Recommended Posts

They added more bloat with a chat client that no one wanted and reduced their search engine to Yahoo.

Bad decisions all around.

your not forced to use the chat client, its called Customization. im pretty sure firefox offers that. same with SEARCH Engine, just because Yahoo maybe defasult, doesnt mean you have to use it. . i dont see what ya complaining about

  • Like 1

My two cents on Firefox, which I have been using since before version one and why I am not going to stop using it any time soon...

- Add-on support which is second to none, especially if you need an ad blocker.
- Web standards support only rivaled by Chrome. IE will finally be back in the fold when Spartan comes on the scene.
- It's not a browser created by an advertising/data collecting company.
- Syncing across platforms. I have a Windows PC, a Linux laptop, two Android devices (phone/tablet), and a Firefox phone. I can sync my Firefox browser on everything with Chrome coming close. IE is not even in the game here...

- Browser customization anyone?
- Firefox being open sourced is a plus for me.

Speed? Firefox can be clunky on Flash intensive sites but otherwise I don't really notice any difference between the major browsers. Remember, 64-bit and muti-process support is just around corner for Firefox which should end all talk of it being slow (except for the trolls).

Where Firefox went wrong is that it has been reduced to copying Chrome.

 

When is the last time that Firefox introduce innovative features that make people want to say, "Woo! I want to try that" ?

 

The annoying updates that keep breaking extensions doesn't help either.

 

Mozilla= 90's netscape browser correct?

I would have to agree with the chat client part.  I mean, what the heck?  Why?  What other clients is it compatible with?

Its an open standard called webrtc, so should be compatible with any browser that supports webrtc. afaik chrome also supports webrtc, not sure about other browsers.

Its an open standard called webrtc, so should be compatible with any browser that supports webrtc. afaik chrome also supports webrtc, not sure about other browsers.

It should be an official add-on that is not installed by default.

First time I saw it - I thought my browser was compromised.

But FF usage will continue dropping as long as Google has the "A faster way to browse on Windows" advertisement everywhere.

I don't think I'll ever stop using Firefox as my primary browser because it's user centric. Chrome is my secondary, but I find that Google is heavy handed with their approach to changes. One thing that really irritated me was when they removed the option to change the new tab page. The fact that I had to make the history file read only to disable the recent history thumbnails is ridiculous.

Strangely enough many would argue just the opposite, that Firefox started becoming crappier when Mozilla started chasing Chrome's version numbering with its own rapid release model that resulted in half-baked 'features' being pushed out every so often (along with add-ons being broken).

 

 

Flash is still used by many sites that haven't moved on to HTML5 yet, or else I'd definitely leave it off. Can't wait for the day I can get rid of Flash just like I did with Java (undoubtedly the two biggest malware vectors thanks to how sloppily they're coded).

You can use Shumway as an alternative to Flash.

It should be an official add-on that is not installed by default.

First time I saw it - I thought my browser was compromised.

But FF usage will continue dropping as long as Google has the "A faster way to browse on Windows" advertisement everywhere.

It is not in memory until you go online on Firefox Hello, so it is not really enabled by default.

 

 

Its an open standard called webrtc, so should be compatible with any browser that supports webrtc. afaik chrome also supports webrtc, not sure about other browsers.

http://caniuse.com/#feat=rtcpeerconnection

Thanks. Last time I tried that it broke some Flash-based sites quite badly, especially some online games a few family members like to play. As an experiment I don't think it's quite ready for prime-time yet.

Oh yes, I agree that it is not completely ready but it has made huge strides recently.

I'd been using Firefox since it was first released; it will always have a place in my heart. Since version 29 released last year with the new UI, I have started using Pale Moon, a fork of Firefox. For my wants and needs, Pale Moon simply became a better browser. I love that it supports Firefox extensions while still giving me the level of customization I want over the UI, along with providing some under-the-hood tweaks.

 

I never cared for the minimalistic design of Chrome, and Firefox seems to be following that minimalistic design trend.

I never cared for the minimalistic design of Chrome, and Firefox seems to be following that minimalistic design trend.

Not a fan of the minimal setup either but very easily changed into a more traditional layout, never mind missing out on the improvements the later versions of the browser has that aren't present in Pale Moon.

I gave Firefox a try last week.  Unfortunately I kept running into hangs that would last around 5 seconds.  Very frustrating because I do want to move to a more privacy-oriented browser but they have to get the quality bar up.

It probably wasnt firefox that hung... probably flash or an addon

Not a fan of the minimal setup either but very easily changed into a more traditional layout, never mind missing out on the improvements the later versions of the browser has that aren't present in Pale Moon.

Some people prefer that their browser look and work the way they want it without having to load multiple add-ons just to revert UI changes they detest. As far as improvements go, I don't see what Pale Moon users might be missing out on. Chat? Who cares. And it's not as if Pale Moon is forever frozen in a pre-Australis state. Non-Australis code is regularly merged into its codebase.

Some people prefer that their browser look and work the way they want it without having to load multiple add-ons just to revert UI changes they detest. As far as improvements go, I don't see what Pale Moon users might be missing out on. Chat? Who cares. And it's not as if Pale Moon is forever frozen in a pre-Australis state. Non-Australis code is regularly merged into its codebase.

Sure, if you're willing to overlook all the performance improvements, additional standards, and other under the hood improvements that have been added, never mind the stuff that's coming soon like the new engine, multiprocess support, etc... Pale Moon has been getting outpaced by vanilla Firefox for a while now. Besides, its kind of silly to praise extensions in one post then criticize them in the next.

Sure, if you're willing to overlook all the performance improvements, additional standards, and other under the hood improvements that have been added, never mind the stuff that's coming soon like the new engine, multiprocess support, etc... Pale Moon has been getting outpaced by vanilla Firefox for a while now.

I don't see what great improvements vanilla FF has that PM lacks, and I've compared both. Not to mention FF has an ESR release precisely because not everyone loves their ridiculous rapid release model.

 

Besides, its kind of silly to praise extensions in one post then criticize them in the next.

Care to point out the post in this thread where I praised extensions? Not that I don't like them, but a) I hate people trying to put words in my mouth, and b) I clearly stated that loading extensions that use up resources and possibly reduce stability and security just to revert UI changes that some people detest is not what everyone wants to do. What do you have against PM anyway, I wonder? Are PM users preventing you from using FF in any way?

I don't see what great improvements vanilla FF has that PM lacks, and I've compared both. Not to mention FF has an ESR release precisely because not everyone loves their ridiculous rapid release model.

Well if you want old and stable, sure, the ESR is fine for that. But we were talking added features, and they publish release notes for that sort of stuff, never mind the performance improvements alone.. Pale Moon is hardly faster any more by any stretch.

 

Care to point out the post in this thread where I praised extensions? Not that I don't like them, but a) I hate people trying to put words in my mouth, and b) I clearly stated that loading extensions that use up resources and possibly reduce stability and security just to revert UI changes that some people detest is not what everyone wants to do. What do you have against PM anyway, I wonder? Are PM users preventing you from using FF in any way?

Oops, was on a phone typing that last night and got the wrong person. So sue me. That said, back up on the attitude princess, never mind I'm curious how rearranging UI elements would be a security risk.. I'd be more concerned with a fork of an old version of a browser that's had many vulnerabilities in its history done by a very small team of people, sounds riskier by far. As far as PM goes, I honestly don't give a rats ass what anyone uses, I thought this was a discussion.. use whatever makes you happy.

Personally, I use Cyberfox - just like Firefox, but better in every single way that I've noticed, including already being compiled for 64-bit processors/(Windows)OS (32-bit and portable versions also available). It's also compiled into separate versions for Intel and AMD systems to take advantage of the different instruction sets, etc those two companies use in their CPUs.

 

Has built-in webdev tools and some other nice features, and also disposed of things like Telemetry, Healthreport, sponsored tiles & other components that collect info.

 

What really caught my eye recently is that unlike the last time I visited the Mozilla Firefox download page, the devs actually have a nice box on the download page reminding you to check your plugins (updates) for security purposes. They even include links to Mozilla's web-based plugin check, and the Flash/Java/Silverlight download pages.

 

Caveats: No MacOSX or Linux versions, default new tab page is "Dark", but very clean. Not all Firefox addons/themes will work by default (kind of obvious due to 64-bit and CPU compiling options - devs also clear about this in several places on the site).

 

https://8pecxstudios.com/cyberfox-web-browser

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!