Boston Marathon bomber Tsarnaev found guilty of all charges


Recommended Posts

The penalty phase of jury deliberations starts next week and Tsarnaev is eligible. If the jury returns a death sentence Federal judges rarely deny it .

The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 bans successive habeas corpus petitions for those under federal terrorism death sentences, so if sentenced to death his route of appeals will be far shorter than in state death penalty cases.

Most recent Federal death sentences have been carried out by lethal injection.

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0MZ0ZI20150408?irpc=932

Boston Marathon bomber Tsarnaev found guilty of all charges

BOSTON (Reuters) - A jury on Wednesday found Dzokhar Tsarnaev guilty of killing three people and injuring 264 in the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, as well as fatally shooting a police officer four days later.

Tsarnaev, 21, was found guilty of all 30 counts against him, with 17 of the charges carrying the death penalty. The same U.S. District Court jury will now decide whether to sentence him to death or life in prison without possibility of parole.

Tsarnaev silently looked down, occasionally fidgeting, as the lengthy verdict was read. The courtroom was packed with survivors of the attack, the parents of 8-year-old Martin Richard, the youngest fatality, and law enforcement officials, including former Boston Police Commissioner Ed Davis.

Jurors spent just over 11 hours evaluating Tsarnaev

oh good, killing him will make everything right and better.

Well that or, insult to injury, paying for his life in prison with your tax dollars.
  • Like 2

Well, absolutely no one to blame for that but himself. He's 21 years old, the defence that he was doing so because of his brother was never going to work.

 

It wasn't to get him off / found not guilty, it was to try and soften the sentence to try and avoid the death penalty. 

It wasn't to get him off / found not guilty, it was to try and soften the sentence to try and avoid the death penalty.

Oh sure. But that doesn't change my statement. At 21 years old (or 19 years old when he committed the crime?) he was most likely well aware that he wasn't going to survive. Either K.I.A. or via the death penalty, he will have understood that.

He wouldn't be sucking air, having human contact, enjoying his meals, reading, or otherwise enjoying life to the degree prison allows. All good IMO.

 

 

Being stuck in prison for the rest of his life is worse than being dead. 

 

even then, revenge killing just to save money... yeah, good... 

 

Killing Breivik wouldn't make anyones life better, it wouldn't solve any problems and he certainly isn't enjoying prison life, not even in comfy norwegian prisons. 

Being stuck in prison for the rest of his life is worse than being dead. 

 

even then, revenge killing just to save money... yeah, good... 

 

Killing Breivik wouldn't make anyones life better, it wouldn't solve any problems and he certainly isn't enjoying prison life, not even in comfy norwegian prisons

 

Yeah, I remember him bitching about not being able to play the latest games a couple of years back. The inhumanity.

that's one person, and you're assuming a killer and psychopath is talking truth.

 

being locked up and not able to do whatever you want whenever you want breaks you. thinking otherwise and worse thinking you need to hurt and torture or better yet kill people for justice makes you a pretty terrible human being, technically a psychopath as well. 

Yeah, I remember him bitching about not being able to play the latest games a couple of years back. The inhumanity.

 

Maybe they should also "print" information about all the other things he's complained about instead of just the one thing they could sell papers and page views with out in the world. 

that's one person, and you're assuming a killer and psychopath is talking truth.

 

being locked up and not able to do whatever you want whenever you want breaks you. thinking otherwise and worse thinking you need to hurt and torture or better yet kill people for justice makes you a pretty terrible human being, technically a psychopath as well. 

 

Maybe they should also "print" information about all the other things he's complained about instead of just the one thing they could sell papers and page views with out in the world. 

 

So don't believe one killer/psychopath but believe the other.  Right!   Or as you usually do, are you suggesting your Norwegian psycho is better than ours.

 

/s

He should have his life terminated. People like this dont deserve to live, plain and simple after what he did.

  • Like 3

Well that or, insult to injury, paying for his life in prison with your tax dollars.

People on death row cost considerably more than people that's serving life in prison without parole. The whole death row complex and the appeal process cost many times more. You should also never kill a terrorist, especially not when they are backed by extreme muslims since it becomes a part of their agenda. They say that martyrdom is achieved when you either kill yourself for God or when you're punished with death when you do God's work. He should NOT get the death penatly, anyone who says that he should are ignorant about the fact that his supporters will celebrate more if he's killed than if he has to serve life in prison and die in misery. If someone is caught alive, don't kill them. When it comes to non-terrorist acts, the death penatly is still a very bad idea due to much higher cost and the probability that you've caught the wrong person is still too great for capital punishment to be used. Capital punishment should not be used if you don't have the justice system straight out of a utopia. Innocent people are put on death row and put to death when they've plead innocent all along and their innocense is proven too late. Anyone who promotes capital punishment should be put on death row for that very reason, allowing terrorists to get their way or allowing innocent people to actually waste a ton of tax money and then get killed. Capital punishment is STUPID no matter how you put it! Putting someone to death ends their misery, punishment should feel like a punishment until natural death. If the  justice system was fool proof then capital punishment would've been executed within a few days.

 

- Do you want to allow innocent people to be sentenced to death and then die before their innocense is proven? (Innocent until proven guilt, no?)

- Do you want to go along with the terrorists' agenda and allow a terrorist to achieve martyrdom?

 

Lock him away and make people forget about him! THAT'S punishment, it feels deep inside the convict but it's also partially reverseable (you can't give back lost time nor repair psychological damage).

The justice system IS NOT fool proof! Anyone who thinks that it is, is a complete FOOL!

Lock him away and make people forget about him! Make him disappear without a trace, inside a cell somewhere in the middle of a wasteland in the US.

People on death row cost considerably more than people that's serving life in prison without parole. The whole death row complex and the appeal process cost many times more. You should also never kill a terrorist, especially not when they are backed by extreme muslims since it becomes a part of their agenda. They say that martyrdom is achieved when you either kill yourself for God or when you're punished with death when you do God's work. He should NOT get the death penatly, anyone who says that he should are ignorant about the fact that his supporters will celebrate more if he's killed than if he has to serve life in prison and die in misery. If someone is caught alive, don't kill them. When it comes to non-terrorist acts, the death penatly is still a very bad idea due to much higher cost and the probability that you've caught the wrong person is still too great for capital punishment to be used. Capital punishment should not be used if you don't have the justice system straight out of a utopia. Innocent people are put on death row and put to death when they've plead innocent all along and their innocense is proven too late. Anyone who promotes capital punishment should be put on death row for that very reason, allowing terrorists to get their way or allowing innocent people to actually waste a ton of tax money and then get killed. Capital punishment is STUPID no matter how you put it! Putting someone to death ends their misery, punishment should feel like a punishment until natural death. If the  justice system was fool proof then capital punishment would've been executed within a few days.

 

- Do you want to allow innocent people to be sentenced to death and then die before their innocense is proven? (Innocent until proven guilt, no?)

- Do you want to go along with the terrorists' agenda and allow a terrorist to achieve martyrdom?

 

Lock him away and make people forget about him! THAT'S punishment, it feels deep inside the convict but it's also partially reverseable (you can't give back lost time nor repair psychological damage).

The justice system IS NOT fool proof! Anyone who thinks that it is, is a complete FOOL!

Lock him away and make people forget about him! Make him disappear without a trace, inside a cell somewhere in the middle of a wasteland in the US.

 

Except for this case is slightly different. It said that in the OP if you had read it. It won't have all the same appeals processes. It'll be much shorter.

Except for this case is slightly different. It said that in the OP if you had read it. It won't have all the same appeals processes. It'll be much shorter.

Correct. This is a Federal case so the State courts are cut out of the appeals chain. He'd also get just a single habeas corpus hearing instead of judge shopping for near-endless ones.

IIRC his appeal will go to the District Court for the District of Massachusetts, then the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, and finally the US Supreme Court which is very likely to dismiss it without a hearing. They don't have to take up every appeal.

Except for this case is slightly different. It said that in the OP if you had read it. It won't have all the same appeals processes. It'll be much shorter.

You should give him the "best" punishment. Don't please the supporters. Kill him and he reaches martydom and that's ranked high (in goodness) among people like him Don't please the terrorists.

Just put him in prison, and then put him in general population.  He wouldn't last long.

 

 

It's kind of strange that people who oppose the death penalty use the argument that it is cruel when the fact is living the rest of your life in the prison system is probably infinitely worse.

 

There are valid reasons to oppose the death penalty, but the act of execution being cruel isn't really a particularly good one when you consider the horrifying state of most prison systems.

If you kill him, you martyr him and he wins.

 

If you throw him into a toilet of a jail, like Guantanamo Bay (a prison for terrorists) for the rest of his life, he's not going to be enjoying himself at all.

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!