Recommended Posts

They added more bloat with a chat client that no one wanted and reduced their search engine to Yahoo.

Bad decisions all around.

your not forced to use the chat client, its called Customization. im pretty sure firefox offers that. same with SEARCH Engine, just because Yahoo maybe defasult, doesnt mean you have to use it. . i dont see what ya complaining about

  • Like 1

My two cents on Firefox, which I have been using since before version one and why I am not going to stop using it any time soon...

- Add-on support which is second to none, especially if you need an ad blocker.
- Web standards support only rivaled by Chrome. IE will finally be back in the fold when Spartan comes on the scene.
- It's not a browser created by an advertising/data collecting company.
- Syncing across platforms. I have a Windows PC, a Linux laptop, two Android devices (phone/tablet), and a Firefox phone. I can sync my Firefox browser on everything with Chrome coming close. IE is not even in the game here...

- Browser customization anyone?
- Firefox being open sourced is a plus for me.

Speed? Firefox can be clunky on Flash intensive sites but otherwise I don't really notice any difference between the major browsers. Remember, 64-bit and muti-process support is just around corner for Firefox which should end all talk of it being slow (except for the trolls).

Where Firefox went wrong is that it has been reduced to copying Chrome.

 

When is the last time that Firefox introduce innovative features that make people want to say, "Woo! I want to try that" ?

 

The annoying updates that keep breaking extensions doesn't help either.

 

Mozilla= 90's netscape browser correct?

I would have to agree with the chat client part.  I mean, what the heck?  Why?  What other clients is it compatible with?

Its an open standard called webrtc, so should be compatible with any browser that supports webrtc. afaik chrome also supports webrtc, not sure about other browsers.

Its an open standard called webrtc, so should be compatible with any browser that supports webrtc. afaik chrome also supports webrtc, not sure about other browsers.

It should be an official add-on that is not installed by default.

First time I saw it - I thought my browser was compromised.

But FF usage will continue dropping as long as Google has the "A faster way to browse on Windows" advertisement everywhere.

I don't think I'll ever stop using Firefox as my primary browser because it's user centric. Chrome is my secondary, but I find that Google is heavy handed with their approach to changes. One thing that really irritated me was when they removed the option to change the new tab page. The fact that I had to make the history file read only to disable the recent history thumbnails is ridiculous.

Strangely enough many would argue just the opposite, that Firefox started becoming crappier when Mozilla started chasing Chrome's version numbering with its own rapid release model that resulted in half-baked 'features' being pushed out every so often (along with add-ons being broken).

 

 

Flash is still used by many sites that haven't moved on to HTML5 yet, or else I'd definitely leave it off. Can't wait for the day I can get rid of Flash just like I did with Java (undoubtedly the two biggest malware vectors thanks to how sloppily they're coded).

You can use Shumway as an alternative to Flash.

It should be an official add-on that is not installed by default.

First time I saw it - I thought my browser was compromised.

But FF usage will continue dropping as long as Google has the "A faster way to browse on Windows" advertisement everywhere.

It is not in memory until you go online on Firefox Hello, so it is not really enabled by default.

 

 

Its an open standard called webrtc, so should be compatible with any browser that supports webrtc. afaik chrome also supports webrtc, not sure about other browsers.

http://caniuse.com/#feat=rtcpeerconnection

Thanks. Last time I tried that it broke some Flash-based sites quite badly, especially some online games a few family members like to play. As an experiment I don't think it's quite ready for prime-time yet.

Oh yes, I agree that it is not completely ready but it has made huge strides recently.

I'd been using Firefox since it was first released; it will always have a place in my heart. Since version 29 released last year with the new UI, I have started using Pale Moon, a fork of Firefox. For my wants and needs, Pale Moon simply became a better browser. I love that it supports Firefox extensions while still giving me the level of customization I want over the UI, along with providing some under-the-hood tweaks.

 

I never cared for the minimalistic design of Chrome, and Firefox seems to be following that minimalistic design trend.

I never cared for the minimalistic design of Chrome, and Firefox seems to be following that minimalistic design trend.

Not a fan of the minimal setup either but very easily changed into a more traditional layout, never mind missing out on the improvements the later versions of the browser has that aren't present in Pale Moon.

I gave Firefox a try last week.  Unfortunately I kept running into hangs that would last around 5 seconds.  Very frustrating because I do want to move to a more privacy-oriented browser but they have to get the quality bar up.

It probably wasnt firefox that hung... probably flash or an addon

Not a fan of the minimal setup either but very easily changed into a more traditional layout, never mind missing out on the improvements the later versions of the browser has that aren't present in Pale Moon.

Some people prefer that their browser look and work the way they want it without having to load multiple add-ons just to revert UI changes they detest. As far as improvements go, I don't see what Pale Moon users might be missing out on. Chat? Who cares. And it's not as if Pale Moon is forever frozen in a pre-Australis state. Non-Australis code is regularly merged into its codebase.

Some people prefer that their browser look and work the way they want it without having to load multiple add-ons just to revert UI changes they detest. As far as improvements go, I don't see what Pale Moon users might be missing out on. Chat? Who cares. And it's not as if Pale Moon is forever frozen in a pre-Australis state. Non-Australis code is regularly merged into its codebase.

Sure, if you're willing to overlook all the performance improvements, additional standards, and other under the hood improvements that have been added, never mind the stuff that's coming soon like the new engine, multiprocess support, etc... Pale Moon has been getting outpaced by vanilla Firefox for a while now. Besides, its kind of silly to praise extensions in one post then criticize them in the next.

Sure, if you're willing to overlook all the performance improvements, additional standards, and other under the hood improvements that have been added, never mind the stuff that's coming soon like the new engine, multiprocess support, etc... Pale Moon has been getting outpaced by vanilla Firefox for a while now.

I don't see what great improvements vanilla FF has that PM lacks, and I've compared both. Not to mention FF has an ESR release precisely because not everyone loves their ridiculous rapid release model.

 

Besides, its kind of silly to praise extensions in one post then criticize them in the next.

Care to point out the post in this thread where I praised extensions? Not that I don't like them, but a) I hate people trying to put words in my mouth, and b) I clearly stated that loading extensions that use up resources and possibly reduce stability and security just to revert UI changes that some people detest is not what everyone wants to do. What do you have against PM anyway, I wonder? Are PM users preventing you from using FF in any way?

I don't see what great improvements vanilla FF has that PM lacks, and I've compared both. Not to mention FF has an ESR release precisely because not everyone loves their ridiculous rapid release model.

Well if you want old and stable, sure, the ESR is fine for that. But we were talking added features, and they publish release notes for that sort of stuff, never mind the performance improvements alone.. Pale Moon is hardly faster any more by any stretch.

 

Care to point out the post in this thread where I praised extensions? Not that I don't like them, but a) I hate people trying to put words in my mouth, and b) I clearly stated that loading extensions that use up resources and possibly reduce stability and security just to revert UI changes that some people detest is not what everyone wants to do. What do you have against PM anyway, I wonder? Are PM users preventing you from using FF in any way?

Oops, was on a phone typing that last night and got the wrong person. So sue me. That said, back up on the attitude princess, never mind I'm curious how rearranging UI elements would be a security risk.. I'd be more concerned with a fork of an old version of a browser that's had many vulnerabilities in its history done by a very small team of people, sounds riskier by far. As far as PM goes, I honestly don't give a rats ass what anyone uses, I thought this was a discussion.. use whatever makes you happy.

Personally, I use Cyberfox - just like Firefox, but better in every single way that I've noticed, including already being compiled for 64-bit processors/(Windows)OS (32-bit and portable versions also available). It's also compiled into separate versions for Intel and AMD systems to take advantage of the different instruction sets, etc those two companies use in their CPUs.

 

Has built-in webdev tools and some other nice features, and also disposed of things like Telemetry, Healthreport, sponsored tiles & other components that collect info.

 

What really caught my eye recently is that unlike the last time I visited the Mozilla Firefox download page, the devs actually have a nice box on the download page reminding you to check your plugins (updates) for security purposes. They even include links to Mozilla's web-based plugin check, and the Flash/Java/Silverlight download pages.

 

Caveats: No MacOSX or Linux versions, default new tab page is "Dark", but very clean. Not all Firefox addons/themes will work by default (kind of obvious due to 64-bit and CPU compiling options - devs also clear about this in several places on the site).

 

https://8pecxstudios.com/cyberfox-web-browser

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!