Recommended Posts

Have you ever question the purpose of life or life in general that is put here on earth?  Have you ever question the existance of god?  Have you ever doubt "The Theory of Evolution"?

 

July 7, 1947, an object crash-landed near a ranch that is approximately 75 miles northwest of Roswell.  The government had done everything they can to make sure this incident never happened.  Many people had witness this event first-hand but their effort to bring this out to the public had been heavily suppressed, leaving many of us question if this event did really exist.  Many of the dis-information agent had done their part in trying to cover everything and wipe their hands clean.  Some of these agent was caught red-handed and later acknowledge that they are the indeed the agent.  Some people had extensive knowledge of this incident and waiting just the right time to release the info.

 

At the time, Matilda O'Donnell MacElroy was acting as a nurse but later because close with the alien.  She was chosen by the alien to be her interpreter.  She has recently release transcript to be published before her death.  "Roswell - The Alien Interview" is a book that contains many of the unanswered questions that many people have asked over the centuries including many of the scientific theory that had been the foundation of our understanding of the universe is now answered.

 

Do you dare to adopt an open-mind view or are you willing to hold dear to your ignorance and dissolve this subject as hoax and move on?  What type of person are you will be based on what you do with this information.  Here is the full transcript interview.  Decide for yourself.  Regurgitate and post your thoughts.

 

Do you dare to adopt an open-mind view or are you willing to hold dear to your ignorance and dissolve this subject as hoax and move on?

It's comments like this that turn these discussions into a sh*t-show.  Essentially you're saying that people are idiots if they don't believe in all these alien abduction claims.  There are more sides to this...

 

Where's the proof?  People can tell all the stories they want, but in the end, it means absolutely nothing without proof.  A lot of nutjobs have been called out for making stories up, which doesn't help.  Every single photo or video of a "UFO" is blurry, which is obviously puzzling in this day and age.  There's really just nothing to even build a weak case for any of this.

 

There is a good probability that there is life somewhere else in the universe, but there is not a single bit of proof yet to back it.

Some people are convinced that we can break the speed of light, but without proof, it's all just BS.  Same concept applies.

  • Like 1

Do you dare to adopt an open-mind view...

"Are you willing to accept jesus christ into your heart and be saved."

 

That's how it reads. Your view is not much different from blind faith in religion.

 

Drop this kind of nonsense and start looking at the universe in a scientific way.

 

There is a very good chance that aliens and even intelligent ones, perhaps even far more advanced than us, exist in the universe, but believing in old, half-assed, unproven stories is not the way to find or contact them.

 

Even watching known fiction like star trek TNG would be more useful than watching such drivel.

I love how these idiots post this crap and say "OMG wake up, question what you are told, open your eyes"  and yet blindly believe all this bull.

 

The best way to deal with them is to do exactly what they say. Question -everything- they tell you! :p

I love how these idiots post this crap and say "OMG wake up, question what you are told, open your eyes"  and yet blindly believe all this bull.

 

 

I like how the OP makes the post then disappears, or maybe he was abducted.  :o

  • Like 2

All I have to say to this is (for what it's worth)

If we are indeed the only intelligent life in the universe/galaxy/cosmos, that is one hell of a waste of space

And an unfathomable amount of it. There is space out there we cannot see yet.

  • Like 1

All I have to say to this is (for what it's worth)

If we are indeed the only intelligent life in the universe/galaxy/cosmos, that is one hell of a waste of space

 

there's a difference between accepting the statistical fact that there likely is a lot of intelligent life out there in space and claiming they gave been visiting earth.

 

if you accept that, then you must also accept Hawking's claim that any alien spending the ridiculous amount of resources to travel to another solar system isn't coming to say hi and be friends.

 

 

and btw "I am agent" :p

  • Like 1

there's a difference between accepting the statistical fact that there likely is a lot of intelligent life out there in space and claiming they gave been visiting earth.

 

if you accept that, then you must also accept Hawking's claim that any alien spending the ridiculous amount of resources to travel to another solar system isn't coming to say hi and be friends.

 

 

and btw "I am agent" :p

I am really heavily flu'd up dude, and would wholeheartedly love to have an enjoyable conversation on the subject, but you'll have to forgive me, as my brain is mostly mush right now

I did like the 'Agent H' reference though :)

Oh goody, four and a half hours of the same non evidential nonsense. Though I will say that claiming the universe is over 80 trillion years old is a new one.

 

So, because Human scientists say the universe -- I actually believe in the multiverse -- is 13.82 billion years old, then it has to be what we say.

 

And, when we look at distant galaxies using Hubble, we are looking into the universe's past, how do we know that the galaxies -- including our own -- are not actually the old galaxies, and the ones we see in Hubble pictures are the new ones?

 

Our science is not the only one out there!

Oh goody, four and a half hours of the same non evidential nonsense. Though I will say that claiming the universe is over 80 trillion years old is a new one.

 

All jokes aside, like someone else has already said, we have no idea how old the universe really is. We thought it was 8 billion, then 10, then 11, then 13.8 then... the point is, we are looking from a fixed 'point' in space and with technology that shows us more as it improves, whereas if life is elsewhere and moved across the galaxy (or even universe), then they may have a different view, or, a different way of measuring time and age.

So, because Human scientists say the universe -- I actually believe in the multiverse -- is 13.82 billion years old, then it has to be what we say.

 

And, when we look at distant galaxies using Hubble, we are looking into the universe's past, how do we know that the galaxies -- including our own -- are not actually the old galaxies, and the ones we see in Hubble pictures are the new ones?

 

Our science is not the only one out there!

 

 

 

All jokes aside, like someone else has already said, we have no idea how old the universe really is. We thought it was 8 billion, then 10, then 11, then 13.8 then... the point is, we are looking from a fixed 'point' in space and with technology that shows us more as it improves, whereas if life is elsewhere and moved across the galaxy (or even universe), then they may have a different view, or, a different way of measuring time and age.

 

 

 

 

I agree we could be way off but we can only go off of our current understanding and the evidence that we currently have. Stating something like 80 trillion years without providing even a hint of supportive evidence is something that can be laughed off. Then again, the nothing provided in the video offers evidence for pretty much most of the claims made. As for measuring time in a different way, that's irrelevant when trying to explain something in a concept for us. 

Have you ever question the purpose of life or life in general that is put here on earth? 

 

We have no purpose we act like a virus on the surface of a Planet

 

Have you ever question the existance of god? 

 

There is none no questions to answer

 

Have you ever doubt "The Theory of Evolution"?

 

Its a THEORY as per the title as we who exist right now where not there at the time

Have you ever doubt "The Theory of Evolution"?

 

Its a THEORY as per the title as we who exist right now where not there at the time

 

Well, technically, it's a "best hypothesis based on the large amount of available evidence."

 

I dislike the use of the word "theory", as too many morons out there don't know what a scientific theory even IS...

  • Like 2

I am one of those kinds of people who does keep an open mind but not that wide like in that picture. That being said I think science and religion can work together its just that it needs to be explained better. For instance the bible says God created the earth in less than a week and its about 6,000 years old give or take. Well if you look at the records of how old fossils are and how far light has to travel from other places it does not add up. Well who is to say that time in Gods view a day isn't  like a trillion years. That would account for the randomness and weird stuff thats out there in space. Just because the bible does not say it, it does not mean it didn't happen. If there are other civilizations out there God could have created those too or at least put the building blocks of life out there in such a way evolution would happen. To say that there is no God we would have to have an explanation for everything, such as why do the laws of physics break down the closer you get to a black hole? Either our understanding of the universe is flawed or there is something there that does not want us to find Him/Her.

why do the laws of physics break down the closer you get to a black hole? Either our understanding of the universe is flawed or there is something there that does not want us to find Him/Her.

 

The laws of physics don't "break down" when you get closer to a black hole.

The laws of physics don't "break down" when you get closer to a black hole.

Its been said numerous times that the laws of physics do break down with black holes or they cease to work right. I remember even seeing this on that new astronomy show that everyone went ape ###### over that has that really boring black guy on it. I cant think of the name but he said this too.

Again its a theory as no ones been near a Black Hole recently and lived to tell the tale so your arguing semantics.Any branch of such theoretical science will have viewpoints on either side even from well informed scientists take global warming as an example.

Its been said numerous times that the laws of physics do break down with black holes or they cease to work right. I remember even seeing this on that new astronomy show that everyone went ape ###### over that has that really boring black guy on it. I cant think of the name but he said this too.

 

I think you're mi-interpreting what they mean by that. they probably shouldn't have used those words either, as it doesn't break down, but the extremes in there causes things to change but still to our understanding. after all what happens in there is still theory based on our calculations of the damn laws of physics... if they broke down they couldn't very well use them to calculate how they work could they.

such as why do the laws of physics break down the closer you get to a black hole?

[citation needed]

 

Its been said numerous times that the laws of physics do break down with black holes or they cease to work right. I remember even seeing this on that new astronomy show that everyone went ape ###### over that has that really boring black guy on it. I cant think of the name but he said this too.

Nope doesn't count.

 

The nice thing about laws of physics is that they always apply. Hence why they're laws.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview by Razvan Serea WACUP (WinAmp Community Update Project) is a modern, enhanced version of the classic Winamp music player, designed for better stability, performance, and compatibility. Built for Windows, WACUP retains the familiar Winamp interface while adding 64-bit support, bug fixes, and new features like improved audio format support, customizable skins, and optimized playlist management. Unlike bloated alternatives, WACUP focuses on lightweight performance and regular updates, making it the best choice for fans of the classic Winamp experience. Basically, if you miss the good old days of Winamp and want a modern upgrade that doesn’t mess things up, WACUP is for you! WACUP key features: Classic Winamp Feel – Keeps the familiar interface and functionality. Bug Fixes & Stability – Fixes old Winamp issues and improves performance. 64-Bit Support – Works better on modern systems. More Formats & Plugins – Supports additional audio formats and third-party plugins. Customizable UI – Skins and tweaks for a personalized look. Better Library Management – Improved playlists, media organization, and search. No Bloat – Focuses on performance without unnecessary extras. Regular Updates – Community-driven development with new features and fixes. WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview changelog: Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when doing some of the drag + drop actions within the media library window Fixed a loading crash seen related to a problem with some of the artwork cache image files being restored which should now be better handled allowing for the bad image to be removed without it failing Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when the internal metadata cache clearing is triggered which could block the main ui thread for too long with this now being moved to a background thread Fixed some performance issues with some of the methods related to determining artwork support which mainly affected the local library import / refresh (this is still slower for some compared to other players because there's more data & artwork aspects being checked for which means doing more processing on a single file despite the best of attempts to reduce duplicate / heavy processing where possible) Fixed a crash with the JTFE based missing files hotkey which no one seems to have used for an age for this to appear (maybe it's time to seriously consider stripping out features that aren't being used) Fixed how some of the file types which use extra information to reference their sub-songs is handled which was preventing some from being correctly resolved back to their base file (noticed fixing above) Fixed an issue with the handling of files with underscores in their filepath which wasn't being correctly handled causing some of the filename to be lost when shown as the title if title reading is delayed Fixed a few things that might be behind NotSoDirect not being stable for some setups though am still not certain that the changes done for this are going to fully resolve the problem from the crash reports Fixed the OS toast handling when there's no prior shortcut in the OS start menu to now create the shortcut (needed to allow the yes/no buttons for the new build / post-release toast) to be done as a hidden one so it's less likely to cause annoyance for those not wanting to see it whilst still allowing this less than ideal OS api implementation requirement to be met to avoid toasts without the needed buttons Fixed a regression when moving from taglib1 to taglib2 which broke some of the handling in place to allow for external programs to still access files when wacup has a held open cached instance of the file Everything else Updated cppwinrt (gen_win10shell.dll) to 3.0.260520.1 (26 May 2026) Updated libcurl (libcurl.dll) to 8.2.1 (24 Jun 2026) Updated Monkey's Audio (in_ape.dll) to 13.15 (28 Jun 2026) Updated mpg123 (mpg123.dll) to 1.33.6 (6 Jun 2026) Updated OpenSSL (libcurl.dll) to 3.5.7 (9 Jun 2026) Updated pugixml to 1.16 (16 Jun 2026) Updated taglib (tag2.dll) to 2.3.0 (11 May 2026) Updated vgmstream (in_vgmstream.dll) to the latest Git commit from 28 Jun 2026 Download: WACUP 64-bit | 9.6 MB (Freeware) Download: WACUP 32-bit View: WACUP Website | Screenshots Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • "over a thousand engineering hours" and started selling it but could not take a couple of minuets to send an AI email to ask permission. What an expensive lesson.
    • just tested it yesterday, a simple page with autoloading ADS takes 60mb....just 1 page for 60 megabytes.   poor people with a limited internet never will visit neolose
    • Tor Browser 15.0.17 by Razvan Serea Protect your privacy. Defend yourself against network surveillance and traffic analysis. Tor is a network of virtual tunnels that allows people and groups to improve their privacy and security on the Internet. The Tor software protects you by bouncing your communications around a distributed network of relays run by volunteers all around the world: it prevents somebody from watching your Internet connection and learning what sites you visit, it prevents the sites you visit from learning your physical location, and it lets you access sites which are blocked. The Tor Browser Bundle lets you use Tor on Windows, Mac OS X, or Linux without needing to install any software. It can run off a USB flash drive, comes with a pre-configured web browser to protect your anonymity, and is self-contained. Tor Browser 15.0.17 changelog: All Platforms Updated Tor to 0.4.9.11 Updated NoScript to 13.6.25.1984 Build System / All Platforms Bug tor-browser-build#41821: Update gpg subkeys for boklm Bug tor-browser-build#41827: Update morgan's keychain with renewed key Download: Tor Browser (64-bit) | Tor Browser (32-bit) | 109.0 MB (Open Source) View: Tor Browser Website | Other Operating Systems Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      530
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!