Apple products are priced too high?


Recommended Posts

Actually i'm evaluating to switch all my system to Apple... but i see a very high price level if compared to the hardware.

 

I don't want to start a flame, i want only to ask if actually you don't find that the price are too high.

 

I'm using without problem, my windows desktop, a macboook  and a linux desktop... 

 

But with the exit of Windows 10... i think that Apple must "rethink" the price policy and invest more into the computer section... Apple is not only iPhone, is made of very good computer.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1256854-apple-products-are-priced-too-high/
Share on other sites

For me, I look at the overall package that comes with an Apple product. Yes they are a little pricey, however, try to get the same kind of service from companies like HP, Asus, Acer, and Samsung when something goes wrong. Additionally, the craftsmanship on their products are excellent, if that matters to you. Compare the trackpads, keyboard flex, laptop hinges, with the companies mentioned, and you'll see the difference. With all that said, I still keep my Windows 7 and Linux Mint machines nearby. I don't believe in one size fits all.

In my experience the mac book air is priced in line with ultrabooks from other OEMs. Last year I grabbed the model with i5, 4gb ram and 256 GB ssd for

As someone who did what you are thinking of doing (switching everything to Apple), it's not a great idea. If you're going to invest in an "ecosystem", make sure it's one that works well with other systems. With Apple, you basically need all Apple, and that can get very expensive with the way Apple product cycles are released. There's a lot of ways you'll be obsolete within a couple years of owning an Apple unless you keep purchasing the latest products from them. This is true of owning any technology, but the effect is amplified with Apple. And you should expect this: the company is driven by huge margins on hardware sales. They need you to keep buying the latest gadgets from them.

 

I did Apple only from 2004-2011 and since switching back out of Apple, I have saved thousands. If I would have invested all the money in AAPL stock instead of spending it on their products back then, I'd literally have about half a million dollars today.

Yes they're overpriced

Some will have you believe that that means they're better or you will get better service, nmo they just cost more because Apple

Price has nothing to do with a product being better. Yes, you said that, however, I've seen enough of your posts to know your agenda. Many can attest to Apple's superior customer service, quality, and ecosystem.

Take one apart and you will see a level of engineering and quality that is 100% missing in all PC manufacturers.

Hardware isnt the problem - its the software that caters to the braindead populous that keeps me away.

I agree with the engineering and quality that goes into their computers. However, can you clarify the software-brain dead relation?

They don't have any budget models, so when you compare the lower end Apple computers to the low end computers from other brands the prices appear higher. There are plenty of computers available from other brands that are similar in spec and price to Apple's.

Apple charge more because they can, when they tried competing with the likes of Dell they got slaughtered because they had to compromise on build quality to get there.

The retina iMac is actually fairly well priced, the screen alone costs like 90% of the entire price.

  • Like 2

Something is only worth what people are willing to pay for it. With this in mind 'overpriced' is a very personal concept.

To me it is over priced because I prefer more power to pound ratio, however other people may prefer the Apple ecosystem, build quality etc, in which case it's not over priced for them.

In general yes Apple products are priced high when you just look at the components however when you compare Apple's consumer products (all of them bar the Mac Pro pretty much) with higher end systems from Dell, HP, Lenovo, etc. then the prices are pretty equal. It isn't really fair to compare a Dell Inspiron to a MacBook Pro even if the components are near identical the engineering and build quality of the MacBook Pro is much higher. Also outside of the core components like CPU and GPU Apple do tend to come with higher quality/better parts such as much faster SSDs, higher quality displays, etc.

 

When you look at something like the new MacBook it is pretty damn hard to justify the price for the machine regardless of how impressive the engineering is. I mean look how small they managed to scale down the internal too. It is mental how small it is. However it is crazy expensive because of this.

 

Until very recently the MacBook Pro was pretty much equal in price to similar laptops from Dell and HP. It is only with the most recent models that others have moved into first place for price and performance. It took years for manufactures to catch up with things like the MacBook Air and there still isn't anything like the 5k iMac from other computer makers.

 

Now as to whether the extra work in engineering, build quality and exclusive access to OS X is worth the extra cost is up to the individual. For me I would love a 5k iMac but I really have no use for such a machine. I am quite happy with a mid-range Windows machine from Dell.

  • Like 3

I do not see Apple Products being overpriced. You are not just paying for the hardware/os.. You are paying for excellent attention to detail and very high quality materials.   You are also buying into "the apple family". 

 

Let's take an iPhone or Macbook for example.. For the entire first year you own that device, you can setup a time for you to bring in the store for them to show you whatever you want. They are not rushed and are very patient. You really only get that with Apple.. It doesn't cost anything extra.. That is a big deal for a lot of people.. Think of all the people that don't know how to use a smartphone or someone who wants to learn more about their OS other than surf the web? They take care of the customers. 

 

Apple Products also hold their value very well.. If you buy a Macbook Pro and want to upgrade in a couple years.. You'll be able to sell that Macbook Pro for  alot more than let's say a Dell..

 

iPads.. Their screens are amazing and very light.. That has to come at a cost..

 

Apple may cost more, but it's well worth it.. 

Yes they're overpriced

 

Some will have you believe that that means they're better or you will get better service, nmo they just cost more because Apple

 

 

I used to believe that apple products are overpriced, and its a hard thing to digest still for me.  But people like who ive quoted who are just haters with no knowledge dont see the bigger picture. 

 

So if you look at only specs/hardware, itll come off as overpriced...but..

 

Phones:  Apple phones last for years and get prompt software updates.  Most android vendors abandon their devices and the nexus line even has turned to crap with the N9 as an example of a device that google clearly cant support.

Laptops:  My macbook air is the first laptop to last me over 1 year, its 2 years old now and is serving me well.  Also, having the ability to just take it into the Apple store is a huge peace of mind thing, rather than having to ship it away.  

Battery Life:  Apple products always trump their competitors when it comes to battery.PC's, phones, everything

 

I had an iPhone 6+, and returned it because im so used to android. but to this day I miss it a little.  I miss the speed and battery.  Im stuck in a cycle of buying android phones yearly though..Next year im jumping ship from Android and probably going iOS as WP isnt quite ready yet. 

 

I had an iPad, and I was frustrated with the limitations of iOS, and went for a Nexus 9...100% regret on that.  iPad works, Nexus 9 has shown me how downhill android is going. 

 

Long story short, I can trust an apple product.  I cant trust an Android or Windows device nearly the same. 

Better engineering? Not to sure about that.

 

My first mac book g5 lasted only 2 years before dieing, do to a common problem with the on board video chip problem similar to xbox RROD. (at least MS extended the warranty, apple didn't do nothing to resolve this problem)

 

 

I also had a first gen mac book air and that thing was an overheating nightmare.  It would hit 100c....

  • Like 1

Better engineering? Not to sure about that.

 

My first mac book g5 lasted only 2 years before dieing, do to a common problem with the on board video chip problem similar to xbox RROD. (at least MS extended the warranty, apple didn't do nothing to resolve this problem)

 

 

I also had a first gen mac book air and that thing was an overheating nightmare.  It would hit 100c....

I recently tried a new MBP Retina, and found that it didnt match the quality I was used to from Apple...It ran hot, slow, and killed battery fast.  I will say the Retina's do seem to have some sort of performance issue which is why Im looking at a Surface 4 or something this year. 

Better engineering? Not to sure about that.

 

My first mac book g5 lasted only 2 years before dieing, do to a common problem with the on board video chip problem similar to xbox RROD. (at least MS extended the warranty, apple didn't do nothing to resolve this problem)

 

 

I also had a first gen mac book air and that thing was an overheating nightmare.  It would hit 100c....

 

All hardware can have problems. Having deployed hundreds of Mac, Dell and Lenovo (not IBM) laptops over the years the Mac's have by far the lowest failure rate with the Lenovo IdeaPad's being absolutely awful. I buy Dell for personal use as I have never had a problem with them but that doesn't mean Dell are more reliable, there are many factors that go into hardware reliability the the obvious one being how the user looks after them.

 

You want to know the biggest cause of damage, outside of simple hardware failure, to machines I have deployed? Being yanked off a table by the power cored. MagSafe has saved so many MacBook Pro's over the years from that one simple design. I am not looking forward to USB-C chargers becoming standard. I would much rather MagSafe had stuck around, it is one of the best developments Apple ever come up with.

If you don't see any value in what they offer, then yes, they are over priced. Same goes for anything else, really.

 

+1

 

I'm vested in the Apple ecosystem myself and it has served me well for the most part.  The only reason I would use Windows is for Office because Apple versions remains crippled (even with the improved upcoming version).  With that said, Apple did increase the prices outside of the US due to strong dollar which kind of sucks but can't really fault Apple for that.

 

With certain products though, you do need to step back and see if the apple sticker is worth the price.  For example, I don't have an issue buying the airport extreme, but I probably wouldn't buy the Time Capsule.

 

In terms of longevity, it really depends on the kind of user you are and what you need out of your system.  Other than the iPhones that I upgrade every 2 years, rest of the hardware can easily go 3~4 years without replacement (fairly long time in the tech world).

I buy Apple for two reasons: 1) because I like their products, and 2) because I can afford their products. If you don't have the funds then go with the best you can afford. . .it really cannot get any simpler. . . :)

It isn't really fair to compare a Dell Inspiron to a MacBook Pro even if the components are near identical the engineering and build quality of the MacBook Pro is much higher. Also outside of the core components like CPU and GPU Apple do tend to come with higher quality/better parts such as much faster SSDs, higher quality displays, etc.

I don't know about the MacBooks, but I do know the PowerBook and iMac line was plagued with bad batteries (first battery in mine was recalled, got a replacement and that was recalled as well), extreme overheating (mine would get so hot it would burn my hand), and other problems. Almost every iPhone has also had 'gate' issues. Every one I know that has an iPhone has had the screen crack while no one with a Galaxy has. So I'm not too sure about the "build quality", however, the builds are certainly sleek and aesthetically pleasing.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!