Peta demands Britain's oldest pub changes its name to show 'compassion' for animals


Recommended Posts

Peta demands Britain's oldest pub changes its name to show 'compassion' for animals

Animal rights group says Ye Olde Fighting Cocks in St Albans should update its name to Ye Olde Clever Cocks to reflect the change in society's attitudes

Britain's oldest pub is under to pressure to change its name - Ye Olde Fighting Cocks - from animal rights group Peta.

 

They say the eighth century boozer in St Albans, Hertfordshire, should be renamed to Ye Olde Clever Cocks to "reflect compassion for animals".

 

But regulars at the pub - listed as Britain's oldest by Guinness World Records - say the idea is "bonkers".

Since it was founded in the eighth century, the pub in Abbey Mill Lane has had many names, but since 1872 it has been called Ye Olde Fighting Cocks because of its history of cockfighting - a sport banned in the UK in the 1800s.

 

But in a letter sent to the pub on Monday, Peta, or People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, urges the pub to update its name to Ye Olde Clever Cocks - in recognition of society's growing compassion for animals.

Peta director Mimi Bekhechi said: "Changing the name would reflect today's rejection of needless violence and help celebrate chickens as the intelligent, sensitive and social animals they are.

 

"Today, kind people are appalled by the thought of forcing birds to fight to the death and more people than ever are making the compassionate choice not to eat chickens, either."

 

The Review ran an online poll asking readers if they thought the name should be changed, in which 61 per cent (517 people) said no compared to 39 per cent (334 people) who said yes.

Hundreds have also taken to social media to express their outrage at the idea.

 

Alasdair Melville used to work at the pub and is a former pupil of St Albans School.

 

The 31-year-old said: "Rather than worrying about the name of a pub, I think Peta should worry about looking after chickens at chicken farms for example.

"There is a better way to make a point."

 

Mr Melville, who owns estate agents Hawk and Chadwick, added: "If the pub were to change its name, where does it end?

 

"I do not associate the name with ###### fighting, I associate with the history.

"St Albans is great place in which to work and live because it's steeped in history."

 

Esme Rice has lived in the city for 20 years and said the pub was a landmark.

 

She said: "I remember eating in their garden when I was young and my dad explaining about the sport and how barbaric it is but how this pub is a mark of heritage and history, not a celebration of the sport."

 

Another regular, Robert Oakhill, 71, said: "The thing that appals me is the total lack of appreciation of history.

 

"The current name informs us about the past. It enables us to contemplate the great advances that have been made.

 

"The new name is, to use the most appropriate critical term, 'bonkers'."

Source: The Telegraph

The best way to deal with attention seeking organisations like PETA, is to ignore them.

 

I'd like to see a battle between the RSPCA and PETA, where the RSPCA rips the head off PETA and eats it

Hey PETA, why don't you all just <bleep!> off and go murder a few 1000 more of those lost pets you have in your animal "sanctuaries"? 

I read they destroy 90 to 95% of the animals they "rescue"

PETA does realize that when that pub serves things like chicken wings, burgers, and the like, that those animals were killed, right?  I mean, at least in a fight with each other they both have a sporting chance.

PETA is so full of hypocrisy. They push for the rights of animals, but they euthanize thousands every year. Most animals don't last 3 months in one of their shelters. PETA has no right demanding or asking that a pub, that freaking old, to change their name. I mean, that'd be like the United States asking the United Kingdom to change their name, so "United" isn't apart of it. It's just ludicrous!

PETA can make all the demands they want.  Doesn't mean anyone needs to react.  The most that will happen is that a few teenage girls will bitch about this.

  • Like 1

The only good part of PETA is the naked women in their ads. Jumped the shark, they have.

 

 

Wait, isn't that sexist? I guess PETA wouldn't care about all of that. One moral crusade at a time, I suppose.

 

PETA are the worst example of an activist group. The issue of protecting animals is important, their ranting ###### distracts and detracts from it.

So given this absurdity we need to change the following too

 

The Blind Beggar,

Dirty Dick's

The Hare and Hounds

The Stag & Hounds

the Saracen's Head

Dog and Duck

Dog and Gun

The Dog's Bollocks

 

 

And just to clarify

 

Fighting Cocks: ###### fighting; but the fighting ###### also could be a heraldic sign. Ye Olde Fighting Cocks in Saint Albans rivals Ye Olde Trip to Jerusalem in Nottingham for the title of oldest pub. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pub_names

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
    • “Could” … in the IS the healthcare is run by insurance companies that make indecent profits denying basic treatments to people that are paying money for nothing. Besides, where are all the Trump epigones who were stating that the tariffs were going to paid by foreign companies and not the US citizens? …
    • Microsoft Teams gets smarter at spotting sneaky meeting bots by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is set to receive a couple of new features soon, including a dedicated Recap app and a rather controversial location tracking functionality. The Redmond tech giant has also explained how it has made online communication and collaboration a lot more performant this year. Now, the company has detailed more secure bot admission mechanisms, as first reported by us in March 2026, and now available in Teams. As the use of AI has expanded across enterprise environments, Microsoft has begun allowing users to integrate bots into their meetings for various tasks, such as note-taking. While this has a tangible productivity benefit for users, Microsoft has highlighted how misconfiguration has allowed bots to join meetings that they shouldn't. This has created security and privacy risks, which Microsoft is now combating using a new Teams admin policy that allows organizers to control how external bots access meetings. Admins can leverage a policy called Manage external bots and their access to meetings. The default configuration is "When detected, require approval before joining", which places detected bots in a lobby before they are explicitly admitted into the meeting. The other option disables the experience. Microsoft has also requested admins to only allow organizers and co-organizers to manage access to a meeting, so that other people don't randomly allow bots into meetings. Teams will now be able to leverage infrastructure signals to intelligently detect and distinguish between bots and humans. Microsoft will soon also trial a registration experience for independent software vendors (ISVs) to build a system that registers a bot with Microsoft, so it is marked as a "known" bot. Teams will also categorize bots as trusted and suspected threats so that organizers can quickly identify which bots they want to allow into a meeting. Additional safeguards to block accidental admission of a bot into a meeting include: No one-click Admit option for identified bots Confirmation prompts when admitting participants that include bots Warnings when organizers choose Admit all, and bots are included Microsoft has begun rolling out this experience, and it will be retiring the current CAPTCHA verification implementation. In the future, the company plans to roll out new capabilities like allow-lists, organization-wide policies, admin reports, audit logs, and more granular controls.
    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!