Recommended Posts

Hi!

 

I have a home server with low power requirements but a very noisy power supply. I've looked into replacing the fan which some have been able to do but I can't find a low profile low noise fan so I'm now looking into getting a different PSU. The board and CPU maxes out at around 45-50 watts and it's capable of connecting 12 drives. I'm planning on populating all 12 ports on it so I want a power supply that's capable of that and I would guess that under the worst circumstances (highest load possible) the drives would consume up to 60W and 5A. I need a power supply that's very quiet and can supply my server with enough power. I found Streacom Nano150 PSU but the amper

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1248444-low-power-high-efficiency-psu/
Share on other sites

400 watts, isn't too powerful, and you should be very happy with it, you mention it being pricey, but when moving from an item necessary, to an item more convenient, that does happen.

I'll throw in a vote for the seasonic 400 fanless.

  • Like 2

What about a 520W fanless PSU?
http://www.silverstonetek.com/product.php?pid=481&area=en

Or the 400W
http://www.silverstonetek.com/product.php?pid=228&area=en

You will draw the amount power needed for what your powering so if something using less then 200W from a 400W PSU it will only use 200W and the efficiency to output that power is based on the 80 Plus certification for AC power in to DC power out.

You don't need to worry about overspeccing. The power supply will only draw as much as it needs. So if you have 90w of components, an 800w power supply with 90% efficiency only draws 100w.

The efficiency is not constant, it peeks at around 50%. So using 5W from a 400W PSU is not ideal. Power efficiency at 5-25W isn't specified which is why I was bringing this up. The 80 Plus certification only says that the efficiency needs to be at least 80% at 20%, 50% and 100% load. Efficiency at low power use is rarely talked about since computers either use 0-1W when off or 50W+ when on. The machine that I'm using PEEKS at 45-50W which is why I'm asking all this.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • In the boot options in the UEFI is set to legacy or CMS? It needs to be set to UEFI if it's not already.
    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      465
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!