Recommended Posts

So your system is somehow magically different and will perform differently?

So you think every browser works the exact same way across systems? That there are no such things as processor-specific optimizations? And as I said, even if there's a performance difference, claiming that the quantum of difference is exactly the same across systems is truly laughable (but not a surprise to hear at this point).

 

Real world? Ok, fire up a site that's script heavy, enjoy your browser while it stalls pondering things.

Yeah, I tested all the sites that I frequent and there's no noticeable difference between FF and PM on my system. You can make all the ludicrously ignorant claims you want about my experience, but it's just getting to be increasingly pathetic.

 

Those 5 seconds saved during that one time install must have really been worth it to cause so much drama over.

Yes, drama from you, who is making such a passionate push for FF usage over my choice of browser. But go on, continue being a drama queen as if it's gonna change people's minds.

 

Now blance that big plus of yours with <snipped typical exaggeration about how much PM is missing>

Yeah, yeah, blah, blah. Not losing anything here with the latest PM installed, works well and no site issues whatsoever, but thanks for being so concerned about all I'm supposedly missing out on. Lol.

 

Again, you're ignoring reality, it's very easily detectable in daily usage

Go on making that claim. Perhaps if you say it enough times it will magically come true for everyone around the world.

 

one-click-and-done fix for the ugly UI

I've said many times by now that I prefer PM to doing even the supposedly one-click-and-done fix in FF, but apparently it's not something that you are able to comprehend. You can go on blathering about how easy it is, yada yada, but don't seem to understand the point of me not giving a damn. FF works well for you, great. You feel smug and superior while using it over those who use PM? How nice. Meanwhile as per my testing PM works just as well for me for my needs despite all your desperate efforts to prove it doesn't.

Don't see any point of continuing this discussion because it's just going round in circles now.

 

Why has this topic become a Firefox vs. Pale Moon argument?!? Who in the hell cares? Use whatever you want.

Precisely. I don't see why anyone's personal choices need to be questioned as long as it doesn't affect anyone else.

Chrome for me does exactly what I want. Firefox extensions were extremely problematic (slow, constantly needing updating, attention grabbing) and the update process was a nightmare, so I moved over to Chrome soon after it was released and have stuck with it ever since. I've tried IE, Firefox and Opera over the years to compare the experience but have always gone back to Chrome, though I do use Opera as my secondary browser because of the Turbo Mode.

 

Firefox became everything that made IE so bad - a slow development cycle, poor standards support and UI updates that made no sense. It was a great browser in its day but it has served its purpose and has been made obsolete by Chrome. Given the slow nature of the open source development model I don't see Firefox ever being competitive, unless Google makes some serious missteps. I still don't understand why Firefox has a separate search bar and such small text for the URL bar.

 

Firefox and its addons auto update now, you can hide an addon's UI and the development cycle is much faster. Plus, Firefox is probably the most strictly standards following browser.

Firefox's awesome bar can be used to search, you don't need the separate search bar.

 

Also, Firefox is on par, if not faster than Chrome. You can can get even more speed by using Waterfox.

 

 

Having less add-ons installed and being able to use an interface by default that I prefer tips the balance clearly in PM's favor.

 

I am not sure why people think Firefox addons make things slower. It depends on how crappy the addon is. Also, see if Waterfox or Cyberfox is faster for you.

 

 

the main thing for me is the fact it syncs between devices and I can log into my Google account and my bookmarks and saved passwords instantly come across, no additional accounts on top of what I already have.

Have you heard of Firefox Sync? (no offense, it is just that Mozilla doesn't advertise as much as Google so it might be an unknown feature to those who don't use Firefox)

Chrome did one good thing - use WebKit and further its development (except they forked it into Blink).

 

Other than that, everything about Chrome is garbage.

 

- horrid UI with no title bar, cramped tabs, limited options

- a UI thats been copied by every other browser because users are stupid

- forced use of Chrome for apps like Hangouts

- uses much more memory

- a total joke of an extension system

- insane numbering scheme, again copied by others. Chrome 44 and FF 36 is insanity when we used to have a new major version every year at most

- terrible if you have > 5 tabs - all of them load on startup, slows entire pc down, uses more memory

 

The reason Chrome is popular is because most people are idiots, its just that simple. I'm amazed people on tech savvy sites like Neowin can claim with a straight face that Chrome is faster or that it uses less resources.


Also, Chrome is nothing more than a way for Google to get ad views. They could stop making it open source any day.

 

Mozilla is a great organization that has done amazing things for the Internet and it just wouldn't be the same without them. Firefox leads innovation in every area whether its new UX research, support for new standards etc.

I'd love to use Internet Explorer, but experience too many hangs/random tab crashes...
Chrome and firefox are not bad, although Chrome takes the upper hand with it's simplicity and performance (not talking about standard's "compliance" (lol), just plain performance)

 

Firefox and its addons auto update now, you can hide an addon's UI and the development cycle is much faster. Plus, Firefox is probably the most strictly standards following browser.

Firefox's awesome bar can be used to search, you don't need the separate search bar.

 

Also, Firefox is on par, if not faster than Chrome. You can can get even more speed by using Waterfox.

I appreciate that Firefox has changed a lot over the years but there's just not enough to make me go back. For me to even consider it it would have to be substantially better than Chrome, which it isn't for me. As for performance / resources, those aren't major factors for me; all the browsers are fast enough for what I want to do, so it comes down to the user experience.

 

Other than that, everything about Chrome is garbage.

 

- horrid UI with no title bar, cramped tabs, limited options

- a UI thats been copied by every other browser because users are stupid

- forced use of Chrome for apps like Hangouts

- uses much more memory

- a total joke of an extension system

- insane numbering scheme, again copied by others. Chrome 44 and FF 36 is insanity when we used to have a new major version every year at most

- terrible if you have > 5 tabs - all of them load on startup, slows entire pc down, uses more memory

I disagree. For me Chrome has the best UI, hence why it has been copied by other browsers. Memory isn't an issue for most users, especially if it results in a more stable browser (separate processes for tabs). The extension system is preferable to me, as Firefox became an unstable mess because of extensions - that situation might have changed now but perceptions are hard to shift. The extensions do what I need without slowing down the browser or resulting in instability. The numbering scheme is utterly, utterly irrelevant and makes it clear you're criticising Chrome for the sake of it. As for tabs on startup, I've never noticed any issues with performance when opening large numbers of tabs - as for memory, I have twenty tabs loaded on Chrome and it uses less memory than five tabs on Firefox (all of which are included in the twenty tabs in Chrome for the sake of fairness).

I appreciate that Firefox has changed a lot over the years but there's just not enough to make me go back. For me to even consider it it would have to be substantially better than Chrome, which it isn't for me. As for performance / resources, those aren't major factors for me; all the browsers are fast enough for what I want to do, so it comes down to the user experience.

Yeah, I understand, once you're situated in a platform that is convienient, it might even be worse to move out.

Have you heard of Firefox Sync? (no offense, it is just that Mozilla doesn't advertise as much as Google so it might be an unknown feature to those who don't use Firefox)

 

Yeah, but I need to create a separate account, and I'm trying to avoid having to create more accounts unless it's absolutely necessary now.

 Really I don't like Chrome at all or the newer Opera (Chrome by another name). 

Common misconception. The new Opera uses the same Chromium engine but it is a very different browser from Chrome. A lot of features got lost in the move from their old Presto engine but it's still Opera. The Opera button in the top corner, the more efficient use of screen space, speed dial (where you control the new tab page not the browser), the download manager, the recent tabs feature, the fact that Flash is still external to the browser, actons around managing tabs, all sorts of little ways it's quite different from Chrome and for the most part more common-sense than Chrome. Also the complete lack of integration with Google services, which I like.

Well, after having problems switching to Firefox at first (I was having some strange connection problems) I decided to give it another shot.  Why?  Thanks to Google!  Apparently Chrome is changing their plugins format and some of the plugins I use at work will break with this update.  Also, Unity will no longer work, so I can't get my quick gaming session in from Armor Games or Kongregate :p

 

Surprisingly (to me) I had no more connection issues at all and everything seems to work great.  I do seem to notice that webpages tend to take a split second longer to fully load than on Chrome, not sure why.

Well, after having problems switching to Firefox at first (I was having some strange connection problems) I decided to give it another shot.  Why?  Thanks to Google!  Apparently Chrome is changing their plugins format and some of the plugins I use at work will break with this update.  Also, Unity will no longer work, so I can't get my quick gaming session in from Armor Games or Kongregate :p

 

Surprisingly (to me) I had no more connection issues at all and everything seems to work great.  I do seem to notice that webpages tend to take a split second longer to fully load than on Chrome, not sure why.

Firefox delays page painting to speed up connections. You can change this delay in about:config.

http://kb.mozillazine.org/Content.notify.interval

http://kb.mozillazine.org/Content.max.tokenizing.time

http://kb.mozillazine.org/Content.switch.threshold

http://kb.mozillazine.org/Nglayout.initialpaint.delay

 

It will be fixed with e10s, which you can get in Firefox Developer Edition builds.

I've tried switching from Firefox but always end up going back. I guess I'm just used to all of my extensions and that. Tampermonkey never seems to work the same way Greasemonkey does, as an example. I do have Chrome for the odd site that Firefox gives me issues with. And I use it as the main browser on my phone.

i haven't used Firefox for years i move to chrome and recently i downloaded Firefox and im loving it. I've slowly migrated my tabs from chrome to Firefox and had a discussion at work and to my surprise a lot of the guys recently moved back to Firefox too. I think the tech savvy guys like us who like speed and online privacy will keep firefox alive and well.. lol i've got my gf using firefox too

Firefox delays page painting to speed up connections. You can change this delay in about:config.

http://kb.mozillazine.org/Content.notify.interval

http://kb.mozillazine.org/Content.max.tokenizing.time

http://kb.mozillazine.org/Content.switch.threshold

http://kb.mozillazine.org/Nglayout.initialpaint.delay

 

It will be fixed with e10s, which you can get in Firefox Developer Edition builds.

Cool.  I'll just wait for it to come to the main build.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Samsung is shutting down yet another app used by millions by David Uzondu Samsung has announced that it is shutting down Samsung Max, its VPN service used by more than 50 million people, effective today. Samsung Max VPN, if you don't know, was an Android app born on February 23, 2018, out of the ashes of Opera Max, a very popular data-saving VPN that Opera had discontinued the previous year. Samsung bought the discontinued service, rebranded it, and added a native Samsung UI to fit the Galaxy ecosystem. The app could do things like compress images, help you manage background data on a per-app basis, reduce video data consumption, shrink music files, optimize webpages, block advertisement trackers in incognito mode, and encrypt your internet traffic on public Wi-Fi networks. Image via SammyGuru If you open the app now, you'd be greeted by a shutdown banner warning that all VPN, data saving, and privacy services stopped functioning on June 15, 2026. The creators failed to provide a reason for the shutdown, instead publishing a farewell note that read: "Thank you for being with us over the years. Your support and activity truly meant a lot to us and helped shape this app into what it became." This same message appears on the Google Play Store listing for the app as well. Max VPN is the latest service from Samsung to join the list of discontinued applications from the company. Just two months ago, the Korean tech giant announced that it is completely shutting down Samsung Messages, forcing millions of users to migrate to Google Messages by next month. The only devices that the shutdown won't affect are older smartphones running Android 11 or lower. Some of the features of Google Messages that Samsung hopes will entice users include AI-powered scam detection to block suspicious links, integrated Gemini AI tools to generate quick replies, custom chat bubbles, and universal RCS compatibility for sharing high-quality media with iOS users. The platform also offers seamless syncing across tablets and smartwatches. In addition to that, users gain access to message scheduling, smart classification, and automated category sorting. Via: SammyGuru
    • 1. Define "better". 2. It's still more expensive than equivalent PCs so... And there is not one Windows platform. This is the mistake ALL Apple oriented people make. Apple is one OEM. You could reasonably compare them to one PC OEM, say Dell or HP. But you can't compare them to ALL PC OEMs. Case in point, Apple has NO touch screen MacBooks. No tablet Macs. There are no rugged Macs. The variety of PC OEM design is insane. With Apple, you have... Apple. The problem is that you're starting with Apple as the definition of "good" then filtering out anything that isn't close to an existing Apple product, then trying to homogenise all of those left into a fictional product line and then ignore any innovations to create a minimal feature subset so you can say "See! Apple better!" PS: I was an Apple dev for 17 years and helped develop MacInTalk and disability solutions for Apple, and worked on Microsoft Office for MacOS - and I have several Macs and MacBooks - so tread very carefully.
    • Major Xbox layoffs may claim South of Midnight developer Compulsion entirely by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft has been making major changes in its gaming wing Xbox for a few months now, including the appointment of a new CEO, a large number of leadership changes, and strategy shifts. However, the company is seemingly also looking at initiating a major layoffs wave at Xbox and perhaps even a studio closure. The new report lands from Kotaku, Xbox first-party developer Compulsion Games is being shuttered soon by Microsoft. For those unfamiliar with the studio, it's the team behind Contrast (2013), We Happy Few (2018), and South of Midnight (2025). Its latest game was quite well received, even winning a Peabody Award for its writing. It even received a 9/10 in Neowin's own review, highlighting its engaging storyline, gorgeous world, and curious characters. The studio joined Xbox Game Studios in 2018, just as Microsoft announced it is acquiring Playground Games, Undead Labs, and Ninja Theory. Despite recent listings for new staff roles, according to the new report, Compulsion Games is being closed entirely, with over 90 staff being let go. Kotaku also added that the studio's leadership is in negotiations with Microsoft about this decision, but no official details have been revealed yet. The report lands just as two senior managers of Xbox leave their posts at Microsoft Gaming. Head of Xbox Game Studios Craig Duncan and chief of staff Louise O'Connor originally began their journey in Rare and have been a part of Xbox for over two decades. Dunkan has been responsible for games like Kinect Sports and Sea of Thieves, while O'Connor was primarily working on Rare's Everwild project before its cancelation. If this report about the studio shutdown is accurate, this may just be the start of a major new layoffs wave at Xbox Game Studios. There are also rumors of Arkane Studios being heavily affected. As always, take all these reports with a grain of salt until something official materializes from Microsoft or the studios.
    • The flaw with this analysis is that this laptop has a cellphone CPU in it. In the Intel world, that would be an N150 and those are everywhere, even in low end laptops. You can get an N150 based NUC with 16GB RAM and 256GB-512GB SSD... NOT soldered in... for < $500 Canadian (around US$360). The problem is two fold: tech bloggers/writers on most tech site (like this one, ironically) overvalue Apple and apparently aren't in the same earnings class as most regular people. As a result, we get breathless articles about how everyone needs a folding phone when most people just cannot afford one... or really need one. And we get Apple used as the baseline metric regardless of whether that comparison makes any sense. If Dell or HP released a retail laptop with a cellphone motherboard, you'd be all over them for doing that - but Apple does it and it's genius. I see articles suggesting what Samsung - a company that basically started the foldable phone market and has built them for eight years - needs to do to compete with Apple's unreleased, unspecced and unseen folding phone. Sorry, no - if the Neo (really creative name there BTW - still, better than the Go, the other "creative" product name everyone's using) encourages PC makers to make cellphone laptops using lower end ARM processors, we all lose. It's a step backwards and a capitulation to the fact that semiconductor makers and computer OEMs (and tech bloggers) have totally lost the plot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      ThatGuyOnline earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      197
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      127
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!