Do you care about saving the human race?


Do you care about saving the human race?  

137 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you care about saving the human race?

    • Yes
    • Maybe
    • No
    • If it effects me while i'm alive, yes, otherwise no, I don't care!


Recommended Posts

I was thinking about all of these movies centering around "Saving the human race". Finding another planet so that we can start populating it, so the human race doesn't be coming extinct.

 

I was thinking "If the human race is going to get in trouble after i'm dead and gone, couldn't really give a crap what happens to the human race. If it goes extinct it goes extinct."

 

What are your thoughts?

Well, I do care about the human race in the sense that we need to sustain ourselves to better the universe, but if we develop something that could do this job better, I wouldn't care, because it would be better for the universe.

 

Yes, but they probably won't do that by the time you die, after which you'll be dead.

Yes, but they probably won't do that by the time you die, after which you'll be dead.

Yeah, but I don't care if I die either, as long as there is still progress, whether it be by humans or beings that supersede them. I would just like to be a small part of that progress, and in that way, I guess I do care about saving the human race, but as long as we're useful to the universe.

I mean.. overall?? No.. once I die I die and hopefully I'll be a ghost.  However.. I don't want my sons life to be ###### because I don't..so in that way I do care.

 

Lets pretend the earth goes to hell after he dies too.

Lets pretend the earth goes to hell after he dies too.

Hmm.. then I'd feel bad about his kids.. so let's say.. if the whole world were to self implode.. and anyone directly related to my lineage were totally safe.. or didn't have kids then.. I care about the here and now.

The world will never end (well, in 4+ billion years yes but not before). Humans are extremely flexible in terms of survival. Mass death? Sure, but almost certainly there will always be humans. Our strength for survival is not like any other creature, the best survival tool will always be our ability to think rather then act on instinct. I would say this even if i didn't have children.

"Saving the human race" would mean continuing humanity's destruction of the earth and itself...  The planet will start regenerating with a vengeance the second there is no human left to pollute it.

 

Okay, that's not quite true, because of things like nuclear power plants and such, humans not being here would first cause more damage, eg meltdowns and such, then would slowly start to recover from the plague of humanity.  :-p

 

That's not to say that we as a part of the earth aren't TOTALLY bad, but at this point in the game, we are doing more damage than good.

 

I mean, come on, would humans care about "saving the environment" if we could figure out a way to survive without it?  Hell no.  We're selfish beings, and we are only saving the earth now because we realize we'd have no means of survival without it...  But if, say, tomorrow, we found a way to colonize another planet, within say 10 years, humanity would collectively say "###### it" and leave this world and whatever creatures remain to crumble without us...  We're parasites that feed on land until it can no longer be inhabited, and then move on and destroy new areas.  The earth will not miss us.  So why bother trying to save a species that does nothing but destroy everything it touches?

  • Like 1

Yeah, but I don't care if I die either, as long as there is still progress, whether it be by humans or beings that supersede them. I would just like to be a small part of that progress, and in that way, I guess I do care about saving the human race, but as long as we're useful to the universe.

 

Useful to the universe? When is that scheduled to begin exactly? We treat our planet like a toilet and are constantly inventing new ways to hurt each other.

 

I love life and cherish the simple pleasures every day, but honestly, the human race as a whole has largely been a failure. The only "useful" thing for the universe would be if humans became extinct. And with the way things are going, it shouldn't be long now.

 

stock-footage-self-illuminated-self-dest

  • Like 2

Quite frankly there are way too many negatives against our species as a whole right now that are working against us having a bright future. Consider:

 

- As a species, we tend to be very aggressive.

- As a species, we tend to be emotionally volatile.

- As a species, we are often too quick to judge without the proper information, and likewise we often do not act when when we should; nor do we possess the wisdom to know the difference much of the time.

- As a species, we often take (or claim) when we have no right or permission to do so.

- As a species, we are often very destructive to the nearby environment without regard for the local balance.

- As a species, we are often fearful and/or suspicious of what we do not understand, even going so far as to destroy it.

- As a species, we often gravitate toward the negative and gravitate away from the positive, usually to our detriment, because it is the easiest or most convenient path to take.

- As a species, we tend to be more concerned with comfort and distraction and material gain than with what is appropriate.

- As a species, we tend to be obsessed with how much control we have over a person, place, and thing -- and this obsession scales upward to the entire Near-Earth region of Space.

- As a species, we still tend to believe in things that do not exist, because those in positions of power or control deem it to be so or out of sheer ignorance on the part of the individual.

 

That's why, at this point in time, our future is not bright.

 

Can it change? Yes.

 

Will it change? Unlikely.

Humans will be wiped out.  I do not care about saving human race.  Earth needs a reset.  There are more morons than smart people.  There are groups of demographic that believe earth is over-crowded.  With these kinds of mentality, we should cease to evolve.  A total reset would be best.

Maybe.

 

Kind of depends on where we are at a given time in history. I would hope saving Humans now would allow for more sophisticated Humans later who actually deserve to survive (in my opinion). Overall, I dislike Humans as it stands now. We're narcissistic, arrogant and violent. I feel more compassion towards a great number of species before I ever would to Humans.

 

But....

 

I like to remain optimistic that we're just in our adolescences right now and we'll wise up to our stupidity eventually. I really hope that's true and it's certainly worth 'surviving' for. We're a relatively new species and we haven't quite worked the bugs out yet. Our intelligence is dangerous because we're not sure, yet, how to use it. I think overtime we may well be a useful resource for the Earth and its fellow inhabitants. Along the way we're certainly doing some damage and we'll rightfully need to reverse that damage to the best of our ability.

 

I also have an obvious bias as I myself am a Human.

Useful to the universe? When is that scheduled to begin exactly? We treat our planet like a toilet and are constantly inventing new ways to hurt each other.

 

I love life and cherish the simple pleasures every day, but honestly, the human race as a whole has largely been a failure. The only "useful" thing for the universe would be if humans became extinct. And with the way things are going, it shouldn't be long now.

But we should be useful to the universe. And that's what I'm saying, I would like humans to stay alive if they are going to better it. If they aren't either make a replacement, or go extinct.

  • 2 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!