Boston Marathon bomber Tsarnaev found guilty of all charges


Recommended Posts

he would have been dead anyway so it makes little difference to him with this sentence and it will not deture others who want to carry out acts like he did.

better that hes executed than be a burden on the tax payer.

 

 

 

  1. Cases without the death penalty cost $740,000, while cases where the death penalty is sought cost $1.26 million. Maintaining each death row prisoner costs taxpayers $90,000 more per year than a prisoner in general population.

 

Better punishment would be life in prison under solitary confinement.  No virgins in heaven for him...

To be honest I am all for any kind of death penalty when it involves those who you CAN NOT deny committed murder, terrorism, etc. He was an adult and he knew the difference between Right and Wrong and he only has himself to blame. 

he would have been dead anyway so it makes little difference to him with this sentence and it will not deture others who want to carry out acts like he did.

better that hes executed than be a burden on the tax payer.

 

Maybe we should use death as a way to fix wasting tax money in other areas to. imagine how much disabled and elderly cost. 

why put this ######er on death row, just execute him and get it over and done with.

 

because, while I wouldn't quite call America civilized when it comes to how it handles criminals, you're not quite a fundamentalist muslim state under imam rule either.

Better punishment would be life in prison under solitary confinement.  No virgins in heaven for him...

 

No, waste of space for people like this.  Why should my tax dollars go to house/feed these kind of people.  2 in the chest, one in the head....done.

They should just put him in a room and make him watch Hunger Games movies until he kills himself.

 

Naw, get all the victims together and let each one have a go at him if they choose to do so.  If he is close to death, let him recover and continue where they left off.

No, waste of space for people like this.  Why should my tax dollars go to house/feed these kind of people.  2 in the chest, one in the head....done.

 

Naw, get all the victims together and let each one have a go at him if they choose to do so.  If he is close to death, let him recover and continue where they left off.

 

That would make those inflicting the punishment no different than him.  In a civilized world there are due processes to deal with crimes.  It's a good thing that those that are in charge of the judicial processes do not act based on their emotions.

 

And, as I already quoted, in most cases Death Penalty costs more than to imprison the person for life.

  • Like 2

No, waste of space for people like this.  Why should my tax dollars go to house/feed these kind of people.  2 in the chest, one in the head....done.

 

Naw, get all the victims together and let each one have a go at him if they choose to do so.  If he is close to death, let him recover and continue where they left off.

 

what about the victims that aren't bloodlust barbarians who understand that violence and revenge, contrary to what the american "justice" system thinks, isn't the solution and won't solve anything ? 

 

Like the father who had to leave his son, who he knew was going to die, to carry his daughter that he could save to hospital while the son had to lie their and die alone. who then stod in front of the jury and argued AGAINST death penalty.

  • Like 2

My tax money is better spent putting a bullet in people like this and being done with it.  Never said that it cost more or less.  And a lot of prisoners live very well even in the worst prisons.


what about the victims that aren't bloodlust barbarians who understand that violence and revenge, contrary to what the american "justice" system thinks, isn't the solution and won't solve anything ? 

 

Like the father who had to leave his son, who he knew was going to die, to carry his daughter that he could save to hospital while the son had to lie their and die alone. who then stod in front of the jury and argued AGAINST death penalty.

 

I said for those who choose to do so.  Of course some will forgive/forget and was really my opinion on the subject.  May not be the most popular opinion.

I can live with grey areas in some murders. Temporary insanity, drugs, just a bad situation.. but cases like this, Death.

 

This wasn't someone who made a mistake, it was premeditated murder that everyone is damn lucky how few actually died.

My tax money is better spent putting a bullet in people like this and being done with it.  Never said that it cost more or less.  And a lot of prisoners live very well even in the worst prisons.

 

I said for those who choose to do so.  Of course some will forgive/forget and was really my opinion on the subject.  May not be the most popular opinion.

 

So, barbarism is ok if the majority are ok with uncivilized barbarism...

 

well that explains a lot...

So, barbarism is ok if the majority are ok with uncivilized barbarism...

 

well that explains a lot...

I honestly don't have an opinion on death penalty, I know that some people could be rehabilitated, but what would you do to people who cannot be, who would kill again and again the moment they had the chance?

Not only that, but killers sentenced to life have killed while in prison. Some do it for cred, some for fun. Worse, some teach other short time prisoners their "craft." When those pupils get out....

In this case he's in the federal system which has a much shorter appeals process. Good riddance.

Not only that, but killers sentenced to life have killed while in prison. Some do it for cred, some for fun. Worse, some teach other short time prisoners their "craft." When those pupils get out....

In this case he's in the federal system which has a much shorter appeals process. Good riddance.

 

So basically.

 

"Our justice and rehabilitation system is a complete failure, therefore we should kill people instead, because revenge and more murder makes everyone feel good and makes everything good again"

  • Like 2

Not only that, but killers sentenced to life have killed while in prison. Some do it for cred, some for fun.

That highlights the need for prison reform, as no prisoner should be put at risk by another. Execution isn't the answer though, which is why virtually every developed nation has abolished the death penalty. It's a barbaric practice that has no place in a civilised society.

So basically.

"Our justice and rehabilitation system is a complete failure, therefore we should kill people instead, because revenge and more murder makes everyone feel good and makes everything good again"

Fact of life: a great many of these killers are malignant psychopaths and there's no rehabilitating them, and while in prison they're a very real danger to other prisoners and the staff.

No amount of politically correct reform attempts or psychobabble treatment is going to change that.

Fact of life: a great many of these killers are malignant psychopaths and there's no rehabilitating them, and while in prison they're a very real danger to other prisoners and the staff.

No amount of politically correct reform attempts or psychobabble treatment is going to change that.

 

oh, so in addition to the previous it's also "well he's sick, so we should just murder him"

oh, so in addition to the previous it's also "well he's sick, so we should just murder him"

 

There is no point in arguing with you, it seem you cannot see the logical side of things.

 

Even for me, let's say I get into an accident or else, and that I end up either completely paralyzed or in a vegetative state, I'd rather be euthanized than spend the rest of my days in a bed plugged to machine. I know it's not the same situation, but what I'm trying to convey here is that keeping someone alive just for the sake of it make no sense. I don't see what is uncivilized about doing that.

It's a barbaric practice that has no place in a civilised society.

That's debatable. Mostly because what makes up civilized society is largely what people consider to be civilized. There's no hard definition that civilized means not killing. It's perfectly civilized to kill someone in self defense, why is out not civilized to kill someone we can't fix and we'll only ever cause problems for society or be a drain on tax dollars? I don't like killing people, but I'm not a fan paying for the room and board for the decades it takes for them to die naturally either.

The truth is there is no real right answer. They both suck, but people today are so afraid of reality they want to pretend people don't die. And even when the worst people in the world get killed people are ready to jump to those defense because no matter how bad you are, killing is wrong. Even if you've ruined tens or hundreds of lives.

Should we really be wasting resources on these people? In the US, most inmates get better healthcare than people outside of jail. Not saying it's a wonderful life inside but we put a lot into making sure these people are comfortable and healthy. I don't think that makes sense. They made a choice that landed them where they are. They need to live with those choices just like anyone else should.

If we can kill people in defense of our lives, why is it suddenly wrong to kill people for taking them with intent? For ruining lives?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google reportedly limited Meta's Gemini access over limited AI compute by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly limiting Meta's use of its Gemini AI models after Meta tried buying more computing capacity than even Google could supply. According to the Financial Times, Google told Meta in March that it could not provide the full Gemini capacity that Meta had requested. This shortfall even disrupted and delayed some of Meta's internal projects. Due to this, Meta even told its employees internally to use AI tokens more efficiently. Meta wasn't the only one to get hit by this sudden refusal by Google; even other customers were affected. But Meta was hit harder because of its unusually high demand for Google's models. The move from Google makes it evident that companies all over are in limited supply of both infrastructure and compute. Alphabet said in April that Google Cloud revenue grew 63% year-over-year to $20 billion in the first quarter, helped by enterprise AI infrastructure and AI solutions. In pursuit of more compute, Meta had earlier signed a multi-billion-dollar AWS agreement as well as a large AMD GPU deal for AI data centers. But the crunch would be short-lived as both Meta and Google have also ramped up infrastructure investments heavily. Meta said in November that it was committing more than $600 billion in the U.S. by 2028 for AI technology, infrastructure, and workforce expansion. In the first quarter of this year, Meta also raised its expected capital expenditure for 2026 to a range of $125 billion to $145 billion, citing higher component pricing and additional data center costs for future capacity. However, this doesn't make the company immune to the current dependence on outside suppliers. Meta has also spent many years promoting Llama as an open-weight alternative to closed models from Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic. But if the reported reliance on Google's Gemini models is severe enough for internal work to get impacted, then it looks like even frontier labs and Big Tech aren't fully self-sufficient. Source: Financial Times
    • I like to reminisce about the good old days, way back in autumn 2025 when building a gaming machine was fun and the drives were about $150 when you caught a deal. Yes duh, back in the day we had it gone. Then baby Skynet came along, hiding in AI datacenters demanding more processing power until it reached singularity. End of a not totally fictional story.
    • My experience in the past with older Windows 11 builds was not great on unsupported machines but I recently used Rufus to put the latest build on a older 5th Gen Core Thinkpad T that we upgraded with a SATA SSD and 8GB of RAM four years ago when hardware was reasonable and it seemed pretty fast and solid. Customer is very happy with the performance and will probably get four more years out of that venerable laptop that he loves so much. Another customer just retired his Dell Studio laptop from 2009 running Windows 10. It got an SSD over 10 years ago and did everything he needed it to for 17 years but he also retired last year and is happy doing everything on his iPad now.
    • Apple's newest AirTag 2 gets first big discount by Taras Buria In late January 2026, Apple introduced its second-generation AirTag trackers, bringing a refresh to the old model that has been on the market for half a decade. Now, you can get these new trackers at an all-time low price, thanks to the first big discount that brought the price down by 17% on Amazon. While the second-generation AirTag looks identical to its predecessor, it packs meaningful upgrades inside. The second-gen ultrawideband chip works 50% farther than the original AirTag, allowing you to detect lost items in a wider range. In addition, the second-generation AirTag features an upgraded Bluetooth chip for extended range and a significantly louder speaker (up to 50%) so that you can hear it better when locating a lost item. Note that the second-gen AirTag only works with iPhones and iPads that run iOS/iPadOS 26 and newer, so you need a compatible device to use the tracker. Like the original AirTag, the AirTag 2 is available in two packs: one and four pieces. Both are now available at a notable discount on Amazon, and you can purchase them using the links below. Apple AirTag 2 tracker - $24 | 17% off on Amazon Apple AirTag 2 tracker (four-pack) - $89 | 10% off on Amazon Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S.- specific and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!