Boston Marathon bomber Tsarnaev found guilty of all charges


Recommended Posts

So don't believe one killer/psychopath but believe the other.  Right!   Or as you usually do, are you suggesting your Norwegian psycho is better than ours.

 

/s

 

Oh look, it's a straw man. 

oh good, killing him will make everything right and better.

Because letting him live fixes everything as well.

 

 

Oh look, it's a straw man. 

 

 

 

Oh look, its another useful thread contribution.

 

 

Him dying would be to give justice to all the families he destroyed. You sound like you are more than happy to rob them of that.

If you kill him, you martyr him and he wins.

 

If you throw him into a toilet of a jail, like Guantanamo Bay (a prison for terrorists) for the rest of his life, he's not going to be enjoying himself at all.

Martyrdom is in the eye of the beholder. 

 

 

Him dying would be to give justice to all the families he destroyed. You sound like you are more than happy to rob them of that.

 

No it wouldn't. it would give them revenge, not justice. 

No it wouldn't. it would give them revenge, not justice.

Reminds me of a quote,

"In certain extreme situations, the law is inadequate. In order to shame its inadequacy, it is necessary to act outside the law. To pursue... natural justice. This is not vengeance. Revenge is not a valid motive, it's an emotional response. No, not vengeance. Punishment."

Punishment works for me.

No it wouldn't. it would give them revenge, not justice. 

 

 

 

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/justice

Definition 5 of justice:  the administering of deserved punishment or reward.

Reminds me of a quote,

"In certain extreme situations, the law is inadequate. In order to shame its inadequacy, it is necessary to act outside the law. To pursue... natural justice. This is not vengeance. Revenge is not a valid motive, it's an emotional response. No, not vengeance. Punishment."

Punishment works for me.

 

If he's dead, how can he experience punishment?

 

Put him somewhere where he can live out a long an empty life, where he's reminded daily of what he did, and just how an utterly insignificant piece of scum he is.

Death is the punishment. In a US federal prison he'd have it too easy.

 

Oh yes. He gets an injection that puts him quietly to sleep, then his life is quietly ended.  Stiff punishment there.

 

I'd rather he spend the next 60+ years being reminded every day of what he did.

No it just takes the scum off the face of the earth.That'll do for me.Justice - 1,Libtards, - 0 

 

I don't think he should be kept alive for any liberal reasons.  I think a more fitting punishment is to make him FEEL his punishment for 60+ years...  Killing him just puts an end to it.

Oh yes. He gets an injection that puts him quietly to sleep, then his life is quietly ended.  Stiff punishment there.

 

I'd rather he spend the next 60+ years being reminded every day of what he did.

As long as you pay for him, I am happy.

It puts him out of our misery, that being the knowledge that the slime is still wasting perfectly good air.

 

And this is the reason you don't have the authority to decide on matters of what is or is not justice. Thankfully there are people who are in a position to do so who are not blinded by damned hatred.

Any of you against the death penalty had a friend or family member killed by another person? Talking about a proving murder where the other was out to kill someone that day. Not talking honest to God accidental deaths. Talking about someone straight up killing another because that's what they set out to do.

 

Until that happens to you, shut up about how people shouldn't be killed for killing others. If it ever happens to you, watch how fast your thoughts on this subject change and how you will want to kill the person/people yourself and how you will gladly do it in a heartbeat if given a chance.

 

Let's say one of you had a child who was murdered in cold blood. The person who did it is still alive and you have a chance to see them die. Death or live the REST OF YOUR LIFE knowing they are alive and well. Sitting in a prison where they probably have TV, radio or even internet access. Yeah some prison have computer labs. Hell you can have cell phones in a lot of them these days. Oh and don't forget the steady flow of drugs they more than likely have or the homemade alcoholic beverages. You can honestly sit there and be fine knowing they are more than likely having a freaking blast? They would have the same, if not more freedom inside than they do outside.

 

It takes a pure psycho to do what he did. "My big brother (who is dead and can't deny it) made me do it". BS and you people know that. He ran over his brother trying to get away from the cops. Did you all forget that? There were others they possibly killed over drugs before the bombing. Forget about that too?

 

They were psychotics. Pure and simple. Little brother will have it made in prison unless his lethal injection comes very quickly. Seems like the more screwed up ones get more freedom than others.

 

 

And this is the reason you don't have the authority to decide on matters of what is or is not justice. Thankfully there are people who are in a position to do so who are not blinded by damned hatred.

 

He admitted to being a part of it. Tried blaming his dead brother that he ran over, but still admitted his part in it. People have a right to have hatred. The guy freaking admits his part in it.

 

I'll stop myself before I say something to get me banned. There's too much ignorance and trolling in this thread,

I don't think he should be kept alive for any liberal reasons.  I think a more fitting punishment is to make him FEEL his punishment for 60+ years...  Killing him just puts an end to it.

Too risky.There is always the chance of release,however remote,at some time in the future & also the long term cost of his incarceration.The sooner he is executed the better for everyone.

And this is the reason you don't have the authority to decide on matters of what is or is not justice. Thankfully there are people who are in a position to do so who are not blinded by damned hatred.

 

Sympathy is wasted on this pond scum. He apparently didn't think twice about ending innocent lives, why should we care for his? 

I am glad they got this guy alive and to the brave law enforcement who was brave to catch him alive. Sure a few bad cops out there and it seems to be the cool thing to bash police now days but most of law enforcement is good and is risking their lives to catch bad guys that many are armed to protect us.

 

This just shows how Americans do not understand these terrorist or use logic when many wanting the death penalty for him. People screaming death penalty are just letting their emotions get in the way before thinking logically.

 2 reasons  why he should NOT get the death penalty.

 

MAIN REASON 

If you give him the death penalty to him and all his terrorist buddies he becomes a martyr ( you cant use conventional methods with these evil radial Muslim terrorist ). Sure he may not have died in combat but he is still on a lesser scale a martyr to these radial terrorist scum bags.  So you are basically upgrading his status!! Let the guy stand in a prison cell until he is an old man and then rot to death! When the death penalty is used in USA it is a painless one now days usually just by injection and just falling to sleep.

 

Second.

 

By killing him you are giving him the EASY WAY out.  There might be a heaven or hell but also there might not be a heaven or hell. No one can prove this so by killing him you are "potentially " giving him the easy way out. 

 

Id rather see the young guy waste away and think on what he did for the next 60 or 70 years ( he is a young monster ) than to give him the easy way out!!

 

Any of you against the death penalty had a friend or family member killed by another person? Talking about a proving murder where the other was out to kill someone that day. Not talking honest to God accidental deaths. Talking about someone straight up killing another because that's what they set out to do.

 

Until that happens to you, shut up about how people shouldn't be killed for killing others. If it ever happens to you, watch how fast your thoughts on this subject change and how you will want to kill the person/people yourself and how you will gladly do it in a heartbeat if given a chance.

 

Let's say one of you had a child who was murdered in cold blood. The person who did it is still alive and you have a chance to see them die. Death or live the REST OF YOUR LIFE knowing they are alive and well. Sitting in a prison where they probably have TV, radio or even internet access. Yeah some prison have computer labs. Hell you can have cell phones in a lot of them these days. Oh and don't forget the steady flow of drugs they more than likely have or the homemade alcoholic beverages. You can honestly sit there and be fine knowing they are more than likely having a freaking blast? They would have the same, if not more freedom inside than they do outside.

 

It takes a pure psycho to do what he did. "My big brother (who is dead and can't deny it) made me do it". BS and you people know that. He ran over his brother trying to get away from the cops. Did you all forget that? There were others they possibly killed over drugs before the bombing. Forget about that too?

 

They were psychotics. Pure and simple. Little brother will have it made in prison unless his lethal injection comes very quickly. Seems like the more screwed up ones get more freedom than others.

 

 

 

He admitted to being a part of it. Tried blaming his dead brother that he ran over, but still admitted his part in it. People have a right to have hatred. The guy freaking admits his part in it.

 

I'll stop myself before I say something to get me banned. There's too much ignorance and trolling in this thread,

 

Innocent people have been pointed out by relatives who grief. You must view it objectivly.

 

Any of you against the death penalty had a friend or family member killed by another person? Talking about a proving murder where the other was out to kill someone that day. Not talking honest to God accidental deaths. Talking about someone straight up killing another because that's what they set out to do.

 

Until that happens to you, shut up about how people shouldn't be killed for killing others. If it ever happens to you, watch how fast your thoughts on this subject change and how you will want to kill the person/people yourself and how you will gladly do it in a heartbeat if given a chance.

 

 

 

The Western Justice System isn't based on notions of revenge. We don't allow victims to dictate punishment in any cases. People accused of crimes receive legal representation and due process. I don't know why people think a system based on vicious barbarism, medieval legal concepts, or Sharia-like brutality would be better than the system we have.

 

Your argument is just an argument from victimisation: If someone has been a victim of something they have a better view or idea of how justice should be carried out. That's essentially vigilantism, and there should be very obvious reasons why that system is a bad idea. 

 

 

There are rational reasons to oppose the death penalty which have nothing to do with what you feel about the convicted persons actions. I'd argue that those reasons are better than the emotional arguments about cruelty.

  • Like 2
  • 1 month later...

Tsarnaev: DEATH

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/16/us/sentence-reached-for-dzhokar-tsarnaev-in-boston-marathon-bombing.html

1) the jury recommends the sentence based on a long list of aggravating and mitigating factors.

2) the vote must be unanimous, with all 12 voting yes.

3) there is a much shorter appeals process in federal courts; fewer jurisdictions and limited habeas corpus appeals.

4) he will go to a federal prison in Indiana where federal death sentences are carried out. Typically lethal injection.

Tsarnaev: DEATH

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/16/us/sentence-reached-for-dzhokar-tsarnaev-in-boston-marathon-bombing.html

1) the jury recommends the sentence based on a long list of aggravating and mitigating factors.

2) the vote must be unanimous, with all 12 voting yes.

3) there is a much shorter appeals process in federal courts; fewer jurisdictions and limited habeas corpus appeals.

4) he will go to a federal prison in Indiana where federal death sentences are carried out. Typically lethal injection.

he would have been dead anyway so it makes little difference to him with this sentence and it will not deture others who want to carry out acts like he did.

better that hes executed than be a burden on the tax payer.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!