.a3f436da8b8a4a898af4ef9f92eec58f.png

They'd have to half the price of the hardware and knock off 20 quid p/m before I even considered it. I know their costs are high but that doesn't make it an attractive proposition. I think even people in rural areas will think twice, it's rare there isn't at least one other option they can take up.

9 hours ago, cacoe said:

They'd have to half the price of the hardware and knock off 20 quid p/m before I even considered it. I know their costs are high but that doesn't make it an attractive proposition. I think even people in rural areas will think twice, it's rare there isn't at least one other option they can take up.

I know a few users at work that have horrible internet connections and no other options.  One lives in the mountains (and is currently using another satellite provider) and the other lives outside a major city using DSL I believe but isn't all that close to it.  It might be worth it for them... especially if the company would pay for it.

10 hours ago, cacoe said:

They'd have to half the price of the hardware and knock off 20 quid p/m before I even considered it. I know their costs are high but that doesn't make it an attractive proposition. I think even people in rural areas will think twice, it's rare there isn't at least one other option they can take up.

 

Soon they'll be launching satellites with laser inter-satellite links to allow direct hops without the packets hitting ground stations, then next year the version 2 satellites start going up on Starship 300-400 at a time. Version 2 will multiply throughput and expand coverage to ships and aircraft. FCC filings estimate service in the gigabit range (1000 Mbps).

16 hours ago, cacoe said:

They'd have to half the price of the hardware and knock off 20 quid p/m before I even considered it. I know their costs are high but that doesn't make it an attractive proposition. I think even people in rural areas will think twice, it's rare there isn't at least one other option they can take up.

The target market is people who currently have no option, or the currently available offering is not adequate. This means most of Europe is not their target market, as they provide most of their counties with decent internet. 

A lot of rural people in larger counties ie Canada/USA/Australia etc are currently relying on satellite services or ADSL1 which are the same price or more expensive with worse speed.

There is also a lot of people who would move to rural areas if they had the ability to have a decent connection.

Other markets are, moving services, Planes/trains/boats etc which existing services dont service very well. As well as quick popup/tear down deployments, ie construction sites/army bases/disaster relief etc.

 

These sorts of users are the target market, and will provide the initial bulk of users until they can bring down costs. They will never be a massive provider for city/suburban users as the density just doesn't work.

 

  • 3 weeks later...

Desperate, they are.  LEO constellation's like SpaceX's StarLink & Amazon's Kuiper are a huge threat to ViaSat, Hughes, etc. business models. 

 

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2021/07/spacex-wins-court-ruling-that-lets-it-continue-launching-starlink-satellites/

 

Quote

 

Judges reject Viasat’s plea to stop SpaceX Starlink satellite launches

 

SpaceX can keep launching broadband satellites despite a lawsuit filed by Viasat, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday.

 

Viasat sued the Federal Communications Commission in May and asked judges for a stay that would halt SpaceX's ongoing launches of low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites that power Starlink Internet service. To get a stay, Viasat had to show that it is likely to win its lawsuit alleging that the FCC improperly approved the satellite launches.

 

A three-judge panel at the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit was not persuaded, saying in a short order that "Viasat has not satisfied the stringent requirements for a stay pending court review." The judges did grant a motion to expedite the appeal, however, so the case should move faster than normal.

>

 

 

On 01/07/2021 at 02:22, IsItPluggedIn said:

The target market is people who currently have no option, or the currently available offering is not adequate. This means most of Europe is not their target market, as they provide most of their counties with decent internet. 

A lot of rural people in larger counties ie Canada/USA/Australia etc are currently relying on satellite services or ADSL1 which are the same price or more expensive with worse speed.

There is also a lot of people who would move to rural areas if they had the ability to have a decent connection.

Other markets are, moving services, Planes/trains/boats etc which existing services dont service very well. As well as quick popup/tear down deployments, ie construction sites/army bases/disaster relief etc.

 

These sorts of users are the target market, and will provide the initial bulk of users until they can bring down costs. They will never be a massive provider for city/suburban users as the density just doesn't work.

 

I'm not convinced as to how viable their market is... I mean, that's only a tiny percentage of the population they're aiming at and the costs involved to provide services to that tiny market are... extreme.  If the market grows, and it will as they increase in popularity, they're going to quickly run into bandwidth issues in areas of higher population density unless they actively refuse customers and I don't even see how they can practically reach their desired satellite count considering they have to be replaced after 5 years...

 

I know his ultimate plans for Starlink are for serving an Earth/Moon/Mars linkup, but that's not happening anytime soon and if he TRULY wants to bring internet to rural areas, it's probably cheaper to start a cellphone company and build masts.

On 23/07/2021 at 08:48, FloatingFatMan said:

I'm not convinced as to how viable their market is... I mean, that's only a tiny percentage of the population they're aiming at and the costs involved to provide services to that tiny market are... extreme.....

Maybe this is the problem between us and him. We can't see what he sees. He is a bi-millionaire, we (or rather me) not even close to the first million. Seriously, I have some doubts too.

On 23/07/2021 at 02:48, FloatingFatMan said:

I'm not convinced as to how viable their market is... I mean, that's only a tiny percentage of the population they're aiming at and the costs involved to provide services to that tiny market are... extreme.  

 

Serving the un-/under-served, such as the rural US, Australia, Canada, India, etc. is why governments subsidize such service. It's cheaper than running 50 miles of optical cable to serve a few small communities, and Starlink can also serve local 5G and other networks. Stick a receiver (not necessarily Dishy), solar panel, big battery, and wireless transmitter on a pole or building and you can serve a whole remote village.

 

Aside from that are the major customers; governments, military, airlines, ships at sea, polar service, financial networks, agricultural, scientific, etc. Long damned list. 

 

Quote

I don't even see how they can practically reach their desired satellite count considering they have to be replaced after 5 years...

They're reopening their pad at Vandenberg Space Force Base to help with Falcon 9 Starlink launches so 3 pads for that at 60/launch, plus once Starship goes into service it'll be able to launch 300-400 per flight.

 

 

Edited by DocM
On 23/07/2021 at 16:48, FloatingFatMan said:

I'm not convinced as to how viable their market is... I mean, that's only a tiny percentage of the population they're aiming at and the costs involved to provide services to that tiny market are... extreme.  If the market grows, and it will as they increase in popularity, they're going to quickly run into bandwidth issues in areas of higher population density unless they actively refuse customers and I don't even see how they can practically reach their desired satellite count considering they have to be replaced after 5 years...

 

I know his ultimate plans for Starlink are for serving an Earth/Moon/Mars linkup, but that's not happening anytime soon and if he TRULY wants to bring internet to rural areas, it's probably cheaper to start a cellphone company and build masts.

The target market is people who currently have no option, or the currently available offering is not adequate. This means most of Europe is not their target market, as they provide most of their counties with decent internet. 

A lot of rural people in larger counties ie Canada/USA/Australia etc are currently relying on satellite services or ADSL1 which are the same price or more expensive with worse speed.

There is also a lot of people who would move to rural areas if they had the ability to have a decent connection.

Other markets are: moving services, Planes/trains/boats etc which existing services dont service very well. As well as quick popup/tear down deployments, ie construction sites/army bases/disaster relief etc.

 

These sorts of users are the target market, and will provide the initial bulk of users until they can bring down costs. They will never be a massive provider for city/suburban users as the density just doesn't work.

On 22/07/2021 at 23:48, FloatingFatMan said:

I'm not convinced as to how viable their market is... I mean, that's only a tiny percentage of the population they're aiming at and the costs involved to provide services to that tiny market are... extreme.  If the market grows, and it will as they increase in popularity, they're going to quickly run into bandwidth issues in areas of higher population density unless they actively refuse customers 

The economics will make sense with government subsidy and paying customers over time. Especially as they can in some cases hitch-hike on other missions to deliver replace satellites the cost to maintain it will continue to fall along with the cost of launching their rockets.

 

Being in a position where you can refuse customers is actually a good point for a business as long as they have a balanced checkbook. There's nothing wrong with defining a niche market if the math works out. Now as far as bandiwdth goes, I don't know enough about the bandwidth limitations of their satellite arrays to make projections on what will saturate their network.

On 22/07/2021 at 23:48, FloatingFatMan said:

and I don't even see how they can practically reach their desired satellite count considering they have to be replaced after 5 years...

With how fast Space X is turning out rockets, they could easily keep up with that, at least in my opinion.

On 22/07/2021 at 23:48, FloatingFatMan said:

I know his ultimate plans for Starlink are for serving an Earth/Moon/Mars linkup, but that's not happening anytime soon and if he TRULY wants to bring internet to rural areas, it's probably cheaper to start a cellphone company and build masts.

It's actually not, depending on the areas... you're dealing with tons of regulations, tons of infrastructure that doesn't exist, etc. There's a reason why these places are still alienated from modern internet access - the labor involved and costs involved far outweigh the benefit. With Starlink, SpaceX gets a service they can sell AND a service they can use for LEO communications. It's a win-win, and likely would have been deployed anyways to support Musk's rapid launch endeavors.

On 22/07/2021 at 21:14, DocM said:

Desperate, they are.  LEO constellation's like SpaceX's StarLink & Amazon's Kuiper are a huge threat to ViaSat, Hughes, etc. business models. 

 

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2021/07/spacex-wins-court-ruling-that-lets-it-continue-launching-starlink-satellites/

 

 

Don't blame them though.  I don't know much about the company but my assumptions are that they cannot make their own satellites, and the cost to launch them is enormous.  They had to really be on the ball to beat SpaceX at this...  but I'm making a lot of assumptions and did little research.

On 23/07/2021 at 02:48, FloatingFatMan said:

I'm not convinced as to how viable their market is... I mean, that's only a tiny percentage of the population they're aiming at and the costs involved to provide services to that tiny market are... extreme.

I know of 3 people in around my ~200 person company that need this... I'm sure there are more but they just come into the office instead of working from home.  One employee has already signed up for the service.  I'm curious to see how it works, however... but I'm in town and will likely never need the service.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think there will be a 27H1 for actual users of 26H1 The 25h2 supports ARM too : Snapdragon X, Snapdragon X Plus and Snapdragon X Elite
    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is also the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!