Boston Marathon bomber Tsarnaev found guilty of all charges


Recommended Posts

That's debatable. Mostly because what makes up civilized society is largely what people consider to be civilized. There's no hard definition that civilized means not killing. It's perfectly civilized to kill someone in self defense, why is out not civilized to kill someone we can't fix and we'll only ever cause problems for society or be a drain on tax dollars? I don't like killing people, but I'm not a fan paying for the room and board for the decades it takes for them to die naturally either.

The truth is there is no real right answer. They both suck, but people today are so afraid of reality they want to pretend people don't die. And even when the worst people in the world get killed people are ready to jump to those defense because no matter how bad you are, killing is wrong. Even if you've ruined tens or hundreds of lives.

Should we really be wasting resources on these people? In the US, most inmates get better healthcare than people outside of jail. Not saying it's a wonderful life inside but we put a lot into making sure these people are comfortable and healthy. I don't think that makes sense. They made a choice that landed them where they are. They need to live with those choices just like anyone else should.

If we can kill people in defense of our lives, why is it suddenly wrong to kill people for taking them with intent? For ruining lives?

vigilantism that's why. People think "well if they're just going to prison to be put to death, why not just kill the guy myself and save the tax payers dollars.

If they rot in jail for the rest of their lives it shows that there are consequences for their crimes.

They're not going to care a whole damn lot of they're strapped to a table and peacefully put to sleep and die without any pain.

At least alive they'll still feel real physical and emotional pain.

vigilantism that's why. People think "well if they're just going to prison to be put to death, why not just kill the guy myself and save the tax payers dollars.

If they rot in jail for the rest of their lives it shows that there are consequences for their crimes.

They're not going to care a whole damn lot of they're strapped to a table and peacefully put to sleep and die without any pain.

At least alive they'll still feel real physical and emotional pain.

 

 

That's a bad and horrible anti-death penalty argument 

Can't you do any better? 

Might as well argue it's the "humane" or "right" or "nice" thing to do

There is no point in arguing with you, it seem you cannot see the logical side of things.

 

Even for me, let's say I get into an accident or else, and that I end up either completely paralyzed or in a vegetative state, I'd rather be euthanized than spend the rest of my days in a bed plugged to machine. I know it's not the same situation, but what I'm trying to convey here is that keeping someone alive just for the sake of it make no sense. I don't see what is uncivilized about doing that.

 

 

So your argument is, a completely irrelevant statement?

 

and that would in any case be your choice, which I wholly support. people who are in intolerable pain and can't be cured, should have the option of ending their life. same if you're conscious but locked to a bed completely paralyzed only capable of communicating with blinking, then yeah, let the poor person end it, but it has to be up to the person.  in any case, it's completely irrelevant to this discussion anyway. 

 

Killing people just because it's easier, cheaper, better, revenge, he's a bad person who will always be bad.... it all boils down to revenge and is not right in any modern civilized society. 

 

Heck even as bad as they are they can actually be useful to society when locked up. and I'm not talking about the american style forced labour "rehab". 

Being stuck in prison for the rest of his life is worse than being dead. 

 

even then, revenge killing just to save money... yeah, good... 

 

Killing Breivik wouldn't make anyones life better, it wouldn't solve any problems and he certainly isn't enjoying prison life, not even in comfy norwegian prisons. 

So then let's be humane and sentence him to death. It's the only right thing to do.

 

Being cruel just to be cruel doesn't make anyone's life better, nor would it solve any problems.

I think what he getting is what he deserves. I know it harsh. But he showed no remorse when the verdict was read, when they said that he be sentenced to death. He showed no emotions, and please don't say he was in shock. If he took a life of a child, then I am sorry but he had a right to choose between right, and wrong. Now if he was remorse and feels guilty, and knew what he did was wrong then yes I wouldn't go for the death sentence I would had gone for life instead. 

And the death penalty is just as cruel.

Not according to Hawkman. He just said that a life sentence is worse than death.

 

Of course, if both are "just as cruel", then maybe we should just let him go then. I would very much dislike for anyone to think I might be cruel.

Guys it not Cruel he is getting what he deserves. Doesn't anyone realize if someone takes a life, and show no remorse then there life should be taken. He showed no remorse guys, and you guys are defending him.I really don't think the kid understands right from wrong, and would probably most likely do it again if you guys let him go.

That would make those inflicting the punishment no different than him.  In a civilized world there are due processes to deal with crimes.  It's a good thing that those that are in charge of the judicial processes do not act based on their emotions.

 

And, as I already quoted, in most cases Death Penalty costs more than to imprison the person for life.

 

Do a Kickstarter to cover all those costs and expedite his death penalty. No need to delay.

Do a Kickstarter to cover all those costs and expedite his death penalty. No need to delay.

 

Sadly the soonest we can rid ourselves of this scum is 15 years, IF the Feds rush, which I doubt they will, what with appeals and all that other legal stuff lawyers drool about 

Timothy McVeigh was convicted in 1997 and executed by lethal injection in 2001 after all of his appeals failed (an unusually short period of time).  Maybe Tsarnaev's legal process will not be drawn out either.

Well, we'll have to agree to disagree then.

 

But do tell me, because I am genuinely interested, how could those people be useful in society?

 

They can be used as examples, they can e studied, they can talk with people who might end up in their situation after you have a half decent rehab system actually work with them and have them work out their issues, and since most of these types of people change drastically as they get older. 

They can be used as examples, they can e studied, they can talk with people who might end up in their situation after you have a half decent rehab system actually work with them and have them work out their issues, and since most of these types of people change drastically as they get older. 

 

 

Not much to study, they follow a religion that encourages the type of actions they commit, as for the rest, keeping them away from society is the best  alternative 

Not much to study, they follow a religion that encourages the type of actions they commit, as for the rest, keeping them away from society is the best alternative

There is a lot to study when it comes to people like that. Human behaviour is very unpredictable.

As many have already stated, there is a reason why the vast majority of civilized nations have abolished the death penalty.

Haven't you guys learned from history? Killing people solves nothing. Killing terrorists only brought about more terrorists. Incarcerating people solved nothing either. Instead, we should be looking into, and solving, social issues at their roots.

There is a lot to study when it comes to people like that. Human behaviour is very unpredictable.

As many have already stated, there is a reason why the vast majority of civilized nations have abolished the death penalty.

Haven't you guys learned from history? Killing people solves nothing. Killing terrorists only brought about more terrorists. Incarcerating people solved nothing either. Instead, we should be looking into, and solving, social issues at their roots.

 

 

Wer'e going ot have to agree to disagree, I frimly believe the death penalty is needed and useful, can't argue with "civilized" people about it 

Wer'e going ot have to agree to disagree, I frimly believe the death penalty is needed and useful, can't argue with "civilized" people about it 

 

I hope you don't oppose the sharia justice and punishments in extremist muslim states either then, cause you sound just like them in your "arguments"

Civilized society.  Funny concept.  No society is civilized or else things like this wouldn't happen.  He was given due process, found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.  He was treated fairly and that is where it ends.  He deserves what he is getting.

 

And barbarism?  Seriously?  I think people are tossing that around way to much.  Killing this guy is him getting off easy.  He has a really good chance of being treated way worse in jail.  Of course, the opposite could happen as well.

 

And that is really my opinion on the subject, like it or not, agree with it or not.  I really do not care.

I hope you don't oppose the sharia justice and punishments in extremist muslim states either then, cause you sound just like them in your "arguments"

there's a huge difference between sharia and this. Sharia demands hands be cut off for just for theft. the death penalty is applied to almost everything after that. this person committed a crime of such magnitude that he has forfeited his right to life. We're not executing him because he took some drugs or left a religion. He killed people, maimed and seriously injured many others, caused a major city to shut down, and caused terror throughout a whole nation. He received every benefit of a fair criminal justice system and the benefit of being tried in one of the most liberal states in the country.  It's just stupid to compare this to sharia

there's a huge difference between sharia and this. Sharia demands hands be cut off for just for theft. the death penalty is applied to almost everything after that. this person committed a crime of such magnitude that he has forfeited his right to life. We're not executing him because he took some drugs or left a religion. He killed people, maimed and seriously injured many others, caused a major city to shut down, and caused terror throughout a whole nation. He received every benefit of a fair criminal justice system and the benefit of being tried in one of the most liberal states in the country.  It's just stupid to compare this to sharia

 

I said sharia justice not sharia laws, and even then sharia laws vary depending on state and interpretation. 

There is a lot to study when it comes to people like that. Human behaviour is very unpredictable.

As many have already stated, there is a reason why the vast majority of civilized nations have abolished the death penalty.

Haven't you guys learned from history? Killing people solves nothing. Killing terrorists only brought about more terrorists. Incarcerating people solved nothing either. Instead, we should be looking into, and solving, social issues at their roots.

 

So if killing terrorists or jailing them solves nothing, what do you suggest we do with this Joker Tsarnaev character? Counsel him and try to integrate him back into society?

So if killing terrorists or jailing them solves nothing, what do you suggest we do with this Joker Tsarnaev character? Counsel him and try to integrate him back into society?

Obviously killing terrorists doesn't work. And yes, I believe changing his opinion on his views would be a lot easier than changing opinions of those that believe death sentences solve anything.

Obviously killing terrorists doesn't work. And yes, I believe changing his opinion on his views would be a lot easier than changing opinions of those that believe death sentences solve anything.

 

Too many uncertainties in your approach.

 

What about killing Nazis? Was that effective or should we have sat down with Hitler and tried to talk him into being a nice guy?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GnuCash 5.16 by Razvan Serea GnuCash is a personal and small business finance application, freely licensed under the GNU GPL and available for GNU/Linux, BSD, Solaris, Mac OS X and Microsoft Windows. It’s designed to be easy to use, yet powerful and flexible. GnuCash allows you to track your income and expenses, reconcile bank accounts, monitor stock portfolios and manage your small business finances. It is based on professional accounting principles to ensure balanced books and accurate reports. GnuCash can keep track of your personal finances in as much detail as you prefer. If you are just starting out, use GnuCash to keep track of your checkbook. You may then decide to track cash as well as credit card purchases to better determine where your money is being spent. When you start investing, you can use GnuCash to help monitor your portfolio. Buying a vehicle or a home? GnuCash will help you plan the investment and track loan payments. If your financial records span the globe, GnuCash provides all the multiple-currency support you need. Between 5.15 and 5.16, the following bugfixes were accomplished: Bug 421610 - RFE: Include logical dates for View->Filter by "date range"The Select Range section of the Date tab of the register's Filter By dialog box is changed to provide relative, specific date, or days ago options for the start and end of the filter range. The Show number of days item label is changed to Show from days ago to better reflect what it does. Bug 436105 - esc key not working as expected in register: Enable the escape key to cancel a field edit. Bug 797384 - Gnucash doesn't handle commodity prices with big numerator/denominator properly. Bug 798004 - Next gen UI for stock transactions Bug 799314 - Add "enter now" option in scheduled transaction editor. tab to allow users to select the scheduled transactions to be included in a “Since Last Run…” window. If there are no instances of a selected transaction triggered by today’s date, the next instance is triggered. Bug 799751 - autocomplete crash Bug 799759 - Users can't Enable entries via Checkboxes on Scheduled Transactions PageAllow the Enabled box in the list of scheduled transactions to be operated instead of having to open the transaction editor dialog and change the Enabled checkbox. Also added use of the Name column as the secondary column sort for all the other columns. Bug 799762 - Poor handling of cases where hidden/placeholder accounts are used in the account register Bug 799766 - Double line preference not respected in search register Bug 799767 - POST /accounts in bindings/python/example_scripts/rest-api is broken Bug 799777 - `xaccSplitSetParent`: reparenting a committed split silently drops its KVP slots (online_id, cap-gains links) Other changes & improvements: Numeric values may now be selected to copy in the Accounts page. Add new Finance::Quote source Finnhub.io: Free API key (personal/non-professional use) available at https://finnhub.io. Set FINNHUB_API_KEY environment variable to API key to use this source. As of June 2026, free tier API limit is 60 API calls/minute. The Investment Lots report has new optional columns for Computed Annual Growth Rate. Python Bindings: Improved translation of primary object (Account, Transaction, Split, etc.) so that they can be treated as normal Python objects. This is accomplished with SWIG magic so no existing code is obsoleted. Python Bindings: Better conversion of GLists to Python lists. Python Bindings: Destroy the QofSession in the Python Session dtor to prevent leaving the database locked. [engine] Add first-class online_id accessors for Split and Account and make them available to Python bindings, removing the unused Transaction online_id property. Improve C++ implementation of QofBook. Correct the Doxygen doc for qof_instance_get/set_kvp. [gnc-log-replay.cpp] fix incorrect guid dump Add some Boost library requirements needed by libgnucash-guile to CMakeLists.txt so that missing feature will fail at configure time. Use Compile-time Regular Expressions instead of std::regex in gnc-filepath-utils.cpp and instead of boost::regex in the CSV importer, with the CTRE v3.11.1 header added to borrowed [gnc-filepath-utils.cpp] null check char* arguments Add ChartJS licenses. Removed AEX from list of commodities. euronext.com is now using JS based anti-webscraping. [report-core] always offer options summary in reports. This is useful to debug reports. The Add options summary option is removed because it's no longer optional. Remove remaining obsolete IMContext from sheet Fix blurry text in HiDPI offscreen-rendered widgets Add port field to database connection dialog: The convention of appending the port number after the host isn't obvious. When editing a split in the register treat the account as being changed only if it isn't the one selected before editing instead of if the user performed an edit Return immediately from qof_book_destroy if hash_of_collections is null. If qof_book_destroy is called on a QofBook* freshly created with qof_book_new (usually because it was used to create a session that now must be destroyed) it would try to empty the non-existent hash tables, crashing. Clean up Flathub metadata to solve warnings at flatpak build time. Be consistent in naming GncPluginPage and GncPluginPageRegister HTML: Remove unimplemented function declarations. [gnc-html.cpp] remove unused buggy string conversion functions Convert libgnc-html to C++ Apply -Wall -Werr -Wmissing-prototypes to C++ compilation on Windows and fix the resulting errors. New and Updated Translations: Arabic, Croatian, Danish, Dutch, German, Finnish, Hungarian, Korean, Norwegian-Bokmal, Spanish Download: GnuCash 5.16 | 176.0 MB (Open Source) Links: GnuCash Home page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft finally launches WSL Containers in public preview by David Uzondu Microsoft has announced that WSL containers, a feature that allows developers to run Linux containers natively inside Windows without the need for Docker Desktop, is now available in public preview several weeks after Microsoft previewed it at Build 2026. To use the new container feature, you first have to install the latest pre-release version of the Windows Subsystem for Linux by running a quick update command in your terminal: wsl --update --pre-release After installing, you'd get access to the new Linux container CLI (wslc.exe) and the programmable API. Microsoft said that the CLI has a "familiar format" that matches the toolsets developers already use every day. If you know standard Docker commands, your muscle memory will translate directly to wslc.exe, which even features a built-in alias called container.exe. You can quickly run a full Ubuntu KDE desktop container by exposing ports, or pass your graphics card straight into a machine learning environment to run PyTorch workloads. Passing the --gpus all flag inside the run command instantly links your hardware. Image via Microsoft As for the API, developers can now embed Linux container operations directly inside native Windows applications without exposing the command line to users. The team integrated the API directly into MSBuild and CMake, so developers can define container steps directly in project files. Apart from bringing the CLI and API into public preview, Microsoft also said that it's working on a new default file system called virtiofs to speed up file transfer rates between Windows and Linux. Microsoft also introduced an experimental networking mode named consomme, which resolves compatibility issues with corporate VPNs by routing Linux network traffic straight through Windows. One thing to note about WSL containers is that they don't run in your standard WSL distributions; instead, every application and CLI session spawns its own lightweight Hyper-V utility VM in the background. This basically reduces the chances of one app snooping on the container of another app.
    • Google reportedly limited Meta's Gemini access over limited AI compute by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly limiting Meta's use of its Gemini AI models after Meta tried buying more computing capacity than even Google could supply. According to the Financial Times, Google told Meta in March that it could not provide the full Gemini capacity that Meta had requested. This shortfall even disrupted and delayed some of Meta's internal projects. Due to this, Meta even told its employees internally to use AI tokens more efficiently. Meta wasn't the only one to get hit by this sudden refusal by Google; even other customers were affected. But Meta was hit harder because of its unusually high demand for Google's models. The move from Google makes it evident that companies all over are in limited supply of both infrastructure and compute. Alphabet said in April that Google Cloud revenue grew 63% year-over-year to $20 billion in the first quarter, helped by enterprise AI infrastructure and AI solutions. In pursuit of more compute, Meta had earlier signed a multi-billion-dollar AWS agreement as well as a large AMD GPU deal for AI data centers. But the crunch would be short-lived as both Meta and Google have also ramped up infrastructure investments heavily. Meta said in November that it was committing more than $600 billion in the U.S. by 2028 for AI technology, infrastructure, and workforce expansion. In the first quarter of this year, Meta also raised its expected capital expenditure for 2026 to a range of $125 billion to $145 billion, citing higher component pricing and additional data center costs for future capacity. However, this doesn't make the company immune to the current dependence on outside suppliers. Meta has also spent many years promoting Llama as an open-weight alternative to closed models from Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic. But if the reported reliance on Google's Gemini models is severe enough for internal work to get impacted, then it looks like even frontier labs and Big Tech aren't fully self-sufficient. Source: Financial Times
    • I like to reminisce about the good old days, way back in autumn 2025 when building a gaming machine was fun and the drives were about $150 when you caught a deal. Yes duh, back in the day we had it gone. Then baby Skynet came along, hiding in AI datacenters demanding more processing power until it reached singularity. End of a not totally fictional story.
    • My experience in the past with older Windows 11 builds was not great on unsupported machines but I recently used Rufus to put the latest build on a older 5th Gen Core Thinkpad T that we upgraded with a SATA SSD and 8GB of RAM four years ago when hardware was reasonable and it seemed pretty fast and solid. Customer is very happy with the performance and will probably get four more years out of that venerable laptop that he loves so much. Another customer just retired his Dell Studio laptop from 2009 running Windows 10. It got an SSD over 10 years ago and did everything he needed it to for 17 years but he also retired last year and is happy doing everything on his iPad now.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      533
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!