Recommended Posts

No thanks.  I'd rather use Firefox'es built in ones over Firebug.

 

I like Chrome's developer tools better. They work better for me, and its purely preference.

I've used Chrome's dev tools and I agree that they have better organization, but I've just gotten used to using Firefox since it is my main browser. It really is a matter of preference and familiarity.

well its kind of arguing semantics, but not really - the browser uses Flash, but its not part of the browser.

IE and Chrome has proper support for Flash. Firefox doesn't work as well for many people.

Guess what the average user is going to do here.

Pale Moon is hardly faster any more by any stretch.

No slower than FF either, so I don't see any disadvantage to using it like you keep droning on about.

 

I'm curious how rearranging UI elements would be a security risk.. I'd be more concerned with a fork of an old version of a browser that's had many vulnerabilities in its history done by a very small team of people, sounds riskier by far.

You can't simply 'rearrange' UI elements to go back to a pre-Australis state. You need add-ons for that and any add-on increases resource usage and can definitely introduce security holes, especially since many are sloppily coded. PM also gets security patches and features ported over from FF regularly and works just fine for everyone who uses it.

 

Speaking of UIs, I hate how every browser seems to think Chrome's UI is something worthy of being copied. Mozilla used to chart its own course once upon a time but it's just lost all focus recently, which explains the decline in its market share. Lots of people moved to FF alternatives like PM post-Australis, or to Chrome since if that's the sort of UI they were going to be forced to use they might as well use Chrome itself.

It is losing market share because Mozilla are putting large amounts of work into things the majority of people couldn't care less about. Things like Apps (how is this different to extensions?) and Hello (why?!).

 

I want a faster browser. I don't care about all these extra things I, and the majority of other users, just don't use. Hello should have just been an official, optional, extension not something built into the browser annoying me when I upgrade.

 

I love Firefox. It is the only browser I ever use but I want it to be faster. It has gotten a lot better but it could still be much better still.

 

Is it time for a reboot like what Firefox was to the Mozilla suite? Just a super lean browser with extension support? None of the extra things like dev tools (stick that in a developer edition only). A clean, simple UI. Etc.

 

Also I am not a big fan of the new Australis look and feel. It isn't as clean as it once was and I lost some customisation options. I am probably in the minority wanting such a lean browser though. Oh well. I will still use Firefox over Chrome. I am not a big fan of Google these days. They want to know way too much about everything I do.

  • Like 3

No slower than FF either, so I don't see any disadvantage to using it like you keep droning on about.

Oooook..

benchmarks.png

One of my random test systems, Firefox 37 beta on the left (with a lot of addons, including some that are considered "fat"), Pale Moon 25.2.1 on the right with no addons whatsoever.  Day to day usage I can easily see Pale Moon get bogged down on script-heavy sites where Firefox doesn't anymore, it's almost on par with Chrome, very close,  and with the new engine that's in the works that's going be an even bigger difference.  Sorry, reality doesn't agree.. and I'm the one who's droning? Heh.. starting to sound like the type that clings to Windows XP. If you want to use it, by all means go for it, but at least be honest about it mmkay?

 

You can't simply 'rearrange' UI elements to go back to a pre-Australis state. You need add-ons for that and any add-on increases resource usage and can definitely introduce security holes, especially since many are sloppily coded. PM also gets security patches and features ported over from FF regularly and works just fine for everyone who uses it.

It's one addon... memory usage with it enabled and disabled?  Almost  impossible to tell the difference. 

 

As far as PM's addons go.. if the addons work (some don't or require special trickery), not all features have been ported (media source extensions yet? Aw, no, better hope Flash plays nice), and resource usage is still more or less on par between the two.. sorry, but I highly doubt there's very many people who actually use Firefox or one of its knockoffs with zero addons, and besides, even loaded to the gills with addons it still uses a lot less memory than Chrome by far.  Security holes in an addon that moves toolbars around?  Please, show me a vulnerability, would love to see it.

 

 

Speaking of UIs, I hate how every browser seems to think Chrome's UI is something worthy of being copied. Mozilla used to chart its own course once upon a time but it's just lost all focus recently, which explains the decline in its market share.

 

So do I,hence me changing it.. because you know you're not forced into using it.  Forced implies being unable to change, but since you can.. rhetoric, sorry.  But I seriously doubt that's why Firefox lost marketshare.. it's kind of hard to go toe to toe with a 10 ton gorilla with infinite pockets like Google.

 

 

It is losing market share because Mozilla are putting large amounts of work into things the majority of people couldn't care less about. Things like Apps (how is this different to extensions?) and Hello (why?!).

 

Meh not keen on Hello either (*shrug*), apps though are kinda sorta somewhat handy depending on your needs, self-contained web app that's independent of the browser, used to use a few of these on Chrome too.  I can run these on a different monitor than my primary and it doesn't interfere with the browser itself.  It has it's selective uses.. not a game changer, but nice to have for some, ignore it and never see it if you don't.

I was an Opera user for about 5 years then I switched to Chrome because of its simplicity, speed, and the way it ties in with Google's services so well. I've personally had a largely glitch free experience with Chrome. I can't say I've ever liked Firefox, the fact that they use non native UI controls makes it feel clunky to me, the XUL engine they use just feels outdated and clunky. It's very much a personal thing these days, there's nothing explicitly wrong with Firefox, they just can't match Google's development budget and it shows. It's not the fastest browser of them all but it works well enough.

Day to day usage I can easily see Pale Moon get bogged down on script-heavy sites where Firefox doesn't anymore, it's almost on par with Chrome, very close,  and with the new engine that's in the works that's going be an even bigger difference.  Sorry, reality doesn't agree.. and I'm the one who's droning? Heh.. starting to sound like the type that clings to Windows XP. If you want to use it, by all means go for it, but at least be honest about it mmkay?

I don't use beta versions. For me PM 25.2.1 is easily on par with FF 36.0.1 and I see no appreciable difference at all in daily browsing, even on script-heavy sites. You can blabbler about XP all you want here as if it's remotely relevant to the topic at hand, doesn't change what I experience on my system.

 

I highly doubt there's very many people who actually use Firefox or one of its knockoffs with zero addons, and besides, even loaded to the gills with addons it still uses a lot less memory than Chrome by far.

Mem usage compared to Chrome? Perhaps it does use less but I don't give a rat's ass about Chrome anyway.

 

Security holes in an addon that moves toolbars around?  Please, show me a vulnerability, would love to see it.

May or may not be an actual vulnerability - I never stated there was one definitely. But there's always the possibility of one and whatever be the resource usage it is something entirely unnecessary and PM users choose not to pay that penalty. Also, if you think the difference between Australis and the classic UI is just a toolbar being moved around you have no clue.

 

So do I,hence me changing it.. because you know you're not forced into using it.  Forced implies being unable to change, but since you can.. rhetoric, sorry.  But I seriously doubt that's why Firefox lost marketshare.. it's kind of hard to go toe to toe with a 10 ton gorilla with infinite pockets like Google.

Yeah, people who detest Australis might not be forced to use it but they are certainly forced to load add-ons to undo the damage wrought by Mozilla. Those who feel strongly about it and would rather not jump through these hoops use PM and it works for them, as simple as that. Australis may not be the reason FF is losing market share, but it definitely has contributed. Mozilla didn't have a hard time going toe to toe with Google and others earlier and that's why many loved FF. Things like Australis are symptomatic of how they have lost their unique vision and seem to think aping Google is the way forward. What's sad is it's not as if Chrome is better by leaps and bounds - not even close. They could have provided a Chrome-like theme or skin for all those deluded people who think it's the best UI going around, instead of attempting to become a me-too clone. That's not why people chose it in the first place.

 

Is it time for a reboot like what Firefox was to the Mozilla suite? Just a super lean browser with extension support? None of the extra things like dev tools (stick that in a developer edition only). A clean, simple UI. Etc.

Also I am not a big fan of the new Australis look and feel. It isn't as clean as it once was and I lost some customisation options. I am probably in the minority wanting such a lean browser though.

+1 and nope, you're not in the minority. I bet lots of people would love a rebooted FF. If they do it right I'm sure users of forks such as PM, WaterFox and the like would switch back in a jiffy and they'd win back many of the users they've bled to Chrome and others.

I don't use beta versions. For me PM 25.2.1 is easily on par with FF 36.0.1 [

... not even close. Same big difference. I can draw another picture if it helps.

 

May or may not be an actual vulnerability - I never stated there was one definitely. But there's always the possibility of one and whatever be the resource usage it is something entirely unnecessary and PM users choose not to pay that penalty.

Ah, so it's just a maybe now. Maybe I prefer to stick with the team that actually wrote the thing too versus an unknown group of a couple people who are messing with somebody else's work, you know because there's a possibility of vulnerabilities being created. And as I mentioned, the resource usage is practically nonexistant.. what penalty?

Also, if you think the difference between Australis and the classic UI is just a toolbar being moved around you have no clue.

That's funny, because my Firefox looks and acts near identical to a setup I have of Pale Moon, just saying. I can spare a clue if you need one.

 

Yeah, people who detest Australis might not be forced to use it but they are certainly forced to load add-ons to undo the damage wrought by Mozilla. Those who feel strongly about it and would rather not jump through these hoops use PM and it works for them, as simple as that.

Damage? Jump through hoops? You mean click click done? Mmkay then. God forbid you actually have to do something that's actually hard.

 

Mozilla didn't have a hard time going toe to toe with Google and others earlier and that's why many loved FF.

Wrong. Look at a market share chart that spans over the past few years. Fun fact, Firefox's marketshare didn't go into a tailspin until mid 2009... not long after Chrome was officially released, and coincidentally, long before Austrailis came about. Again, rhetoric and reality don't match.

Chrome for me does exactly what I want. Firefox extensions were extremely problematic (slow, constantly needing updating, attention grabbing) and the update process was a nightmare, so I moved over to Chrome soon after it was released and have stuck with it ever since. I've tried IE, Firefox and Opera over the years to compare the experience but have always gone back to Chrome, though I do use Opera as my secondary browser because of the Turbo Mode.

 

Firefox became everything that made IE so bad - a slow development cycle, poor standards support and UI updates that made no sense. It was a great browser in its day but it has served its purpose and has been made obsolete by Chrome. Given the slow nature of the open source development model I don't see Firefox ever being competitive, unless Google makes some serious missteps. I still don't understand why Firefox has a separate search bar and such small text for the URL bar.

I don't see Firefox going away anytime soon. I actually am looking forward to their updates to Developer Tools, most of which are in the nightlies (even though some highly experimental). The main reason I use Chrome is for the developer tools - still not matched by anyone else IMO (tired Firefox Developer Edition but couldn't look at that ugly black UI for more than 3 minutes). But for FF to go away - I don't see it. Yes, not the dominant browser it used to be but I still see many people (hell even my parents prefer using it over anything else). Chrome was cool but not the case at all anymore. Also people (myself included) are straight up starting to hate Google and I don't see their arrogance and BS weakening so I wouldn't be surprised if FF market share to start growing again. 

If Firefox would scale things properly on HiDPI displays (my laptop is 3K) then I would use it as my sole browser. Unfortunately, things like the vSphere Web Client are almost impossible to use within it due to lack of proper scaling. I keep it around for certain things, but generally it goes unused at this point. 

Same big difference. I can draw another picture if it helps.

Yeah, draw as many purty pictures you want if you think it's magically going to make FF faster for me compared to PM.

 

Ah, so it's just a maybe now.

Since you seem to lack basic comprehension skills or are deliberately being obtuse, here are a few quotes for you:

"extensions that use up resources and possibly reduce stability and security"

"any add-on increases resource usage and can definitely introduce security holes"

 

Less the add-ons loaded, less the possibility of security holes and increased instability, and definitely less resource usage no matter by how much. You can deny it all you want but doesn't change facts.

 

Maybe I prefer to stick with the team that actually wrote the thing too versus an unknown group of a couple people who are messing with somebody else's work, you know because there's a possibility of vulnerabilities being created.

And maybe I trust the people behind the particular fork I'm using, since I know them as well or little as I do the ones posting patches for FF. What is your point anyway? Is anyone questioning why you're using FF? So why is some people preferring PM over FF making you get your panties in such a twist?

 

That's funny, because my Firefox looks and acts near identical to a setup I have of Pale Moon, just saying. I can spare a clue if you need one.

Spare us your stupid condescension, that's enough. Perhaps you'd like some clues because FF doesn't look like PM without multiple add-ons.

 

Damage? Jump through hoops? You mean click click done? Mmkay then. God forbid you actually have to do something that's actually hard.

Yeah, some people do not like going click-happy adding add-ons to undo crap they never needed in the first place. But god forbid that anyone not like FF because you said so. Lol, try harder.

 

Wrong. Look at a market share chart that spans over the past few years. Fun fact, Firefox's marketshare didn't go into a tailspin until mid 2009... not long after Chrome was officially released, and coincidentally, long before Austrailis came about. Again, rhetoric and reality don't match.

And I quote once again since you have a problem comprehending simple English: "Australis may not be the reason FF is losing market share, but it definitely has contributed." It may have been bleeding users to Chrome since well before Australis but there's no question that an additional bunch of people dumped it after Australis was implemented. Might not conform to your notion of 'reality' but that's a fact.

Unfortunately Google's ecosystem, love it or hate it, is always gonna make it the "alternative browser" to IE and that's a shame because FF is definitely a great browser and Chrome has gone from lean to becoming a resource hog extraordinaire.  Everyone I know, even non-techies, know about Chrome because of "Google" or "Android" but very few know of FF.  Mozilla just doesn't have the resources to grow FF share unless they come up with some new unique killer feature that will differentiate it from all the other browsers in a big way that gets people talking and word of mouth spreading like they heydays before Chrome when FF was stealing IE share in a big way. 

Actually,

I use Friefox about 50% of the time now along with IE11. Never used to like Firefox before and have never been able to tolerate Chrome. Used to use Opera all the time, but since they switched engines and did all the crap to it that they did, it's garbage, IMO. Seamonkey turned me off quie a while, but I keep forgetting the reason I quit!

 

Chrome has NEVER been fast at anything on any of my 9 machines, and I do hate that wait that Friefox has when first starting it up, but once that's done, it's quick for me. IE has always been a good performer on my machines too.

 

Don't know if I dare say this, but I think Chromes popularity is due to total fanboyism just as Firefox's was also when it first came out.

Yeah, draw as many purty pictures you want if you think it's magically going to make FF faster for me compared to PM.

Wow ok, you're right, screw facts.. what's in your head is obviously more accurate than an actual benchmark.

 

"extensions that use up resources and possibly reduce stability and security"

"any add-on increases resource usage and can definitely introduce security holes"

Oook.. and both browsers share these very same problems. But again, something that's just changing your interface's layout, I'd really love to see how that drags on performance or creates a security hole.

 

Is anyone questioning why you're using FF? So why is some people preferring PM over FF making you get your panties in such a twist?

*shrug* You're the one throwing a nutty about this.. anyone gives you a counterpoint and drama ensues. Believe those panties are yours.. if you can't handle a mature discussion then fine, I'll bow out.

 

Spare us your stupid condescension, that's enough. Perhaps you'd like some clues because FF doesn't look like PM without multiple add-ons.

Again, it's one addon, and again, I can post a screenshot, not like it even matters to most people, least of all me, but since it annoys you so much I'm game.

 

Yeah, some people do not like going click-happy adding add-ons to undo crap they never needed in the first place.

What? So now people suddenly accidentally wind up in the extensions repository and randomly click stuff? Hey, whatever floats your argument I suppose.

 

It may have been bleeding users to Chrome since well before Australis but there's no question that an additional bunch of people dumped it after Australis was implemented. Might not conform to your notion of 'reality' but that's a fact.

Numbers are fact. Speculation is exactly that, speculation.. got some hard numbers showing people dumped it specifically because of Australis? See, if you look at the real numbers.. between Firefox 29's release and today, Firefox lost ~2.1% marketshare. That's all. The biggest drops came a couple years beforehand, long before Australis was even a thing. So please.. before you quote "fact", do take the time to look those facts up beforehand mmkay? ;) You go on ahead quoting obtuse and comprehension and talking about panties, I'll take facts any day.

I stopped using Firefox in Windows 8/8.1 for quite some time because it was taking forever to start up.  But recently I downloaded it again (on a new build / reinstall of OS) and am really pleased with its speed.  You know what I like?  When you right click, the context menu has a forward and back arrow, as well as refresh icon.  That's a cool thing.  

 

Here at work, I use Opera, and like it a lot.

The main reason that I moved from Firefox to Chrome was that at the time of release, Chrome was very lightweight. It's become less so now but the main thing for me is the fact it syncs between devices and I can log into my Google account and my bookmarks and saved passwords instantly come across, no additional accounts on top of what I already have.

If it gets to a point where Chrome is unusable then so be it, but for the time being I don't see myself moving to another browser.

Wow ok, you're right, screw facts.. what's in your head is obviously more accurate than an actual benchmark.

You can squee like a fangirl over some synthetic benchmark all you want, or act all smug if FF pips PM by a few ms in rendering that no-one will notice. Knowing nothing at all about my hardware or the sites I visit, for you to claim that FF is going to be noticeably faster than PM for my use case just shows your ignorance and arrogance.

 

Oook.. and both browsers share these very same problems.

Yes indeed they do, but at least with PM I do not have to include those add-ons for reverting back the UI. All the rest of the add-ons being equal, I use less add-ons with PM than I do with FF, and to me that's a definite plus.

 

*shrug* You're the one throwing a nutty about this.. anyone gives you a counterpoint and drama ensues.

Counterpoint? Ha. Between the two of us you're the only one playing the stupid my-browser-is-better-than-yours game. You can go on and on all you want about how FF is so obviously superior since it seems to give you some weird sense of superiority, but it's not as if any users of others browsers including PM give a ****.

 

Again, it's one addon, and again, I can post a screenshot, not like it even matters to most people, least of all me

I couldn't care less what anyone else uses, least of all you. I'm not proselytizing about any browser like you are. For me since the performance difference (if at all any) between PM and FF is undetectable in daily usage, I choose to prioritize other things. Having less add-ons installed and being able to use an interface by default that I prefer tips the balance clearly in PM's favor. It's as simple as that. Unless FF offers me a noticeable performance advantage that would far outweigh the negatives of having to deal with its ugly default UI, PM will be my browser of choice, end of discussion.

 

got some hard numbers showing people dumped it specifically because of Australis? just how many precisely dumped the browser because they were disgusted with the UI changes.

No, because there's no one place obviously where people have registered their reasons for switching from FF. All I know is there was a huge uptick in interest in PM after Australis debuted in the nightlies. Maybe MC Straver can share some info regarding the PM download stats pre and post-Australis but of course that would still not account for people who switched to other browsers. I will say however that given its precipitous drop in market share from its heyday, even 2.1% is nothing to scoff at given how it represents millions of users. Every enthusiast lost has a compounding effect and as long as they ignore the complaints of their users there is only one way they'll go and that's down, hurtling towards irrelevance. Oh they might very well hang around like Netscape or Opera did but without a significant user base they will never be in a position to shape the future WWW landscape.

 

You know what I like? When you right click, the context menu has a forward and back arrow, as well as refresh icon. That's a cool thing.

Just curious - have you removed those buttons from your toolbar? Or do you find right-clicking and selecting those options quicker than simply clicking on toolbar buttons?

You can squee like a fangirl over some synthetic benchmark all you want, or act all smug if FF pips PM by a few ms in rendering that no-one will notice. Knowing nothing at all about my hardware or the sites I visit, for you to claim that FF is going to be noticeably faster than PM for my use case just shows your ignorance and arrogance.

Really? Wow ok, talk about panties in a bunch. So your system is somehow magically different and will perform differently? Neat. No it's not some "few ms in rendering", it's sitting there watching the f'ing browser choke on a heavy site that's easily replicated. I can run this same set of tests on over 20 other systems here and show the same trend. Real world? Ok, fire up a site that's script heavy, enjoy your browser while it stalls pondering things. Take your ignorance and scroll down a bit where you actually for proof about performance then blatantly ignore it. Ignorance and arrogance indeed. Sorry, instead of feeble (and sad) attempts at insults, try sticking to the topic hmm? It's just laughable.

 

Yes indeed they do, but at least with PM I do not have to include those add-ons for reverting back the UI. All the rest of the add-ons being equal, I use less add-ons with PM than I do with FF, and to me that's a definite plus.

One freaking addon. *golfclap* Those 5 seconds saved during that one time install must have really been worth it to cause so much drama over. Now blance that big plus of yours with lost performance, lost standards, lost features, lost addon compatibility, etc etc... don't let that scale hit you on the foot.

 

Counterpoint? Ha. Between the two of us you're the only one playing the stupid my-browser-is-better-than-yours game.

And yet you keep going on and on throwing a tantrum and calling names instead of providing that real counterpoint. Oh yes.. I'm the only one. Clueless.

 

For me since the performance difference (if at all any) between PM and FF is undetectable in daily usage, I choose to prioritize other things. Having less add-ons installed and being able to use an interface by default that I prefer tips the balance clearly in PM's favor.

Again, you're ignoring reality, it's very easily detectable in daily usage, and that one whole addon thing again. Yea, it is as simple as that.

Unless FF offers me a noticeable performance advantage that would far outweigh the negatives of having to deal with its ugly default UI, PM will be my browser of choice, end of discussion.

Guess that'll never happen since you're too busy burying your head in the sand about real world performance and the one-click-and-done fix for the ugly UI. End of discussion.

 

All I know is there was a huge uptick in interest in PM after Australis debuted in the nightlies.

Source? I can show you real numbers showing Firefox's decline, and there wasn't a huge loss in marketshare after Firefox 29's release, their biggest drop came long beforehand.. *shrug* maybe they were all IE users who switched? Even the author flat out says he doesn't know and is just guessing, it's in their forums.
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I gave the tool a chance the other day to make a USB. An hour later it was stuck at 0% downloaded. I downloaded the official ISO, downloaded Rufus, and made the USB myself in 15 min.
    • <Moved to software discussion and support> I've got fond memories of Winamp. Changing the skins, the different visualisations etc. But now I just need a simple music player. MSN messenger would be another one, MSN Messenger Plus (I think?) offered so many different plugins. But again, it probably wouldn't work for me these days. And then there is miRC. i think it's still going these days, but lord i had fun with that back in the day. Now it's mostly stuff like Discord, WhatsApp group chats, Signal, Telegram... /me is showing his age...
    • ive always been fascinated by old software this is an old video player for windows from apple
    • In the way that you framed it incorrectly. You wrote: "The constant need to close all browser sessions and wait for a new version to install" There's no "constant need to close all browser sessions". That's factually incorrect. The browser downloads its updates in the background and installs them when you open it again. Silently. And there's no "wait for a new version to install", updates are small and take 2-3 extra seconds AT MOST, if any. If you have an SSD, there's zero extra time. Also, every mainstream browser operates this way. Firefox, the FOSS go-to browser, the default on almost every Linux distro, does exactly the same. Also, you don't need to constantly restart Edge for updates to install, you can completely ignore them and it doesn't even ask you to handle them, it's all silent and automatic. So I don't understand what else do you want.
    • DuRoBo Krono Review: Portable E-Ink reader with great ideas that need a bit of improvement by Taras Buria Phone-sized e-readers are gaining traction these days, with more people treating them as a getaway device to cure phone addiction (or at least they are trying to) or having a more pocket-friendly reader that is easier to carry and hold. The market now has plenty of such readers to choose from, and DuRoBo is the latest addition, a new player that offers a more interesting approach to the idea. The Krono is a $279 e-reader with an interesting twist, which tries to make the device more fun and ergonomic. Here is my review. Disclaimer: DuRoBo provided the review sample without any editorial input or pre-approval. The Krono comes in a phone-sized box with pink accents. Inside, you get the device itself, a short user manual, and a USB cable. The cable is a bit old-fashioned, Type-A to Type-C, which is a bit disappointing. Hot take: I would rather have no cable in the box rather than another Type-A cable that gets immediately thrown into my box full of similar cables I never use. The Krono also has no charger in the box, as it relies on accessories you already own, which is fine with me. Here are the specs: Dimensions 154 x 80 x 9.0 mm or 6.06" x 3.15" x 0.35" 173 g or 6.10 oz Materials Black or White plastic Display 6.13-inch E-Ink Carta 1200, 1,648 x 824 pixels, 300 ppi Touch-capacitive. Dual-tone frontlight. Processor 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 (QTI SM6350) 2 performance cores at 2.07 GHz 4 efficiency cores at 1.71 GHz Memory 6 GB Storage 128GB, non-expandable ~104GB available out-of-the-box Operating system Android 15 with a custom launcher Connectivity Wi-Fi and Bluetooth Battery 3,950 mAh battery Buttons and port USB Type-C port Power button, Volume button, Smart Dial Breathing Lights Audio Mono Speaker and Dual microphones In the box The Krono, a Type-A to Type-C cable, user manual Price $279 on Amazon First impressions Right off the bat, no, this is not a phone replacement. Do not approach this device thinking it can serve you as a dumb phone to cure your TikTok addiction. In addition to the fact that the Krono has no cellular connectivity, I strongly believe that no amount of extra devices can fix your phone addiction until you put some serious effort into it. The Krono is a phone-sized e-reader, a companion for your phone dedicated to reading without distractions. The DuRoBo Krono is made of plastic with a very fine texture. It is hardly premium, but I also cannot say it feels cheap. The device is also a bit thick, quite dense, and well-built without rattling or cracking. You get to choose between two colors: white and black. The front has quite thick bezels, which is hardly surprising for an e-ink device. These things use front light, with LEDs usually placed on the screen perimeter. While I do not mind thicker bezels, the notably larger chin cheapens the look a little. What I mind is a notable seam between the display and the main case, which, after just two days of use, collected plenty of dust and specks. The back of the Krono is what makes the device stand out. There is a cylinder (DuRoBo calls it the Axis) embedded in the back of the reader, housing three elements: a power button on the right edge, a Smart Dial on the left edge, and "Breathing Lights" on the back. An etched DuRoBo logo sits below the cylinder, and it is the only piece of branding you can find on the device. Overall, the design and materials are very unassuming, but the cylinder with additional control elements certainly elevates the look and makes it more interesting. Other physical elements include two microphones (one on the top edge and one on the bottom edge), a USB Type-C port, a volume rocker, and a single mono speaker. There is no fingerprint reader, so if you want to protect your device, a PIN is your only option. The official TPU case is not the most premium-looking Display The Krono has a 6.1-inch E-Ink Carta 1200 touchscreen display with a resolution of 1,648 x 824 pixels (300 ppi). The display is front-lit, and you can adjust the brightness and temperature from cool to warm. Unfortunately, the Krono lacks automatic brightness and temperature adjustments, and you cannot set a custom schedule for the frontlight. However, you can set it to always enable frontlight so that you can see what is happening on the screen when turning it on in a dark environment. On the bright side (get it?), the front light can get extremely dim so that the screen is barely readable in a pitch-dark room. The front light is also uniform across the screen, with no noticeable temperature gradients. I am very susceptible to uneven front light, and it is very easy for me to notice it, but the Krono is doing a very good job in this area. I also like that the edge shadow is not very prominent and barely visible in the black variant. E-Ink Carta 1200 is not the newest generation (there are Carta 1250 and 1300), but it is still a good display. It supports three modes: Clarity, Speed, and Quality. In Clarity mode, text is very sharp and easy to read, but you trade that for more ghosting, a slower refresh rate, and more artifacts when the display changes images. Speed mode, as the name suggests, boosts refresh rate and reduces ghosting, but fine print and text become more jagged. Finally, Quality mode is only available in Android apps. It has the lowest refresh rate, but in return, you get much better visuals, improved gradients, and more. Like brightness and temperature, you can toggle modes from the control center. It is available when swiping from the top-right corner of the screen (the top-left is for notifications). I also like that the Krono can work as a desk clock when not in use. It has a bunch of screensavers, including horizontal clocks with time, date, and current battery level. The screen refreshes once per minute, and battery drain is extremely low (not even 1% in 24 hours). It is a great use of the technology, and another thing I wish more e-ink devices featured. Smart Dial The Smart Dial is Krono's main party trick. It sits on the left side of the device and serves multiple purposes. You can twist or press it to perform various actions, depending on the current use case scenario. When reading books, twisting the dial flips through pages, and pressing it refreshes the screen. On the home screen, the dial adjusts the brightness, and holding the dial pressed launches voice note recording. Finally, a quick double press launches the DuRoBo AI chatbot. While the dial scroll is not notched, it is very smooth and has haptic feedback that confirms your actions, which feels very nice. As a long-term Apple Watch user, I love the idea behind the dial. It feels very natural and oddly satisfying to use, especially with that subtle haptic feedback. I never liked flipping pages with touch input, and I strongly believe each e-reader should come with some sort of physical controls for turning pages. The Krono has both volume buttons (which also work as page turners) and the dial, so you are free to use whichever you prefer. With that said, the dial is not perfect. For one, it sticks out of the case way too far for my liking, raising concerns about durability and longevity when carrying the Krono around in a pocket (it is a pocket-sized device after all). Also, it has too much wobble, which cheapens the experience and makes it feel a bit flimsy and unsecured. While there are two plastic guards on the Krono's case, they are way too small for any kind of protection. I also think DuRoBo should let users customize dial actions (the only available customization is scroll direction), particularly for long and double presses. Not everyone needs voice notes, and DuRoBo AI does not work without an active internet connection, leaving the long press essentially useless when offline. I do not mind these features, and I genuinely think they are useful, but I would rather have the ability to toggle between screen modes, turn the frontlight on/off, or launch my favorite app. I also agree with people on Reddit asking developers to let users adjust the dial sensitivity. I hope this is something DuRoBo can implement with a software update to make the experience more personalized (it is a Smart Dial, after all) and incentivize users to fiddle with the Dial more often. The Dial is a fantastic idea, so please, guys, improve it a little. As for ergonomics, they are mostly fine, but the dial's position may feel a little awkward and way too high. When I use a phone or a phone-sized gadget, I tend to rest one of its corners on my palm for a more secure grip. With the Krono, such a grip is impossible because you cannot reach the dial even with big hands. You have to lower the reader a bit and hold it like a bottle without any extra support for the bottom edge. Such a grip is not necessarily uncomfortable (the Krono is also light enough for it), but it requires a bit of muscle retraining. Sometimes, I do not bother with the dial and hold the Krono like my phone, flipping through pages with volume buttons, as they are perfectly positioned for my right-hand thumb. Interestingly, when testing the Krono, I would often find myself thinking that a roller embedded in the long plastic cylinder on the back of the device would have been a much more comfortable solution. There is a free idea for you, guys. Software The Krono runs Android 15 with a very minimal launcher on top. The home screen presents you with a list of apps, a scrollable list of widgets, and your user profile. Widgets can display time, calendar, or recent books for quick access. You can also add or remove apps from the home screen to keep the most useful stuff around without tapping "Apps." I like this minimalistic approach; it looks clean, easy to understand, and light. I understand that some may find the list of all apps way too clean, but fortunately, DuRoBo lets you switch to traditional icons. The reader also has a bunch of preinstalled apps: Read: The default app for reading. Browser: A Chromium-based browser. Files: A simple file manager. Music: A simple music player. Spark: A voice recorder with transcription support and AI summarization DuRoBo AI: A built-in AI chatbot. Transfer: An app for file transfer over Wi-Fi. If that is not enough, there is the Google Play Store, where you can download all the extra apps you need, alternative readers, podcast apps, chatbots, and more. DuRoBo is not trying to give you an all-in-one device. The standard software experience is quite minimal, which makes it easy to approach and learn. The standard reader supports EPUB, EPUB3, AZW3, MOBI, PDF, TXT, DOC, and DOCX, which is more than enough to let you read most books without third-party software. As for customizing the reading experience, you can select one of five built-in fonts, adjust size and thickness, adjust margins and spacing (only three variants for each), change text alignment and direction, toggle the reading status bar, and switch to dark mode. There is also text-to-speech, which utilizes Android's default TTS tech. While I like the simplistic approach, I cannot help but feel DuRoBo could have made the built-in reader a bit more customizable. However, I am not going to bog down on this, as you can always install any other reader you prefer using the Play Store or by sideloading an APK. Getting books to the Krono is very simple. Given that the device is an Android smartphone without cellular connectivity, you can transfer files via a USB Type-C cable, download them using the built-in browser, share them over Bluetooth, or use cloud storage. My favorite was the built-in Transfer app. It is simple, reliable, and very well-designed. I was surprised by how well-designed the web portal is. It is fast, pretty, and properly categorized. Well done! Once you have your books loaded, you can highlight or underline text, add annotations, bookmark pages, check the table of contents, and ask AI about the selected text. Unfortunately, the Krono has no built-in vocabulary, but again, that is something a third-party reader could fix. Overall, the built-in reader is light and snappy, with just the minimum amount of features for a regular user to enjoy reading books. The Krono has no built-in reading tracking, so stat nerds will have to look for third-party reading apps. However, you can set a daily reading goal, and the reader will notify you when you reach it (for example, one hour). You can also set a reminder to read at a certain time, and when the time comes, the Krono will light up its back LEDs and unlock itself to nudge you. Other than that, the rear LEDs do nothing, not even showing charging progress, which is an unfortunate misopportunity if you ask me. Quirks aside, Krono's Android runs quite snappily and bug-free. Early reviews of the Krono criticized its Android 13-based software quite a lot, but now, the reader runs Android 15, and its software has fixed plenty of initial complaints. I never experienced any issues with built-in apps. AI attempts The DuRoBo Krono comes with a built-in AI chatbot. There is no information on what model powers this thing, but the system says it was "trained by Google." You can launch the bot from the app list or by double-pressing the dial. It works just like any other chatbot, and you can ask it anything by typing or using voice input. The AI saves your chats, and you can rename, export, or delete them. DuRoBo AI requires an active internet connection, and it does not work offline. Its reach and capabilities are also limited. You can only chat in the app and use it in the reader app as a makeshift vocabulary. However, the implementation is kinda awkward. You can only send a selected portion of text to AI without giving it any requests or instructions. I highlighted the word "dumb," and it apologized to me for not being useful. You also cannot ask follow-up questions or send the generated response to a separate chat. The chatbot is also slow, even with fast Wi-Fi, making the overall experience quite frustrating, which makes me again wish for the ability to remap the double press to something else. Spark, the standard voice recording app, also uses AI for note summarization and transcribing. Neither feature works offline, unfortunately. Spark records notes up to 30 minutes using Krono's dual microphones, and you can rename or export notes. Transcription quality is decent, and the speed is alright, but you can find much better solutions in the Google Play Store. What I like about Spark is that transcribed notes are not locked, and you can always type more to elaborate on your ideas, which is handy. Overall, I like that the Krono is not shoving AI down my throat, but to be honest, there is really not that much to shove. AI features here feel raw and need improvements to be more useful. Battery Life Like most E-Ink readers, the Krono has fantastic battery life. Even with a clock as a screensaver, its standby power consumption is incredibly low. And when in use, you can get weeks of reading on a single charge. Without the front light, my unit never sipped more than one or two percent of battery during a one-hour reading session. It was nice to see plenty of battery-related settings. You can limit charging at 80% to protect battery health long-term, check the number of charging cycles, manufacturing/first-time use date, battery health, and the maximum capacity. Additionally, the Krono lets you select what hardware remains enabled when sleeping. This lets you keep Wi-Fi and Bluetooth on (say, if you want to receive notifications, for some reason) and keep audio playing when locked. Turning these features off effectively eliminates any standby battery drain. I left my Krono sitting for 24 hours with a clock screensaver on, and it did not drop a single percent. The pretty big 3,950 mAh battery justifies the device's thickness and ensures you do not have to charge it for long periods. Speaking of charging, it is capped at only 10W, which is a bit disappointing, as getting such a big battery to 100% takes a notably long time in the era of super-fast charging smartphones. DuRoBo Moodi The Moodi is a standalone, optional accessory for your Krono. It is a wireless remote with two customizable buttons that you can use to flip pages, control media, or scroll webpages. The accessory connects via Bluetooth. Despite having a built-in rechargeable battery, it is extremely light. While the Moodi's shape and form factor is not what I would call particularly ergonomic, it is not uncomfortable to hold and use. The Moodi comes with six removable magnetic buttons with various smiley faces. Buttons sit securely, and they have nice-feeling, albeit a little loud, clicks. It is a cute touch that adds a little more fun and character to the device. There is also an accented power button and a single status LED. The latter displays charging status and connection mode. The Moodi supports three modes: Reading: Buttons work as volume buttons, allowing you to flip pages in the built-in reader or other apps that support page turning with volume buttons. Media: Buttons work as skip forward/backward, which is useful when listening to audiobooks, podcasts, or music. Scroll: The third mode lets you scroll pages in the web browser or any other application The Krono properly detects the Moodi and presents you with an on-screen guide when you connect it for the first time (it also displays the battery level). However, you can only change modes by holding both buttons for a few seconds. It is also worth noting that the Moodi works with other devices. I connected it to my iPhone and it let me adjust volume or control media playback. Sadly, the scroll did not work, so you cannot use it to waste time scrolling TikToks. Overall, the Moodi is a cute little accessory, which I can recommend for those who read a lot. It is very useful for remote page flipping when you do not want to burden your hands by holding the Krono all the time. I only wish DuRoBo included a lanyard for the built-in loop. As for the battery life, after using the Moodi for a few days, I only managed to drop several percent of its 90 mAh battery. Despite the small size, it is rated for weeks of use, which is pretty impressive. At $35.99, I cannot say the Moodi is a must-have accessory, but I see the appeal. I prefer using the Krono with its Smart Dial, as I rarely read for more than 40-60 minutes in one sitting. However, if you have a stand and like reading for long periods, the Moodi is the right thing to have. It is a bit more expensive than regular page flippers on Amazon, but it is on par with similar products from Kobo or BOOX. Plus, it has a little more fun to it with removable buttons and better integration into the Krono. Conclusion At the end of the day, DuRoBo Krono is a nice pocket-sized e-reader. Its software focuses on the main things without trying to be everything at once. The smart dial idea is unique and great, and I wish more manufacturers had something similar in their devices. The display is also good, with an even frontlight and "always-on" support. I did not notice any deal-breaking issues with the Krono. However, you can feel that the idea needs some improvements, such as a slightly stiffer dial in a more ergonomic location, perhaps a little more premium materials, and better software customization. I hope the company won't give up on the idea and improve the dial and ergonomics in the second generation. Buy DuRoBo Krono Black - $279.99 on Amazon Buy DuRoBo Krono White - $279.99 on Amazon Buy DuRoBo Moodi - $35.99 on Amazon As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ssd21345 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      195
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      95
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!