Touch friendly File Explorer (formerly Windows Explorer)


Recommended Posts

Shouldn't Microsoft be making File Explorer more touch friendly at least in tablet mode?

 

Microsoft doesn't need to make a modern File Explorer, all it need to do is make file explorer bigger (ie. wider) in tablet mode.

 

This is not touch friendly:

(I do realize that this is from Windows 8, but not that much has changed)

 

Windows-8-File-Explorer.png

  • Like 1

Please don't give them more ideas, lest we receive a Universal'd File Explorer in the same vein as Calculator.

  • Like 5

I agree this needs to be done. Personally, I find that it is a pain to use File Explorer on my Surface without the type cover; and I have an even more difficult time doing file management on a device like the Dell Venue 8 Pro (and this will probably apply to other devices with a small screen). This is not even taking to account other issues with the File Manager (overtly complicated UI [they need someway to clean it up yet keep it functional], the broken and outdated preview system.

 

One thing about Windows 10 and the entire idea of Windows as a service idea is that new features will be added once the OS has been released, so even if it does not come instantly at launch I believe that it will come eventually. In fact, I believe MS is already working on this, because Windows Phone 10 Technical Preview has a new universal WinRT based File Manager, and while that application has too little functionality at this point to replace the existing feature-rich Win32 file manager on the desktop, it could be the basis for an eventual replacement to the File Manager (once more features are added and it has become optimized for desktops and tablet devices). However, rewriting the Windows File Manager as a WinRT application and making it the default system to browse files is no small task because the existing File Manager is so deeply integrated into the operating system and both first-party and third-party applications that they probably will not be able to remove it all at one go, but rather they will have to eventually migrate off of it (this is the same with the Control Panel [which I believe is actually part of the File Manager, aka Explorer], Windows Media Player, and many other apps).

  • Like 1

I think File Explorer can really be improved and can meld a touch-mouse interface.  Some of those unofficial mock-ups looked great and achieve the functionality we need (well, at a glance).  

 

The equivalent on Yosemite (and previous versions of Mac OS) is extremely functional and, while not designed for touch, has  more intuitive design for that interface method. 

OneDrive app on Windows 8.1 can manage both OneDrive and local files. 

 

For now, there's plenty of 3rd party solutions on the Windows Store, my favorite being Files&Folders

I don't understand why they don't implement the Office 2013 Touch Mode toggle in the rest of the desktop apps like File Explorer and be done with it. If you're using mouse turn it off if you like, if you're using touch then turn it on - yes it's a bit of manual labor but it works...

I don't understand why they don't implement the Office 2013 Touch Mode toggle in the rest of the desktop apps like File Explorer and be done with it. If you're using mouse turn it off if you like, if you're using touch then turn it on - yes it's a bit of manual labor but it works...

 

Continuum will cover that.  But they need to make Explorer as useful via touch as it is via mouse.

I don't understand why they don't implement the Office 2013 Touch Mode toggle in the rest of the desktop apps like File Explorer and be done with it. If you're using mouse turn it off if you like, if you're using touch then turn it on - yes it's a bit of manual labor but it works...

Well remember most of the touch stuff is with Metro apps. Also Office using touch versus Explorer is explorer is part of the OS and Office is an installed application. But they are working on it in the Technical Preview.

 

http://www.winbeta.org/news/windows-10-microsoft-promises-updated-file-explorer-user-experience-ux

I think there should be a whole load more detailed and options for Explorer in desktop mode (perhaps using an expert option). In the end, something is going to come along that offers either basic mode for touch and casual users and then a detailed mode for those using a mouse. Microsoft should do it first and not have to catch up once again in its own previously dominated back yard.

Please don't give them more ideas, lest we receive a Universal'd File Explorer in the same vein as Calculator.

There is nothing wrong with Calc. It's time for change, and Explorer needs upgraded. It sticks out like a sore thumb on Windows 8, and is even worse on Windows 10. There's a lot of push for a new Explorer, and Windows 10 is the time to release one.

 

 

I've created my own concept that I submitted for feedback:

Explorer_Dark.png?psid=1

  • Like 1

I am genuinely worried that Microsoft has already shown most of its card on January 21st and there's no redesigned File Explorer (Windows Explorer) coming.

 

They're not even close to being done yet.

Please don't give them more ideas, lest we receive a Universal'd File Explorer in the same vein as Calculator.

 

yeah, don't give them idea to screw up windows even more.

There is nothing wrong with Calc. It's time for change, and Explorer needs upgraded. It sticks out like a sore thumb on Windows 8, and is even worse on Windows 10. There's a lot of push for a new Explorer, and Windows 10 is the time to release one.

 

 

I've created my own concept that I submitted for feedback:

 

Yes there is, has less features, more cumbersome and looks like crap. don't fix what isn't broken.

  • Like 2

yeah, don't give them idea to screw up windows even more.

Yes there is, has less features, more cumbersome and looks like crap. don't fix what isn't broken.

Great, so by your definition, the old calc was broken. Windows 10 is a responsive OS, and a responsive application it was not. Same goes for Explorer.

Great, so by your definition, the old calc was broken. Windows 10 is a responsive OS, and a responsive application it was not. Same goes for Explorer.

 

What I don't want is the desktop to be overhauled to work with a tablet.  Lets make everything bigger so I can press it with my finger. The mouse and keyboard are out dated /s. While I do have that 7 inch HP tablet and as nice as it would be to be able to use the desktop better with my finger, I do 99% of my productivity on my Desktops and I like Windows just the way it is.

 

I have a hard time getting anything useful done with a tablet, excluding the surface with a keyboard, just give me a good old fashion laptop or desktop with a keyboard.

 

I can do in 2 mins that would have taken me 5 -10 mins on a tablet and not near the frustration.

 

If you remove the number of tablets that have physical keyboards, that leave ALOT if not most of them that do not, and man typing on a virtual keyboard is not much fun at all.

  • Like 2

What I don't want is the desktop to be overhauled to work with a tablet.  Lets make everything bigger so I can press it with my finger. The mouse and keyboard are out dated /s. While I do have that 7 inch HP tablet and as nice as it would be to be able to use the desktop better with my finger, I do 99% of my productivity on my Desktops and I like Windows just the way it is.

 

I have a hard time getting anything useful done with a tablet. excluding the surface with a keyboard, just give me a good old fashion laptop or desktop with a keyboard.

 

I can do in 2 mins that would have taken me 5 -10 mins on a tablet and not near the frustration.

 

If you remove the number of tablets that have physical keyboards, that leave ALOT of them that do not, and man is typing on a virtual keyboard not much fun at all.

Cool. 99% of the world disagrees.

Great, so by your definition, the old calc was broken. Windows 10 is a responsive OS, and a responsive application it was not. Same goes for Explorer.

 

This is rich.  How was the old calculator broken by warwagon's definition of "Yes there is, has less features, more cumbersome and looks like crap"?

 

Technically, the new calculator has less features (doesn

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!