Recommended Posts

I hope it doesn't die; it has been my preferred browser for years.  I regularly test my web apps in IE and Chrome...IE 10/11 I don't mind since it feels lightweight and the font rendering isn't too bad, but Chrome for me is unfortunately another whole game.  It *seems* to me that Google is throwing a ton of stuff in Chrome without caring how it comes out of the wash.  The latest example for me is the faint and washed-out font rendering both in the UI and in pages.  It just *seems* they're on a another highway than I'm on.  I like how the settings are in Firefox...might seem old-school to some, but to me it's simple and detailed.

 

Also, I couldn't live without AdBlock plus in FF.  I've gotten so used to having custom filters set that strip out sidebars and flashing things on pages, that it's mind-blowing to me when I see those pages without the filtering.

Unsurprised am I. Firefox was my default browser for a long time until they allowed advertising, I`ve tried quite a few ways of getting rid of it to no avail. Windows put out a fix for the problem on exploder and it worked so now that's my default. If Firefox could fix that advertising problem I`d have no hesitation in moving back to it.

What 'advertising problem'?

 

The only 'advertising' in firefox is a few curated sponsor tiles on the new tab page, and they only show up on a clean install of firefox or when you clear your history... its very easy to simply click the x button on those tiles to remove them, or you can hide all tiles completely by clicking the button on the top right of the new tab page, or even disable the new tab page completely by setting it to about:blank, and you can also replace the new tab page completely with one of the various speed dial extensions....

I've recently switched back to Firefox at home for a change.  I use portable firefox at work because the network settings are separate to IE, whereas Chrome just uses IE proxy settings.

 

I always seem to have problems with embedded flash elements crashing Chrome, and slowness etc occasionally. 

I don't take kindly to a man being run out of his job by a bunch of SJWs, who don't measure up to his little toe, that are butthurt about a measly $1000 donation to prop 8 when the majority of Californians supported it too. Go to any website, including this one, and look at it's source code. everytime you see "<script type='text/javascript'>" you need to thank that man.

The reaction after he stepped down from the other side was just as dumb, the eich thing was a ridiculous manufactured controversy on both sides of the issue, mozilla was on a no-win situation there.

 

Online media manufatured that whole circus, fanned the flames and sat there raking in precious clickbait.

It also disrupts anything I'm doing for somethign that shouldn't require restarting the browser. it's archaic design. 

Which is why they've changed it and allowed restartless addons for quite some time, its the fault of the addon devs if they haven't fixed their addons to be restartless yet. Many major addons already are restartless, adblock plus for a noticeable example.

  • Like 2

I rarely use IE.  I used to use IE a lot after Netscape was bought out by AOL years ago.  Then a year or so later, I have been mainly FF.  I use Chrome for Chromecast and my mobile.  I find Chrome works better than FF for mobile.  My personal preference.   And I have not had an addon break with an update in a few years.  Used to happen all the time but again, have not had a problem for a while.

 

If Chrome ever catches up in FF in the way of addons/extensions.....I may consider removing FF.  I don't like to have a lot of redundant apps installed.

Firefox + uBlock + squeaker757 color themes = happy camper here.  Cool to know I'm part of the top 10%!   ;)

 

P.S. With Neowin white-listed of course!

Show the screenshot of your Firefox

 

This is my Firefox on Win10 and I love it!

That looks pretty...  Can you tell me how to get my fox to look like that?  What do I need to do?  Will the search result page shows dark screen too?  I hate white screen.  It's annoy.

I really hope Spartan is something that can be comparable to Chrome and FF in terms of plugins, security, and performance, because I really don't like being beholden to Chrome.

 

Firefox, I use primary for secure things so I don't get those mixed up in Chrome with my regular browsing.

 

Choosing between Chrome and FF... flip a coin. They both have strengths and weaknesses and both can have performance issues. Both also have rabid fans (more for FF than Chrome, though). Any non-techie user would barely be able to name which is which.

I switched back to Firefox a few months back. Chrome scrolling was too annoying to deal with and I couldn't get it just right even with add-ons. Firefox scrolling is just perfect for me with just couple about:config tweaks.

 

The main thing that made me switch to Chrome was mobile devices, I hadn't tried Firefox on phone/tablet in ages and when I last tested them they were not even remotely usable as the main browser. Once I went back to Firefox as the default desktop browser I also decided to give the mobile version a try. I'm glad I did.. Firefox is now the best browser on all platforms, Firefox Sync is so much better than Chrome and the ability to use same add-ons on both desktop and mobile is awesome.. wee for actually working Android adblocking (without root).

Chrome and Firefox look essentially the same, depending on user tweaks.

 

I always wondered why people still bother with a URL box and a search box... seems redundant. Though calling them "Awesome Bar" and "Omni Box" does sound retarded.

So, just like IE users then? After all, the only reason IE has any marketshare whatsoever, is because Microsoft forcibly made it inextricable from the underlying OS (for anticompetitive purposes of course).

 

Pretty much. But I do need IE to download Firefox :rofl:

Chrome and Firefox look essentially the same, depending on user tweaks.

 

I always wondered why people still bother with a URL box and a search box... seems redundant. Though calling them "Awesome Bar" and "Omni Box" does sound retarded.

Because in Firefox you can select different search engines/sites in the search box. IMDB, Wikipedia, Youtube, etc can all be searched individually. That's superior to the URL box which will just use your default search engine.

Pretty much. But I do need IE to download Firefox :rofl:

Technically you don't. Just run a console and download FF from Mozilla's FTP server using FTP commands.

Because in Firefox you can select different search engines/sites in the search box. IMDB, Wikipedia, Youtube, etc can all be searched individually. That's superior to the URL box which will just use your default search engine.

Technically you don't. Just run a console and download FF from Mozilla's FTP server using FTP commands.

and you can also remove the search bar in firefox and just use the URL bar to search

Because in Firefox you can select different search engines/sites in the search box. IMDB, Wikipedia, Youtube, etc can all be searched individually. That's superior to the URL box which will just use your default search engine.

 

Um, you can do that in Chrome with one field as well. Right click on any field on any site, use Add as Search Engine, then you just need to type the name to activate that search engine like "youtube hampster dance" will directly search youtube.

I wouldn't call it broken just because it lacks those two things. I doubt Google has any interest in implementing multi-row tabs.

Users consider it broken, hence the requests. Chrome is fine if you have <5 tabs which I guess is what Google thinks is typical usage, and might well be for most people, but it fails for any power user/pro, e.g. most people on forums like this one.

I believe anyone who thinks IE or Firefox are slow/bloated compared to Chrome, haven't used either of them recently.

It's Chrome which needs to die(don't have any hopes of them improving performance or dropping superfluous features) but sadly Google/Android are taking over the world.

 

 

Amen!!

I'm currently on Firefox and not planning to switch because what I always seek in browser is feature set + speed. So far it doesn't disappoint in speed though I miss some hot-keys and gestures I used to have in other browsers and there's just no add-on to properly replicate those. Even something as simple as Ctrl/Shift-Click to save image to specified folder with no menus or confirmations in process.

 

I switched to all the major browsers there is and all of them have history of being "fastest" at some point and then usually things get ugly. Firefox used to be too slow for me, but now Chrome is last browser I would touch at this point, but I would totally switch to latest IE/Spartan if only feature set was there for me. There was actually a very powerful add-on 'IE7Pro', but as name suggest it only worked well on IE7 and for some reason team behind it just disappeared and never released versions for IE8 and newer (although it did work with IE8 with partially broken functionality).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!