Boston Marathon bomber Tsarnaev found guilty of all charges


Recommended Posts

That's debatable. Mostly because what makes up civilized society is largely what people consider to be civilized. There's no hard definition that civilized means not killing. It's perfectly civilized to kill someone in self defense, why is out not civilized to kill someone we can't fix and we'll only ever cause problems for society or be a drain on tax dollars? I don't like killing people, but I'm not a fan paying for the room and board for the decades it takes for them to die naturally either.

The truth is there is no real right answer. They both suck, but people today are so afraid of reality they want to pretend people don't die. And even when the worst people in the world get killed people are ready to jump to those defense because no matter how bad you are, killing is wrong. Even if you've ruined tens or hundreds of lives.

Should we really be wasting resources on these people? In the US, most inmates get better healthcare than people outside of jail. Not saying it's a wonderful life inside but we put a lot into making sure these people are comfortable and healthy. I don't think that makes sense. They made a choice that landed them where they are. They need to live with those choices just like anyone else should.

If we can kill people in defense of our lives, why is it suddenly wrong to kill people for taking them with intent? For ruining lives?

vigilantism that's why. People think "well if they're just going to prison to be put to death, why not just kill the guy myself and save the tax payers dollars.

If they rot in jail for the rest of their lives it shows that there are consequences for their crimes.

They're not going to care a whole damn lot of they're strapped to a table and peacefully put to sleep and die without any pain.

At least alive they'll still feel real physical and emotional pain.

vigilantism that's why. People think "well if they're just going to prison to be put to death, why not just kill the guy myself and save the tax payers dollars.

If they rot in jail for the rest of their lives it shows that there are consequences for their crimes.

They're not going to care a whole damn lot of they're strapped to a table and peacefully put to sleep and die without any pain.

At least alive they'll still feel real physical and emotional pain.

 

 

That's a bad and horrible anti-death penalty argument 

Can't you do any better? 

Might as well argue it's the "humane" or "right" or "nice" thing to do

There is no point in arguing with you, it seem you cannot see the logical side of things.

 

Even for me, let's say I get into an accident or else, and that I end up either completely paralyzed or in a vegetative state, I'd rather be euthanized than spend the rest of my days in a bed plugged to machine. I know it's not the same situation, but what I'm trying to convey here is that keeping someone alive just for the sake of it make no sense. I don't see what is uncivilized about doing that.

 

 

So your argument is, a completely irrelevant statement?

 

and that would in any case be your choice, which I wholly support. people who are in intolerable pain and can't be cured, should have the option of ending their life. same if you're conscious but locked to a bed completely paralyzed only capable of communicating with blinking, then yeah, let the poor person end it, but it has to be up to the person.  in any case, it's completely irrelevant to this discussion anyway. 

 

Killing people just because it's easier, cheaper, better, revenge, he's a bad person who will always be bad.... it all boils down to revenge and is not right in any modern civilized society. 

 

Heck even as bad as they are they can actually be useful to society when locked up. and I'm not talking about the american style forced labour "rehab". 

Being stuck in prison for the rest of his life is worse than being dead. 

 

even then, revenge killing just to save money... yeah, good... 

 

Killing Breivik wouldn't make anyones life better, it wouldn't solve any problems and he certainly isn't enjoying prison life, not even in comfy norwegian prisons. 

So then let's be humane and sentence him to death. It's the only right thing to do.

 

Being cruel just to be cruel doesn't make anyone's life better, nor would it solve any problems.

I think what he getting is what he deserves. I know it harsh. But he showed no remorse when the verdict was read, when they said that he be sentenced to death. He showed no emotions, and please don't say he was in shock. If he took a life of a child, then I am sorry but he had a right to choose between right, and wrong. Now if he was remorse and feels guilty, and knew what he did was wrong then yes I wouldn't go for the death sentence I would had gone for life instead. 

And the death penalty is just as cruel.

Not according to Hawkman. He just said that a life sentence is worse than death.

 

Of course, if both are "just as cruel", then maybe we should just let him go then. I would very much dislike for anyone to think I might be cruel.

Guys it not Cruel he is getting what he deserves. Doesn't anyone realize if someone takes a life, and show no remorse then there life should be taken. He showed no remorse guys, and you guys are defending him.I really don't think the kid understands right from wrong, and would probably most likely do it again if you guys let him go.

That would make those inflicting the punishment no different than him.  In a civilized world there are due processes to deal with crimes.  It's a good thing that those that are in charge of the judicial processes do not act based on their emotions.

 

And, as I already quoted, in most cases Death Penalty costs more than to imprison the person for life.

 

Do a Kickstarter to cover all those costs and expedite his death penalty. No need to delay.

Do a Kickstarter to cover all those costs and expedite his death penalty. No need to delay.

 

Sadly the soonest we can rid ourselves of this scum is 15 years, IF the Feds rush, which I doubt they will, what with appeals and all that other legal stuff lawyers drool about 

Timothy McVeigh was convicted in 1997 and executed by lethal injection in 2001 after all of his appeals failed (an unusually short period of time).  Maybe Tsarnaev's legal process will not be drawn out either.

Well, we'll have to agree to disagree then.

 

But do tell me, because I am genuinely interested, how could those people be useful in society?

 

They can be used as examples, they can e studied, they can talk with people who might end up in their situation after you have a half decent rehab system actually work with them and have them work out their issues, and since most of these types of people change drastically as they get older. 

They can be used as examples, they can e studied, they can talk with people who might end up in their situation after you have a half decent rehab system actually work with them and have them work out their issues, and since most of these types of people change drastically as they get older. 

 

 

Not much to study, they follow a religion that encourages the type of actions they commit, as for the rest, keeping them away from society is the best  alternative 

Not much to study, they follow a religion that encourages the type of actions they commit, as for the rest, keeping them away from society is the best alternative

There is a lot to study when it comes to people like that. Human behaviour is very unpredictable.

As many have already stated, there is a reason why the vast majority of civilized nations have abolished the death penalty.

Haven't you guys learned from history? Killing people solves nothing. Killing terrorists only brought about more terrorists. Incarcerating people solved nothing either. Instead, we should be looking into, and solving, social issues at their roots.

There is a lot to study when it comes to people like that. Human behaviour is very unpredictable.

As many have already stated, there is a reason why the vast majority of civilized nations have abolished the death penalty.

Haven't you guys learned from history? Killing people solves nothing. Killing terrorists only brought about more terrorists. Incarcerating people solved nothing either. Instead, we should be looking into, and solving, social issues at their roots.

 

 

Wer'e going ot have to agree to disagree, I frimly believe the death penalty is needed and useful, can't argue with "civilized" people about it 

Wer'e going ot have to agree to disagree, I frimly believe the death penalty is needed and useful, can't argue with "civilized" people about it 

 

I hope you don't oppose the sharia justice and punishments in extremist muslim states either then, cause you sound just like them in your "arguments"

Civilized society.  Funny concept.  No society is civilized or else things like this wouldn't happen.  He was given due process, found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.  He was treated fairly and that is where it ends.  He deserves what he is getting.

 

And barbarism?  Seriously?  I think people are tossing that around way to much.  Killing this guy is him getting off easy.  He has a really good chance of being treated way worse in jail.  Of course, the opposite could happen as well.

 

And that is really my opinion on the subject, like it or not, agree with it or not.  I really do not care.

I hope you don't oppose the sharia justice and punishments in extremist muslim states either then, cause you sound just like them in your "arguments"

there's a huge difference between sharia and this. Sharia demands hands be cut off for just for theft. the death penalty is applied to almost everything after that. this person committed a crime of such magnitude that he has forfeited his right to life. We're not executing him because he took some drugs or left a religion. He killed people, maimed and seriously injured many others, caused a major city to shut down, and caused terror throughout a whole nation. He received every benefit of a fair criminal justice system and the benefit of being tried in one of the most liberal states in the country.  It's just stupid to compare this to sharia

there's a huge difference between sharia and this. Sharia demands hands be cut off for just for theft. the death penalty is applied to almost everything after that. this person committed a crime of such magnitude that he has forfeited his right to life. We're not executing him because he took some drugs or left a religion. He killed people, maimed and seriously injured many others, caused a major city to shut down, and caused terror throughout a whole nation. He received every benefit of a fair criminal justice system and the benefit of being tried in one of the most liberal states in the country.  It's just stupid to compare this to sharia

 

I said sharia justice not sharia laws, and even then sharia laws vary depending on state and interpretation. 

There is a lot to study when it comes to people like that. Human behaviour is very unpredictable.

As many have already stated, there is a reason why the vast majority of civilized nations have abolished the death penalty.

Haven't you guys learned from history? Killing people solves nothing. Killing terrorists only brought about more terrorists. Incarcerating people solved nothing either. Instead, we should be looking into, and solving, social issues at their roots.

 

So if killing terrorists or jailing them solves nothing, what do you suggest we do with this Joker Tsarnaev character? Counsel him and try to integrate him back into society?

So if killing terrorists or jailing them solves nothing, what do you suggest we do with this Joker Tsarnaev character? Counsel him and try to integrate him back into society?

Obviously killing terrorists doesn't work. And yes, I believe changing his opinion on his views would be a lot easier than changing opinions of those that believe death sentences solve anything.

Obviously killing terrorists doesn't work. And yes, I believe changing his opinion on his views would be a lot easier than changing opinions of those that believe death sentences solve anything.

 

Too many uncertainties in your approach.

 

What about killing Nazis? Was that effective or should we have sat down with Hitler and tried to talk him into being a nice guy?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft brings Claude to its own Azure infrastructure, powered by Nvidia GB300 Blackwell by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic's Claude models are now generally available in Microsoft Foundry on Azure and are running on Nvidia's GB300 Blackwell Ultra systems. Nvidia wrote in its announcement that the models are hosted on Microsoft Azure and accelerated by GB300 Blackwell Ultra GPUs, with Quantum-X800 InfiniBand networking used to support larger agentic systems and specialized sub-agents that can operate across business domains. This is great for customers and enterprises that want to build autonomous and domain-specific AI agents using Claude without moving outside Microsoft’s cloud platform. Microsoft currently offers Claude models in Foundry in two forms: “Hosted on Azure,” which runs end-to-end on Azure infrastructure and is generally available, and “Hosted on Anthropic infrastructure,” which remains in preview. This separation is quite important for organizations that have procurement, compliance, data processing, or internal governance requirements tied to Azure. Anthropic currently has 11 Claude models listed in Microsoft Foundry, including Opus 4.8, Sonnet 4.6, and even the unavailable Mythos and Fable models. Billing is handled through Claude Consumption Units (CCUs). Microsoft says CCU is an invoicing unit for Claude models in Foundry, with token usage converted using Anthropic’s published per-model token rates. The usage is billed through Azure Marketplace just like models from other distributors and appears on the customer's Azure invoice, while eligible spend can count against a Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment. For starters, GB300 NVL72 is a rack-scale, fully liquid-cooled system that combines 72 Blackwell Ultra GPUs and 36 Grace CPUs. Nvidia has listed 37TB of fast memory, 130TB/s of NVLink bandwidth, and FP4 Tensor Core performance of up to 1,440 petaflops with sparsity. The deal is also part of a three-way partnership between Microsoft, Nvidia, and Anthropic. Under the deal, Anthropic has committed to buying $30 billion in Azure compute capacity and contracting additional capacity up to one gigawatt. Nvidia and Microsoft also said they would invest up to $10 billion and $5 billion in Anthropic, respectively.
    • WhatsApp is getting usernames, and you can reserve your preferred one now by Fiza Ali Sharing your phone number isn't always something you want to do, especially with people you've just met. Whether it's someone from a class, a local community group, or a sports team chat, handing over your number can feel like giving away more personal information than necessary. That's exactly the problem WhatsApp is trying to solve with its upcoming usernames feature. The company has announced that users can now reserve a unique WhatsApp username ahead of the feature's wider rollout later this year. Once usernames become available, they'll let people connect without revealing their phone numbers. It's a change that makes a lot of sense for group chats. Right now, everyone in the group can see your phone number. With usernames enabled, that won't necessarily be the case when someone contacts you for the first time. WhatsApp says it's opening username reservations early because more than three billion people use the app, meaning plenty of people are likely to want the same usernames. Reserving one now gives users a better chance of securing the name they actually want before the feature launches more broadly. If your preferred username is already taken, WhatsApp will also offer a built-in username generator to suggest available alternatives. The feature isn't only aimed at individual users. Creators, businesses, and organisations will be able to claim the same username they already use on Instagram or Facebook, making it easier to keep a consistent identity across Meta's apps. Furthermore, privacy is a big part of how WhatsApp is introducing usernames. There won't be a public directory where people can browse or search for usernames. Instead, people will need to know your exact username before they can start a conversation with you. Additionally, users can also choose to enable a username key, which adds another layer of control by requiring people to enter that key before sending a message. Once the feature rolls out, people who choose to use a username will no longer have their phone number shown when messaging a person or business for the first time. If you want to reserve a username, make sure you're running the latest version of WhatsApp, then head to Settings > Account > Username. The tech giant says usernames will roll out gradually over the coming months, and users will receive an in-app notification when the feature becomes available in their country.
    • When I think about a network, there are really two aspects, the hardware and the wiring. So here is what I would do for both. Wiring: Use Cat6A for the patch panel, outlets, and all structured cables (cables installed in walls). Run plenty of Wireless Access Point (WAP) cables, as a general rule, assume a signal can only pass through 2-3 walls and can't pass through a floor (that is conservative, but trust me on this if you want strong WiFi)  Cat6 patch cables are fine for now if you don't plan to run 10gig, those are easy to replace later if needed. Run OS2 single-mode fiber to anywhere you think you may have a server or sub-switch. (yes, single-mode for everything on a small network, don't mess with multimode unless you are at a scale where that minor cost and power savings will matter). If you really want to future proof, also run fiber to any high density WAP locations, it is likely that WiFi 8 and beyond WAPs will push the limits of 10g. Run 6-12 pairs of single-mode fiber between your MDF and the building's MDF, even if you only need 1 or 2 pairs now, those extra pairs will pay off down the road. Hardware: (its easy to say "get all the features incase you need them", so instead of futureproofing, I am going to take approach of suggesting areas worth investing in, and areas you can save money). Don't overspend thinking you need every feature on every port. You don't need 10g on every port, you don't need PoE on every port. Don't overspend on redundancy either, unless you are ready to buy two of everything, don't waste money buying two of some things and not others. Dual power supplies are worthwhile, but probably not HA or multi-path redundancy.  Get 1 "distribution layer" switch that your router/firewall will connect to as well as all your access layer switches below. This should be a fully managed 10g+ switch with a combination of copper and SPF ports, a few 25g uplink ports are nice for this switch. Given that you said it is a small network, I suggest also using that distribution layer switch for servers and WAPs, meaning it will need PoE. Speaking of wireless, get good professional tri-band WAPs, and either turn on the band stirring options, or limit 2.4 to an IoT only SSID. This will provide a solid WiFi capable nearly everything but the highest of bandwidth clients...you could even consider skipping wiring workstations depending on usage. Access layer switch for workstations and printers can be cheaper switches, 2.5g is a good sweet spot between price and future proofing, but even 1g is fine for most individual clients (the kind that could probably be fine on WiFi). You can consider saving a little on access layer switches by only getting 1 PoE switch for whatever needs it (remember your WAPs are connecting to the distribution switch, not here), and non-PoE for your workstations, because desk phones are falling out of favor. You can also save money here by not buying managed switches if you don't need them--but really do some soul searching there, if you go this route, then anything that isn't on your workstation VLAN would either need to be connected to the distribution switch, or its own access layer switch. Also, don't feel like you need a fancy fabric stacking switches for your access layer, that is the point of the higher-end distribution layer, to remove the need for things like that at this level. Home Hardware: I'm realizing the above assumed an office setting, if this if for your house and home lab then the above still applies, but you'll probably want everything managed and PoE, just because, but you probably also don't need multiple access layer switches. If your total port count is below 24, just skip separating distribution layer and access layer and just get one nice switch with the features you want. If you are at the point of considering a 48-port switch, I would instead get a nice high-end distribution switch for things that need it, and cheaper access layer switches with specs based on the needs of connected devices. For home use, don't worry about home running every device to the main switch, there is nothing wrong with running sub-switches for your media areas and office, those essentially become your access layer, just look for sub-switches with a 10g uplink so sharing bandwidth isn't an issue. Just make sure you always connect them to your distribution/main switch, don't daisy chain, the path should never have more steps than Client>Access>Distribution>Firewall>Internet or Client>Access>Distribution>Server if it is local.
    • Google Meet brings Gemini note-taking to AI Pro and Ultra subscribers by Karthik Mudaliar Google's Gemini-powered "Take notes for me" feature inside Google Meet is now available to Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers. The features work on Google Meet for web as well as on mobile, and Google says that subscribers can use it for meetings they host in many supported languages. As the name suggests, "Take notes for me" allows Gemini to listen to a meeting, generate a summary, identify action items, and save the notes as a Google Doc in the user’s Drive. After the meeting, the organizer receives an email recap with the summary and action items, while the notes can also be attached to the related Calendar event depending on the meeting setup and sharing settings. The feature isn't automatically turned on for everyone, though. Google says that all meeting participants are notified when note-taking is turned on, and users can start it from the pencil icon in Meet or enable it for future calls through Meet’s meeting records settings. For work or school accounts, administrators can also control whether the feature is available and may require explicit participant consent for note-taking, recording, or transcription features. The feature first launched back in 2024, when it was available just for selected Workspace users. Over the years, Google added refinements and more options, including the ability to enable it when scheduling meetings via Google Calendar. Google's support docs say that the feature currently supports English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, and Spanish, but only one language at a time. Meetings with multiple spoken languages are not currently supported, and Google recommends using the tool for meetings between 15 minutes and eight hours. The new feature makes Google Meet closer to its rivals that have AI tools already built in. Microsoft Teams has recently started offering Copilot and intelligent recap features that summarize meetings, surface highlights, and help with follow-ups, while Zoom’s AI Companion can also generate meeting summaries from desktop and mobile meetings.
    • GnuCash 5.16 by Razvan Serea GnuCash is a personal and small business finance application, freely licensed under the GNU GPL and available for GNU/Linux, BSD, Solaris, Mac OS X and Microsoft Windows. It’s designed to be easy to use, yet powerful and flexible. GnuCash allows you to track your income and expenses, reconcile bank accounts, monitor stock portfolios and manage your small business finances. It is based on professional accounting principles to ensure balanced books and accurate reports. GnuCash can keep track of your personal finances in as much detail as you prefer. If you are just starting out, use GnuCash to keep track of your checkbook. You may then decide to track cash as well as credit card purchases to better determine where your money is being spent. When you start investing, you can use GnuCash to help monitor your portfolio. Buying a vehicle or a home? GnuCash will help you plan the investment and track loan payments. If your financial records span the globe, GnuCash provides all the multiple-currency support you need. Between 5.15 and 5.16, the following bugfixes were accomplished: Bug 421610 - RFE: Include logical dates for View->Filter by "date range"The Select Range section of the Date tab of the register's Filter By dialog box is changed to provide relative, specific date, or days ago options for the start and end of the filter range. The Show number of days item label is changed to Show from days ago to better reflect what it does. Bug 436105 - esc key not working as expected in register: Enable the escape key to cancel a field edit. Bug 797384 - Gnucash doesn't handle commodity prices with big numerator/denominator properly. Bug 798004 - Next gen UI for stock transactions Bug 799314 - Add "enter now" option in scheduled transaction editor. tab to allow users to select the scheduled transactions to be included in a “Since Last Run…” window. If there are no instances of a selected transaction triggered by today’s date, the next instance is triggered. Bug 799751 - autocomplete crash Bug 799759 - Users can't Enable entries via Checkboxes on Scheduled Transactions PageAllow the Enabled box in the list of scheduled transactions to be operated instead of having to open the transaction editor dialog and change the Enabled checkbox. Also added use of the Name column as the secondary column sort for all the other columns. Bug 799762 - Poor handling of cases where hidden/placeholder accounts are used in the account register Bug 799766 - Double line preference not respected in search register Bug 799767 - POST /accounts in bindings/python/example_scripts/rest-api is broken Bug 799777 - `xaccSplitSetParent`: reparenting a committed split silently drops its KVP slots (online_id, cap-gains links) Other changes & improvements: Numeric values may now be selected to copy in the Accounts page. Add new Finance::Quote source Finnhub.io: Free API key (personal/non-professional use) available at https://finnhub.io. Set FINNHUB_API_KEY environment variable to API key to use this source. As of June 2026, free tier API limit is 60 API calls/minute. The Investment Lots report has new optional columns for Computed Annual Growth Rate. Python Bindings: Improved translation of primary object (Account, Transaction, Split, etc.) so that they can be treated as normal Python objects. This is accomplished with SWIG magic so no existing code is obsoleted. Python Bindings: Better conversion of GLists to Python lists. Python Bindings: Destroy the QofSession in the Python Session dtor to prevent leaving the database locked. [engine] Add first-class online_id accessors for Split and Account and make them available to Python bindings, removing the unused Transaction online_id property. Improve C++ implementation of QofBook. Correct the Doxygen doc for qof_instance_get/set_kvp. [gnc-log-replay.cpp] fix incorrect guid dump Add some Boost library requirements needed by libgnucash-guile to CMakeLists.txt so that missing feature will fail at configure time. Use Compile-time Regular Expressions instead of std::regex in gnc-filepath-utils.cpp and instead of boost::regex in the CSV importer, with the CTRE v3.11.1 header added to borrowed [gnc-filepath-utils.cpp] null check char* arguments Add ChartJS licenses. Removed AEX from list of commodities. euronext.com is now using JS based anti-webscraping. [report-core] always offer options summary in reports. This is useful to debug reports. The Add options summary option is removed because it's no longer optional. Remove remaining obsolete IMContext from sheet Fix blurry text in HiDPI offscreen-rendered widgets Add port field to database connection dialog: The convention of appending the port number after the host isn't obvious. When editing a split in the register treat the account as being changed only if it isn't the one selected before editing instead of if the user performed an edit Return immediately from qof_book_destroy if hash_of_collections is null. If qof_book_destroy is called on a QofBook* freshly created with qof_book_new (usually because it was used to create a session that now must be destroyed) it would try to empty the non-existent hash tables, crashing. Clean up Flathub metadata to solve warnings at flatpak build time. Be consistent in naming GncPluginPage and GncPluginPageRegister HTML: Remove unimplemented function declarations. [gnc-html.cpp] remove unused buggy string conversion functions Convert libgnc-html to C++ Apply -Wall -Werr -Wmissing-prototypes to C++ compilation on Windows and fix the resulting errors. New and Updated Translations: Arabic, Croatian, Danish, Dutch, German, Finnish, Hungarian, Korean, Norwegian-Bokmal, Spanish Download: GnuCash 5.16 | 176.0 MB (Open Source) Links: GnuCash Home page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!